Banner Advertise

Thursday, September 11, 2008

[ Nokia Club Bangladesh ] [Pics] Guess – Is it Moon or Ball?

Friends!....Its time of guessing.....


just see these fantastic pictures & try to recognize....


which photo is of moon and which one is ball...



__._,_.___

Our Groups Alternative address:
http://bdnokia.com

To Access Our File Archive Center on the web, go to:
http://groups.google.com/group/nokia_club/

Our Wap Address is:
http://wap.BDNokia.Com

Visit Our Wap Portal's Sponsors Site:
http://www.DeshiHost.Com





Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[chottala.com] 21 Reasons to Question the Official 9-11 Story

 
 

 
----- Original Message -----
From: smacko
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 7:24 PM
Subject: [GovernmentShadow] 21 Reasons to Question the Official 9-11 Story

 
September 11, 2001:
21 Reasons to Question the Official Story about 9/11
by David Ray Griffin, Global Research
September 11, 2008

Note: Although the points are stated briefly, I give in each case the pages
in my most recent book---"The New Pearl Harbor Revisited"---where the issue
is documented and discussed more extensively.


(1) Although the official account of 9/11 claims that Osama bin Laden
ordered the attacks, the FBI does not list 9/11 as one of the terrorist acts
for which he is wanted and has admitted that it "has no hard evidence
connecting Bin Laden to 9/11" (NPHR 206-11).

(2) Although the official story holds that the four airliners were hijacked
by devout Muslims ready to die as martyrs to earn a heavenly reward, Mohamed
Atta and the other alleged hijackers regularly drank heavily, went to strip
clubs, and paid for sex (NPHR 153-55).

(3) Many people reported having received cell phone calls from loved ones or
flight attendants on the airliners, during which they were told that Middle
Eastern hijackers had taken over the planes. One recipient, Deena Burnett,
was certain that her husband had called her several times on his cell phone
because she had recognized his number on her Caller ID. But the calls to
Burnett and most of the other reported calls were made when the planes were
above 30,000 feet, and evidence presented by the 9/11 truth movement showed
that, given the technology of the time, cell phone calls from high-altitude
airliners had been impossible. By the time the FBI presented a report on
phone calls from the planes at the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui in 2006, it
had changed its story, saying that there were only two cell phone calls from
the flights, both from United 93 after it had descended to 5,000 feet (NPHR
111-17).

(4) US Solicitor General Ted Olson's claim that his wife, Barbara Olson,
phoned him twice from AA 77, reporting that hijackers had taken it over, was
also contradicted by this FBI report, which says that the only call
attempted by her was "unconnected" and hence lasted "0 seconds" (NPRH
60-62).

(5) Although decisive evidence that al-Qaeda was responsible for the attacks
was reportedly found in Mohamed Atta's luggage---which allegedly failed to
get loaded onto Flight 11 from a commuter flight that Atta took to Boston
from Portland, Maine, that morning---this story was made up after the FBI's
previous story had collapsed. According to that story, the evidence had been
found in a Mitsubishi that Atta had left in the Logan Airport parking lot
and the trip to Portland was taken by Adnan and Ameer Bukhari. After the FBI
learned that neither of the Bukharis had died on September 11, it simply
declared that the trip to Portland was made by Atta and another al-Qaeda
operative (NPHR 155-62).

(6) The other types of reputed evidence for Muslim hijackers---such as
videos of al-Qaeda operatives at airports, passports discovered at the crash
sites, and a headband discovered at the crash site of United 93---also show
clear signs of having been fabricated (NPHR 170-73).

(7) In addition to the absence of evidence for hijackers on the planes,
there is also evidence of their absence: If hijackers had broken into the
cockpits, the pilots would have "squawked" the universal hijack code, an act
that takes only a couple of seconds. But not one of the eight pilots on the
four airliners did this (NPHR 175-79).

(8) Given standard operating procedures between the FAA and the military,
according to which planes showing signs of an in-flight emergency are
normally intercepted within about 10 minutes, the military's failure to
intercept any of the flights implies that something, such as a stand-down
order, prevented standard procedures from being carried out (NPHR 1-10,
81-84).

(9) Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta reported an episode in which
Vice President Cheney, while in the bunker under the White House, apparently
confirmed a stand-down order at about 9:25 AM, which was prior to the strike
on the Pentagon. Another man has reported hearing members of LAX Security
learn that a stand-down order had come from the "highest level of the White
House" (NPHR 94-96).

(10) The 9/11 Commission did not mention Mineta's report, removed it from
the Commission's video record of its hearings, and claimed that Cheney did
not enter the shelter conference room until almost 10:00, which was at least
40 minutes later than he was really there, according to Mineta and several
other witnesses, including Cheney's photographer (NPHR 91-94).

(11) The 9/11 Commission's timeline for Cheney that morning even
contradicted what Cheney himself had told Tim Russert on "Meet the Press"
September 16, just five days after 9/11 (NPHR 93).

(12) Hani Hanjour, known as a terrible pilot who could not safely fly even a
single-engine airplane, could not possibly have executed the amazing
trajectory reportedly taken by American Flight 77 in order to hit Wedge 1 of
the Pentagon (NPHR 78-80).

(13) Wedge 1 would have been the least likely part of the Pentagon to be
targeted by foreign terrorists, for several reasons: It was as far as
possible from the offices of Rumsfeld and the top brass, whom Muslim
terrorists presumably would have wanted to kill; it was the only part of the
Pentagon that had been reinforced; the reconstruction was not finished, so
there were relatively few people there; and it was the only part of the
Pentagon that would have presented obstacles to a plane's flight path (NPHR
76-78).

(14) Contrary to the claim of Pentagon officials that they did not have the
Pentagon evacuated because they had no way of knowing that an aircraft was
approaching, a military E-4B---the Air Force's most advanced communications,
command, and control airplane---was flying over the White House at the time.
Also, although there can be no doubt about the identity of the plane, which
was captured on video by CNN and others, the military has denied that it
belonged to them (NPHR 96-98).

(15) The Secret Service, after learning that a second World Trade Center
building had been attacked---which would have meant that terrorists were
going after high-value targets---and that still other planes had apparently
been hijacked, allowed President Bush to remain at the school in Sarasota,
Florida, for another 30 minutes. It thereby revealed its foreknowledge that
Bush would not be a target: If these had really been surprise attacks, the
agents, fearing that a hijacked airliner was bearing down on the school,
would have hustled Bush away. On the first anniversary of 9/11, the White
House started telling a new story, according to which Bush, rather than
remaining in the classroom several minutes after Andrew Card whispered in
his ear that a second WTC building had been hit, immediately got up and left
the room. This lie was told in major newspapers and on MSNBC and ABC
television (NPHR 129-31).

(16) Given the fact that the Twin Towers and WTC 7 had steel columns running
from their basements to their roofs, they simply could not have come down as
they did---straight down at virtually free-fall speed---unless these columns
had been sliced by means of explosives. Therefore, the official theory,
according to which the buildings came down because of fire plus (in the case
of the Twin Towers) the impact of the planes, is scientifically impossible
(NPHR 12-25).

(17) The destruction of the Twin Towers had many other features---such as
the horizontal ejections of steel beams, the melting of steel, and the
sulfidation and thinning of steel---that can be explained only in terms of
powerful explosives. For example, the fires could not have come within 1000
degrees Fahrenheit of the temperature needed to melt steel (30-36).

(18) Members of the FDNY (Fire Department of New York) provided oral
histories shortly after 9/11 in which one fourth of them testified to having
witnessed explosions in the Twin Towers. Explosions in the WTC 7 as well as
the towers were also reported by city officials, WTC employees, and
journalists (NPHR 27-30, 45-48, 51).

(19) Mayor Rudy Giuliani told Peter Jennings of ABC News that day: "we set
up headquarters at 75 Barclay Street . . . , and we were operating out of
there when we were told that the World Trade Center was gonna collapse. And
it [the South Tower] did collapse before we could actually get out of the
building." However, there was no objective basis for expecting the towers to
collapse; even the 9/11 Commission admitted that none of the fire chiefs
expected them to come down. The FDNY oral histories show that the
information that they were going to collapse came from the Office of
Emergency Management---Giuliani's own office. How could Giuliani's people
have known that the towers were going to come down, unless they knew that
the buildings had been laced with explosives? (NPH 40)

(20) NIST, which produced the official reports on the Twin Towers and
(recently) WTC 7, has been "fully hijacked from the scientific to the
political realm," so that its scientists are little more than "hired guns,"
a former employee has reported, and the 9/11 Commission was no more
independent, being run by Philip Zelikow, who was essentially a member of
the Bush White House (NPHR 11, 238-51).

(21) The official story about 9/11 is now rejected by constantly growing
numbers of physicists, chemists, architects, engineers, pilots, former
military officers, and former intelligence officials (NPHR xi).

* David Ray Griffin. The New Pearl Harbor Revisited: 9/11, the Cover-Up, and
the Exposé. Olive Branch Press, September, 2008, ISBN-10: 1566567297

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=GRI20080911&articleId=10145




No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.21/1667 - Release Date: 9/11/2008 6:55 PM
__._,_.___

[* Moderator's Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[chottala.com] Fw: My Take on Giuliani's Bigotry at the RNC



--- On Thu, 9/11/08, Delegate Saqib Ali <delegate@saqibali.org> wrote:
From: Delegate Saqib Ali <delegate@saqibali.org>
Subject: My Take on Giuliani's Bigotry at the RNC
To: "Delegate Saqib Ali" <delegate@saqibali.org>
Date: Thursday, September 11, 2008, 1:56 AM

SAQIBALI
DEMOCRAT, DELEGATE
M
ARYLAND
'S DISTRICT 39


Dear Friend,

In case you missed it, I wanted to quickly bring to your attention my letter to the editor that appeared in last Tuesday's New York Times regarding the recent speech made by Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani at the recent Republican National Convention.
 
Please take a look by clicking here.
(I have included the text of the letter below for your convenience)
I believe it is unnacceptable for leaders of a national political party to intentionally target an entire community by smears, innuendos and false associations. Its time that we all called such people out on their bigotry. The only way to stop a bully is to fight back. Hard.

If you appreciate this letter and would like to support my work, please make a contribution to my re-election campaign. You can do so by clicking here. I ask that you contribute as generously as you can comfortably afford.

Sincerely,

Delegate Saqib Ali
(301) 685-3409

www.SaqibAli.org

By Authority of Friends of Saqib Ali, Treasurer Christopher Wilhelm

Giuliani and Muslims

Published: September 9, 2008
To the Editor:

As a Muslim-American elected official, I am appalled that Rudolph W. Giuliani chose to equate all terrorists with members of the Islamic faith during his G.O.P. convention address.

He said: "For four days in Denver, the Democrats were afraid to use the term 'Islamic terrorism.' " I imagine they believe it is politically incorrect to say it. I think they believe they will insult someone. Please tell me, who they are insulting if they say, 'Islamic terrorism.' They are insulting terrorists!"

Sorry, Rudy. That statement doesn't insult terrorists; it insults all hard-working, loyal Muslim-Americans. Worse still, none of the convention pundits or commentators for any major paper or network called him on it.

Several Democratic speakers, including Barack Obama, did address the serious issue of the fight against terrorism, but they did it in a way that did not imply that all Muslim people are terrorists. Mr. Giuliani doesn't seem to know better.

Every day, Muslim-Americans serve our country in the armed forces, help us create tighter security systems that protect all Americans, and create jobs for hundreds of thousands of Americans.

The fight against terrorism should be directed toward real terrorists and those who support them, not toward people trying to live the American dream but who follow a different faith.

Whatever happened to the principle of religious freedom upon which the United States was founded?

Saqib Ali

Annapolis, Md., Sept. 5, 2008

The writer is a member of the Maryland House of Delegates.




__._,_.___

[* Moderator�s Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Re: [chottala.com] Corrupion replaced by corruption

Dear All,
 
All of the nonsensical activity of the government to detain people and then letting everyone go fair and square is beginning to look like a circus to me. It is also making the government look bad, while 'the era of wild, wild west' seem to walk in with bloated ego, more daring and absolutely no consideration to the law. In order to revive democracy the government had to cut a sorry deal that ultimately will not be good for the country and pretty soon havoc will result coming election time. This is the story of life in Bangladesh. The idea of notun Bangladesh perhaps may be aptly changed to the story 'notun bangladesh in old style.'
 
This is tragic and horrendous; I think democracy has gotten a nasty kick in its back, but we have not figured that out because our senses are either not acute or drowned in emotion. The country has become captive to the political parties again. My question is, 'Is this we all slaved hard for and gritted our teeth amidst monumental chaos and economic dislocation hoping to see a new country evolve that is more transparent and honest?'
 
Our dreams have been punctured; our wishes to see a new Bangladesh have vanished into ether and our fellow martyrs are perhaps thinking of their sacrifice of life going to wanton and complete waste.
 
I depart with a heavy soul.




--
Ziaur Rahman
CEO
International Institute of Technology & Management
56/2 Lake Circus, West Panthopoth
Dhaka 1205
Tel: 8112916, 01726153318, 01711-543431
www.iitmbd.org

&

Chief Executive Officer
IITM Software
www.iitmsoftware.com
info@iitmsoftware.com
__._,_.___

[* Moderator's Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[chottala.com] Thanx to Doula Bhai (Windsor, ON, Canada)

Thanx to Doula Bhai, (Windsor, ON, Canada) for his best column according to our superber corrupted leaders. seems like our Bangladesh belongs to 2 ladies and 1 man.

what kind of game playing over there, lets get in with reason & come out with out any explanation !!!!!!!


Sultan
Bkk, Thailand.

--- On Tue, 9/9/08, Rezaul Karim <karim_784@yahoo.com.sg> wrote:
From: Rezaul Karim <karim_784@yahoo.com.sg>
Subject: Re: [chottala.com] Corrupion replaced by corruption
To: chottala@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, September 9, 2008, 11:38 AM

It boils down to the fact that Allah does not bless the nation who choose "Zaleem" as their leader. Look where is India and where is Bangladesh and Pakistan. Its a disgrace!!!!
 
Best regards,
Reza.

----- Original Message ----
From: Mohammed Taher <mtaher123us@ yahoo.com>
To: chottala@yahoogroup s.com
Sent: Tuesday, 9 September 2008 09:25:25
Subject: Re: [chottala.com] Corrupion replaced by corruption

Wow, Well written. I do not blame Tareque or Joy we
the people(Chattuker, submissive) made them our
leaders.

Thanks,
Taher.

--- "md. muminul islam chy." <mdmumin@yahoo. co.in>
wrote:

> perfect...i am totally agree with you
>  
> Mumin
> Montreal
> Canada
>
> --- On Mon, 8/9/08, siraj@yahoo. com
> <siraj@yahoo. com> wrote:
>
> From: siraj@yahoo. com <siraj@yahoo. com>
> Subject: [chottala.com] Corrupion replaced by
> corruption
> To: chottala@yahoogroup s.com
> Date: Monday, 8 September, 2008, 1:06 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear Chottala Readers,
> Just look at Pakistan. Asif Ali Zardari once known
> to be  as 10% during the regime of Prime Minister
> Benazir Bhutto.  Later on he was put in jail for 8
> years by Pervez Musharraf for his corruption. Where
> is Asif Ali Zardari now--- prison to President.
> People of Pakistan after garlanding him elected him
> as the President of their country. 
>  
> Who knows after few years we the people of
> Bangladesh will do the same thing as Pakistan did
> now.
> Please wait and see our people will bring Tareque
> Zia or Joy either as President or something like
> that after garlanding them. Because we the people of
> Bangladesh still could not raise ourselves beyond
> that level. Our country is still full of corruption
> from top to bottom. Corrupted people will also bring
> a corrupted leader just like an ass are always
> habituated in drinking dirty water.
>  
> Now look at India. A little bit of corruption is
> there also. But during selection or election they
> are always particular in selecting a patriotic
> leader in a real democratic sense.
>  
> Where is democracy in our country? Do you think our
> people are selecting our leader in a true sense of
> democracy. Our leader always used to tell us they
> have returned the people' s democracy to the people 
> again. What type of democracy they have returned to
> us? In the name of democracy they have presented us
> some corrupted elements from our soceity. We are
> eating now bitter quinines instead of enjoying the
> fruits of democracy. 
>  
> Doula,
> Windsor, ON, Canada    
>  
>  
>  
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it
> now, on
http://help. yahoo.com/ l/in/yahoo/ mail/yahoomail/ tools/tools- 08.html/



Search. browse and book your hotels and flights through Yahoo! Travel


__._,_.___

[* Moderator's Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___