Banner Advertise

Thursday, March 17, 2011

[chottala.com] Death from eating Shrimp-Prawn together with vitamin C



Death  from  eating  Shrimp-Prawn  together  with  vitamin  C 

 

 

YOU  MAY  POISON  YOURSELF  ACCIDENTALLY

In Taiwan , a woman
SUDDENLY died unexpectedly with signs of bleeding from her Ears, Nose, Mouth & Eyes. After a preliminary Autopsy it was diagnosed death due to Arsenic Poisoning death. Where did the Arsenic come from...???

The police launched an in-depth and extensive investigation. A medical school professor was invited to come to solve the case.


The professor carefully looked at the contents from the deceased's stomach, in less than half an hour, the mystery was solved. The professor said: 'The deceased did not commit suicide and neither was she murdered, she died of accidental death due to ignorance!'


Everyone was puzzled, why accidental death? The Arsenic is of the U.S.military for carrying rice seedlings
H Gao.
The professor said:
'The Arsenic is produced in the stomach of the deceased.' The deceased used to take 'Vitamin C' everyday, which in itself is not a problem. The problem was that she ate a large portion of Shrimp/Prawn during dinner. Eating Shrimp/Prawn is not the problem that's why nothing happened to her family even though they took the same Shrimp/Prawn.


However at the same time the deceased also took 'Vitamin C', that's where the problem is!


Researchers at the University of Chicago in the United States , found through experiments, food such as soft-shell Shrimp/Prawn contains a much higher concentration :-
 
Of - Five Potassium Arsenic Compounds.


Such fresh food by itself has no toxic effects on the human body! However, in taking 'Vitamin C', due to the chemical reaction, the original Non-toxic - Five Potassium Arsenic (As Anhydride, also known as Arsenic Oxide, the chemical formula for As205) changed to a Three Potassium Toxic Arsenic (ADB Arsenic Anhydride), also known as Arsenictrioxide, a chemical formula (As203), which is commonly known as Arsenic to the public!


Arsenic poisoning have Magma role and can cause Paralysis to the small blood vessels, "Mercapto Jimei"??, Inhibits the activity of the Liver and Fat necrosis change Hepatic Lobules Centre, Heart, Liver, Kidney,Intestine Congestion, Epithelial Cell Necrosis,Telangiectasia.

Therefore, a person who dies of Arsenic Poisoning will shows signs of BLEEDING FROM  THE....

EARS, NOSE, MOUTH & EYES.


Therefore; as a precautionary measure,

DO  NOT  take ''Shrimp/Prawn'' when taking ''Vitamin C''.


   
After reading this;
     
Please do not be stingy.
   
Forward to your Friends & Family!!!





__._,_.___


[* Moderator's Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[chottala.com] Re: [KHABOR] Gen Ziaur Rahman decided to execute Taher even before the sham trial .......



Dear Mr. Aslam:

 

Assalamua'laikum. Ok, for the sake of argument, I accept your notion that Ziaur Rahman was a cold blooded murderer for killing Col Taher. Then, do you also accept that Shikh Muzibur Rahman was also a cold blooded murderer for killing Siraj Sikdar! I hope you must read or remember when Bongbondhu proclaimed, where Siraj Sikdar after he was assassinated.

 

See, I do not like to write bad things about deceased person. I forgive a person as soon as he/she dies. By doing that, I'm hoping, after I die, some one else also might be forgiving me for my misdeed in this world.  

 

I also see a very bad pattern in our society. If some one is a die hard Bongobondhu supporter, he/she try their best to demonize Ziaur Rahman. And if he/she is a die hard Zia supporter they try the same with Bongobondhu. Though, at times, Zia supporters are less vocal against Bongobondhu.

 

We often forget that both the men did whatever they can for their country. Both the men were patriotic regardless of their short comings. Ironically, both of them also murdered ruthlessly.

 

Let's let their soul to be rest in peace and ask for their mercy to God Almighty. If you really have to write something against them for the sake of historic lesson, pls try not to call any names or give them any title.

 

I always remind myself that what goes around comes around. If I'm hurtful to you, someone else waiting to give me hard time.

 

Life is that simple.

 

Thanks.

Helal

--- On Wed, 3/16/11, Syed_Aslam3 <Syed.Aslam3@gmail.com> wrote:


From: Syed_Aslam3 <Syed.Aslam3@gmail.com>
Subject: [KHABOR] Gen Ziaur Rahman decided to execute Taher even before the sham trial .......
To: khabor@yahoogroups.com, "notun Bangladesh" <notun_bangladesh@yahoogroups.com>, chottala@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, March 16, 2011, 4:00 PM

 
Mr. M.Anwar
Gen Shafiullah has proven himself to be s stupid and inefficient individual
.... but not a cold-blooded killer like Gen. Zia ....[Gen Ziaur Rahman was the planned murderer of Col. Taher. Gen Ziaur Rahman decided to execute Taher even before the sham trial .....Col Taher was put in solitary confinement for around six months before the trial  ........
 
Syed Aslam
 
2011/3/16 Mohiuddin Anwar <mohiuddin@netzero.net>
Mr. Aslam,

 Thanks for all valuable information regardng the killing of Sheikh Mujib.

What was the responsibilty of an Army Chief when an elected President calls him (or order him)to save his life ?
Did he acted according to the rules ?
If he dodn't , why he was not prosecuted for failng to obey the order of an elected President ?
My understanding is that the than Army Chief Gen Shafiullah Zia/Mustaque government offered him Ambassadorship and later Hasina gave him Parliament membership.
Why he was rewarded by both Zia/Mushtaq and later Hasina, What is the secret ?
Can he still be prosecuted by any other government in coming days ?

Sincerely,
M.Anwar
Please note: message attached

From: Syed_Aslam3 <syed.aslam3@gmail.com>
Subject: Re:Bangabandhu Killing : Zia passively involved ...........
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 15:39:30 -0400


____________________________________________________________
Groupon&#8482 Official Site
1 ridiculously huge coupon a day. Get 50-90% off your city&#39;s best!
http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3241/4d81188781f691c4cfbst06duc

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Syed_Aslam3 <syed.aslam3@gmail.com>
To: Khobor <khabor@yahoogroups.com>, notun Bangladesh <notun_bangladesh@yahoogroups.com>, chottala@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 15:39:30 -0400
Subject: Re:Bangabandhu Killing : Zia passively involved ...........
 
Please watch  the YouTube videos:
Conspirators in Mujib Killing:
  

Killer Col. Farook & Col. Rashid's interview:

See more at:
Mr. Mohiuddin Anwar
 
You are asking "Why Shafiullah hesitated/delayed to act to protect the life of the elected President ?  .... if you are right,  it only proves his cowardiceness that bred stupidity and inefficiency (based on the context). It does not implicate him based on the heresy evidence that you are presenting .....
 
Gen Ziaur Rahman decided to execute Taher even before the trial.
Eminent jurist Dr Kamal Hossain yesterday(03/16/2011)  told the high court bench that the trial and execution of Col Taher was illegal and unconstitutional......."It was clearly a murder," Dr. Kamal Hussain said, while making his submission as an amicus curiae (a friend of the court).
DR KAMAL'S SUBMISSION
In his deposition, Dr Kamal said Col Taher was put in solitary confinement for around six months before the trial; he was not even allowed to appoint a lawyer to defend himself.
He added that the "so-called trial" was a shame for the nation, as it was held inside Dhaka Central Jail with heavy machine guns set around it.
Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, the then attorney general, refused to endorse the then government's decision to try Taher inside the jail, the jurist said, adding that Ishtiaq resigned from his post in protest at the decision.
Dr Kamal said it was a shame that the then chief justice Abu Sadat Md Sayem became the chief marshal law administrator, and it was his regime that tried Col Taher, a decorated freedom fighter.
The state machinery was used to try and execute him, Kamal added..
[Daily Star) :
 
 
2011/3/16 Mohiuddin Anwar <mohiuddin@netzero.net>
Who was the Army Chief , Zia or Shafiullah while Sheikh Mujib was killed ?
Why blaming Zia only for this killing leaving Shafiullah untoched ?
Why Shafiullah hesitated/delayed to act to protect the life of the elected President ?
Why Netri Hasina did not take any action against the than Army Chief Shafiullh, What's the secret ?
 


---------- Original Message ----------
From: Syed_Aslam3 <Syed.Aslam3@gmail.com>
To: Khobor <khabor@yahoogroups.com>,  notun Bangladesh <notun_bangladesh@yahoogroups.com>, chottala@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [notun_bangladesh] Bangabandhu Killing : Zia passively involved
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 17:34:28 -0400

 
 
Bangabandhu Killing
Zia passively involved
Lifschultz tells HC, submits written statement on Taher killing
Ashutosh Sarkar

Lawrence Lifschultz
Gen Ziaur Rahman was passively involved in the assassination of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, US journalist and writer Lawrence Lifschultz yesterday told the High Court.

Clik here to read Lifschultz's statement

This has become clear from the conversations with Col Farooq Rahman and Col Abdur Rashid, convicted killers of Bangabandhu, and from the book Bangladesh: A Legacy of Blood written by Anthony Mascarenhas, he said.

He said Ziaur Rahman was in the shadow of the whole episode of August 15, 1975 because he was very much one of the main players of the game.

In reply to a question from the HC, Lifschultz said Ziaur Rahman could have stopped the assassination of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman because he (Zia) knew the plot.

Zia was a complicated man and was the main beneficiary of the assassination, he said, adding, Zia was responsible for killing many freedom fighters including army official Khaled Mosharaf.

The Pulitzer Prize winner who had covered the trial of Col Abu Taher in 1976 placed his statement before the HC bench of Justice AHM Shamsuddin Chowdhury Manik and Justice Sheikh Md Zakir Hossain.

The bench is hearing a writ petition that challenged the martial law regulation under which the military tribunal was formed and Taher was sentenced to death.

Earlier on January 20, the HC bench requested Lifschultz to appear before it to place a statement on the trial and execution of Taher.

Lifschultz on January 31 sent a written statement to the HC bench through the Attorney General's Office saying that Gen Ziaur Rahman made the decision of Col Abu Taher's execution before formation of the military tribunal that gave the execution order.

Gen Manzur, then high-ranked military officer, knew with absolute certainty that Zia had decided to have Taher hanged before the "so-called trial" began, Lifschultz said in the statement.

"Subsequently, this fact was also confirmed to me by two high-ranking military officers, who were close to Zia at that time," he said in his January 31 statement, which was placed before the HC bench on February 3.

Lifschultz yesterday appeared before the same HC bench around 2:30pm and placed a written and a verbal statement before it.

He said the trial of Col Taher was not even a show-trial since it had no projection or demonstration.

There existed a "Special Military Tribunal No 1" which convened at the Dhaka Central Jail. "I was there. I stood outside the prison. I watched men, like Colonel Yusuf Haider, the so-called Tribunal's chairman, walk through the prison gates," he said in the written statement.

It was a premeditated assassination of which Ziaur Rahman was the assailant, Lawrence Lifschultz who arrived in Dhaka on March 12 told the court.

Although Zia had convened a meeting of the generals returned from Pakistan as Moudud Ahmed stated in a book, the decision to kill Taher was taken exclusively by Zia, he said, adding that he (Zia) had convened that meeting only to pretend that those generals had involvement in killing Taher.

"Moudud Ahmed claimed that Ziaur Rahman had convened a gathering of 46 "repatriated" officers to discuss the sentence that should be passed on Taher. It was well known that not a single officer who had participated in the Liberation War was willing to serve on Special Military Tribunal No 1. But General Zia's special convocation of repatriates appears to have ended with unanimous decision. They wanted Taher to hang," his written statement said.

"Moudud claims his source for this story was General Zia himself. In this respect, Moudud's version of events tallies with what General Manzur claimed to me regarding General Zia having personally taken the decision on what the verdict would be. One man, Ziaur Rahman, decided, on his own, to take another's life. He then asked a group of about fifty officers to endorse his decision," he stated.

The US journalist said he had tried to go inside the so-called court but was not allowed.

"I had tried to meet Ziaur Rahman many times for taking an interview from him, but he did not allow me to do so," he said, adding that he was expelled from Bangladesh at that time.

Replying to another question from the HC, Lifschultz said he could not term it as anything other than assassination, as Syed Badrul Ahsan, a journalist of The Daily Star, stated in 2006 that it was purely and simply a murder.

"Syed Badrul Ahsan has called the Taher case 'murder pure and simple'. In an article published in July 2006, Ahsan writes: 'When he (Lifschultz) speaks of Colonel Taher and the macabre manner of his murder (it was murder pure and simple) in July 1976, he revives within our souls all the pains we have either carefully pushed under the rug all these years or have been allowed to feel through the long march of untruth in this country,' according to the statement.

Zia decided to kill Taher as he wanted to appease the army officers repatriated from Pakistan and also consolidate the grief on power.

Taher wanted to return democracy in the country, but Zia wanted to rule the country as a dictator, he said.

Lifschultz said it was one of the saddest human rights violations in the whole of Asia.

He said he had been trying to get the whole truth for so many years and he was happy that he was now in a position to disclose whatever information he had before the HC.

The court will resume the hearing today.

Attorney General Mahbubey Alam and Additional Attorney General also appeared before the court.

 
 

 
কর্নেল তাহেরকে বিচারের নামে হত্যা করা হয়েছে

 
জিয়াই ছিলেন এই পরিকল্পনার নায়ক

আদালতে মার্কিন সাংবাদিক লিফশুলজ

০০ ইত্তেফাক রিপোর্ট

সামরিক আদালতে কর্নেল (অব.) তাহেরের বিচার প্রসঙ্গে প্রখ্যাত মার্কিন সাংবাদিক লরেন্স লিফশুলজ বলেছেন, ওটা কোন বিচার ছিলো না। তথাকথিত বিচারের নামে মুক্তিযুদ্ধের অন্যতম সেক্টর কমান্ডার কর্নেল (অব.) আবু তাহের বীর উত্তমকে পূর্ব-পরিকল্পিতভাবে হত্যা করা হয়েছে। আর এই পরিকল্পনার নায়ক ছিলেন তৎকালীন সেনা শাসক মেজর জেনারেল জিয়াউর রহমান। তিনি আরো বলেন, জিয়া মনে করতেন কর্নেল তাহের তার পথে বড় বাধা। এ কারণে তাকে তথাকথিত বিচারের নামে ফাঁসিতে ঝুলানো হয়। কর্নেল তাহেরের গোপন বিচারের বৈধতা চ্যালেঞ্জ করে দায়ের করা রিট আবেদনের শুনানিতে তিনি এ কথা বলেন। বিচারপতি এ এইচ এম শামসুদ্দিন চৌধুরী ও বিচারপতি শেখ মো. জাকির হোসেনকে নিয়ে গঠিত হাইকোর্টের ডিভিশন বেঞ্চে তিনি গতকাল সোমবার দীর্ঘক্ষণ বক্তব্য রাখেন। আদালত তাকে বিভিন্ন বিষয়ে জিজ্ঞাসা করলে তার উত্তর দেন লিফশুলজ।

লরেন্স লিফশুলজ পেশায় লেখক ও সাংবাদিক। বর্তমানে তিনি যুক্তরাষ্ট্রের কানেকটিকাটে বসবাস করছেন। ১৯৭৬ সালে তিনি ফার ইস্টার্ন ইকনোমিক রিভিউ পত্রিকার দক্ষিণ এশীয় প্রতিনিধি ছিলেন। ১৯৭৬ সালে গোপন সামরিক আদালতে কর্নেল তাহের ও তার সঙ্গীদের বিচার হয়। ওই বছরের ১৭ জুলাই দেয়া রায়ে কর্নেল তাহেরের ফাঁসি ও অন্য ১৭ জনকে বিভিন্ন মেয়াদে সাজা হয়। ২১ জুলাই কর্নেল তাহেরের ফাঁসি কার্যকর করা হয়। ওই বিচার চলাকালে পেশাগত দায়িত্ব পালনে বাংলাদেশে এসেছিলেন লরেন্স লিফশুলজ। কিন্তু তিনি বিচারকাজ প্রত্যক্ষ করতে পারেননি। ঢাকা কেন্দ্রীয় কারাগারের সামনে থেকে তাকে আটক করা হয় এবং পরে বাংলাদেশ থেকে বহিষ্কার করা হয়। পরবতর্ীকালে 'কর্নেল তাহের : অসমাপ্ত বিপস্নব' -এ শিরোনামে তার একটি গ্রন্থ রয়েছে যা বাংলাদেশ ও যুক্তরাষ্ট্র থেকে একযোগে প্রকাশিত হয়েছে।

তাহেরের গোপন বিচারের বৈধতা নিয়ে তার সহোদর ঢাকা বিশ্ববিদ্যালয়ের শিক্ষক অধ্যাপক ড. আনোয়ার হোসেন, তাহেরের স্ত্রী লুৎফা তাহের গত বছরের ২৩ আগাস্ট হাইকোর্টে রিট আবেদন দায়ের করেন। এ নিয়ে হাইকোর্ট রুল জারি করেছিল। গত ২০ জানুয়ারি ওই রিটের শুনানিকালে হাইকোর্ট লরেন্স লিফশুলজকে হাজির হয়ে বক্তব্য দেয়ার অনুরোধ জানায়। তবে দুর্ঘটনায় সন্তান আহত হওয়ার কারণে লিফশুলজ বাংলাদেশে আসতে পারেননি। তিনি তার লিখিত বক্তব্য ই-মেইলের মাধ্যমে পাঠান। সেই বক্তব্য আদালতে দাখিল করা হয়। গতকাল স্বেচ্ছায় আদালতে হাজির হয়ে ওই বক্তব্যের ধারাবাহিকতায় তিনি আরো একটি লিখিত জবানবন্দি আদালতে উপস্থাপন করেন। এ সময় তার সঙ্গে ছিলেন এটর্নি জেনারেল এডভোকেট মাহবুবে আলম, অতিরিক্ত এটর্নি জেনারেল এডভোকেট এম কে রহমান প্রমুখ।

জবানবন্দিতে লরেন্স লিফশুলজ বলেন, এ দিনটির জন্য আমি দীর্ঘ ৩৫ বছর অপেক্ষায় করেছি। গত সপ্তাহে তাহেরের মেয়ে জয়া আমাকে বলেছে, ' এই মুহূর্তটির জন্য আমি আমার সারা জীবন অপেক্ষা করেছি।'

তার বাবা যখন মারা যান, তখন জয়ার বয়স ছিল পাঁচ বছর। লিফশুলজ আদালতকে উদ্দেশ করে বলেন, আপনি দেখতেই পাচ্ছেন, সারা জীবন অপেক্ষার পর অনেকেই আপনার কাছে আসছেন বিচারের জন্য।

লিফশুলজ বলেন, আমি বিশ্বাস করি না যা ঘটেছে তাকে 'বিচার' বলা যায়। এমনকি এটা 'লোক দেখানো বিচারও' নয়। কারণ সামরিক সরকার এটা দেখানোরও পক্ষপাতী ছিল না। আমি আমার আগের এফিডেভিটে বর্ণনা করেছি, আমি কিভাবে তৎকালীন চিফ অফ জেনারেল স্টাফ জেনারেল মঞ্জুরের সঙ্গে দেখা করেছি। স্পেশাল ট্রাইবু্যনাল গঠনের এক মাস আগে আমি তার অফিসে তার সঙ্গে দেখা করি। অনেক বছর আগ থেকে আমি মঞ্জুরকে চিনতাম। আমি ব্যাখ্যা করেছি কিভাবে জেনারেল মঞ্জুর তাহেরের কথিত বিচারের বিরোধিতা করেছিলেন। কর্নেল তাহেরের ফাঁসি কার্যকর করার পর জেনারেল মঞ্জুর ব্রিটেনে লোক পাঠিয়েছিলেন আমার সঙ্গে দেখা করার জন্য। তিনি আমাকে জানাতে চেয়েছিলেন জেনারেল জিয়া ব্যক্তিগতভাবে তাহেরের ফাঁসি কার্যকর করার সিদ্ধান্ত নিয়েছিলেন। বিএনপির বর্তমান স্থায়ী কমিটির সদস্য ব্যারিস্টার মওদুদ আহমদের একটি লেখা প্রসঙ্গেও কথা বলেন লরেন্স লিফশুলজ। তিনি বলেন, "মওদুদ আহমদকে আমি তরুণ মানবাধিকার আইনজীবী হিসাবে চিনতাম। কিন্তু তিনি আদর্শ থেকে অনেকদূর সরে গেছেন। ক্ষমতার যাত্রাপথে এটা কোন বিরল ঘটনা নয়। মওদুদ আহমদ দাবি করেছেন, 'তাহেরের সাজার ব্যাপারে জিয়াউর রহমান ৪৬ জন সেনা কর্মকর্তার মতামত নিয়েছিলেন।' এটা সবারই জানা, একজন মুক্তিযোদ্ধা অফিসারও ওই ট্রাইবু্যনালের সঙ্গে যুক্ত ছিলেন না। মওদুদ আহমদ দাবি করেছেন, 'তার এ বক্তব্যের সূত্র জিয়া নিজে।' তবে জেনারেল মঞ্জুর আমাকে বলেছেন, জিয়া ব্যক্তিগতভাবেই সিদ্ধান্ত নিয়েছিলেন তাহেরের বিচারের রায়ের ব্যাপারে। জিয়াউর রহমান নিজেই সিদ্ধান্ত নিয়েছিলেন, আরেক জনের জীবন কেড়ে নেয়ার। এটা সম্পর্কে আমরা কি বলতে পারি? এটাকে কি আইনি পন্থা বলা যায়? সামরিক শাসকরা নিজেরাই নিজেদের আইন লেখেন।'

লরেন্স লিফশুলজ বলেন, ১৯৭৬ সালে গোপন বিচারের নামে কারা অভ্যন্তরে যা ঘটেছে তা জিয়াউর রহমানের পরিকল্পনা অনুযায়ীই ঘটেছে। তিনি বলেন, 'সিদ্ধান্ত ছিল জিয়ার নিজেরই। এর সঙ্গে সেনাবাহিনীর কেউ জড়িত ছিলেন- এমনটি আমি মনে করি না।' লিফশুলজ বলেন, 'সেটা কোন বিচার ছিলো না। যদি এটা বিচার হতো তবে কেন তা কোর্টে হলো না। কেন এটা কারা অভ্যন্তরে হলো? কোন ধরনের বিচার কারাগারে হয়? সেক্ষেত্রে আমার উত্তর হচ্ছে, যে বিচার কোন বিচার নয়, সেটাই কারাগারে হয়।' তিনি আরো বলেন, 'তাহেরের সঙ্গে যাদের বিচার করা হয়েছে তাদেরকেও পযর্াপ্ত আইনি অধিকার থেকে বঞ্চিত করা হয়েছে। বাংলাদেশের সংবিধান অনুযায়ী তাদের মৌলিক অধিকার লংঘিত হয়েছে। বিচারটি অবৈধ উপায়ে হয়েছে এবং অবৈধ উপায়ে অত্যন্ত গোপনীয়তার সঙ্গে তা সম্পন্ন হয়েছে। সে বিচারের কোন আইনগত ভিত্তি ছিলো না। এটি হয়েছে কারাগারের অভ্যন্তরে। যেখানে সংবাদ মাধ্যমকে বাইরে রাখা হয়েছে। যাতে এই অবিচারের কারণে জনগণের ক্ষোভ প্রকাশিত না হয়। সাংবাদিকদের হুমকি দেয়া এবং দেশের বাইরে পাঠিয়ে দেয়া হয়েছে।'

লিফশুলজ বলেন, 'কর্নেল তাহেরের মেয়ে জয়া তার পিতার হত্যাকাণ্ডকে বর্ণনা করেছে গুপ্তহত্যা হিসাবে। বিশেষ ট্রাইবু্যনাল-১ ছিল কলাকৌশল (ম্যাকানিজম) যার মাধ্যমে গুপ্ত হত্যা কার্যকর করা হয়। বদরুল হায়দার তার লেখায় তাহেরের বিচারকে বর্ণনা করেছেন 'হত্যাকাণ্ড' হিসাবে। ২০০৬ সালের ওই লেখায় তিনি মিথ্যার দীর্ঘযাত্রা সম্পর্কে বলেছেন, 'পাঁচ বছর আগের রাষ্ট্রব্যবস্থা সম্পর্কে তার বক্তব্য সঠিক ছিল।' যদিও এখন নতুন যুগের উন্মোচন ঘটেছে। সুপ্রিম কোর্ট পঞ্চম ও সপ্তম সংশোধনীকে অবৈধ ঘোষণা করেছে। আদালত এ সমাজের অবিচ্ছেদ্য অংশ এবং এটা পরিবর্তনের উপাদান।'

তিনি আরো বলেন, 'সুপ্রিম কোর্টের জন্য এটা চ্যালেঞ্জ যে, এ ব্যাপারে সিদ্ধান্ত নেয়া বিশেষ ট্রাইবু্যনাল-১ এর কার্যক্রমের কোন আইনি বৈধতা ছিল কি না? কারণ ওই ট্রাইবু্যনাল গঠনের পূর্বেই তাহেরকে ফাঁসিতে ঝোলানোর সিদ্ধান্ত নেয়া হয়। বিচারের নামে জোরপূর্বক এক সাজানো নাটক মঞ্চায়ন করা হয়। কারণ বিশেষ ট্রাইবু্যনাল-১ একবারই গঠিত হয়েছিলো। তারা আর কোন বিচার কার্যক্রম পরিচালনা করেনি। বাস্তবে এই ট্রাইবু্যনাল ছিলো অবৈধ ও অসাংবিধানিক একটি আদালত। যার উদ্দেশ্য ছিলো বিচারের নামে হত্যাকাণ্ড ঘটানো।

তিনি বলেন, 'দশ দিন পূর্বে তাহেরের কন্যা জয়া আমাকে লিখেছে, সে এখন তীব্রভাবে রায়ের জন্য অপেক্ষা করছে। যদিও এ রায় তার (জয়া) বাবাকে ফিরিয়ে দেবে না। কিন্তু এটা এ ধরনের হত্যাকাণ্ডের সমাপ্তির ঘটনা, যা তার এবং তার দুই ভাইয়ের কাছ থেকে এত কম বয়সে তার বাবাকে কেড়ে নিয়েছিল। হাইকোর্টের রায় কর্নেল তাহেরের শুভাকাঙ্ক্ষীদের মনে কিছুটা প্রশান্তি দেবে।'

লিখিত বক্তব্যশেষে আদালতের বিভিন্ন প্রশ্নের জবাব দেন লরেন্স লিফশুলজ। তিনি বলেন, রাজনৈতিক উপাদান থাকাতেই তাহের মামলার সংবাদ সংগ্রহে আগ্রহী হয়েছিলেন তিনি। জিয়াউর রহমানের পূর্ব পরিকল্পনাতেই কর্নেল তাহেরের ফাঁসি হয়। এ হত্যাকাণ্ডের জন্য দায়ী একজনের নাম বলতে হলে জিয়াউর রহমানের নামই বলবেন তিনি। বিচারের আগেই তিনি তাহেরের ফাঁসি কার্যকর করার সিদ্ধান্ত নিয়েছিলেন। তবে বঙ্গবন্ধু হত্যাকাণ্ডে জিয়াউর রহমান প্রত্যক্ষ বা পরোক্ষভাবে জড়িত ছিলেন কি না-এমন প্রশ্নের স্পষ্ট কোন জবাব দেননি তিনি।

৭৫'র পরবতর্ী ঘটনার নেপথ্যে

ছিলেন জিয়া ঃ লিফশুলজ

বেলা ১১টার দিকে অতিরিক্ত এটর্নি জেনারেল এডভোকেট এম কে রহমানের কক্ষে সাংবাদিকদের সঙ্গে আলাপকালে লরেন্স লিফশুলজ বলেন, ১৯৭৫ সালে বঙ্গবন্ধুকে সপরিবারে হত্যার পরবর্তী ঘটনার নেপথ্যে ছিলেন জিয়াউর রহমান। ক্ষমতা কুক্ষিগত করা এবং স্বৈরতান্ত্রিক শাসন প্রক্রিয়ায় তিনি কর্নেল তাহেরকে ফাঁসি দেয়ার মতো ঘটনাও ঘটান। তিনি বলেন, জিয়ার সঙ্গে মোশতাক, ফারুক ও রশীদ গংদের যোগসূত্র ছিল। তবে জিয়া কখনো পাদপ্রদীপের আলোয় আসেননি। তিনি বলেন, লন্ডনে আমাকে দেয়া এক সাক্ষাৎ্কারে রশীদ বলেছিলেন, ১৫ আগস্ট হত্যাকাণ্ডের আগে জিয়ার সঙ্গে তাঁদের যোগাযোগ ছিল। নেপথ্যে থেকেই তিনি তাদের সমর্থন যোগাচ্ছিলেন। এমনকি সেনাবাহিনী যাতে তা প্রতিরোধ করতে এগিয়ে না আসে, সে ব্যাপারেও তৎপর ছিলেন তিনি। এরপর জিয়া ৭ নভেম্বর স্বরূপে আবির্ভূত হন। তিনি বলেন, কর্নেল তাহেরের গোপন বিচার নিয়ে করা মামলাটি ঐতিহাসিক। নতুন প্রজন্মের এ বিষয়ে জানার আগ্রহ আছে। আমার প্রশ্ন, দীর্ঘ ৩৫ বছর ধরে কেন এ ঘটনার বিচার হলো না?

সাংবাদিকদের সঙ্গে আলাপের এক পযর্ায়ে লিফশুলজের সঙ্গে দেখা করতে আসেন জাসদ সভাপতি হাসানুল হক ইনু এমপি, ড. আনোয়ার হোসেন, লুৎফা তাহের প্রমুখ। দুপুর সোয়া দুইটায় লরেন্স লিফশুলজকে নিয়ে হাইকোর্টের সংশিস্নষ্ট বেঞ্চে হাজির হন এটর্নি জেনারেল এডভোকেট মাহবুবে আলম ও অতিরিক্ত এটর্নি জেনারেল এডভোকেট এম কে রহমান।
 
 Janakantha:

 

 Samakal:
 
YouTube videos:
 
Conspirators in Mujib Killing:
 
 
 
 
 





__._,_.___


[* Moderator�s Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[chottala.com] Behind the Myth of 3 million




Behind the Myth of 3 million - Chapter- I: The Making of The Myth   
ePublication
Written by Dr. M. Abdul Mu'min Chowdhury   
Thursday, 01 February 1996 00:00
Article Index
Behind the Myth of 3 million
Chapter- I: The Making of The Myth
Chapter - II: The Probity of the Myth
Chapter - III: Mujib's Search for Fact
Chapter - IV: The Truth that Mujib Suppressed
Chapter - V: The Recycling of the Myth
Chapter - VI: The Forgotten Humanity
Chapter - VII: The Glimpses of Truth
Chapter - VIII: Behind the Myth
All Pages

Page 2 of 9
1.1. A Belated Bust-up:
In May 1973, Abdul Gaffar Choudhury, a well known newspaper columnist and close associate of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, said: 'We are now saying three million Bengali's have been martyred. Without any survey we are telling three million Bengali's have died.' [1] After openly raising doubts about the alleged figure, Choudhury left Bangladesh for good for Britain.

It took another twenty years for the question to be raised again. Participating in a debate in the National Assembly of Bangladesh on 15 June 1993, Col. Akbar Hussain, a decorated 'Mukti Juddha' and a Cabinet Minister under both General Ziaur Rahman and Mrs Khaleda Zia, returned to the question. Making a pointed attack on the Awami League for its 'propensity to falsify history', he said that the Awami League had created the myth of 'three million killed', whereas in reality it was closer to a tenth of that figure. On the following day Shudhangshu Shekar Haldar, a Hindu member of Awami League, challenged Col. Hussain to substantiate his assertion with 'recorded proof'. Responding to the challenge, the Minister told the National Assembly that after the creation of Bangladesh an announcement was made to pay Tk. 2,000 to every family that suffered loss of life where upon only three hundred thousand families had claimed such compensation. Had there been three million individuals dead, their families would have claimed for compensation. Poignantly, Haldar could not, and did not, challenge the figure of those actually claimed compensation. Nor could he give any satisfactory explanation for the missing two million seven hundred thousand. Instead, he began inquiring as to what could have prompted the Minister to question' a well-known fact'.

The tactic was "a clear one: if you cannot 'kill' the message, 'kill' the messenger. Having done that however, he requested the presiding Deputy Speaker to expunge Col. Hussain's remarks from the proceedings of the Assembly. At this point Abdus Samad Azad, standing in for the Awami League leader, stood up and spoke in support of his party colleague's demand for the effacement of the remarks. His argument was: 'So far no one, including General Ziaur Rahman, has challenged the figure of three million. We had it from our leader Sheikh Mujib and it must stand as correct'. [2]

1.2. Mujib's Part in the Myth Making:
Indeed, it was Mujib's stamp of approval which gave the oft quoted number both its life and respectability. On 10 January 1972, the very day of his return to Bangladesh from prison in West Pakistan, he publicly announced:

..... "Three million people have been killed. I believe that there is no parallel in the history of the world of such a colossal loss of lives for the struggle for freedom." [3]

He repeated the same charge before the world in a television interview given to the British broadcaster David Frost. In the same interview, which was recorded at his private residence in Dhaka and was broadcasted from New York on 18 January 1972, he also made the astounding claim that the very house in which the interview was taking place had been destroyed by the Pakistani Army! [4] A day earlier the Time Magazine quoted Mujib saying,

'if Hitler could have been alive today he would be ashamed' [5]

During the following weeks and months, his insistence on the three million figure grew and it became his all-purpose 'opening song'. Let me give an example.

"The vice-secretary asked me to sit in the corridor crowded with at least 50 persons. He then walked into the office and informed Mujib of my presence. I heard a terrible growl and the poor man reappeared shaken, asking me to wait. I waited. One hour, two hours, three hours, four hours, then at eight o'clock I was still there in that damned corridor. At 8-30 a miracle occurred: Mujib was ready to receive me. I was asked to enter. I entered into a large room with a sofa and two armchairs. Mujib was sprawled all over the sofa and two fat ministers were seated in the armchairs with their bellies in the air. No one rose. No one made a greeting and no one responded to mine. There was a very long silence until Mujib gestured to me to sit down. I sat on a small corner of the sofa and opened up the tape recorder preparing the first question. But, I didn't have time for that. Mujib started to shout: 'Hurry up, quick, understand?' 'I have no time to waste, is that clear?' 'The Pakistanis have killed three million people, is that clear? Yes, three, three, three.' (How he arrived at that figure, I'll never understand. The Indians speaking of the victims have never gone over the one million figure). I said: 'Mr Prime Minister...' Mujib started to shout again: 'They killed my women in front of their husbands and children, the husbands in front of their sons and wives, the sons in front of their fathers and mothers, the nephews before their grandfathers and grandmothers, the grandfathers and grandmothers in front of their nephews, cousins in front of cousins, aunts in front of uncles, brother-in-law in front of sister-in-law .. . 'Mr Prime Minister, I would like .. .' 'Listen to her, she would like! She would like. You have no right to want anything, understand? Is that clear?"

This is the account of the well-known Italian journalist Oriana Fallaci's interview with Mujib. [6]

Yet, only on 8 January 1972 in London, on his way back to Bangladesh, the same Mujib had claimed that 'one million people had been killed in Bangladesh.' [7] One might wonder who updated the figure for Mujib? Was it done between his journey from London to Dhaka, via New Delhi or immediately after his arrival in Dhaka? It has been claimed by one of the 'involved' Indian organisers of the 'Freedom Movement' that 'By and by he [Mujib] came to know more details and later in Dacca he put the figure at 3.5 million' .[8] Since Mujib focussed on three million, rather than on his long time benefactor's averred three and a half million, one might think he was still hesitant to paddle out everything his 'involved' benefactors were handing him out. But, where did he get this figure form?

1.3. The Myth Makers at Work:
However inventive Mujib was with facts and however insistent he became with the fiction of 'three million killed' and 'three hundred thousand raped', as we shall see he himself did not fabricate it. He simply parroted in public, what was given to him in private. In fact, the figure which he was eventually handed out, went through several updates at the hands of a number of involved quarters.

1.4. The Swadhin Bangla Betar:
Up to 10 December 1971, Mujib's own Awami League colleagues, few of whom ever ventured out to face the Pakistan Army and most of whom had reportedly spent their Indian sojourn in enjoyment with their friends and families [9] had been circulating an estimated casualty figure of three hundred thousand, through the 'Swadhin Bangla Betar'. [10] Even years later his party Vice President, Zahirul Qayyum, would implicitly contest the myth of three million by pointing to this estimate broadcasted by the official organ of the Bangladesh Government in exile.[II]

1.5. Indian Authorities:
Yet, on 7 January 1972 the Press Trust of India, quoting Sheikh Abdul Aziz, the newly appointed Communication Minister of Bangladesh [12], reported from Calcutta a casualty figure of over one million. However, the news communicated by the Indian national news agency stressed that the casualty toll was a provisional one and disclosed that the Government of Bangladesh was going to collect statistics in order to obtain the actual figure. Apparently, to give some credibility to the Minister's newly updated estimate, he was quoted as saying that in his own village the Pakistan Army had killed 107 persons. [13] There was no explanation as to how the estimated death toll rose by three-fold in a matter of three weeks, during most of which the 'culprit' Pakistan Army had been under Indian custody.

To be fair to the Minister, this figure of one million killed was floating around from the beginning of the insurgency. One Asad Choudhury wrote a poem, called 'Report 1971' at the start of the insurgency. In it he told his readers that the Pakistani Army had, by then, massacred one million Bengalis and have raped forty thousand women. [14] Likewise, on 24 June 1972 the 'Swadhin Bangla Betar' broadcasted a speech, supposedly written by Maulana Bhashani, which, inter alia, claimed that 'after sacrificing one million invaluable lives, the struggling masses of independent Bengal would not accept any thing else. Their only road is either full independence or death.' [15] But, one might still want to know, why the Minister suddenly found this preferable over the 'Swadhin Bangla Betar's' hitherto 'official' figure of three hundred thousand?

In this connection, it is to be noted that the Indian authorities, including India's military establishment, have consistently maintained that so far as they were concerned the casualty figure stood at one million. What is more interesting, M.R.Akhtar Mukul, who as the head of the' Swadhin Bangla Betar' and the presenter of its best known programme 'Charampatra' (Dire Letter) had been regularly disseminating out the three hundred thousand figure up to 10 December 1971, in his book of recollection 'Ami Bijoy Dekhechi' (I Have Seen Victory) he piously authenticated the one million casualty toll without ever mentioning his old vaunted death toll. [16] Those who are familiar with Mukul' s professed willingness to lie for facilitating Indian cover-ups [17] would not be surprised at his volte face. Nor would they doubt that like Mukul, Sheikh Abdul Aziz was also made to endorse the figure deemed appropriate for the occasion by the Indian authorities.

In his reminiscence Field Marshall Sam Manekshaw simply presented the figure as a 'well-known fact' and expressed utter incredulity at the figure of three million with which Mujib's name became inextricably linked. [18] Likewise, in a mass produced video interview Lt Gen. Jagjit Singh Aurora said that 'all of us knew' that the Pakistan Army had brutally killed 'about a million people'; yet Sheikh Mujib who 'was more an agitator and less an administrator' decided to 'make it more brutish' by saying that the Pakistan Army had killed three million Bengalis. He pointed out that Mujib's figure was 'absolutely impossible', because the Pakistan Army had 'simultaneously fought within the country and at the borders'. [19] Earlier, Maj.Gen.D.K.Palit, who also had a hand in 'the birth of Bangladesh engineered by the Indian Army', gave the same one million figure as if it was an indubitable fact which required no supporting proof. [20] Despite Palit's stance, one should heed the significance of the fact that neither Manekshaw nor Aurora have vouched for the authenticity of the Indian figure beyond that it was a 'well-known fact' or some how 'known to us'.

The 'absolutely impossible' figure of three million to which Mujib publicly tied up his own name was not absolutely his own invention. The 'credit' for its fabrication was due to one Ehtesham Haider Choudhury, editor of the Dhaka daily Purbadesh and his Russian friend, the Pravda representative in Dhaka.

1.6. The Purbadesh/Pravda/ENA:
In a signed editorial under the heading of 'Hang the Yahya Junta' on the 22 December 1971 issue of the Purbadesh, Choudhury claimed that the 'enemy occupation forces have savagely killed about three million innocent people and more than two hundred intellectuals'. [21] Curiously enough, only on the previous day the same daily printed an eight column red coloured banner heading, asking: 'How many people of Bengal have been killed?' In it Ershad Majumdar, the paper's senior reporter, categorically said that 'every where people are asking: How many people of Bangladesh have been killed? How many 'lakhs' (unit of hundred thousand)? 10,20,30,40 or 50 lakhs? No one seems to have the answer. But the people are not likely to leave the question unanswered. Answer we must have.' [22]

Within days the Pravda printed a news claiming that over three million people have been killed by the Pakistan Army. The Soviet daily carried the news without mentioning the Purbadesh editorial. The report was credited to its Special Correspondent. ENA, the Bangladesh news agency, lifted the Pravda news and reproduced it in all major Dhaka dailies under the beading: 'Pak Army Killed Over 30 Lakh People'. Now it read

"The Communist Party Newspaper Pravda has reported that over 30 lakh persons were killed throughout Bangladesh by the Pakistani occupation forces during the last nine months, reports ENA.

Quoting its Special Correspondent stationed in Dacca, the paper said that the Pakistani military forces immediately before their surrender to Mukti Bahinis and the Allied Forces had killed about 800 intellectuals in the capital city of Bangladesh alone.[23]

The change from 'less than three million' of the Purbadesh editor into 'over three million' is to be marked. The effortless four-fold increase in the number of intellectuals allegedly killed is also to be noticed. We may also keep in mind Jyoti Sen Gupta's false claim regarding Mujib's announcement that 3.5 million people have been killed.

1.7. How Mujib Took to Parroting the Last Figure:
It was reported that on his arrival in Dhaka on 10 January 1972 the lobby behind the fabrication of the 'absolutely impossible' figure promptly briefed the returning Bangladesh leader with the added 'fact' of three hundred thousand women raped, who in turn immediately went on parroting it. [24] Thus, the self-serving fiction of 'three million killed' and 'three hundred thousand women raped' was created.


Notes and References
1. Abdul Gaffar Choudhury, Shahosh Kare Kichu Shaythay Katha Bala Proyjan, (With Courage a Few Truth Have to be Said), The Dainik Janapad, Dhaka, 20 May 1973
2. Cf. The Proceedings of the National Assembly of Bangladesh, 15 and 16 June, 1993.
3. Ramendu Majumdar, Bangladesh My Bangladesh': Selected Speeches and Statements, Muktadhara. 74 Farashganj, Dhaka - 1, 1972: 140
4. Cf. M.R.Akhtar Mukul, Ami Vijoy Dekhechi (I Have Seen Victory), Sagar Publications, GPO Box 3057, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 1391 BS (1984): 245.
5. Time Magazine, NewYork, 17 January 1972.
6. Oriana Fallaci, An Interview with Mujibur Rahman, L' Europeo, Rome, 24 February, 1972. [cf.' Text in Appendix - I]
7. Jyoti Sen Gupta, History of Freedom Movement in Bangladesh, 1947-73: Some Involvement, Naya Prokash, 206 Bidhan Sarani, Calcutta - 6, 1974: 445
8. Jyoti Sen Gupta, ibid .: 445
9. Abdul Gaffar Choudhury, op cit.
10. Yahya Mirza, Interview with Mr.Abdul Muhaimin, The Tarokalok, 1 March, 1990; and Jauhuri, Tirish Lakher Telesmat (The Riddle of Thirty Lakh), Asha Prokashani, 435 Elephant Road, Dhaka - 1217, 1994: 48.
11. Jauhuri, ibid: 48-49
12. Four new ministers were added to the five-men Government which in existence in Calcutta since April, 1971. The new appointments were made on 29 December 1971
13. Jauhuri, op cit: 63-64
14. M.R.Akhtar Mukul, op cit: 95
15. ibid: 95
16. ibid: 376
17. Manzurul Karim , Betorkito Mujib (The Controversial Mujib)
18. ibid::
19. Lt.Gen Jagjit Singh Aurora, Reminiscences of Bangladesh War (video interview), Mass Communication Research Centre, Jamia Millia Islamia, Delhi, 1994.
20. Maj.Gen. Palit, The Lightning Campaign: The Indo-Pakistan War 1971, Compton Press, Salisbury, 1972: 24
21. The Purbadesh, Dhaka, 22 December 1971.
22. The Purbadesh, Dhaka, 21 December 1971
23. The Bangladesh Observer, Dhaka, 5 January, 1972.

 


 Reply Reply to all Forward



__._,_.___


[* Moderator's Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[chottala.com] Re: [Diagnose] BD concedes Transit Corridor to India?



Dear Mr. Turkman
 
You do not need to be circustic .since I do not know in depth knowledge of the bilateral agreement between India and Bangladesh,  I must not get into the arguments. But the fact remains, India is our neighbor and believe to be a good friend. We share same values and more or less same culture..We both need to help each others for its development and welfare of its citizens. We must keep good relation with India and at the same time with other countries. As far as transit and 1 billion dollar assistance, anything fair and reasonable, beneficial for both nation, we must not be negative at all times. 
 
Just hope for the best .
 
Dilawar Hossain
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: S Turkman
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 12:19 AM
Subject: [Diagnose] BD concedes Transit Corridor to India?

 

Oh please forgive me. I had no idea we are at war with Kaafir India just like Pakistan has been since 1948 and had no idea that BD should not have any kind of dealings with our Enemy India. How could I be so treasonous?
Lets talk with Pakistan and declare war at India simultaneously to conquer it ...!


From: Khoka Mia <akhoka786@yahoo.com>



Mr. Turkman, why it is always that you are fanatically in support of India's interest? Are you an India promoter? What is your share in this deal, will you tell us? If you are brave enough why don't you list all the unsettled issues between Bangladesh and India; and don't forget to add on the list the diversion of all surface water by India, building dams on transboundary rivers.
All the issues brought to light by Zoglul Husain is absolutely correct. These are legitimate concern and poses threat to the existence of Bangladesh as an independent and sovereign nation.
What Bangladesh is getting except the perpetuity assurance of the present government? The present government is buying perpetuity to a tutelage government under India by selling the interest of Bangladesh.
 
-Bangladeshi 

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: "S Turkman" <turkman@sbcglobal.net>


   


Look at Iran ...!
* She is at fault in making money through Bandar Abbas port also because it is providing Transit Corridor to Russia, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan and all Central Asian States 2 decades ago.
Iran is so stupid that 2 decades ago, she spent billions to build a Highway connecting that port of Ashkhabad, Turkmenistan and also built a Railway Line going through whole length of the country from that port to connect with old USSR Railway System northeast of her.
What a stupid country ...!
* And then, there is a stupid country, Germany that conceded Transit to Soviet Natural Gas Pipe Line in 1970's to let her Gas be sold to almost all countries in Continental Europe despite US Opposition.
USA is a stupid country. She had also conceded transit of Natural Gas Pipe line to Canada going through whole north-south length of it going to Mexico.
* Pakistan is another example of such stupid concession. She has conceded transit to Iranian Gas Pipe Line despite US Opposition, going to India and our stupid Enemy, India has conceded Transit of that Pipe line to BD after it reaches her. 
What can we do?
This world is full of stupid countries like BD.
.
S U Turkman

--- In reform-bd@yahoogroups.com, Zoglul Husain <zoglul@...> wrote:
>
>
> Equipment from India arrives
>
> http://www.thedailystar.net/story.php?nid=177610

> Comment: We are totally opposed to transit/corridor agreement with India under the present circumstances. Roads constructed for these purposes will almost certainly be used for India's military purposes, which may even be from the very first consignment of smaller items, scheduled from 20 March. (Please see: ODC shipment begins March 20 http://www.bdnews24.com/details.php?cid=2&id=189840 ). This is not only a security risk, it is occupation of our infrastructure, an attempt to subjugate us, which may also drag us between warring parties. 

> I don't know if there would be demos, barricades, etc., but the govt is making a grievous betrayal of the country. They know we were denied transit from/to Nepal, Bhutan, etc. They know the problems between the two countries have not been resolved. The very serious problems of river water, border killings, smuggling in India's favour, enclaves, trade policies, conspiracy and hegemony, military and security, etc., etc. are in the way of developing friendly relations between the two countries. The govt is still behaving like lackeys mesmerised under the spell of a hegemonic power.

> It's all an utter betrayal of national interest and sovereignty. We condemn the govt on Hasina's MoU's with India, in which our national interests have been sold out and our sovereignty surrendered. We must unite to resist these.

   



__._,_.___


[* Moderator's Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___