Banner Advertise

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

Re: [chottala.com] To the Chief Adviser, Dr. Fakhruddin Ahmed

CTG must needs to continue for doing trial works CTG can do good works before conducting election.
  1. By reading net mails & hearing newses it seems that there is no any honest politician in Bangladesh. The so called politicians & supporters of politicians are the Razakers. BAL. BNP & JP. Politicians are dishonest inefficient CTG system Government is real great proof.
  2. Razakers means Jamati ML & Paki minded people.
  3. BAL means Hijakers hartal doers & short knowledge people leaded by outsiders for breaking closing & burning works.
  4. BNP means Chur Moha Chur doing conspiracy for power.
  5. JP means Scaracher.
 
  1. CTG can form educational advisor councils by collecting from through out the country of well educated experienced honest people for discussing to make correct idea & plan for updating education system & providing the people through out the country for making them skilled in their respective working fields
  2. So it needs for the present CTG to continue to stay in power for providing nation wide quality education to all
  3. To create honest wise political leaders to lead the country
  4. To reform works in political party to contest in election
  5. To create honest creative law makers for making rules & laws
  6. To create foresighted wise skilled planers for planning.
  7. To create good efficient administrators to rule the administration
  8. To create perfect executors to execute the plan
  9. To create creative builders to build the country for saving people. 
  10. A register needs to be maintained  for checking whether are the University teachers coming at University in time, are they  taking classes in regular time, are they giving teaching lessons to the students with update preparation knowledge or not???
  11. Actions should needs to be taken against the teachers who are responsible to maintain academic discipline & to provide update wise education to the students so action should not be taken against the students
  12. This Present CTG must need to make a very strong action team for investigating to take legal action against the persons ( may be teachers or others) who are destroying academic atmosphere in the education area disturbing the students for getting proper update quality education not taken regular classes not taken examination in time by the so called learned Dr teachers & created seasons jots in doing nasty nonsense stupid uneducated quality less politics (politricks) to damage the country by doing works of breaking burning closing the industry business centers for increasing price hiking of everything & creating people's disasters.
  13. CTG can form a business & industry advisor councils to control the market prices with the cooperation with all business men.
  14. CTG can create many jobs centers for providing jobs to the jobless people.
  15. So  CTG long lives & earns efficiency to rule the country efficiently.
 



innovation_line <no_reply@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
To the Chief Adviser, Dr. Fakhruddin Ahmed
This message has been in the making for a long time. We were hoping that we would not have to send this out. The fact that this is published now, it should act as an alarm for your government.
 
A note to readers: If you agree with this message, please each one of you forward it to feeedback@pmo.gov.bd, so he knows how many people favours this. This is very important! 
 
A valid question or issue that can be raised is this - why did we change our position on the issue of trial of war criminals now  - whether it shoudl be done by the interim government, as opposed to our initial position of trying them by an elected government? We have touched on the issue in earlier occassions, but we did not really address the issue directly. Why change position in such an important issue and why risk embarrasing the current government whose capacity is alreay limited by a time bound roadmap and also, they have taken so many projects that it should be already too much for them. We agree. Still, we changed our position with a sane mind. Why? 
 
Frankly, changing our position on this issue has nothing to do with the issue itself. Surprised, huh?
 
Let us explain.
 
Just look around. There are many people who do not beleive that this issue will be addressed by the government who will be elected through the election for which your people are so on-work. Your promise of free and fair election in a level playing field. Yet, people still do not beleive that your project will be eventually successful. Why? It seems the perception is that the old faces will be coming back to form the government.
 
Not only the other people, your own government, including yourself, are part of the same public. You also do not beleive that there will be new political parties coming to power. It will be the same AL or BNP or their combination with other smaller evils. This is - even when - they have not changed their actions and words a tad.
 
The fact that you think they will be coming to power again is demonstrated through the words of your governemnt. You guys talk about why AL or BNP is not reforming themselves. Why do you care? If they want to keep the culprits on top, if they want to stay un-reformed or ill-formed, let them be. Shouldn't a level playing field ensure their defeat - if they do not reform? Can you see the logic? People are not stupid. People of Bangladesh never voted the wrong people - they always vote for the best choice at the time. The question is whether there will be alternative to traditional choices?
 
So, what is the problem? You can not achieve what you initially thought? At least, the body language suggests so. Or is it the fact that you plainly can not complete the project, the project definiiton was faulty given the resources? If you think its doable, why dont you talk about resources? Why not get people on board with what your thoughts are on this?
 
So, if that is the case, then why shouldn't we expect that you do at least one thing. Try those criminals. At least, you can do that. Changing a corruption economy is much more complex a problem than trying some criminals - specifically when that was done at the birth of the country. So, we thought. Do you see the logic that justifies change in our initial position on the issue? If you can not deliver the real thing, why dont you at least deliver this? Hope we have communicated our logic well so all know.
 
Lastly, as we do always, here are some problem solving.
 
Is there still any way to salvage the project? Yes, this is a great project of reconstruction to many of us Bangladeshis. That is why they have given you - an unelected government - to govern more than anybody could even think. We would be inclined to say that yes, there is still time to achieve the mission. We have written about it before. Let us repeat for the benefit of the readers.
 
You can not change nature of the politicians, with the resources you have (particularly less time). It is true. But you can change the dynamics of the socio-political structure. There are many ways to do that. Given the timeframe you have left, here is the most effective one.
 
There have always been a competition for the elected positions in various level of governance system (starting from UP member to MP). Many people vie for those posts. But so far, only the corrupt ones have gone for that. No serious people who are also honest have ever dreaded to compete for those, except for few lucky ones who were born in very rich family. You have to make these positions attractive to the honest people. This has to be done in such a way that being rich is no longer a pre-condition. Our suggestion is that you give a monthly salary of at least 50 paisa per month per voter for these elected office-holders (instead of current declaration of meagre doubling the TK 1500 to TK 3000, that is funny). If this policy is adopted, that would make these positions attractive to the competent people in a way that will change the dynamics of politics in Bangladesh. For a posting on a related topic, see this link: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bdresearchers/message/2607  The specific numbers are not important, but it has to be big enough to make any substantial change.
 
We know what many of our readers are thinking. We do not blame you guys. Its not your fault. Even our best intellectuals will also be saying the same. For example, you ask Dr. Wahiduddin Mahmud or Dr. Yunus or Dr. Muzaffar Ahmed or any other respected intellectuals, they will tell you that its not a good idea. People should come to public offices to serve the country, not for money, blah blah blah. Behind this assumption, they think that only the sons and daughters of the rich are entitled to compete for the election. That basic assumption is false and that is destroying our democratic foundation. If our this assumption is true, that would explain the root cause of many of our problems. This mindset is coming from last century.
 
You guys assume that all who are competent are born in the elite families. You couldn't be more wrong. Look at the local level leaders. Lives of most of these leaders are not only a story of rise in corruption, there are also many a story of rising economic condition. They become ward member because they think that is only way to make a decent money. To do that they first become mastan. And some percent eventaully succeed, the smarter ones. Though that is wrong way. But what is the alternative? If a honest person even somehow becomes elected, what is he supposed to do after being elected? Run his family for 3000 taka and still be popular chairman? Or do you want these few honest people do the impossible jobs, and then go asking for money to the rich of the soceity to run his family?
 
Our system do not prize the honest and competent. We currently have a system which punishes, if you are foolish enough to be honest and talk your mind.
 
Say for example, somebody does a job which pays him taka 30,000 per month. He has achieved this through hard work, honestly, during his last 35/40 years of life. This monthly salary is probably his only life-line to support the family, because none of his father or father-in-laws were theives, let alone himself. So, what choices do you give him, if he wants to go back to his village and fight for the UP chairman or a ward member position? Being elected itself a big challenge. Your election commission has a lot of work to enable this type of candidates to get a level-playing field in the villages. Is there a legal way for this person to raise money for election spending? Can he open a bank account and receive donation for running for office?
 
Or say a person who is earning 1,20,000 taka from a job, and he is considering to go for MP candidacy.
 
There is no legal framework for these two person to raise their funds from their personal network, if they want to. Election commision will have to figure that out soon. Time is running out.
 
But our today's talk is not about that. We are assuming that election commission will do that effectively and sooner than later. But then comes the policies that you make or your advisory council make.
 
Once these type of candidates get elected, if they gets upto there, what does he do to make sure that their families are still being fed well and their children being sent to a good school? Have you ever thought of making a budget of your elected official - the type that you so often talk about - the honest and competent ones? If you have not done so, you better do that. Do not assume that all of them will have their savings account or father's money to support their families. Few might and be still honest, but many wont.
 
Do not expect that their budget will come from out of pocket. It will either come from corruption (the traditional candidate) or from the government exchecker (because most of your honest and competent candidates do not have money or do not come from rich families)!!
Off course, unless you make a provision to receive donation for personal spending which we think is a bad idea.
 
So, unless you make sure that you change the incentives and framework so that the nature of the competitors are changed, you can not make any significant effect in the system. You have to change the stuctural parameters, if you really understand the problem and you really mean what you say. If you do this, the positive result will be much better than you can think of. Don't beleive us? Ring in some top rated professor in social system dynamics or application of complexity theory in social systems and ask them to run a simulation on this. MIT or Stanford or INSEAD or Tokyo or NUS or many other similar schools have such experts. To do this, to pay for the expenses of the elected officials, is not a big amount for the nation. If we expect a positive result, the money figure is manageable. The other article for we earlier provided link has some calculation. This seemingly insignificant injection of energy into the structure has the capacity of changing the system within a very few years time. Moreover, you do not have to go that far in doing simulation. You have a real example closer to home. Singapore and many others are reaping the benefits of such policies.
 
If you can not or do not have the courage to do this, then give us a break - bakhwas should be stopped. The fact that your government is not stealing money, the mastans are mostly gone, you are trying to reform the bureacracy and the police, etc are good enough reason to praise you. But there is no need to increase the expectation of the populace in saying that they should expect a good government or good leadership after this election. Beyond your tenure, let "A story of a thirty some" to continue for some more years (To read the story, see http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/vinnomot/message/10977). It won't be as bad as it were pre-1/11. But there is no gurantee that your cosmetic and half-hearted reform efforts will make a strong enough dent to reverese the degeneration in the system.
 
Dear readers, still there is no need to be dishearned. Our changes will be much slower than we thought we would be getting. After all, you represent a failed generation - what better could you do? For the same reason, we had earlier opposed the idea of Dr. Yunus's joining politics with the banner of NaShok. With such a bunch of incompetent, hypocrite and closed-minded generation, we actually should not be expect much better than this. 
 
If public thinks that the current government is not doing everything in their reach to establish good governance, it would be an opportunity lost. Please, please, please. Take actions to inject some honest energy in the system. Take actions to make a competition among honest and competent, not a competition among the corrupt and culprits. The fact that you are running the country, is unconventional. So, do not hesitate just because some bureaucrat tells you that its unconventional, or can not be done. Think for yourself.
 
If you do have have the will to do that, then try the war criminals, at the least.
 
We think both can be done. Start the war crimes commission by this Independence Day. Then start the elections of the local government bodies, under the proposed policies. And once all is over, hold the general election. All of these can be and should be done.
 
 
May the Almighty bless them all.
 
If you thought some of the ideas are worth of your reading time, please forward it to others. If you have an ear to the columinsts in regular traditional media, please forward it to them. If you have an ear to the journalists and news editors of the electronic media, discuss it with them. Hope they would look at the suggestions and give due diligence. 
 
 
Thanks for your time,
Innovation Line
 
==================================================================================================
Note: This is a freelance column, published mainly in different internet based forums. This column is open for contribution by the members of new generation, sometimes referred to as Gen 71. If you identify yourself as someone from that age-group and want to contribute to this column, please feel free to contact. Thanks to the group moderator for publishing the article.
 
Dear readers, also, if you thought the article was important enough so it should come under attention of the head of the government please forward the message to them. Email address for the Chief Advisor: feeedback@pmo.gov.bd or at http://www.cao.gov.bd/feedback/comments.php . The more of you forward it to them, the less will be the need to go back to street agitation. Use ICT to practice democracy. It is already proven that this government responds to the feedback.
===================================================================================================

Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com __._,_.___

[* Moderator's Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[chottala.com] Publication of People's View

Publication of the Daily People's View from Chittagong has resumed. Once popular English Daily eidited by late Nurul Islam is now being Edited by Osman Gani Mansur (Previously the Bureau Chief of Ittefaq) while Hassan Shahriar acts as the Chief Editor. You may read the daily in: www.peoples-view.org
 
 
Prof. Abdul Mannan
__._,_.___

[* Moderator's Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[chottala.com] To the Chief Adviser, Dr. Fakhruddin Ahmed

To the Chief Adviser, Dr. Fakhruddin Ahmed
This message has been in the making for a long time. We were hoping that we would not have to send this out. The fact that this is published now, it should act as an alarm for your government.
 
A note to readers: If you agree with this message, please each one of you forward it to feeedback@pmo.gov.bd, so he knows how many people favours this. This is very important! 
 
A valid question or issue that can be raised is this - why did we change our position on the issue of trial of war criminals now  - whether it shoudl be done by the interim government, as opposed to our initial position of trying them by an elected government? We have touched on the issue in earlier occassions, but we did not really address the issue directly. Why change position in such an important issue and why risk embarrasing the current government whose capacity is alreay limited by a time bound roadmap and also, they have taken so many projects that it should be already too much for them. We agree. Still, we changed our position with a sane mind. Why? 
 
Frankly, changing our position on this issue has nothing to do with the issue itself. Surprised, huh?
 
Let us explain.
 
Just look around. There are many people who do not beleive that this issue will be addressed by the government who will be elected through the election for which your people are so on-work. Your promise of free and fair election in a level playing field. Yet, people still do not beleive that your project will be eventually successful. Why? It seems the perception is that the old faces will be coming back to form the government.
 
Not only the other people, your own government, including yourself, are part of the same public. You also do not beleive that there will be new political parties coming to power. It will be the same AL or BNP or their combination with other smaller evils. This is - even when - they have not changed their actions and words a tad.
 
The fact that you think they will be coming to power again is demonstrated through the words of your governemnt. You guys talk about why AL or BNP is not reforming themselves. Why do you care? If they want to keep the culprits on top, if they want to stay un-reformed or ill-formed, let them be. Shouldn't a level playing field ensure their defeat - if they do not reform? Can you see the logic? People are not stupid. People of Bangladesh never voted the wrong people - they always vote for the best choice at the time. The question is whether there will be alternative to traditional choices?
 
So, what is the problem? You can not achieve what you initially thought? At least, the body language suggests so. Or is it the fact that you plainly can not complete the project, the project definiiton was faulty given the resources? If you think its doable, why dont you talk about resources? Why not get people on board with what your thoughts are on this?
 
So, if that is the case, then why shouldn't we expect that you do at least one thing. Try those criminals. At least, you can do that. Changing a corruption economy is much more complex a problem than trying some criminals - specifically when that was done at the birth of the country. So, we thought. Do you see the logic that justifies change in our initial position on the issue? If you can not deliver the real thing, why dont you at least deliver this? Hope we have communicated our logic well so all know.
 
Lastly, as we do always, here are some problem solving.
 
Is there still any way to salvage the project? Yes, this is a great project of reconstruction to many of us Bangladeshis. That is why they have given you - an unelected government - to govern more than anybody could even think. We would be inclined to say that yes, there is still time to achieve the mission. We have written about it before. Let us repeat for the benefit of the readers.
 
You can not change nature of the politicians, with the resources you have (particularly less time). It is true. But you can change the dynamics of the socio-political structure. There are many ways to do that. Given the timeframe you have left, here is the most effective one.
 
There have always been a competition for the elected positions in various level of governance system (starting from UP member to MP). Many people vie for those posts. But so far, only the corrupt ones have gone for that. No serious people who are also honest have ever dreaded to compete for those, except for few lucky ones who were born in very rich family. You have to make these positions attractive to the honest people. This has to be done in such a way that being rich is no longer a pre-condition. Our suggestion is that you give a monthly salary of at least 50 paisa per month per voter for these elected office-holders (instead of current declaration of meagre doubling the TK 1500 to TK 3000, that is funny). If this policy is adopted, that would make these positions attractive to the competent people in a way that will change the dynamics of politics in Bangladesh. For a posting on a related topic, see this link: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bdresearchers/message/2607  The specific numbers are not important, but it has to be big enough to make any substantial change.
 
We know what many of our readers are thinking. We do not blame you guys. Its not your fault. Even our best intellectuals will also be saying the same. For example, you ask Dr. Wahiduddin Mahmud or Dr. Yunus or Dr. Muzaffar Ahmed or any other respected intellectuals, they will tell you that its not a good idea. People should come to public offices to serve the country, not for money, blah blah blah. Behind this assumption, they think that only the sons and daughters of the rich are entitled to compete for the election. That basic assumption is false and that is destroying our democratic foundation. If our this assumption is true, that would explain the root cause of many of our problems. This mindset is coming from last century.
 
You guys assume that all who are competent are born in the elite families. You couldn't be more wrong. Look at the local level leaders. Lives of most of these leaders are not only a story of rise in corruption, there are also many a story of rising economic condition. They become ward member because they think that is only way to make a decent money. To do that they first become mastan. And some percent eventaully succeed, the smarter ones. Though that is wrong way. But what is the alternative? If a honest person even somehow becomes elected, what is he supposed to do after being elected? Run his family for 3000 taka and still be popular chairman? Or do you want these few honest people do the impossible jobs, and then go asking for money to the rich of the soceity to run his family?
 
Our system do not prize the honest and competent. We currently have a system which punishes, if you are foolish enough to be honest and talk your mind.
 
Say for example, somebody does a job which pays him taka 30,000 per month. He has achieved this through hard work, honestly, during his last 35/40 years of life. This monthly salary is probably his only life-line to support the family, because none of his father or father-in-laws were theives, let alone himself. So, what choices do you give him, if he wants to go back to his village and fight for the UP chairman or a ward member position? Being elected itself a big challenge. Your election commission has a lot of work to enable this type of candidates to get a level-playing field in the villages. Is there a legal way for this person to raise money for election spending? Can he open a bank account and receive donation for running for office?
 
Or say a person who is earning 1,20,000 taka from a job, and he is considering to go for MP candidacy.
 
There is no legal framework for these two person to raise their funds from their personal network, if they want to. Election commision will have to figure that out soon. Time is running out.
 
But our today's talk is not about that. We are assuming that election commission will do that effectively and sooner than later. But then comes the policies that you make or your advisory council make.
 
Once these type of candidates get elected, if they gets upto there, what does he do to make sure that their families are still being fed well and their children being sent to a good school? Have you ever thought of making a budget of your elected official - the type that you so often talk about - the honest and competent ones? If you have not done so, you better do that. Do not assume that all of them will have their savings account or father's money to support their families. Few might and be still honest, but many wont.
 
Do not expect that their budget will come from out of pocket. It will either come from corruption (the traditional candidate) or from the government exchecker (because most of your honest and competent candidates do not have money or do not come from rich families)!!
Off course, unless you make a provision to receive donation for personal spending which we think is a bad idea.
 
So, unless you make sure that you change the incentives and framework so that the nature of the competitors are changed, you can not make any significant effect in the system. You have to change the stuctural parameters, if you really understand the problem and you really mean what you say. If you do this, the positive result will be much better than you can think of. Don't beleive us? Ring in some top rated professor in social system dynamics or application of complexity theory in social systems and ask them to run a simulation on this. MIT or Stanford or INSEAD or Tokyo or NUS or many other similar schools have such experts. To do this, to pay for the expenses of the elected officials, is not a big amount for the nation. If we expect a positive result, the money figure is manageable. The other article for we earlier provided link has some calculation. This seemingly insignificant injection of energy into the structure has the capacity of changing the system within a very few years time. Moreover, you do not have to go that far in doing simulation. You have a real example closer to home. Singapore and many others are reaping the benefits of such policies.
 
If you can not or do not have the courage to do this, then give us a break - bakhwas should be stopped. The fact that your government is not stealing money, the mastans are mostly gone, you are trying to reform the bureacracy and the police, etc are good enough reason to praise you. But there is no need to increase the expectation of the populace in saying that they should expect a good government or good leadership after this election. Beyond your tenure, let "A story of a thirty some" to continue for some more years (To read the story, see http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/vinnomot/message/10977). It won't be as bad as it were pre-1/11. But there is no gurantee that your cosmetic and half-hearted reform efforts will make a strong enough dent to reverese the degeneration in the system.
 
Dear readers, still there is no need to be dishearned. Our changes will be much slower than we thought we would be getting. After all, you represent a failed generation - what better could you do? For the same reason, we had earlier opposed the idea of Dr. Yunus's joining politics with the banner of NaShok. With such a bunch of incompetent, hypocrite and closed-minded generation, we actually should not be expect much better than this. 
 
If public thinks that the current government is not doing everything in their reach to establish good governance, it would be an opportunity lost. Please, please, please. Take actions to inject some honest energy in the system. Take actions to make a competition among honest and competent, not a competition among the corrupt and culprits. The fact that you are running the country, is unconventional. So, do not hesitate just because some bureaucrat tells you that its unconventional, or can not be done. Think for yourself.
 
If you do have have the will to do that, then try the war criminals, at the least.
 
We think both can be done. Start the war crimes commission by this Independence Day. Then start the elections of the local government bodies, under the proposed policies. And once all is over, hold the general election. All of these can be and should be done.
 
 
May the Almighty bless them all.
 
If you thought some of the ideas are worth of your reading time, please forward it to others. If you have an ear to the columinsts in regular traditional media, please forward it to them. If you have an ear to the journalists and news editors of the electronic media, discuss it with them. Hope they would look at the suggestions and give due diligence. 
 
 
Thanks for your time,
Innovation Line
 
==================================================================================================
Note: This is a freelance column, published mainly in different internet based forums. This column is open for contribution by the members of new generation, sometimes referred to as Gen 71. If you identify yourself as someone from that age-group and want to contribute to this column, please feel free to contact. Thanks to the group moderator for publishing the article.
 
Dear readers, also, if you thought the article was important enough so it should come under attention of the head of the government please forward the message to them. Email address for the Chief Advisor: feeedback@pmo.gov.bd or at http://www.cao.gov.bd/feedback/comments.php . The more of you forward it to them, the less will be the need to go back to street agitation. Use ICT to practice democracy. It is already proven that this government responds to the feedback.
===================================================================================================
__._,_.___

[* Moderator's Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Re: [chottala.com] Long lives CTG...........CTG can do...The circumstances do not allow any judicial verdict to ask the present CTG for conducting fair & neutral election within 90 days.

CTG can do
  1. By reading net mails & hearing newses it seems that there is no any honest politician in Bangladesh. The so called politicians & supporters of politicians are the Razakers. BAL. BNP & JP.
  2. Razakers means..Jamati ML & Paki minded people.
  3. BAL means Hijakers hartal doers & short knowledge people leaded by outsiders for breaking closing & burning works.
  4. BNP means Chur Moha Chur doing conspiracy for power.
  5. JP means Scaracher.
 
  1. CTG can form educational advisor councils by collecting from through out the country of well educated experienced honest people for discussing to make correct idea & plan for updating education system & providing the people through out the country for making them skilled in their respective working fields
  2. So it needs for the present CTG to continue to stay in power for providing nation wide quality education to all
  3. To create honest wise political leaders to lead the country
  4. To reform works in political party to contest in election
  5. To create honest creative law makers for making rules & laws
  6. To create foresighted wise skilled planers for planning.
  7. To create good efficient administrators to rule the administration
  8. To create perfect executors to execute the plan
  9. To create creative builders to build the country for saving people. 
  10. A register needs to be maintained  for checking whether are the University teachers coming at University in time, are they  taking classes in regular time, are they giving teaching lessons to the students with update preparation knowledge or not???
  11. Actions should needs to be taken against the teachers who are responsible to maintain academic discipline & to provide update wise education to the students so action should not be taken against the students
  12. This Present CTG must need to make a very strong action team for investigating to take legal action against the persons ( may be teachers or others) who are destroying academic atmosphere in the education area disturbing the students for getting proper update quality education not taken regular classes not taken examination in time by the so called learned Dr teachers & created seasons jots in doing nasty nonsense stupid uneducated quality less politics (politricks) to damage the country by doing works of breaking burning closing the industry business centers for increasing price hiking of everything & creating people's disasters.
  13. CTG can form a business & industry advisor councils to control the market prices with the cooperation with all business men.
  14. CTG can create many jobs centers for providing jobs to the jobless people.
  15.  CTG long lives & earns efficiency to rule the efficiently.
 





The circumstances do not allow any judicial verdict to ask the present CTG for conducting fair & neutral election within 90 days.
For conducting fair & neutral election
CTG needs to do reforming works
1)    In  all Political party.  
2)    In all Education Sector.
 
 

Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com __._,_.___

[* Moderator's Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

RE: [chottala.com] A very important posting we should read again and again Unveiled

Dear Mr. Mirza Golam Sabur,

Thanks for your comment. I fully agree with you. Excellent ideas.
We always dream of one peaceful,prosporus,happy 'Sonar Bangladesh'(without corruption).

Thanks.
Farid

[chottala.com] Fwd: Federal system in government is the right form of govt. for Bangladesh

     I strongly endorse that adoption of federal system is the correct solution for Bangladesh.  The federal system ensures distribution of power to the local/provisional/state authorities away from the central authority.  Centralization of power is the main source of corrupt practices since the power/office holders are not directly answerable to the population.  It also represents colonial era of rule.  In this regard, I would like to applaud the recent implementation of separation of Judiciary from the Executive branch.  Although it will take sometime for full impact of this action, it is definitely a great beginning!  Next step will be to separate Legislative branch from the executive--that may be a constitutional process! 
     A federal system (U.S. model) will ensure transparency in law and order, taxation, appropriate resource distribution, police and municipal functions, and above all accountability to local people.  For example, an SP (superintendent of police) appointed by the central government bears no loyalty or obligation to the elected mayor or other local/district administration.  The SP and the whole contingency of police force do not belong to local community, and as such do not appreciate the local needs since their career hinges on pleasing the central authority.  The DC, SP represented in the colonial era the enforcers of the Crown's rule.  Areas of foreign policy, defence, and other central issues will remain with the center along with the overriding authority to protect local population and administration.  
      It may be a long way to achieving a federal system; but the discussion is appropriate to take place! 
      Regards,
                   Sultan

Mohammad Farid Hossain <farid2002hossain@hotmail.com> wrote:
To: <chottala@yahoogroups.com>
From: Mohammad Farid Hossain <farid2002hossain@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 20:51:41 +0000
Subject: [chottala.com] A very important posting we should read again and again Unveiled


Mr. Faruque Alamgir
Thanks for telling the plain truth. I do not know when and how we are going to learn.
-farid





To: chottala@yahoogroups.com
From: s_ayubi786@yahoo.com
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 07:33:49 +0000
Subject: [chottala.com] [khabor.com] Re: A very important posting we should read again and again Unveiled the ugly fcae of BALISTs

I think that adopting a presidential system exactly like USA with
former districts as states could be the answer to our problems. that
could mean the end of the heredetary leadership in politics. I think
that the time has come to think over it seriously.
Salahuddin Ayubi

--- In chottala@yahoogroups.com, Faruque Alamgir <faruquealamgir@...>
wrote:
>
> Aminul Bhai
>
> You have to tell "A spade A Spade" else you queue in the same
line with the congenital liars and impotent Jibis here and abraod.
>
> There is true saying that "Koila Dhuiley Moila Jaina" and that
is very much "Lagsoi" (appropriate) for the Awami League who always
betrayed the cause of the people. People believed them in 1971,1973
and 1996 but paid heavy price in terms of democracy being crushed
underone Party rule,shattering of economy and defamation of the
sanctity of the motherland overseas.
>
> Ofcourse the BNP is also a conglomerate of Thieves of "Baghdad"
who almost emptied the national exchequere and help the "Janwars
Razakars" to fly high the "Lal Sabuj" pataka earned by a ocean of
blood .This is an unexcusable offence against the sacrifice of the
Martyres of Muki Judhdha.
>
> So niether BNP nor heavily tainted peoples and demo lover Awami
Lewague could be trusted to sit in the steering again. The
unfortunate part of the scenario
> is that no second line of leadership developed. Wherever there was
some potentiality but again those are nothing but "Po Dhora Dalal" of
eithier party.
>
> Let us, hope that something new to come to usher the nation
into the shiny path of development and true Patriotism be reflect in
each and every citizens acts both within and outside Bangladesh.
>
> Greetings to all Bangladeshis.
>
> Faruque Alamgir
>
>
> "Md. Aminul Islam" <aminul_islam_raj@...> wrote: Alamgir Bhai,
> You too unveiled their ugly face.
>
> Faruque Alamgir <faruquealamgir@...> wrote:
> Friend Aminul
>
> How dare you say a Mujib Coat (Neheru Coat !!!!!) dhari and Haji
and Bomb maker( it is said that Mohiuddin's first wife was killed by
bomb made in his house
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? )
a "Dakhaldar" .
>
> The BAL's do not have any crime and even they were Razakars but
joined them just turned Mukti Jodhdha. So the case was with scores
of criminal hajees(??) in the leadership of Awami League. One of my
friend was a valiant freedom frighter and BAL activist turned looter
after ' 71 and amassed hundreds of crores and his son kept up the
tempo with full force. Now the great Awami's Bap Beta are hinding
may be in their mentors land of seculars
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> My dear friend please wait for more painfull episodes when these
thugs,murderers, looters and Kombol Chors will emerge from jail
victorious( the evil sign is very much visible by the release
ofhooligan/arsonists teachers od DU/RU) showing thumbkin to the
sanctity of Judiciary. Bangladesh is the personal peoperty of theses
goons. Dhik Dhik these so-called saviour of demo.
>
> Faruque Alamgir
>
> "Md. Aminul Islam" <aminul_islam_raj@...> wrote: To:
banglarnari@ yahoogroups. com
> From: mramjan@hotmail. com
> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 03:42:32 -0500
> Subject: RE: [banglarnari] The fate of my 'razakar' poem and my
comments
>
> In your poem you have intentionally targeted a man as
Razakar who is not really a Razakar. Indeed, 90% Razakar were,
mostly from Awami Voters those Rickshawala and Tela wala and wood
cutter or daily labour joined the Razakar Forces for a salary of TK
90 per month mostly for economic reason rather any political
ambition (except a few) and who helped eventually the Mukti Bahini
by giving information for some extend even though some miscreant
used their arms capacity for illigal ambitions, same thing what had
happened to our braved Mukti Bahini after independence, by looting
non Bengali properties and business, for instance where still Baga
Bangali Qader Siddiqi is living, a delicious home, what he forcibly
evacuated the non Bengali family and occupied, the same happened
with famous Mukti Bahini Mayor Mohiuddin Chowdhury (Ctg) who had
occupied the properties of Bihari Nur Uddin , I am still hearing the
begging voices of Nur Uddin's daughter, mery bacche
> Bhuker hay thora kana dedo, in KC dey road Chittagong (1974-75)
>
> The list of Razakar and their salary records may still preserved
under government but I strongly suggest unknowingly on primitive
guess to harm anyone is out of civic approach.
>
> Moreover the Daily Star whose financial root from cross border
sources and engaged in a specific mission should be avoided from
any intellectual support.
>
> Sincerely
>
> Mohammed Ramjan Ali Bhuiyan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo!
Mobile. Try it now.
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo!
Search.
>






Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. __._,_.___

[* Moderator's Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___