Banner Advertise

Tuesday, September 2, 2008

[chottala.com] Aafia Siddiqui Indicted for Attempting to Kill United States Nationals in Afghanistan and Six Additional Charges

Aafia Siddiqui Indicted for Attempting to Kill United States Nationals in Afghanistan and Six Additional Charges

WASHINGTON, Sept 02, 2008 /PRNewswire-USNewswire via COMTEX/ -- Michael J. Garcia, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, announced today the indictment of Aafia Siddiqui on charges related to her attempted murder and assault of United States nationals and officers and employees. Siddiqui is scheduled to be arraigned on the Indictment on Thursday, September 4, 2008, at 11:30 a.m. by United States District Judge Richard M. Berman in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. According to the Indictment filed in Manhattan federal court:
On July 18, 2008, a team of United States servicemen and law enforcement officers, and others assisting them, attempted to interview Aafia Siddiqui in Ghazni, Afghanistan, where she had been detained by local police the day before. The United States interview team included, among others: three officers and employees of the United States Army; two officers and employees of the Federal Bureau of Investigation; and two United States Army contract interpreters.
The interview of Siddiqui was to take place at an Afghan police compound in Ghazni. In a second-floor meeting room at the compound -- where Siddiqui was being held, unbeknownst to the United States interview team, unsecured, behind a curtain -- Siddiqui obtained one of the United States Army officer's M-4 rifle and attempted to fire it, and did fire it, at another United States Army officer and other members of United States interview team. Siddiqui repeatedly stated her intent and desire to kill Americans.
Siddiqui then assaulted one of the United States Army interpreters, as he attempted to obtain the M-4 rifle from her. Siddiqui subsequently assaulted one of the FBI agents and one of the United States Army officers, as they attempted to subdue her.
On the previous day, July 17, 2008, when Siddiqui was detained by Afghan authorities, a number of items were in her possession, including handwritten notes that referred to a "mass casualty attack" and that listed various locations in the United States, including Plum Island, the Empire State Building, the Statue of Liberty, Wall Street, and the Brooklyn Bridge.
Other notes in Siddiqui's possession referred to the construction of "dirty bombs," and discussed various ways to attack "enemies," including by destroying reconnaissance drones, using underwater bombs, and using gliders. Siddiqui also possessed a computer thumb drive that contained correspondence referring to specific "cells," "attacks" by "certain cells," and "enemies." Other documents on the thumb drive discussed recruitment and training.
Siddiqui, a 36-year-old Pakistani woman, resided in the United States from in or about 1991 until June 2002, and obtained degrees from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Brandeis University. Siddiqui returned to the United States on December 25, 2002, and departed on January 2, 2003.
Siddiqui is charged in the Indictment with: (1) one count of attempting to kill United States nationals outside the United States; (2) one count of attempting to kill United States officers and employees; (3) one count of armed assault of United States officers and employees; (4) one count of using and carrying a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence; and (5) three counts of assault of United States officers and employees.
If convicted, Siddiqui faces a maximum sentence of: 20 years in prison on each of the attempted murder and armed assault charges; life in prison on the firearm charge; and eight years in prison on each of the remaining assault charges.
Mr. Garcia praised the investigative work of the Joint Terrorism Task Force, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and New York City Police Department. He also expressed his gratitude to the United States Department of State for their assistance in the case.
Mr. Garcia said that the investigation is continuing.
Assistant United States Attorney Christopher L. Lavigne is in charge of the prosecution.
The charges and allegations contained in the Indictment are merely accusations and the defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.
SOURCE U.S. Department of Justice Last update: 4:49 p.m. EDT Sept. 2, 2008
 

AFP
Pakistani-born scientist indicted on murder charges in US
AFP - 6 hours ago
NEW YORK (AFP) — A US court on Tuesday announced the indictment of Pakistani-born, US-
 

Aafia Siddiqui
New York Daily News
Aafia was set up, says her lawyer
Daily Times, Pakistan - Aug 14, 2008
NEW YORK: A lawyer for Dr Aafia Siddiqui accused the US government on Wednesday of setting up her client by planting evidence on her. ...
Video: The case against Aafia Siddiqui - 6 Aug 08 AlJazeeraEnglish
The case of Pakistani neuroscientist Aafia Siddiqui Reuters India
US judge orders medical treatment of Aafia Siddiqui Tehran Times
Daily Times - Pakistan Dawn
all 365 news articles »
 
__._,_.___

[* Moderator's Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[chottala.com] Israeli PR fails the ‘decent, honest, truthful' test

 
Israeli PR fails the 'decent, honest, truthful' test
02/09/2008 11:00:00 PM GMT            
(dennisfox.net) The settlements, like the Separation Wall, is a Trojan horse used to bite deep into Palestinian land

 
It's a mistake to think you can turn around a poor brand by throwing more PR at it. In Israel's case they'll have to cut out the crime and racism and hand back what they have stolen.

By Stuart Littlewood

When Ron Prosor arrived in London last year to take up his post as Israeli ambassador he was eager to step up public relations. He told the Israeli newspaper Haaretz: "I'm not afraid to appear anywhere, and there is no platform… that I will not utilize for PR work."

We are familiar with the usual Israeli PR mantras:

- having to contend with suicide bombers,

- how Arafat turned down former prime minister Barak's so-called 'generous offer' in 2000,

- how the Israeli public has moved to the left in recent years whereas Palestinians have - moved to the extreme right,

- Israel is a democracy under attack,

- Jerusalem is the capital of Israel forever,

- Israel is against any negotiations with Hamas because it as a terrorist movement.

This last is all the more preposterous when echoed by the U.S., Britain and the EU, which have connived to keep Palestine under Israel's military jackboot for 40 years.

Israel, of course, is an ethnocracy with racist laws, not a democracy as we know it in the West. This week an Israeli human rights organization, Gisha, is appealing against a decision by Israel's so-called 'democracy' banning radio advertisements to highlight the plight of Palestinian students enrolled at foreign universities but prevented by Israel from leaving the Gaza Strip. The director-general of the Broadcast Authority said the subject was "politically and ideologically controversial".

I wonder if the Ambassador is aware that in the UK PR campaigns are supposed to observe rules set down by the Advertising Standards Authority? In short, all marketing communications must be legal, decent, honest and truthful. The main difficulty for Israeli PR, as others have pointed out, is that Israel is probably the world's worst brand, followed closely by Zionism. Any marketing effort that is remotely decent, honest or truthful would sink both.

Let's take the recent Telegraph article, in which the Ambassador says "the constant barrage of rockets being fired on Israeli citizens... the average British citizen is painfully unaware that, since Hamas seized control of Gaza last year, 1,400 rockets and 1,500 mortar bombs have landed on Israeli soil." He fails to mention that these crude, home-made projectiles are nothing compared to the thousands of high-tech munitions fired by Israeli F16s, helicopter gun-ships, armed drones, tanks, troops and warships at the 1.5 million civilians imprisoned in the Gaza Strip. Is that honest?

Under the rules "no marketing communication should mislead, or be likely to mislead, by inaccuracy, ambiguity, exaggeration, omission or otherwise".

Ambassador Prosor claims that "Britain has become a hotbed for radical anti-Israeli views ...Israel has been cast as a pantomime villain… a climate of hatred is fomented on campuses." This would be hard to prove. Under the rules he must hold documentary evidence to support all claims, whether direct or implied, that are capable of objective substantiation.

If anti-Israeli views do exist, I imagine they're directed not so much against the Israel people as the Zionist Tendency that rules.

As for hatred, the Israeli government provides a runs master-classes on how to stoke it up. Take the latest example. A report by Peace Now, an Israeli non-governmental organisation, says that at least 2,600 new Israelis-only homes are currently under construction – illegally - in Palestine's West Bank, an increase of 80 per cent over last year. In occupied East Jerusalem, which Palestinians justly claim as the capital of their future state, the number of new Israeli government bids for construction has increased from 46 in 2007 to 1,761 so far this year.

This breaches earlier agreements as well as international law and obviously undermines final status talks. Tzipi Livni, the Israeli foreign minister, says the construction will not affect talks. "The peace process is not, and should not be, affected by any kind of settlement activities" and the settlement building programme should not be used as an excuse to avoid negotiations, she tells Palestinians.

What planet is the woman on? Everybody knows perfectly well that settlement building, like the Separation Wall, is a Trojan horse used by Israelis to bite deep into Palestinian land, seize control of precious water resources and fragment any future Palestinian state. The Israel government is busily creating 'facts on the ground' that are likely to prevent any peace deal, so cannot be regarded as a real 'partner for peace'.

Enter Condoleezza Rice, having lost all touch with reality and ignoring Peace Now and other reports. She says she has faith in Israeli intentions. "I don't believe that it is Israel's policy to increase activity in the settlements, rather it is to decrease activity," she remarked during a press conference. Rice is supposed to be bright but evidently inhabits the same planet as Livni.

  • PR lies go unchallenged

Let's dwell for a moment on Barak's 'generous offer', another of the myths Israelis love to peddle. The West Bank and the Gaza Strip, seized by Israel in 1967 and occupied ever since, comprise just 22% of pre-partition Palestine. When the Palestinians signed the Oslo Agreement in 1993 they agreed to accept the 22% and recognise Israel within 'Green Line' borders (i.e. the 1949 Armistice Line established after the Arab-Israeli War). Conceding 78% of the land that was originally theirs was an astonishing compromise on the part of the Palestinians.

But it wasn't enough for Barak. His 'generous offer' required the inclusion of 69 Israeli settlements within the 22% remnant. It's plain to see on the map that these settlement blocs create impossible borders and already severely disrupt Palestinian life in the West Bank. Barak also demanded the Palestinian territories be placed under "Temporary Israeli Control", meaning Israeli military and administrative control indefinitely. The 'generous offer' also gave Israel control over all the border crossings of the new Palestinian State. What nation in the world would accept that? The truth contained in Barak's maps was hidden by propaganda spin.

At Taba, Barak produced a revised map. The Palestinians considered it a basis for negotiation but Barak repudiated it after his election defeat. You don't have to take my word for it – the facts are well documented and explained by organisations such as Gush Shalom.

Another rule to remember is that you "should not exploit the credulity, lack of knowledge or inexperience" of your audience.

Several weeks ago I and others, describing ourselves as Friends of Mohammed Omer, wrote to Ambassador Prosor asking for an explanation after the young journalist was beaten up and hospitalised by Israeli security thugs when he arrived at the Allenby Bridge border crossing on 26 June.

Mohammed, who had committed no crime, was on his way home to his family in Gaza after receiving the coveted Martha Gellhorn prize for journalism at a ceremony in London.

Mr Prosor ignored our request and several reminders, and finally had his Deputy Head of Mission send a woefully inadequate response to an MP. In it the Israelis tried to demolish Mohammed's 'testimony' and discredit him. But according to Mr Omer no Israeli investigator contacted him and no-one asked for medical reports. Refusing an independent inquiry or tribunal in such a case, and not even interviewing the victim or his doctors, or the Dutch diplomats who accompanied him, spells whitewash… and a PR blunder of the first magnitude.

As if that wasn't bad enough, when the two Free Gaza boats broke the illegal blockade last week Israel's propaganda machine lashed out, calling the 40-odd multi-national and multi-faith activists who undertook the voyage a "handful of provocateurs seeking a public relations stunt… aimed at boosting Hamas". This ridiculous claim didn't end there. The siege-breakers, said Israeli officials, "support Hamas suicide bombers and rocket attacks on Israel towns and cities" and show "a complete and total disregard for innocent Israel terror victims".

Unable to say anything intelligent about the voyagers – or indeed Hamas – the Israelis as usual resorted to nasty accusations that could not possibly be justified.

Most of the PR fodder pumped out relentlessly by Israeli propagandists in London and Tel Aviv could never hope to pass the 'decent, honest and truthful' test. Those responsible for it are plainly incompetent in the professional marketing sense. If only the Palestinians and the Arab League would get their media act together they could make mincemeat of their Israeli tormentors in the all-important battle for hearts and minds.

But I hear on the grapevine that the Palestinian Authority – that den of collaborators in Ramallah – promised their U.S. sponsor not to embarrass Israel in public. So the PA, knowing which side their bread is buttered, make no effort. Israel's PR lies go unchallenged… except by Hamas.

It's a mistake to think you can turn around a poor brand by throwing more PR at it. You have to improve the product. In Israel's case they'll have to cut out the crime and racism, hand back what they have stolen, scrupulously observe international law and UN Charter obligations, and show contrition for past sins. Only then will it be possible to begin turning Israel into an acceptable and marketable entity with a fine reputation for justice and good neighbourliness, which surely is what most people wish to see.

When that's on track is when good PR kicks in.

-- Stuart Littlewood is author of the book Radio Free Palestine, which tells the plight of the Palestinians under occupation.

Source:

© 2008 Stuart Littlewood

 

Israeli PR fails the "decent, honest and truthful" test

Stuart Littlewood


© Carlos LATUFF

  • Middle East Online

    Sep 2, 2008 ... Israeli PR Fails the 'decent, honest, truthful' Test .... Stuart Littlewood is author of the book Radio Free Palestine, which tells the ...
    www.middle-east-online.com/english/?id=27658 - 22k - 10 hours ago - Cached - Similar pages - Note this
  • Middle East Online

    Israeli PR Fails the 'decent, honest, truthful' Test ... law and UN Charter obligations, and show contrition for past sins, says Stuart Littlewood. ...
    www.middle-east-online.com/english/ - Similar pages - Note this
    More results from www.middle-east-online.com »
  • Israeli PR Fails the 'decent, honest, truthful' Test - soc.culture ...

    Sep 2, 2008 ... Israeli PR Fails the 'decent, honest, truthful' Test. Options ... show contrition for past sins, says Stuart Littlewood. ...
    groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/browse_thread/thread/82cfa1a9ac53f361 - 57k - 6 hours ago - Cached - Similar pages - Note this
  • __._,_.___

    [* Moderator's Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

    * Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




    Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
    Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
    Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
    Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

    __,_._,___