Dr. Mannan:
I am sure you did not read the article yourself. Mr. Rahman tried to decieve the readers in general but not readers of the Janakontha , because Janakantha readers are mostly one sided. Mr. Rahman testifying only for the International Tribunal Act of 1973 that was approved during Sheikh Mujib's time. He did not testify on the new version of the International Tribunal Act of 1973 which has been ratified in such a way that it remained no more International in character except the word 'International" in it.
Let me remind you that when the the International Tribunal Act of 1973 had passed at the Parliament of Bangladesh nobody at home or abroad said a word against it because that was compatable with international laws.
Just one example will suffies my statement and argument. The convicts ( I said convicts, because the people in the tribuna,l that is the judges, had already convicted them at Ghatok Dalala Nirmul Committee) will not be able to appeal to nobody per new amendment. Also articles by reporters (biased or not biased and the paper cuttings or clips will be acceptable as evidence without any doubt wich was not part of the act then. These types of things were not there in the original law of the tribunal act. In one word I can say that the act has been made upside down by force just to get easy conviction. That's not called rules of law.
Per that enactment of 1973, there were 160 thousands complain and cases filed against razakars and atrociy makers of 1971 but you know out of those 160 thousand cases there were none against the people who are in custody and are being tried by the party cadres now. Does it make a question mark in your open mind?
Shahadat Suhrawardy
To: kms_alam@yahoo.com; nizam.reuters@gmail.com; mbjalil@gmail.com; badrulkhan2003@yahoo.com; mmbarua@gmail.com; srbanunz@gmail.com; mhc652442@gmail.com; chottalasultan@yahoo.com; chottala@yahoogroups.com; sayedchowdhury@hotmail.com; Diagnose@yahoogroups.com; farhad_mansur55@yahoo.com; fuahamed@soc.sau.ac.in; firdaus.ali@hotmail.com; Faridul.Islam@uvu.edu; huahmed@yahoo.com; ihasnu@hotmail.com; shuda@xula.edu; nazrul@gmx.at; subehkhan@yahoo.co.uk; khabor@yahoogroups.com; nurannabi@gmail.com; userajuddin@worldbank.org; ohruhin@yahoo.com; rahman_shafiqur@yahoo.com; shrahman@pvamu.edu; rahman36@hotmail.com; mehdirajeb@gmail.com; rumana_subhan@yahoo.com; shahid6609@yahoo.com; abutaher@gmail.com
From: abman1971@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:56:26 -0800
Subject: [Diagnose] Trial of Ghulam Azam
__._,_.___
[* Moderator's Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.
* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]
__,_._,___
I am sure you did not read the article yourself. Mr. Rahman tried to decieve the readers in general but not readers of the Janakontha , because Janakantha readers are mostly one sided. Mr. Rahman testifying only for the International Tribunal Act of 1973 that was approved during Sheikh Mujib's time. He did not testify on the new version of the International Tribunal Act of 1973 which has been ratified in such a way that it remained no more International in character except the word 'International" in it.
Let me remind you that when the the International Tribunal Act of 1973 had passed at the Parliament of Bangladesh nobody at home or abroad said a word against it because that was compatable with international laws.
Just one example will suffies my statement and argument. The convicts ( I said convicts, because the people in the tribuna,l that is the judges, had already convicted them at Ghatok Dalala Nirmul Committee) will not be able to appeal to nobody per new amendment. Also articles by reporters (biased or not biased and the paper cuttings or clips will be acceptable as evidence without any doubt wich was not part of the act then. These types of things were not there in the original law of the tribunal act. In one word I can say that the act has been made upside down by force just to get easy conviction. That's not called rules of law.
Per that enactment of 1973, there were 160 thousands complain and cases filed against razakars and atrociy makers of 1971 but you know out of those 160 thousand cases there were none against the people who are in custody and are being tried by the party cadres now. Does it make a question mark in your open mind?
Shahadat Suhrawardy
To: kms_alam@yahoo.com; nizam.reuters@gmail.com; mbjalil@gmail.com; badrulkhan2003@yahoo.com; mmbarua@gmail.com; srbanunz@gmail.com; mhc652442@gmail.com; chottalasultan@yahoo.com; chottala@yahoogroups.com; sayedchowdhury@hotmail.com; Diagnose@yahoogroups.com; farhad_mansur55@yahoo.com; fuahamed@soc.sau.ac.in; firdaus.ali@hotmail.com; Faridul.Islam@uvu.edu; huahmed@yahoo.com; ihasnu@hotmail.com; shuda@xula.edu; nazrul@gmx.at; subehkhan@yahoo.co.uk; khabor@yahoogroups.com; nurannabi@gmail.com; userajuddin@worldbank.org; ohruhin@yahoo.com; rahman_shafiqur@yahoo.com; shrahman@pvamu.edu; rahman36@hotmail.com; mehdirajeb@gmail.com; rumana_subhan@yahoo.com; shahid6609@yahoo.com; abutaher@gmail.com
From: abman1971@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:56:26 -0800
Subject: [Diagnose] Trial of Ghulam Azam
It seems that some people are shell shocked, disappointed and frustrated because of the arrest of Ghulam Azam. Why should someone who is 89 face such a humiliation they ask? Some questions the validity of ICT. Some wants his fair trial. Jamat has budgeted $25 million dollars initially, (this is documented) to discredit this trial and wage a propaganda war within the country and internationally. There will be many beneficiaries of this big budget. Just for those interested below are two links of writings of former bureaucrat Mr. Waliur Rahman and Dr. Muntasir Mamoon, appearing in today's Daily Janakantha. Those interested may read it. I do not want any feedback nor any comments on it.
Warm wishes.
Mannan
http://www.dailyjanakantha.com/news_view.php?nc=16&dd=2012-01-13&ni=83113
http://www.dailyjanakantha.com/news_view.php?nc=16&dd=2012-01-13&ni=83112
--
_________________________________
Warm wishes.
Mannan
http://www.dailyjanakantha.com/news_view.php?nc=16&dd=2012-01-13&ni=83113
http://www.dailyjanakantha.com/news_view.php?nc=16&dd=2012-01-13&ni=83112
--
_________________________________
__._,_.___
[* Moderator's Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.
* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]
Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
