Banner Advertise

Tuesday, June 17, 2008

[chottala.com] The collaborators of Pakistani occupation should never be forgotten or forgiven ....

The collaborators of Pakistani occupation should never be forgotten or forgiven ....
 
What do you mean? After the proclaimation of Independence the whole nation
was united against Pakistani occupation forces. There was no division, there ware
only  few hand-picked traitors who collaborated with the foreign occupation army.
 
The people's struggle, sufferings and sacrifices in 1971 forms the basis of our
nationhood and should always be remembered and uphold.
 
The collaborators of foreign occupation should never be forgotten or forgiven
on any pretext whatsoever. .....
 
Our history has proven that Pakistan doctrine is a failed ideology. Any attempt to
justify that ideology under a new cover should be exposed. All attempts to
insult Bangladesh Liberation War and Mukti Bahini and with false propaganda
by the protégés of Pakistan must be exposed and stopped.
 
Lest We Forget: A History of our Liberation War is a powerful testimony to an
event in our nation's history which cannot be comprehended & forgotten but must
be retold .....  retold over and over again.....
 
Syed Aslam

 
On 6/16/08, Salahuddin Ayubi <s_ayubi786@...> wrote:

                       In 1971 the nation was divided in pro and anti liberation camps. Is there any justigfication to continue that division to this ay forty years  on. Pakistan only lasted for 24 years.

                 Does it really make any sense that we remain a divided nation to this day.

                            Salahuddin Ayubi

--- On Mon, 6/16/08, Citizen Bangladesh <citizen.bangladesh@...> wrote:

From: Citizen Bangladesh <citizen.bangladesh@...>
Subject: Re: [khabor.com] Syed Aslam is insulting Islam and the Muslims of Bangladesh
To: khabor@yahoogroups.com, KSidd37398@..., "Syed Aslam" <Syed.Aslam3@...>
Date: Monday, June 16, 2008, 11:32 PM


I want to know:

 

Did Pakistan paid our money, assets (of billions of $$$) due to us since 1972?

 

Did Pakistan take their stranded citizen from Bangladesh (we are spending billions of taka for them) since 1972?


 
On 6/14/08, KSidd37398@... <KSidd37398@...> wrote:

Dear Syed Aslam [Tilak Mataji] history must be based on facts which are verifiable.
If you make up ugly stories about Islam and Muslims, you will have to face criticism.

Among Muslims, collaborators are those who side with the enemies of Islam and Muslims.

I am saying that Pakstan is no longer a problem for Bangladesh.
For 37 India has been exploiting and ripping off Bangladesh. East Pakistan existed for only 23-24 years.
You are distorting history by trying to ignore the 37 years.
Why do you want to ignore the fact that Bangladesh is being strangled by India. That shows that you are the enemy of the people of Bangladesh.

I love the people of Bangladesh because they are part of the global family of Islam
It is the agents of India who are the foreigners.

You have published pictures trying to connect me to Osama bin Laden, thus putting my life in danger. You should apologize and remove the pictures, otherwise I will find out who you really are and take you to court for criminal endangerment.

Better wake up now!
Show me your face. Are you Syed Aslam or Tilak Mataji?

__._,_.___

[* Moderator's Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[chottala.com] Goodbye Shahzadi by Shyam Bhatia - A sleazy biography ?????

Book Review – Goodbye Shahzadi, Shyam Bhatia

Book Review – Goodbye Shahzadi, Shyam Bhatia

An Indian journalist's sleazy biography of Benazir Bhutto.

[By Mayank Austen Soofi]

Petty games people play. Indian journalist Mr. Shyam Bhatia who had known Ms. Benazir Bhutto since her student days in Oxford, during the 70s, have penned a quickie biography of Pakistan's late prime minister. He has accused her of smuggling nuclear secrets to North Korea during a state visit to Pyongang by carrying CDs containing data about uranium enrichment in an overcoat "with deepest possible pockets".

That's just the most serious charge in this thin, seemingly hurriedly written book that has little flair for fine writing and hardly any consideration for credible sources to back up its wild claims.

Mr. Bhatia calls the young Ms. Bhutto a 'self-obsessed' girl with legendary tantrums who would throw "ashtrays like flying saucers at the servants" in ancestral home at Larkana.

Indeed, his Benazir-at-Oxford emerges as quite a flamboyant woman who drove a yellow MG sports car, dunked down white wine, and had a "myriad of mostly white boyfriends." However, Mr. Bhatia soon contradicts himself by claiming that Ms. Bhutto was madly in love with "two extremely handsome Pakistani students" who (here's the cake) "firmly rebuffed marital enquiries on her part".

In this breezy breathless portrayal of Benazir's young days, Mr. Bhatia hasn't inserted any footnotes to add to the credibility of his 'accusations'.

There's more.

Ms. Bhutto-at-Oxford "epitomized the classic spoilt rich girl from a third world country". Ms. Bhutto-the-PM was hardly any improvement. She was "no different from the village women of her home province who swear by faith healers and other superstitious practices". The author goes on to castigate her for making a "lengthy journey to Bangladesh to seek the benediction of a local holy man". Tch tch.

And, there's more.

According to Mr. Bhatia, Pakistan's assassinated leader had a "chameleon-like quality" who was "equally at ease with Marxists and capitalists, Indians and Israelis, Islamic fundamentalists and liberal democrats, Chinese, Australians, in fact anyone on planet". Phew.

Then there's a chapter on Ms. Bhutto-the-wife. It's basically about her husband's alleged corruption titled "The Marriage Business" (very smart-alecky!).

But the most damning charge that Mr. Bhatia makes against Ms. Bhutto is that she transferred nuclear secrets to North Korea by carrying CDs with sensitive information in her overcoat during a state visit to the hermit nation in 1993. The female James Bond returned home, according to Mr. Bhatia, with another set of CDs that carried missile information, courtesy North Korea.

How did Mr. Bhatia get his information? He says that Ms. Bhutto told him so in her Dubai home after a dinner of Lamb biryani, chocolate ice cream and fresh fruits (no white wine?). Any proof? Oh, he had his tape recorder but Ms. Bhutto asked him to switch it off. Why didn't he tell it earlier? After all, this was an explosive story and Mr. Bhatia is a journo. Oh, he had promised Ms. Bhutto not to reveal her confession in her lifetime. Convenient.

Let's face it. This is, how to put it…a sleazy biography. Lot of muck thrown but with scant regard to evidence and, err, decency.

It is true Ms. Bhutto left behind a questionable legacy but Mr. Bhatia could have written a more sincere bio. He had the good fortune to know his subject from a close quarter. He first saw Ms. Bhutto in "pyjamas and dressing-gown" in Oxford. He was by her side when Ms. Bhutto addressed the historic rally in Lahore's Iqbal Park following her triumphal return to Pakistan in 1986. He later went on do a series of interviews with Ms. Bhutto during her exile in Dubai. Pity then that Mr. Bhatia ended up with such trash.
Posted by Mayank Austen Soofi at 3:38 PM
 
 

Goodbye Shahzadi: A biography of Benazir Bhutto

Shyam Bhatia

Goodbye Shahzadi: A biography of Benazir Bhutto

Goodbye Shahzadi is an exclusive and highly charged account of the life and times of one of the world's most fascinating political leaders, Benazir Bhutto.

Hardback | 5.5" x 8.5" (140mm x 216mm) | 146 pp

with a 16 page photo insert

ISBN 9788174366580

Rs.295.00  

About this book

Few journalists are intimate witnesses to a career from political cradle to grave. Shyam Bhatia was on first name terms alongside Benazir every step of the way and his book is a revelation. A relationship that began among the dreaming spires of Oxford continued across the world from Pimlico to Pakistan. Along the way she told Bhatia things that she told no other journalist--history-making details that make this book a must read for anyone who is a serious student of the politics of West Asia and of the front line state that she led as the first woman prime minister of a Muslim country. We see unprecedented detail of one of the most significant deals of this or any other century--how North Korea gained access to the technology which gave it the capability to develop nuclear weaponry.  There are insights into Benazir's relationships with the military and politicians in her own country, and what impact she had on their opposite numbers in India. This is Benazir as you have never seen her before--off guard, relaxed, open and honest. The woman who embraced both the sports car and the chador who might have done so much for her country.
                                                       David Watts, Associate Editor, Asian Affairs

Goodbye Shahzadi is an exclusive and highly charged account of the life and times of one of the world's most fascinating political leaders, Benazir Bhutto. Drawing on his personal notes and tape-recorded interviews, Shyam Bhatia presents the assassinated leader's innermost thoughts as well as never-before-revealed secrets about Pakistan's nuclear and missile programs.

About the author

Shyam Bhatia, Editor of Asian Affairs magazine, has been a staff foreign correspondent for London's Observer newspaper based in Cairo and Jerusalem, and US correspondent and Foreign Editor of the Deccan Herald. A frequent visitor in the past to Pakistan and an Arabic speaker, he has won the Foreign Reporter of the Year Award in the British media and is the author of India's Nuclear Bomb, Nuclear Rivals in the Middle East, Brighter than the Baghdad Sun and Contemporary Afghanistan.
 
Bhatia and Benazir first met at Oxford where he refused to support her campaign to obtain an honorary degree for her father and then Pakistan Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto. A bitter fight over the issue of the honorary degree later gave way to an enduring friendship, supplemented by regular heart-to-heart talks and interviews in London and Dubai. Some details of what Benazir told Bhatia about her family and about Pakistan's defense and foreign policies remained confidential in her life time and are revealed for the first time in this book.

 http://www.rolibooks.com/lotus/biography/-/goodbye-shahzadi-a-biography-of-benazir-bhutto/

 

 

 


 

Few journalists are intimate witnesses to a career from political cradle to grave. Shyam Bhatia was on first name terms alongside Benazir every step of the way and his book is a revelation. A relationship that began among the dreaming spires of Oxford continued across the world from Pimlico to Pakistan. Along the way she told Bhatia things that she told no other journalist--history-making details that make this book a must read for anyone who is a serious student of the politics of West Asia and of the front line state that she led as the first woman prime minister of a Muslim country. We see unprecedented detail of one of the most significant deals of this or any other century--how North Korea gained access to the technology which gave it the capability to develop nuclear weaponry. There are insights into Benazirs relationships with the military and politicians in her own country, and what impact she had on their opposite numbers in India. This is Benazir as you have never seen her before--off guard, relaxed, open and honest. The woman who embraced both the sports car and the chador who might have done so much for her country.
In 2003 and 2004 she agreed to a series of searingly honest interviews on the record with me about herself, her family, and her political life. At the time I did publish some, but not all the material from the tapes of those interviews. Some tapes containing much of the unpublished material, including her revelations about Pakistan's nuclear programme, remained locked away in my filing cabinet. They only came to light by chance soon after she was assassinated when I was scouring through my personal papers. I realised then that the tapes contained exclusive information about contemporary issues that had never before been revealed.
— Shyam Bhatia
In his latest book, Goodbye Shahzadi, Shyam Bhatia traverses the highs and lows of a 34-year-long friendship with Benazir Bhutto to present a personal account of the woman and her politics. In the course of many candid conversations with the author, Benazir spoke about her family and Pakistan's defence and foreign policies. In this book Bhatia reveals, for the first time, details of conversations that remained confidential during her lifetime. Excerpts:
 
Although America had provided much of Islamabad's military hardware and been the major source of foreign economic aid, any suggestion that a Pakistani ruler was prepared to get overly close to the US was bound to be viewed with suspicion on the Pakistani street. The link with Delhi was more complex. India had been Pakistan's traditional adversary from the time of Independence, and the two countries have engaged in three major wars in 1947–48, 1965, and 1971. Therefore, any notion of a Pakistani prime minister seeking the aid of the enemy to sort out their domestic problems was bound to be controversial.
However, elected civilian prime ministers like Benazir also needed to be on at least moderately friendly talking terms with Delhi to avoid the kind of Indian military build-up along the border that would provide the Pakistan army with an excuse to strengthen its grip at home. Achieving the right balance is a difficult and sensitive exercise. Standing aloof from India invited the risk of allowing an unchecked flare-up of tensions to develop into something more serious. Being too obviously friendly with India risked being called an Indian or Hindu 'agent'. Where India was concerned, it could be argued the dice was loaded against her long before she became prime minister.
It did not help that Indira Gandhi, ostensibly Pakistan's and the Bhutto family's foe, was one of the first international leaders to make repeated pleas for clemency for Zulfikar Ali Bhutto after he was sentenced to death. It was the same Indira Gandhi, then in Opposition, who twice received Benazir's brothers, Murtaza and Shahnawaz, at her Delhi residence following their father's execution.

 
It was during that first meeting with Indira Gandhi in 1979 that Murtaza suggested dividing Pakistan into four parts as a way of permanently blocking a future role for the generals. His controversial proposal for the dismemberment of Pakistan is recorded by his erstwhile colleague, Raja Anwar, in his book entitled The Terrorist Prince. Benazir's first personal exposure to the politics and conflicts that kept Pakistan and India at each other's throats, came during the 1965 India–Pakistan war. She and her sister Sanam were at boarding school in Murree, close to the Kashmir border, when war broke out and the nuns in charge of the school made the girls participate in air-raid practices and blackouts. Six years later, as a college undergraduate at Harvard, Benazir was more directly involved when war broke out again, this time over the emerging nation of Bangladesh, and she was summoned by her father to New York to help him as he prepared his brief for the United Nations Security Council. It was while she was managing the telephones at her father's New York hotel suite and simultaneously acting as hostess for the delegations calling on him that Zulfikar gave Benazir her first lesson in international diplomacy.
When peace talks with India began the following year in S[h]imla, Benazir was once again at her father's side. This time she was personally introduced to Indira Gandhi and other Indian dignitaries, but it was her experiences at the mass level that made the greater impression. Her autobiography and other contemporary accounts record the ecstatic reception she received whenever she ventured out into the streets of S[h]imla, with traffic-jams and small mobs of enthusiastic Indians craning their necks to get a better view of her. One local newspaper carried the iconic headline, 'Benazir is benazir'.
Many years later, when Benazir was Prime Minister of Pakistan in her own right, she hosted a visit to Islamabad by Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi. The occasion was a regional summit of South Asian countries, and Benazir used it to try and forge a better personal rapport with Rajiv and Sonia, who were invited to a private dinner with Benazir and her husband during the course of the three-day visit. Six months later Rajiv was back in Islamabad, this time on a purely bilateral visit. The two visits led to a series of mutual confidence-building measures, including force reductions along the borders and an agreement that India and Pakistan would not attack each other's nuclear installations. Benazir would also claim many years later, shortly before she died, that she choked off assistance to militant Indian Sikhs who had been afforded refuge in Pakistan by General Zia. It was the termination of this support, she implied, that finished off militant Sikh demands for an independent homeland carved out of India's Punjab state.

 
Benazir's Indian critics charge her with being two-faced when it came to India. They compare her covert fostering of the Taliban under Major General Nasirullah Babar, later her Interior Minister, with her rallying cry to anti-Indian jihadi militants across both sides of the ceasefire line when she shouted 'Azadi, azadi `85' (freedom, freedom`85). Evidence that she was secretly and violently anti-Indian has been deduced from her television images of 1990 where she was seen inciting Kashmiri militants to take action against India's then Governor of Kashmir, Jagmohan. Still remembered is the shocking cutting gesture she made at that time in 1990, her right hand striking the open palm of her left, as she intoned, 'Jag, jag, mo-mo, han-han'. In her speech aimed at stoking the fury of the jihadis, she said:
"
The people of Kashmir do not fear death because they are Muslims. The Kashmiris have the blood of the mujahideen because Kashmiris are the heirs of Prophet Mohammed, Hazrat Ali, and Hazrat Omar. And the brave women of Kashmir?
They know how to fight and also to live. And when they live, they do so with dignity. From every village only one voice will emerge: freedom; from every school only one voice will emerge: freedom; every child will shout, "freedom, freedom, freedom".
French journalist Fran`E7ois Gautier sensed the same hard line emanating from Benazir when he interviewed her in 1993 and asked her about Kashmir. She responded by telling him: "You have to understand the Pakistani point of view on Kashmir ... that for long the Hindu Pandits in Kashmir exploited and dominated the Muslims who are getting back at them today". Asked whether that was the only reason Pakistan was helping Kashmiris in their fight for self-determination, she replied: "It should be clear also that Pakistan never forgot the humiliating loss of Bangladesh at the hands of India," before adding, "Zia did one right thing. He started the whole policy of proxy war by supporting the separatist movements in Punjab and Kashmir as a way of getting back at India."
Benazir never attempted to justify her jihadi speech or the cutting gesture, but shortly before she was assassinated she claimed credit for reining in the Sikh extremists who had been given sanctuary across the border within Pakistan before she became prime minister.
Benazir's Sikh connection was revealed in December, 2007, after India's National Security Adviser M.K. Narayanan publicly questioned her track record as "not necessarily something which will make us believe that she would follow to the letter what she has said—I think even if she wishes to". A furious Benazir lashed back in an interview with India's Outlook magazine:
"Does anyone remember that it was I who kept my promise to Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi when we met and he appealed to me for help in tackling the Sikhs? Has India forgotten December, 1988? Have they forgotten the results of that meeting and how I helped curb the Sikh militancy?
If anyone kept her word, it was me, not Rajiv. He went back to India and then called me on his way to the Commonwealth to say he could not keep his promise to withdraw from Siachen (the disputed glacier in northern Kashmir) and that he would do it only after the elections."
I had heard of Benazir's azadi speech, as well as some of her other reported virulent comments about India–Pakistan relations, and wanted to see for myself just how much she had changed from the time we first met at Oxford. An occasion to talk to her freely and in depth arose when she invited me to visit her in Dubai in 2003. We had spoken over the telephone a few months earlier, and before that also briefly met in London. It was then that she and I agreed to get together for a heart-to-heart, somewhere private and away from the glare of television cameras.
One of the first questions I put to her before we sat down for dinner in Dubai was about Kashmir; how did she see Kashmir and was it a subject for negotiation? "Its for negotiation and when I was Prime Minister, the Indian Government had agreed to put Kashmir as an independent agenda item," Benazir replied:
"We had two agenda items. One of the agenda items was Kashmir and the second agenda item was India–Pak and we said we must not let lack of progress on one issue impede progress on the other. The second thing is that if we disagree over the territorial unity of Kashmir, we can still work for the social unity of Kashmir by working for safe and open borders. Because if we have safe and open borders, then people can travel, they can trade and then, ultimately, I feel we must ask ourselves that with a population of over a billion people and high rates of poverty amid islands of affluence, what do we do to pick ourselves out of this mess for the future? And l see the only way forward for us is to try and see what the European Union did and to try and have a kind of tariff in a common market that will enable people."
This sounded to me like sensible reasoning, at the very least sharply different from the kinds of sentiment associated with the "azadi, goli chalao" politician of a decade earlier. This new look, or rather a return to the old Benazir, had enhanced her reputation for expressing views that projected her both as sober and positive when it came to India. I, in fact, sensed something fundamental had changed. Speaking to her that day it seemed to me that Benazir had come round to the view that a nuclear armed Pakistan, one of the world's seven nuclear weapons powers, and India could no longer risk head-on confrontations. As she explained; "After India and Pakistan went nuclear in 1998, the PPP had a reappraisal and we said we don't want to follow tit-for-tat with India. Just because India does something, we should not copy it. We should identify our core interests and follow our core interests, but not copy India".
Many in India still do not appreciate the importance of this changed thinking. In effect, Benazir had come around to the same point of view as the US and Soviet Union in their time after they had tested nuclear weapons following the end of the World War II.
Benazir felt that what made sense for India and Pakistan was to strengthen economic ties. "You know what makes economies move?" she asked me rhetorically:
"
In my view economies move through the service sector, through creativity. So if we open up, people will come and visit Pakistan; our hotels will be full; more hotels will be built; more labour will get jobs. Same in your country. All the visitors who come will want to have kebab and tikka and nihari and all the shops that make all the kebab and tikka and nihari will go up. People will want to buy; they will want to spend; they will want to go to museums; they will want to sight-see. It's the flow of money that strengthens our economy and that's what we all need—Nepal or Bangladesh or Sri Lanka or India, or Pakistan; we all need that."
Encouraged by what I had heard thus far, I focused more sharply on bilateral relations, asking Benazir if the bitterness among some Pakistanis was associated with their fear of Indians trying to reclaim the properties they had abandoned at the time of Partition. "There is the older generation; they fear that, but I don't think there is any such thing among the younger generation," she replied.
"I have met people who are very bitter about India and I am sure you have similar people on your side who have witnessed massacres. People who witnessed massacres, it's very difficult for them to let go.
"But, generally speaking, those who did not witness massacres, they all want to talk about their homes in India which they left—and even Indians do the same. I met (former Prime Minister) Mr I.K. Gujral and he told me he had been in Jhelum his whole life. I have met (former Deputy Prime Minister) Mr Advani and he told me about Karachi and Hyderabad.
"It's all about diversity, America is about diversity, Britain is about diversity; it's all about unity through diversity."
I pressed on to ask if Pakistanis looked at Indians in a specific way. Did Pakistanis dislike Indians as such, anyone who held an Indian passport, or was it just the Hindus who were most intensely disliked? "Well it changes from times of tension to times of less tension," Benazir explained.
"When there is tension and troops at the borders, then people hate anyone who is Indian, irrespective of whether they are Muslim or Hindu. They say, "They want to attack us and kill us, they want to destroy us and our country."
"But when there is no tension, people really welcome Indians. I mean Indian films are very popular in Pakistan. Indian goods are smuggled across Pakistan all the time, people are desperate to get Indian visas and travel to India to go and visit their families, and go and see the Taj Mahal and the Mughal heritage of those days. And overseas, in America, I must have travelled to all the states where the Indians and Pakistanis and Bangladeshis see themselves as South Asians. They feel their interests are the same. They work together, they socialize together, there is no hatred at all.
You leave it to the people and they all want to be friends. Sometimes I think that your country and my country, our militaries need a war so that they can go on buying weapons. I don't know. But as far as the people level is concerned, there is a lot of love and affection."
I deliberately kept my most provocative question for the last, and when I put it to Benazir, she almost choked over the cup of tea in her hand. Looking her straight in the face I asked, "As a Pakistani did you ever wake up in the morning and think, "Oh God I wish I could nuke a few thousand Indians?"
Benazir's response was unequivocal:
"For God's sake, never for a moment have I woken up with such a thought—because I know that nuking any Indian—if I was mad enough to think that—would end up nuking my own people. And this is sometimes what I don't understand because neither India can use the nuke, nor can Pakistan. Because whatever country is throwing that nuke knows there is not enough time space to avoid retaliation and is going to get it back. No."
 
Excerpted from
Goodbye Shahzadi by Shyam Bhatia. Published by Roli Books. Pages 130. Price Rs 295
__._,_.___

[* Moderator's Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[chottala.com] All newspaper jobs ads at one place in scanned form

Hi all,

 

Yesterday i see a really usefull website for all of us. The website has all the jobs and admission ads from jang and dawn newspaper at one place. The good thing about it is that it updates daily.so no need to bye newspaper now for ads only. link ofthe website is

 

www.paperpk.com

 

See it and let me tell what you people think about it.

 

Sara Usman


__._,_.___

[* Moderator�s Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[chottala.com] Re: [khabor.com] Re: Bravo! Bravo! Bravo! Our army backed caretaker government - if Tarek – Koko – Khaleda - Nizami gong are released from the custody – than no need keeping anyone in the custody of Bangladesh.

Dear All,
 
We are quickly progressing into becoming a full-fledged 'banana republic.' We should simply ask the Hollywood studios to set shop in Bangladesh and chronicle stories and videos of these high and mighty folks and then perhaps their movies will turn into international block busters. Imagine the power of movie magic present in Bangladesh.

 

What happened to the separation of the judiciary? Did we not just see a monumental hoax played out at the top enclaves of Bangladesh. I pity the system and I pity the people pulling the strings from behind, local or international. In the commentary of life and history, these superfluous and enigmatic decisions without any respect to the law will eventually haunt these people down, while the entire country continues to suffer its afflicted miseries. The oppression of the elites over the proletariat continues unabated with no sign in receding.

 
It is not about AL, BNP or other parties, it is about justice being played in the hands of some people. Someone had commented that there are other flesh and blood people in the prisons needing health-care and, therefore, before becoming 'political human beings' we need to become 'good human beings' and without speaking along partisan lines.
 
Time has come to tow the 'Bangladeshi line' first and then work on individual political schemes. However, all said and done, we need to be responsible in discharging decisions. We have made some quick gains (perhaps very popular) but in the end the country has received a severe slap on its judiciary and the democratic process. 
 
I am making a very unpopular statement but it comes from my heart. No one should be above the law.
 
Thanks
 
Zia
IITM
Dhaka 


 
On 6/17/08, Citizen Bangladesh <citizen.bangladesh@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Shafiq,
 
Very logical input.
We support and agree with your  views.
Government should not proceed on this line.
 
Regards and stay well in NZ
 


 
On 6/16/08, Engr. Shafiq Bhuiyan <srbanunz@gmail.com> wrote:
 
Bravo!   Bravo!   Bravo! 
Our  army  backed  caretaker  government

 

 

If Tarek – Koko – Khaleda - Nizami gong are released from the custody – than no need keeping anyone in the jail or custody of Bangladesh.

 

 

Is there was any crime which were not committed (directly and indirectly) by these gongs during their tenure of 2001 – 2006?

 

  • They looted - stolen cores of taka of people of Bangladesh
  • They took thousands of acres of govt owned land
  • They transferred cores of taka to overseas (even when this CA Mr. Fakruddin was Governor of Bangladesh Bank)
  • They killed, injured political leaders - MPs (from topmost level, like Ex Minister & current MP ASMS Kibria, ex MP Mrs. Ivy Rahman, current MP Ahsanullah Master, ex MP Momtazuddin, Manjurul Imam etc to the grass root level workers - supporters of opposition political parties, even person (in Bogura) reading Quran in the mosque)
  • They gave safe shelter to killers in exchange of cores of taka (Basundhora)
  • They killed, insulted their own party leaders - supporters - sympathisers (like Prof Aftab of DU, Jamal Uddin of Chittagong, Badruddoza Choudhury, Mahi Choudhury, Maj Mannan)
  • They tried to cleansing the religious minority group (killed hundreds of non Muslim, including Principal Binod Bihari, Buddhist spiritual leader)
  • They created thousands of "god fathers"
  • They gave 'mega size' (more than 62) corrupt minister
  • They polluted & destroyed the PSC
  • They polluted & destroyed judicial system
  • They polluted & destroyed the educational system
  • They polluted & destroyed the Administration - Bureaucracy
  • They polluted & destroyed the Election Commission (cores of false voter)
  • They polluted & destroyed the Army - Police and other law enforcing system
 

They  had  polluted  &  destroyed  every  thing of  Bangladesh

 
To find their huge number of crimes – no need of the high power electronic microscope or "intensive investigation"!

 

Only need a fair, unbiased normal mind. So, no need of carry out any "intensive investigation" with "high power electronic microscope"!

 

If you go through the "un protested" newspapers reports (also in abroad) on the corruptions published during the tenure of the notorious Jamat-BNP tenure of 2001 – 2006 (and also after that, till now) including the newspapers sympathised or loyal to them including like, the Prothom Alo, the Amader Shomoy, the Jugantor, the Daily Star, the Inkilab, the Amar Desh, the Manabzamin, the Nayadiganta,. Leave the neutral & sincere newspaper like the Sangbad, the Janakantha, the Shamokal, the Ittefaq and other news paper like the Bhorer Kagoj, Ajkerkagoj (now closed) etc etc. (I can quote hundreds of such news paper report).

 

That is why Bangladesh was "champion" in corruption out of 5 terms 4 terms of Jamat-BNP era (and one time in Awami League era)!

 

Now these culprits are getting released from the custody by this ABCG!

 

Bravo!  Bravo!  Bravo!  Our army backed caretaker government

 

Really SELUKAS!

 

Our present neutral army backed caretaker government is really strange! SELUKAS!

 

 

 
"Sustha thakon, nirapade thakon ebong valo thakon"

Shuvechhante,

Shafiqur Rahman Bhuiyan (ANU)
NEW ZEALAND.

Phone: 00-64-9-828 2435 (Res), 00-64-0274  500 277 (mobile)
E-mail: srbanunz@gmail.com

N.B.: If any one is offended by content of this e-mail, please ignore & delete this e-mail. I also request you to inform me by an e- mail - to delete your name from my contact list.

 

 

 





--
Ziaur Rahman
CEO
International Institute of Technology & Management
56/2 Lake Circus, West Panthopoth
Dhaka 1205
Tel: 8112916, 01726153318, 01711-543431
www.iitmbd.org

&

Chief Executive Officer
IITM Software
www.iitmsoftware.com
info@iitmsoftware.com __._,_.___

[* Moderator's Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[chottala.com] The collaborators of Pakistani occupation should never be forgotten or forgiven ....

The collaborators of Pakistani occupation should never be forgotten or forgiven ....
 
What do you mean? After the proclaimation of Independence the whole nation
was united against Pakistani occupation forces. There was no division, there ware
only  few hand-picked traitors who collaborated with the foreign occupation army.
 
The people's struggle, sufferings and sacrifices in 1971 forms the basis of our
nationhood and should always be remembered and uphold.
 
The collaborators of foreign occupation should never be forgotten or forgiven
on any pretext whatsoever. .....
 
Our history has proven that Pakistan doctrine is a failed ideology. Any attempt to
justify that ideology under a new cover should be exposed. All attempts to
insult Bangladesh Liberation War and Mukti Bahini and with false propaganda
by the protégés of Pakistan must be exposed and stopped.
 
Lest We Forget: A History of our Liberation War is a powerful testimony to an
event in our nation's history which cannot be comprehended & forgotten but must
be retold .....  retold over and over again.....
 
Syed Aslam

 
On 6/16/08, Salahuddin Ayubi <s_ayubi786@yahoo.com> wrote:

                       In 1971 the nation was divided in pro and anti liberation camps. Is there any justigfication to continue that division to this ay forty years  on. Pakistan only lasted for 24 years.

                 Does it really make any sense that we remain a divided nation to this day.

                            Salahuddin Ayubi

--- On Mon, 6/16/08, Citizen Bangladesh <citizen.bangladesh@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Citizen Bangladesh <citizen.bangladesh@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [khabor.com] Syed Aslam is insulting Islam and the Muslims of Bangladesh
To: khabor@yahoogroups.com, KSidd37398@aol.com, "Syed Aslam" <Syed.Aslam3@gmail.com>
Date: Monday, June 16, 2008, 11:32 PM


I want to know:

 

Did Pakistan paid our money, assets (of billions of $$$) due to us since 1972?

 

Did Pakistan take their stranded citizen from Bangladesh (we are spending billions of taka for them) since 1972?


 
On 6/14/08, KSidd37398@aol.com <KSidd37398@aol.com> wrote:

Dear Syed Aslam [Tilak Mataji] history must be based on facts which are verifiable.
If you make up ugly stories about Islam and Muslims, you will have to face criticism.

Among Muslims, collaborators are those who side with the enemies of Islam and Muslims.

I am saying that Pakstan is no longer a problem for Bangladesh.
For 37 India has been exploiting and ripping off Bangladesh. East Pakistan existed for only 23-24 years.
You are distorting history by trying to ignore the 37 years.
Why do you want to ignore the fact that Bangladesh is being strangled by India. That shows that you are the enemy of the people of Bangladesh.

I love the people of Bangladesh because they are part of the global family of Islam
It is the agents of India who are the foreigners.

You have published pictures trying to connect me to Osama bin Laden, thus putting my life in danger. You should apologize and remove the pictures, otherwise I will find out who you really are and take you to court for criminal endangerment.

Better wake up now!
Show me your face. Are you Syed Aslam or Tilak Mataji?

__._,_.___

[* Moderator's Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[chottala.com] Dr.Kamal's silence is a lie & 2 do injustice is more disgraceful than to suffer

Gono Forum President and eminent jurist Dr Kamal Hossain on Monday changed his assessment of the release for eight weeks of detained Awami League president Sheikh Hasina for treatment abroad. Earlier on Friday Dr.Kamal criticised Sheikh Hasina's release, saying the government had become soft on corrupt people. He also alleged that the government had bowed to pressure from certain quarters.I assume that Dr. Kamal has realised that when something important is going on, silence is a lie and to do injustice is more disgraceful than to suffer it.
 
Gopal Sengupta
Canada
__._,_.___

[* Moderator�s Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___