Banner Advertise

Wednesday, June 1, 2011

Re: [chottala.com] Ziaur Rahman tried to turn Bangladesh into fake-Bangladesh like Fakistan




Self-proclaimed Free Thinker Ataul Karim Shahib:
 
You are free to think rubbish ........that does not change the
historical facts that Zia appointed traitor Shah Aziz as the PM....
 
.... As a matter of fact you have resorted to
argumentum ad hominem to prove your way of  "Free Thinking"
without any logical content.
 
FYI, you can not hide your bias by masquerading yourself
as a Freethinker !!!!!!'
 
Thanks
 
Syed Aslam
 
 


 
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Ataul Karim <ataulkarim49@yahoo.com> wrote:
Syed Aslam
Only thing i can write about your comments on Zia is 'intelligence has limits, stupidity do not have any'. And you fall on the later part.
Ataul Karim
(Free Thinker)


From: Syed_Aslam3 <Syed.Aslam3@gmail.com>
To: notun_bangladesh@yahoogroups.com; Khobor <khabor@yahoogroups.com>; chottala@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, May 9, 2011 4:06:03 AM
Subject: [chottala.com] Re: [notun_bangladesh] Re: [KHABOR] Ziaur Rahman turn Bangladesh realBangladesh

 

Interestingly enough, the same Shah Aziz who delivered UN speech
against the emmergence of Independent Bangladesh was chosen by
Ghosok Zia to become the Prime Minister of the People's Republic of
Bangadesh.    What a shame!!!!
 
Ghosok Zia's choice of Shah Azizur Rahman was not an isolated event
..... an attempted step in the process of Pakistanization of Bangladesh ......
 
You said "Perliametarian like Mr Sah Aziz is rare"  What difference
does it make  ... Shah Azizur Rahman was an ardent believer in the
Pakistani ideology [Military rule with a mask of multi-party democracy]....
 
Anyway, you failed to substantiate the battle field front-line actions by Zia
during our Liberation War in 1971. [there is none].
 
FYI, the real Proclamation of Independence was formally announced
by the Bangladesh government-in-exile on 17 April 1971 in Mujibnagar.
The Proclamation so announced in effect provided the fundamental
instrument of law as well as an interim constitution  during
our War of Liberation in 1971.
 

 
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 4:46 AM, Md. Aminul Islam <aminul_islam_raj@yahoo.com> wrote:
mr aslam, zia  not only a freedom fighter , he is sadinoter Ghosok.Mujib or His party never denyed Zia's role rather confer him "BIR UTTOM".
Great Leader sah Aziz Or Mashur Rahman never rehabilited .They were in due places.Perliametarian like Mr Sah Aziz is rare.
No Court Imposed bar  on joining politics for Late S aziz or Mashur Rahman.
Killer of democracy will never like a multiparty system where all have right to join  any party fo his /her choice.

 


From: Syed_Aslam3 <Syed.Aslam3@gmail.com>
To: Khobor <khabor@yahoogroups.com>; notun Bangladesh <notun_bangladesh@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Fri, May 6, 2011 4:08:20 AM
Subject: Re: [KHABOR] Ziaur Rahman tried to turn Bangladesh into fake Bangladesh like Fakistan

 

Zia was a Pakistani infiltrator in Bangladesh Liberation war.
This is the reason he waited till 27th March 1971 to join
the freedom struggle...
Just tell as where did he do his "real fight" ---the fight against the
Pakistan's occupation army in 1971. Please elaborate his
day-to-day "real MUKTIJUDDHO" and how he became a
real MUKTIJODHA .......
Zia tried to play the same game that his Murobbis in
Pakistan has played all along  in the name of Islamic Republic
of Pakistan (Izlamic Refublic of Fakistan  to be more  appropriate) !!!!!
Zia's model of democracy was army Rule masquerading as "Democracy"
-------  show-boat of democracy with military in the behind
 .... No wonder his variety of "democracy" gave birth to Jagodo vis-a-vis
BNP in the cradle of cantonment .... ....
 
Zia rehabilated as many pro-Pakistani, anti-Bangladeh politicians
as he could .... He rehabilated Mashiur Rahman (of Rangpur),
a very  well known Paki-collaborator of 1971. Zia made Shah Azizur Rahman
his Priminister  The same Shah Aziz  who lead the Pakistani delegation to the
United Nation in November 1971, where he   emphatically denied that the
 Pakistan Army's Operation Searchlight was a Genocide in reality. Following
the victory and liberation of Bangladesh Shah Azizur Rahman continued to reside
in Pakistan. He continued to lobby Muslim nations in the Middle East to decline
diplomatic recognition to Bangladesh. 
 
These are just the tip of the iceberg  how Zia initiated the process of 
Pakistanization of Bangladesh .... appropriately, the same process continued to
turn Bangladesh into second Pakistan -
ovxgcwËd xRtwDk kpiwËdk pþæËqËek exkËeÞxqËZ gwvlwËbm exkYZ pËtËQ x§Zyt ewxKþæwËd ! 
FYI,  Zia issued the indemnity Act , which gave amnesty to the killers of
Sheikh Mujib and legalised the military coups of 1975.  These are just  few 
examples of charades  masquerading as democracy & rule of law .......!!!!!.

 PS:
 
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 6:47 AM, Md. Aminul Islam <aminul_islam_raj@yahoo.com> wrote:
Mr Aslam,

Zia was a real fighter ,real MUKTIJODHA. He Knew the faith and belief of people. So he turn this country into a Real Bangladesh not province of India. Killer of democracy will never like Zia. Zia established multi party democracy in this country. Established Faith on Allah as principle of constitution.

He is the most popular politician in Bangladesh.



From: Syed_Aslam3 <Syed.Aslam3@gmail.com>
To: Khobor <khabor@yahoogroups.com>; notun Bangladesh <notun_bangladesh@yahoogroups.com>; chottala@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wed, May 4, 2011 2:19:34 AM
Subject: [notun_bangladesh] Ziaur Rahman turned Bangladesh into ssecond Pakistan !

 

 
Read from the source:
ovxgcwËd xRtwDk kpiwËdk pþæËqËek exkËeÞxqËZ gwvlwËbm exkYZ pËtËQ x§Zyt ewxKþæwËd: gýUËd Ìglwl Ìiwpwóib

Gdw, gÄd ÌaËK: (iŠlgwk 3 Ëi 2011, 20 ÐgmwL 1418, 28 RiwxbDl AwDtwl 1432) - gýUd eÞgwoyËbk eÞb£ ogêRdyd ovgcêdw oiwËgËm þñwcyd gwvlw ÌgZwk ÌKËëbÛk eÞxZÅwZw Ìglwl Ìiwpwóib gËlËQd, xdËR oóeÙ£ß dd Aagw eÞZøqbmêy dd-Gid xgnËt glËZ xMËt AwiwËbk iÖx£ßËjw¦wkwI AËdK oit BxZpwo xgKÚZ KkËQd„ AekxbËK kwRdyxZKkwI blyt þñwËaê AËdK oit AwR†xg Kaw gËld-jw oËZøk Aelwe„ kwRmx£ßk hËt Ggv AxZhx£ßk KwkËYI BxZpwo xgKÚxZ NUËQ„ ZËg 3/4 bmK ek AxZhx£ß I kwRmx£ßk xbd Ìmn pËt jwt„ ZLd dgø BxZpwoxgbkw oxVK xo¦wìæ MÞpY KËkd„ Zwkw MhykhwËg ejêËgqY KËkd Ìj, ÌKwd xgnËt ÌK KLd ÌaËK GKB Kaw glËQd Aagw GËKKoiËt GËKK Kaw glËQd MËùek iZ„ iÖx£ßjÖ˦k 30/40 gQk pVwu KËk ÌKD GKxU Kaw glËl Zw BxZpwËok Avm pËZ ewËk dw„ Awxi BxZiËcøB lq KËkxQ Ìj AwiwËbk dZ×d eÞRdô AZøìæ AwMÞpy iÖx£ßjÖ˦k BxZpwo RwdËZ„ GËaËK Awmw KkËZ ewxk Ìj, iÖx£ßjÖ˦k Ìjog BxZpwo xgKÚZ pËtËQ Zwk Agowd NUËg„ oZø BxZpwo AwiwËbk dgø MËgnKËbk §wkw xlxeg¦ pËgB„

<SPANBELAL_DN05032011000007_02_BELAL_MOHAMMAD.png src="cid:1.4065103839@web121001.mail.ne1.yahoo.com">ovgcêdw oiwËgËm g£ßgø kwLËQd Ìglwl Ìiwpwóib„ Zwk ewËm (gwi ÌaËK) lwglÖ Awdowk, BDoÖf ÌP#cÖky Ggv Awpib pwowd„

xZxd AwËkw gËld, ÌiRk xRtwËK þñwcydZwk ÌNwnK xpËoËg xPxpßZ Kkwk Ìj xgZËKêk AgZwkYw Kkw pËtËQ Zw xRtwDk kpiwËdk Ryg¥mwt ptxd„ xZxd xdËR ÌodweÞcwd ÌaËK eÞcwd owixkK eÞmwoK Ggv kwÄÛexZI pËtxQËld„ GZboËZòI xZxd KLËdw þñwcydZwk ÌNwnK xpËoËg bwxg KËkdxd„ Zwk iÙZ×øk ek bËlk ÌlwKRd Gid bwxg DxVËtËQd„ xRtwDk kpiwËdk qiZwt AwËkwpËdk ek Awikw AwËkw lq Kklwwi Ìj AwbxmêK xbK ÌaËK xZxd AwiwËbk KwQ ÌaËK AËdK bÔËk xQËld„ iÖx£ßjÖ˦k 4 dyxZk AdøZi xQl gwOwxl RwZytZw I ciêxdkËeqZw„ GB bÖËUwkB xgq×˦ xQËld xRtwDk kpiwd„ gwvlwËbmy RwZytZwgwb xpËoËg D¨U GKxU ÌNwnYw xbËld xZxd„ iwdÖn dwMxkKZò ewùUwËZ ewËk, ciê exkgZêd KkËZ ewËk xKìç RwxZþñ£wk exkgZêd pt dw ÌKwd xbd„ xeZw Ìjid oZø, ÌZixd RwZytZwgwbI oZø„ ciêxdkËeqZw ÌKËU xbËt xRtw gÖSwËZ PwBËld Ìj GUw ciêxhx£K x§RwxZoË£òk AdÖowky„ Aaêwu ewxKþæwd Ìj AwbËmêk xhx£ËZ pËtxQl Ggv jw AwËb# xgšwdoóiZ dt„ xZxd gËld, -ËZid GKxU xgnt ÌUËd AwdËld„

xZxd gËld, ciêxhx£K RwZytZwgw jxb xgxcoóiZ pËZw gw MÞpYËjwMøZw awKËZw ZwpËl icøeÞwËPø GZ†Ëlw Ìbm ÌKd? ÌjLwËd AËdK†Ëlw ÌbËmk ciê Ggv hwnw-bÖËUwB GK, Ìo AgþÿwtI GZ RwxZËhb ÌKd icøeÞwËPø? GZ kwÄÛ ÌKd? Aaêwu qiZwt Awowk AwËM xRtwDk kpiwËdk GËpd ewxKþæwd eÞyxZk xgntxU ÌKD Aw^P KkËZ ewxkxd„ gwvlwËbmËK iÖx£ßjÖ˦k ÌPZdwt xfxkËt xdËZ AwËkKxU jÖ˦k WwK xbËt m² ÐoxdK Ìglwl Ìiwpwóib gËld, ovxgcwËd xRtwDk kpiwËdk pþæËqËek exkËeÞxqËZ gwvlwËbm exkYZ pËtËQ x§Zyt ewxKþæwËd„ ZwB ciêxdkËeq kwÄÛ xpËoËg gwvlwËbËmk exkxPxZ xfËk ÌeËZ pËl AwËkKxU jÖ˦k xgKùe ÌdB„ þñwcydZwk iÔliìè pËlw RdKløwYiÔlK exkKùedw ÑZky I gwþægwtd„ ÌgKwkZò ÌiwPd Ggv bwxkbÛøiÖ£ß GKxU Ìbm MVd Ggv bwxkbÛø hwM KËk Ìdtwk iZ GKxU exkËgm ÑZky Kkw„ GKRd ËeËU q×cw xdËt NÖkËQd, AwËkKRd ÌeU hËk LwËâQd-GUw ÌKwd þñwcydZw pËlw? Gid eÞgdZw þñwcyd ÌbËmk ÌKwd iwdÖËnk pItw DxPZ dt„ iwdÖËnk ciêB pËâQ hwM KËk ÌhwM Kkw„

xZxd gËld, GKw£Ëk Awikw jÖ¦ KËkxQ gxp:m¢Øk xgkØ˦, x§RwxZZËZòk xgkØ˦, GLd xdËRk xgkØ˦ xdËRËK jÖ¦ KkËZ pËg„ Aaêwu AwiwËbk iËcø dwMxkKZòËgwc, ¸wZÚZòËgwc, oKËlB hwB-hwB-Gid iËdwhwg ÑZky KkËZ pËg„ oKl oóeËbk Dek eÞËtwRd AdÖjwty oKËlk AxcKwk kËtËQ-Ggv Ìo AxcKwk ÌhwËMk AxcKwk xdxúPZ KkËZ pËg Ggv Gog KwR pËâQ kwRdyxZKËbk„ xZxd gËld, Awikw ÌgZwk KiêykwB PwlÖ KËkxQlwi Ìo ÌKëbÛ„ Aaêwu iÖx£ßjÖ˦k Ìj Ìq¢ ÑZky pËtxQl gŠg¬×k ÌdZÚËZò, Zwk oiaêK oKl fÛËëUB xQl„ Ìo eÞiwY Awikw„

xZxd gËld, 30 iwPê ejêìæ KwlÖkNwUþÿ þñwcyd gwvlw ÌgZwk ÌKËëbÛ Gi G pwdíwd GËoxQËld 26 iwPê„ Awk ÌKwd kwRÐdxZK ovMVK AwËodxd„ Zwk eÞËtwRdI xQl dw„ KwkY, ZwËbk bwxtZò xQl Aoyi„ ZËg AwiwËbk ÌKËëbÛk xdkwe£wk RËdø opwtZw ÌPËtxQlwi ÌoLwdKwk BxeAwk Kiw«wk KøwËïUd kxfK×l BolwËik KwËQ„ xZxd Zwk Ñodø ÌeÞkËYk AxŠKwk KËkxQËld„ xKìç ekgZêyËZ Ìo AxŠKwËkk gwþægwtd NËUxd„ GRËdøB ekxbd 27 iwPê Q×ËUxQlwi exUtw awdwt Ggv ÌoLwËd ÌeËt jwB ÌiRk xRtwDk kpiwdËK„ xZxd owdËëb kwxR pd ÌkxWI ÌýUmËdk xdkwe£w xgcwËd„ Ëglwl Ìiwpwóib gËld, AaP GLd AwItwiy lyËMk ÌKD ÌKD bwxg KËkd Ìj ZwkwB dwxK ÌiRk xRtwËK ÌoLwËd cËk xdËt ÌMËQd„ GxU xdRêlw xiaøwPwk„ GhwËgB iÖx£ßjÖ˦k BxZpwo xgKÚxZ Kkw pËâQ„

jÖ¦wpZ iÖx£ßËjw¦w BDoÖf ÌP#cÖkyk ohwexZËZò Køwx¹ÛËR KiÖøxdxU kØËi AdÖxÅZ G ovgcêdw oiwËgËm g£ßgø kwËLd itidxovp ixplw KøwËWU KËlËRk AeokeÞw® xeÞxëoewl AwpËib pwowd, mpyb exkgwËkk oìæwd xdgwËfk ÌPtwkIiøwd dwxpb dRkØl„ ÂËhâQw g£ßgø kwËLd gwZêw ovþÿw Gdwk oóewbK iÖx£ßËjw¦w lwglÖ Awdowk„ dwxpb dRkØl Zwk g£ßËgø ovgxcêZ AxZxa Ìglwl ÌiwpwóiËbk Dek AwËlwKewZ KËk gËld, xZxd pËld iÖx£ßjÖ˦k AdøZi GK xKvgbìæy„ Zwk KwQ ÌaËK AwR Awikw jw Ìmwdlwi ZwB iÖx£ßjÖ˦k eÞKÚZ BxZpwËok †kØZòeÔYê GKxU Avm„ GhwËgB AwiwËbkËK oxVK BxZpwo lwld KkËZ pËg Ggv dZ×d eÞRdôËK Zw RwdwËZ pËg„ iÖx£ßjÖ˦k xgmwl ARêd óöwd pËt jwt-Gid Ìj ÌKwd ZuekZwËK bÙsZwk owËa eÞxZpZ KkËZ pËg„ ohwexZk oiwedy g£ßËgø iÖx£ßËjw¦w BDoÖf ÌP#cÖky gËld, Awiwk gwxr exUtwt Aaêwu KwlÖkNwU ÌgZwk ÌKëbÛ ÌaËK owiwdø bÔËk„ ZwB Awikw Rwxd Ìo oiËt RygËdk KZUw S^ÖxK xdËt Ìglwl Ìiwpwóib H ÌkxWI ÌýUmd PwlÖ KËkxQËld„

ÂkØËZ Ìglwl ÌiwpwóibËK DuoMê Kkw ÌfkËb#o ÌRoiyËdk ÌlLw 'ËoB P^wb RòlwkwËZ' KxgZwk GKxU Kxe eÞbwd KËkd ËfkËb#o ÌRoiyd„ G KxgZwt 'ËK RwxZk xeZw Awk ÌK þñwcydZwk ÌNwnK' Zw RwdËZ PwItw pt„ Gkek mpyb iÖx£ßËjw¦wËbk AwZôwk eÞwZ mÞ¦w RwxdËt oKËl b^wxrËt GK xixdU xdkgZw ewld KËkd„ exg¢ ÌKwkAwd ÌaËK ewV KËkd Gi G Ìk#f„ oiMÞ AdÖÅwËdk Deþÿwedw KËkd fwkpwdw ÌLwkËmb Ggv xoxid Rwxpk„ AdÖÅwËdk owxgêK Z£òwgcwËd xQËld KiÖøxdxU GøwxƒxhýU BDoÖf BKgwl

http://www.khabor.com/news/2011/05/03/DN05032011000007.htm

 

Also see:

http://www.dailyjanakantha.com/news_view.php?nc=15&dd=2011-05-04&ni=57475

 

 

Aslam





__._,_.___


[* Moderator�s Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Re: [chottala.com] EX CJ Khairul Hoque's bribery



The media and the editors of news papers media should write and publish the facts and truth against corruption for establishing lawful honest administration.

The suchil somaj should speak against corruption for action to build nation under the rules made by parliament in the system of democracy and honest administration.

The duty is of

A)    Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheik Hasina

B)    Bangladesh BAL Government administration

To explain the nation about the news matter written in news papers

"Money has taken from Prime Minister Fund by Ex Chief Justice Kharul Haque."

The duty is of parliament members to form a parliament members committee to investigate the money taking matter by Ex Chief Justice Khairul Kobir from Prime Minister Fund

i)              Is true? and 

ii)            Is lawfully legal?

iii)     Has connection with court verdicts of taking money by Khairul Haque?

After investigation not found legality the committee should file corruption case to the court

1)  for lawful judicial action against Ex Chief Justice Khairul Haque and

2)                        For judicial justice all court verdicts given by him should review.

 

 

 

 

 

 --- On Mon, 30/5/11, Nayan Khan <udarakash08@yahoo.com> wrote:


From: Nayan Khan <udarakash08@yahoo.com>
Subject: [chottala.com] EX CJ Khairul Hoque's bribery
To: "alapon alapon" <alapon@yahoogroups.com>, chottala@yahoogroups.com, dahuk@yahoogroups.com, dhakamails@yahoogroups.com, Diagnose@yahoogroups.com, khabor@yahoogroups.com, mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com, notun_bangladesh@yahoogroups.com, odhora@yahoogroups.com, shetubondhon@yahoogroups.com
Received: Monday, 30 May, 2011, 7:08 AM

 
All concerned citizen should read and realize what really happend in judiciary system recently by this Chief Justice.
 
Look at the dates carefully!
 
 

প্রধানমন্ত্রীর ত্রাণ তহবিলের ১০ লাখ টাকা নেন বিচারপতি খায়রুল হক

অলিউল্লাহ নোমান
আমরা তাঁর কাছে জানতে চেয়েছিলাম, আপনি কি প্রধানমন্ত্রীর ত্রাণ তহবিল থেকে ১০ লাখ টাকা নিয়েছেন — জবাবে সদ্য অবসরপ্রাপ্ত প্রধান বিচারপতি এবিএম খায়রুল হক বললেন, আমি এ বিষয়ে কিছু বলব না। আপনারা প্রধানমন্ত্রীর অফিসকেই জিজ্ঞাসা করুন। আমি রিটায়ার করেছি। প্লিজ ফর গডস সেক, লিভ মি অ্যালোন।
সংশ্লিষ্ট সূত্রে জানা গেছে, প্রধানমন্ত্রীর ত্রাণ তহবিল থেকে ১০ লাখ টাকা নিয়েছেন সদ্য সাবেক প্রধান বিচারপতি এবিএম খায়রুল হক। ২০০৯ সালের ২৭ জুলাই সোনালী ব্যাংকের সুপ্রিমকোর্ট শাখায় বিচারপতি এবিএম খায়রুল হকের ব্যক্তিগত অ্যাকাউন্টে এ টাকা জমা হয়। তখন বিচারপতি এবিএম খায়রুল হক হাইকোর্ট বিভাগের বিচারপতি ছিলেন। অ্যাকাউন্টে জমা হওয়ার দিনেই তিনি আবার ৯ লাখ টাকা উত্তোলন করেছেন।
সংশ্লিষ্ট সূত্র জানায়, ২০০৯ সালের ২১ জুন শেখ মুজিবুর রহমানকে স্বাধীনতার ঘোষক হিসেবে রায় দেন বিচারপতি এবিএম খায়রুল হক। রায়ে বলা হয়—জিয়া নয়, শেখ মুজিবুর রহমানই স্বাধীনতার ঘোষক। এই রায়ের কয়েক দিন পর একজন তরুণ সংসদ সদস্য ও সুপ্রিমকোর্টের আইনজীবী চেকটি বিচারপতি এবিএম খায়রুল হকের কাছে তার দফতরে পৌঁছে দেন বলে জানা গেছে। চেকটি পাওয়ার পর তিনি নিজের অ্যাকাউন্টে জমা দেয়ার জন্য দিলে সুপ্রিমকোর্টের সংশ্লিষ্ট কর্মকর্তা বলেছিলেন, প্রধানমন্ত্রীর ত্রাণ তহবিলের চেকের মাধ্যমে টাকা ব্যক্তিগত অ্যাকাউন্টে জমা দিলে ভবিষ্যতে প্রশ্ন উঠতে পারে।
এ বিষয়ে জানার জন্য গত শনিবার রাত সাড়ে ৮টায় বিচারপতি এবিএম খায়রুল হকের সঙ্গে টেলিফোনে যোগাযোগ করা হলে তিনি প্রধানমন্ত্রীর ত্রাণ তহবিলের চেক নেয়ার বিষয়টি স্বীকারও করেননি, আবার অস্বীকারও করেননি। কৌশলে জবাব দিয়ে বলেন, 'এ বিষয়ে প্রধানমন্ত্রীর অফিসকেই জিজ্ঞাসা করুন। আমাকে অ্যাম্বারাস করছেন কেন।'
গতকাল প্রধানমন্ত্রীর দফতরের পরিচালক (ত্রাণ) মিজানুর রহমানের সঙ্গে যোগাযোগ করে এ বিষয়ে জানতে চাইলে তিনি বলেন, 'এ বিষয়ে আমি কিছুই জানি না। অ্যাসাইনমেন্ট অফিসারের সঙ্গে যোগাযোগ করুন।' অ্যাসাইনমেন্ট অফিসার মনোজ কান্তি বড়ালের সঙ্গে বারবার যোগাযোগের চেষ্টা করেও তাকে পাওয়া যায়নি।
বিচারপতি এবিএম খায়রুল হকের সঙ্গে টেলিফোনে কথোপকথনের সময় আমার দেশ-এর পক্ষ থেকে জানতে চাওয়া হয়, আমাদের এখানে একটা রিপোর্ট এসেছে ২০০৯ সালে আপনার কাছে ১০ লাখ ৩৭ হাজার টাকার একটি চেক প্রধানমন্ত্রীর ত্রাণ তহবিল থেকে এসেছিল। জবাবে তিনি বলেন, 'আপনি প্রধানমন্ত্রীর ওখানেই জিজ্ঞাসা করেন, আমাকে কেন খামোখা অ্যাম্বারাস করছেন।' তখন বলা হয়েছিল, অভিযোগ তো মিথ্যাও হতে পারে স্যার, আপনার কাছ থেকে জিজ্ঞাসা করে
নিতে চাচ্ছি। জবাবে আবারও তিনি বলেন, 'প্রধানমন্ত্রীর ওনাদের ওখানেই জিজ্ঞাসা করেন, ডোন্ট অ্যাম্বারাস মি।' আমরা তো ওনাদের সঙ্গে যোগাযোগ করবো স্যার, আপনার এখানে যেহেতু নাম এসেছে, এ বিষয়ে আপনার বক্তব্য জানতে চাচ্ছিলাম। জবাবে তখনও তিনি বলেন, 'ওনাদের ওখানেই বরং জিজ্ঞাসা করেন, আমি রিটায়ার করে গেছি, প্লিজ ফর গড সেভ, লিভ মি এলোন।।' ঠিক আছে স্যার, এরকম কোনো টাকা ২০০৯ সালের জুলাই মাসে আপনি নিয়েছিলেন কিনা। তখন জবাব না দিয়ে শুধু, 'আমি ছাড়ি ভাই' বলে টেলিফোন রেখে দেন।
অনুসন্ধানে সোনালী ব্যাংক সুপ্রিমকোর্ট শাখায় বিচারপতি এবিএম খায়রুল হকের ব্যক্তিগত অ্যাকাউন্টের হিসাবে দেখা যায়, ২০০৯ সালের ২৭ জুলাই অ্যাকাউন্ট পে চেকের ১০ লাখ ৩৭ হাজার ২৫০ টাকা ট্রান্সপারের মাধ্যমে জমা হয়েছে। সেদিনই আবার নগদ উত্তোলন করা হয়েছে ৯ লাখ টাকা। এর পরের দিন অর্থাত্ ২৮ জুলাই নগদ ২০ হাজার টাকা নগদ উঠানো হয়েছে। এবং একই দিন অপর একটি অ্যাকাউন্ট পে চেকের মাধ্যমে ৩৮ হাজার ৬০০ টাকা তার হিসাব থেকে বিয়োগ হয়েছে।
গতকাল আইনমন্ত্রী ব্যারিস্টার শফিক আহমদের সঙ্গে যোগাযোগ করা হলে তিনি বলেন, 'এ বিষয়ে আমার কিছুই জানা নেই। সাবেক প্রধান বিচারপতি এবিএম খায়রুল হক প্রধানমন্ত্রীর ত্রাণ তহফিল থেকে আদৌ কোনো টাকা নিয়েছেন কিনা বা নিয়ে থাকলেও এই প্রক্রিয়ার সঙ্গে আইন মন্ত্রণালয়ের কোনো সম্পর্ক নেই।' তিনি আরও বলেন, 'অনেক সচিব, বিচারক ও বিচারপতি অসুস্থতার কারণে এবং ব্যক্তিগত সমস্যায় প্রধানমন্ত্রীর তহবিল থেকে অনুদান নেয়ার রেওয়াজ রয়েছে।'
বিচারপতি এবিএম খায়রুল হক হাইকোর্ট বিভাগে ও আপিল বিভাগে থাকাকালীন অনেক রায় দিয়ে আলোচিত হয়েছেন। পুরনো ঢাকার ওয়াইজঘাটে মুন সিনেমা হলের মালিকানার দাবি নিয়ে দায়ের করা একটি মামলাকে কেন্দ্র করে তিনি পঞ্চম সংশোধনী বাতিল করে রায় দেন। সামরিক ফরমানের মাধ্যমে সংশোধিত সংবিধানকে তিনি অবৈধ ঘোষণা করেন। আবার পঞ্চম সংশোধনীর নিজের পছন্দমত কিছু ধারাকে বৈধতাও দেন। এছাড়াও তিনি হাইকোর্ট বিভাগে থাকাকালীন শেখ মুজিবুর রহমানকে স্বাধীনতার ঘোষক হিসেবে রায় দিয়ে হৈ চৈ ফেলে দিয়েছেন। অনেক রাজনৈতিক বিষয়কে আদালতের ঘাড়ে টেনে নেয়া হয়।
আপিল বিভাগেও তিনি অনেক রায় দিয়েছেন। এর মধ্যে সাবেক প্রধানমন্ত্রী বেগম খালেদা জিয়ার ক্যান্টনমেন্টের বাড়ি নিয়ে দায়ের করা লিভ টু আপিল না শুনেই তিনি উত্থাপিত হয়নি মর্মে খারিজ করে দেন। প্রধান বিচারপতি হওয়ার পর তিনিই সর্বপ্রথম সুপ্রিমকোর্টে প্রধান বিচারপতির দফতরে শেখ মুজিবুর রহমানের ছবি স্থাপন করেন। এর আগে সুপ্রিমকোর্টে প্রধান বিচারপতির দফতরে কখনও কোনো রাজনৈতিক নেতার ছবি টাঙানো হয়নি।
সর্বশেষ বিদায়ের আগে তত্ত্বাবধায়ক সরকার নিয়ে তার রায়ের পর দেশে আবার রাজনৈতিক বিতর্ক সৃষ্টি হয়।
 
Regards,
NK

' ' ,
'Awami League' is not a name of a political party, it's a name of disease of Bangladesh.




__._,_.___


[* Moderator�s Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[chottala.com] Re: [ALOCHONA] Ziaur Rahman: the kind of statesman we need now



 

Dear Mr. Mahboob Hossain,

 

I politely and logically disagree with you.

 

Yes, if the same people would have written or published anything against Bangabandhu or Sheikh Hasina - I would have treated them as 'fact' – if he or she or any one on behalf of them had not protested about authenticity or genuinely those news or items and finally and historically established their objection.

 

I can cite many of such examples of protest, condemnation and even court case against someone!

 

A case was lodge against late Rintu (once I had some association in our college life with him along with many BCL workers-leaders like him) about his notorious book.

 
Later it was established in the Court of Bangladesh during last BNP-Jamat era, when a case was lodged by one of family member of Sheikh Hasina (husband of Sheikh Rehana) and after all stages of judicial process – Rintu was found guilty and punished and penalize (heavily, few crores) for his notorious book - full of bogus and fallacious items

 

Yes, when same or any other notable person write or tell against President Zia (like Maudud, Sayed Ali Ahsan, M R Akhtar Mukul, Muntasir Mamun, Gen Osmani, General Safiullah, Major Rafiq BU, Swadesh Roy and many more) - it becomes true (not like the Bible, as bible had changed many time) - when we see authenticity and genuineness of that news or item are not logically and authentically denied or protested by any of his people or supporters.

 

It is BNP and their leaders and supporters utmost duty to prove that - what Maudud had written in his books about VIP CHADABAZI of Zia and many other bad thing about Zia are "not" true and they should also take necessary ' strong ', ' exceptional ' and ' remarkable ' action against (thus proven liar and fraud like) Moudud.

 

As none of these had happened yet in last 25 years against Moudud (from when he started blaming Zia for many corruption and immoral activities).

 

So, we treat them as fact.

 

Rather, what we are observing that Moudud and other like him has become very close and valued to wife of Zia (in spite of his repeated DIGBAZI and serious allegation against Zia) Also like, SAKA, who phrased Khaleda Zia like a DOG!

 

So, we treat them as fact.

 

I am not telling Bangabandhu or Sheikh Hasina is a "FERESTA" (means he had committed no mistakes or crimes at all!).

 

But extent and number of their mistakes are very small than mistakes of any other leader of Bangladesh. We can compare it like the mistakes done by a 1st boy of the class to the mistakes done by a 3rd division holder of the same class.

 

Any 1st boy also generally does not get 100% marks (i.e. no mistakes).

He may get mere 60% (or less, when none get 1st class) or as high as 99 % (very rare)  of the total marks (depends on the level and standard of education). So, 1st boy also do make mistakes in exams!

 

Similarly a 3rd division holder may get 44.9% marks (maximum) and he has also done mistakes in same exam.

 

But, that 1st boy is not treated or evaluated or marked as that 3rd division holder !

 

Practically the 3rd division holder or common people never highlight the mistakes of the 1st boy

 

Or

 

Never say that they (the 1st boy and the 3rd division holder) are equal or "equivalent"  

 

Politically - contribution, sacrifice, suffering, foresightedness and hence position and status of Bangabandhu in the history of Bangladesh is much much elevated than any other (corresponding) politicians-leaders of Bangladesh (or the than East Pakistan).

 

We should not utter any other name along with Bangabandhu, they (like Suhrawardy, Sher-e-Bangla, Bhasani, Tajuddin, Sayed Najrul, Comrade Moni Singh's name may come). They (with due respect) may be placed in lower tier than him (but they are at much higher than we common people).

 

Capt. Mansur Ali, Kamruzzaman, Khondakar Mustaq, Dr. Kamal, Prof. Muzaffar, Gen Osmani's name should come at later tire.

 

Then the name of Sirajul Alam khan, Sheikh  Moni, Razzak, Tofael, Comrade Farhad, A K Khandakar, Gen Rob. General Safiullah, General Zia, General Khaled Misharraf, Col Taher's name may come)

 

We see the same thing in all sports ground. There is some level difference between 1st, 2nd and 3rd position in all "victory stand" at all sports field, to distinguish 1st, 2nd and 3rd position.

 

So, tell white as white and black as black.

 

Also think before you ink!

 

 

 --

"Sustha thakon, nirapade thakon ebong valo thakon"

Shuvechhante,

Shafiqur  Rahman Anu

N.B.: If any one is offended by content of this e-mail, please ignore & delete this e-mail. I also request you to inform me by an e- mail - to delete your name from my contact list.




On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:46 PM, mahboob hossain <mahboob987@yahoo.com> wrote:
 

Mr. Shafiq Bhuiyan,

If the same people would have written anything against Bangabadhu or Hasina you would have told that is dam lie. When same person told against President Zia it becomes ture like the Bible and you ensured that what Modud written is true. I requested everybody not to tell anything against Zia and Bangabandhu. They made some mistake but against their will I believe.
I did not expect such comment after my request for unity.
MH
 


From: Engr. Shafiq Bhuiyan <srbanunz@gmail.com>
To: alochona@yahoogroups.com; mahboob987@yahoo.com; Khabor <news@khabor.com>; chottala@yahoogroups.com
Cc: KHABOR INFO <info@khabor.com>; Nuruzzaman Manik <manik061624@yahoo.com>; Khobor <khabor@yahoogroups.com>; mina farahh <farahmina@gmail.com>; mahmudurart@yahoo.com; Salim Hazari <salimhazari@yahoo.com>; Khondkar Saleque <khondkar.saleque@gmail.com>; Kaium <kaium91@yahoo.com>; Arif Ahamed <ahamed.ahmed@gmail.com>
Sent: Wed, June 1, 2011 10:21:31 AM
Subject: Re: [ALOCHONA] Ziaur Rahman: the kind of statesman we need now

 

Dear Mr.mahboob Hossain 
 
Are  these false allegation against Zia?
 By his collegue and also by his wife's most depedent collegue Moudud and also by BNP minded medeia?

 
 
 
About Zia's corruption, please read the following mail posted by me.
 
General Zia started VIPCHADABAZI 1st time in Bangladesh.
He asked his 10 cabinet ministers to give him 3 lakh per month for "party".
 
You may think, this statement is not true or statement by some anti Zia politician /people
 
But  no,  bro,  no
 
It is written by that General Zia's higher-ranking cabinet member and later Khaleda-Ershad's most important ministerial colleague and now one of the closest and influential leaders (of Noakhali lobby) of Khaleda & BNP, most culprit and corrupt Moudud in one of his book.
 
This was disclosed and written by one of the meritorious journalist of Bangladesh and ex brilliant student Mr, Anisuzzaman Manik and it was published on the 22nd December 2009 in a sub-editorial column.

 
More than 17 montsh have passed, this report was published,
 
I thought either BNP will make some (LOK DHEKHANO) protest or will expel this culprit or corrupt Moudud from BNP and (will receive him again, later on, as Khaleda done to SAKA. SAKA was expelled from BNP when he compared Khaleda as a "dog" and later she welcomes him again in BNP and made him a BIG leader and minister.
 
But, alas, nothing happened to that culprit and corrupt Moudud nor any protest by BNP leaders or by BNP minded GIAN PAPEE (though  now Jamat-BNP has many media and few paid GIAN PAPEE too),
 
So, it is now again established that General Zia was not only cool brain killer but was also a corrupt and father of VIPCHADABAZI in our country, Bangladesh.
 
 
Please tell him to read the following news also
 
I mentioning below some of the many black records - facts about ex President late General Zia (based on some authentic documents). I have collected these from different newspapers only.
 
 
Zia and then his wife Khaleda Zia have only established Jamat -Shibir politically - economically - Said senior Journalist (anti Awami Legume minded) Mr. Foez Ahmed. For detail please read the news published in anti Awami League newspaper the Amadershomoy on 24.11.07
http://www.amadershomoy.com/news.php?id=214214&sys=3
 
 
Up to now in Bangladesh, inflation percentage was highest (18.46 %) during Zia era only .For detail please read the news published in anti Awami League newspaper the Naoyadigonta on 24.11.07
http://dailynayadiganta.com/2007/11/22/fullnews.asp?News_ID=53327&sec=1
 
 
 
Maximum numbers of people were hanged in Gen Zia era only (morethan70 %) 281 out of 400. For detail please read the news published in anti Awami League newspaper the Amadershomoy on 20.10.07
http://amadershomoy.com/news.php?id=206336&sys=3
 
 
Thanks Nuruzzaman Vai for your nice input on culprit and corrupt Zia.
 
http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=4650#comment-12458
 
But, most unfortunately, one of the blogger, named Adil Mahmood had said that, none can raise any allegation of corruption and napitism about late Zia and he was least corrupt among all the Presidents (of substantial period) of Bangladesh. Indirectly he was tyrying to say that criminal General Zia was an honest (99.99 % false) both personally and politically.
 
But these are all utter lies.
 
I had challenged him based on the following statements, facts and documents - but no reply.
 
I have seen his younger brother (most probalble his name was Mizanur Rahman and had many years ago) used to work in in BCCI bank in Muscat Oman. Where he got the job mainly as a brother of President Zia. We all know that BCCI bank used to patronise all corrupt statesmen of the thirld and Muslim world, which was bankrupted in 1991-1992 for the huge corruption and miss-management.
 
Zia's another corrupt cousin was made acting MD of BIMAN (during the ending period of last Jamat –BNP era and he (Zia's corrupt cousin) and his BEAI Flight Engr Iskandar had "landed" (ruined) BIMAN !
Please also read the famous book of Dr. Minah Farah about criminal Zia.
She has openly challenged all Zia supporters (NaPaki, Jamat-BNP) about the reliability, accuracy, authenticity and honesty of the contents ofd her book!
Only few honest and sincere writers, like her, can claim such genuineness in boldly and openly!
 
Finally, see the personal (both characterwise and monitory) corruption of General Zia's wife (Falu and monitory corruption) and his two son's (billion dollar monitory corruption and multiple terrible bad character)

 
Any logical comments, arguments will be cordially welcome.
 
 
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:54 PM, mahboob hossain <mahboob987@yahoo.com> wrote:
 

Nice article indeed ! I cannot imagine why Tarq and Khaleda did not
follow late president Zia. We may not support BNP or we may not
support AL but we should respect Bangabandhu and Zia for their
enormous contribution for this nation. I have never heard any word
against Sheik Mujib by Zia but how narrow minded AL people bring
lot of false allegation against Zia. Both leaders has some limitations we should forgive them because they were human. If we love Bangladesh we need to remain united and for this we must stop talking against them. If we insult Bangabandhu Zia will be insulted and if we insult Zia Bangabandhu will be insulted. If we are brave and honest we have to accept this truth.
Many truth has come out from this article.
 
Once again I thank Mr. Rumi Ahmed for his nice write up.
and also Isha Khan for circulating it
MH

Ziaur Rahman: the kind of statesman we need now


by Rumi Ahmed

Today is the 30th death anniversary of President Ziaur Rahman. This anniversary comes at a time when Zia, his image, contribution and his philosophy are under fiercest attack ever.

After decades of relentless attack on Zia, the war hero and Zia the statesman, after abysmal failure of Zia's party to portray him appropriately and effectively, it is no surprise if much of new generation Bangladeshis carry a faulty perception of Ziaur Rahman.

These days we talk a lot about bringing forward-looking youthfulness in our politics. And we also talk a lot about coming out of the slippery slope of hatred and vengeance and create a politics of reconciliation. We keep on hoping, hopelessly, for political leaders with courage and honesty.

Indeed, 35 years ago, it was Ziaur Rahman who brought all these traits together into the politics of Bangladesh and helped people of Bangladesh dream big.

When Zia went on live radio and declared "I hereby proclaim the independence of Bangladesh on behalf of our great national leader Bangabandhu…" he was only 34 years old. Then when he took over the helms of Bangladesh he was 39, and by the time he died leading Bangladesh through its most formative years, Zia was only 45.

Missing in all discussions on Zia is his outright bravery that shaped his and his family's life as well as shaped the fate of Bangladesh. At the age of 29, he won a military award of gallantry for his bravery during 1965 Indo-Pak war. On 25th March night, leaving his family at the mercy of murderous Pakistani forces, when he revolted and held his pistol at the head of his commanding officer Colonel Janjua – Zia knew very well that he only had one way out of this: fight and win the war.

A political settlement might have pardoned politicians, but for him and his men, a court martial and death penalty was inevitable. In this regard, he or other revolting military officers were not at the same ground with politicians involved with the war.

Five years later, on 3rd November 1975, when Zia was put under house arrest by Col. Shafaet Jamil's forces, death may have lurked much closer. Four days later, when Col Taher's Marxist indoctrinated murderous forces were chanting slogan, "Sepoy Sepoy bhai bhai, Officer er rokto chai (Sepoys are brethren – want blood of the officers), killing officers and their families indiscriminately, the whole military chain of command was at tatters, Zia — rather than confining himself to the safety of Army Chief's office protected by trusted soldiers — went to work. Again risking his life, all day he visited unit to unit to pacify the blood-thirsty rebels and with firm command disarmed the jawans, bringing them back under officers' control.

Rest of his life and leadership also contain examples of courage. Numerous coup attempts neither could isolate him from the people nor could slow him down.

Living at a time when politics in Bangladesh has become suffused with vengeance and communalism, and while we constantly lament lack of fresh intelligent faces in our politics, Zia's reconciliatory statesmanship seems like a remote phenomenon. With 15th August massacre and the bloody November at the backdrop, Zia created the biggest ever coalition to rebuild Bangladesh. Not only he included leftist, rightist, centrist political elements in his platform, he also relied heavily on fresh faces — young and bright professionals — in his nation building politics.

Unlike present day, Zia's political platform was not only for the career politicians, rich businessmen or retired generals or bureaucrats. Leading members of his party and government were the smartest physician, the smartest professor, the smartest accountant, the smartest barrister, the smartest editor and the wisest judge of that time.

He did not only focus on his own government and party; he understood fully the need and role of a strong opposition in a democracy. While he inherited a martial law imposed by the leaders of 15th August coup and constitutional one-party rule imposed by pre 15th August Awami League government of Bangabandhu — Zia made it his first priority to bring back multiparty democracy in Bangladesh. Rather than trying to permanently erase Awami League from Bangladesh, he took all the steps necessary to revamp Awami League from the ruins of BAKSAL.

Recently, Bangladesh went through an experimental under-disguise military rule to impose 'reform' within the main political parties of Bangladesh. Our political parties have always been managed in a dictatorial way by the leader. Despite all the false propaganda against him as a brutal dictator, Zia apparently was the first, if not the only leader to allow exercise of democracy within the party. Election of Shah Azizur Rahman as the leader of parliament and prime minister is a perfect example. Ziaur Rahman did not want Shah Aziz for the role owing to the latter's role in 1971. He wanted ex-NAP leader Moshiur Rahman Jadu Mia to become the leader of parliament and the prime minister.

When Jadu Mia passed away, he preferred a fresh face such as Dr Badruddoza Chowdhury or Saifur Rahman for the job. However, he also wanted the party's parliamentarians to choose their leader through a secret ballot, which the shrewd Shah Aziz managed to win. Zia could have ignored the wish of his MPs, but chose not to.

While we now see how petty partisanship trump over all other qualifications in government's day-to-day business, Zia always welcomed people who were not his direct supporters, including his political opponents. Zia's foreign minister was Professor Shamsul Haq, who served Zia till his death but never joined his party. Mr. M R Siddiqui — a prominent Awami League leader from Chittagong —refused to disown Awami League and remained president of Chittagong unit. Yet Zia, with a bipartisan spirit, appointed Mr. Siddiqui as his most vital ambassador, to the United States.

Zia's message is as relevant today as it was during his time. Read up any of his speeches, they will appear timely and pertinent. His speech defining Bangladeshi Nationalism remains the most inclusive and the most successful vision of our nationhood that was ever articulated by a Bangladeshi leader. His speeches about family planning, nuclear proliferation or climate change were decades ahead of their time in describing the challenges that would one day face us. In the field of diplomacy, he pioneered the friendly relations with countries of the Middle East that have become our most important labour markets and one of the mainstays of our economy.

TIME Magazine, in its June 8, 1981 issue, published a full-page report on the death of President Ziaur Rahman. The report ended with these sentences:

The slain Zia had been one of South Asia's most promising leaders, a man who lived modestly while others chose corruption, who searched tirelessly for solutions to his country's awesome poverty. He was also a fatalist. Once, reflecting on his service for Pakistan in the 1965 war with India over Kashmir, he observed: "There is no scientific explanation for a man to die or live. In front of me many people died, but I got a bonus of life." He used that bonus well, but last week it ran out.











__._,_.___


[* Moderator's Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[chottala.com] Re: [Sonar Bangladesh] Fw: [KHABOR] Ziaur Rahman: the kind of statesman we need now [1 Attachment]

[Attachment(s) from Engr. Shafiq Bhuiyan included below]

 

 

Some genuine allegation against

 

Corrupt, culprit, secret NaPaki agent General Zia

 

These were raised and put in writing by one of his ministerial and party colleague Maudud and also by his wife's most dependent colleague Moudud and also by BNP minded media, Like Nayadiganta, Amadershomoy etc!

 

 

To know detail about

 

Zia's corruption and VIP CHADABAZI,

 

Please read the attached pdf file.

 

 

General Zia started VIPCHADABAZI 1st time in Bangladesh.

He asked his 10 ministers to give him 3 lakh per month for "party".

 

You may think, this statement is not true or statement by some anti Zia politician /people

 

But  no,  bro,  no

 

It is written by that General Zia's higher-ranking cabinet member and later Khaleda-Ershad's most important ministerial colleague and now one of the closest and influential leaders (of Noakhali lobby) of Khaleda & BNP, most culprit and corrupt Moudud in one of his book.

 

This was disclosed and written by one of the meritorious journalist of Bangladesh and ex brilliant student Mr, Anisuzzaman Manik and it was published on the 22nd December 2009 in a sub-editorial column.

 

More than 17 months have passed, this report was published in a daily newspaper and also distributed on hundreds of web blogs, e-mailed BNP activist etc etc

 

Not a single protest was raised!

 

I thought either BNP will make some (LOK DHEKHANO) protest or will expel this culprit or corrupt Moudud from BNP and (will receive him again, later on, as Khaleda done to SAKA. SAKA was expelled from BNP when he compared Khaleda as a "dog" and later she welcomes him again in BNP and made him a BIG leader and minister.

 

But, alas, nothing happened to that culprit and corrupt Moudud nor any protest by BNP leaders or by BNP minded GIAN PAPEE (though  now Jamat-BNP has many media and few paid GIAN PAPEE too),

 

So, it is again established that

 

General Zia was not only cool brain killer

 

But was also

 

A utmost corrupt and father of VIPCHADABAZI

 

 in our country, Bangladesh.

 

 

Mr. Nuruzzaman also provided more input on culprit and corrupt Zia. Please see this link:

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=4650#comment-12458

 

Thanks Nuruzzaman Vai for your nice input on culprit and corrupt Zia.

 

Please read the following news also on culprit and corrupt Zia

 

I am mentioning below some of the many black records - facts about ex President late General Zia (based on some authentic documents). I have collected these from different newspapers only.

 

 

Zia and then his wife Khaleda Zia have only established Jamat -Shibir politically - economically - Said senior Journalist (anti Awami Legume minded) Mr. Foez Ahmed. For detail please read the news published in anti Awami League newspaper the Amadershomoy on 24.11.07

http://www.amadershomoy.com/news.php?id=214214&sys=3

 

 

Up to now in Bangladesh, inflation percentage was highest (18.46 %) during Zia era only .For detail please read the news published in anti Awami League and Jamat-BNP backed newspaper the Nayadigonta on 24.11.07

http://dailynayadiganta.com/2007/11/22/fullnews.asp?News_ID=53327&sec=1

 

 

Maximum numbers of people were hanged in Gen Zia era only (morethan70 %) 281 out of 400. For detail please read the news published in anti Awami League newspaper the Amadershomoy on 20.10.07

http://amadershomoy.com/news.php?id=206336&sys=3

 

 

But, most unfortunately, one of the blogger, named Adil Mahmood had said that, none can raise any allegation of corruption and nepotism about late Zia and he was least corrupt among all the Presidents (of substantial period) of Bangladesh. Indirectly he was trying to say that criminal General Zia was an honest (99.99 % false) both personally and politically.But these are all utter lies.

 

I had challenged him based on the following statements, facts and documents - but no authentic logical reply (from any of the overt and covert BNP-Jamat supporters).

 

I have seen his younger brother (most likely his name was Mizanur Rahman and had many years ago, after 1976 to 1981) used to work in in BCCI bank in Muscat, Sultanate of Oman. He got the job mainly as a brother of Bangladesh President Zia. We all know that BCCI bank used to patronise all corrupt statesmen of the third and Muslim world, which was bankrupted in 1991-1992 for the huge corruption and miss-management.

 

 

Zia's another corrupt cousin was made acting MD of BIMAN (during the ending period of last Jamat –BNP era and he (Zia's corrupt cousin) and his BEAI Flight Engr Iskandar had "landed" (ruined) BIMAN

 

Please also read the famous book of Dr. Minah Farah about criminal Zia.

 

She has openly challenged all Zia supporters (NaPaki, Jamat-BNP) about the reliability, accuracy, authenticity and honesty of the contents ofd her book!

Only few honest and sincere writers, like her, can claim such genuineness in boldly and openly!

 

Finally, see the personal (both character wise and monitory) corruption of General Zia's wife (Falu and monitory corruption) and his two son's (billion dollar monitory corruption and multiple terrible bad character)

 

Any logical comments, arguments will be cordially welcome.

 

 Sustha thakon, nirapade thakon ebong valo thakon"

Shuvechhante,

 
 
Shafiqur  Rahman Anu
 
N.B.: If any one is offended by content of this e-mail, please ignore & delete this e-mail. I also request you to inform me by an e- mail - to delete your name from my contact list.



On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Mohiuddin Anwar <mohiuddin@netzero.net> wrote:
 



---------- Forwarded Message ----------
From: Isha Khan <bdmailer@gmail.com>
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Subject: [KHABOR] Ziaur Rahman: the kind of statesman we need now
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 14:44:27 +0600

 

Ziaur Rahman: the kind of statesman we need now

by Rumi Ahmed

Today is the 30th death anniversary of President Ziaur Rahman. This anniversary comes at a time when Zia, his image, contribution and his philosophy are under fiercest attack ever.

After decades of relentless attack on Zia, the war hero and Zia the statesman, after abysmal failure of Zia�s party to portray him appropriately and effectively, it is no surprise if much of new generation Bangladeshis carry a faulty perception of Ziaur Rahman.

These days we talk a lot about bringing forward-looking youthfulness in our politics. And we also talk a lot about coming out of the slippery slope of hatred and vengeance and create a politics of reconciliation. We keep on hoping, hopelessly, for political leaders with courage and honesty.

Indeed, 35 years ago, it was Ziaur Rahman who brought all these traits together into the politics of Bangladesh and helped people of Bangladesh dream big.

When Zia went on live radio and declared �I hereby proclaim the independence of Bangladesh on behalf of our great national leader Bangabandhu�� he was only 34 years old. Then when he took over the helms of Bangladesh he was 39, and by the time he died leading Bangladesh through its most formative years, Zia was only 45.

Missing in all discussions on Zia is his outright bravery that shaped his and his family�s life as well as shaped the fate of Bangladesh. At the age of 29, he won a military award of gallantry for his bravery during 1965 Indo-Pak war. On 25th March night, leaving his family at the mercy of murderous Pakistani forces, when he revolted and held his pistol at the head of his commanding officer Colonel Janjua � Zia knew very well that he only had one way out of this: fight and win the war.

A political settlement might have pardoned politicians, but for him and his men, a court martial and death penalty was inevitable. In this regard, he or other revolting military officers were not at the same ground with politicians involved with the war.

Five years later, on 3rd November 1975, when Zia was put under house arrest by Col. Shafaet Jamil�s forces, death may have lurked much closer. Four days later, when Col Taher�s Marxist indoctrinated murderous forces were chanting slogan, �Sepoy Sepoy bhai bhai, Officer er rokto chai (Sepoys are brethren � want blood of the officers), killing officers and their families indiscriminately, the whole military chain of command was at tatters, Zia � rather than confining himself to the safety of Army Chief�s office protected by trusted soldiers � went to work. Again risking his life, all day he visited unit to unit to pacify the blood-thirsty rebels and with firm command disarmed the jawans, bringing them back under officers� control.

Rest of his life and leadership also contain examples of courage. Numerous coup attempts neither could isolate him from the people nor could slow him down.

Living at a time when politics in Bangladesh has become suffused with vengeance and communalism, and while we constantly lament lack of fresh intelligent faces in our politics, Zia�s reconciliatory statesmanship seems like a remote phenomenon. With 15th August massacre and the bloody November at the backdrop, Zia created the biggest ever coalition to rebuild Bangladesh. Not only he included leftist, rightist, centrist political elements in his platform, he also relied heavily on fresh faces � young and bright professionals � in his nation building politics.

Unlike present day, Zia�s political platform was not only for the career politicians, rich businessmen or retired generals or bureaucrats. Leading members of his party and government were the smartest physician, the smartest professor, the smartest accountant, the smartest barrister, the smartest editor and the wisest judge of that time.

He did not only focus on his own government and party; he understood fully the need and role of a strong opposition in a democracy. While he inherited a martial law imposed by the leaders of 15th August coup and constitutional one-party rule imposed by pre 15th August Awami League government of Bangabandhu � Zia made it his first priority to bring back multiparty democracy in Bangladesh. Rather than trying to permanently erase Awami League from Bangladesh, he took all the steps necessary to revamp Awami League from the ruins of BAKSAL.

Recently, Bangladesh went through an experimental under-disguise military rule to impose �reform� within the main political parties of Bangladesh. Our political parties have always been managed in a dictatorial way by the leader. Despite all the false propaganda against him as a brutal dictator, Zia apparently was the first, if not the only leader to allow exercise of democracy within the party. Election of Shah Azizur Rahman as the leader of parliament and prime minister is a perfect example. Ziaur Rahman did not want Shah Aziz for the role owing to the latter�s role in 1971. He wanted ex-NAP leader Moshiur Rahman Jadu Mia to become the leader of parliament and the prime minister.

When Jadu Mia passed away, he preferred a fresh face such as Dr Badruddoza Chowdhury or Saifur Rahman for the job. However, he also wanted the party�s parliamentarians to choose their leader through a secret ballot, which the shrewd Shah Aziz managed to win. Zia could have ignored the wish of his MPs, but chose not to.

While we now see how petty partisanship trump over all other qualifications in government�s day-to-day business, Zia always welcomed people who were not his direct supporters, including his political opponents. Zia�s foreign minister was Professor Shamsul Haq, who served Zia till his death but never joined his party. Mr. M R Siddiqui � a prominent Awami League leader from Chittagong �refused to disown Awami League and remained president of Chittagong unit. Yet Zia, with a bipartisan spirit, appointed Mr. Siddiqui as his most vital ambassador, to the United States.

Zia�s message is as relevant today as it was during his time. Read up any of his speeches, they will appear timely and pertinent. His speech defining Bangladeshi Nationalism remains the most inclusive and the most successful vision of our nationhood that was ever articulated by a Bangladeshi leader. His speeches about family planning, nuclear proliferation or climate change were decades ahead of their time in describing the challenges that would one day face us. In the field of diplomacy, he pioneered the friendly relations with countries of the Middle East that have become our most important labour markets and one of the mainstays of our economy.

TIME Magazine, in its June 8, 1981 issue, published a full-page report on the death of President Ziaur Rahman. The report ended with these sentences:

The slain Zia had been one of South Asia�s most promising leaders, a man who lived modestly while others chose corruption, who searched tirelessly for solutions to his country�s awesome poverty. He was also a fatalist. Once, reflecting on his service for Pakistan in the 1965 war with India over Kashmir, he observed: �There is no scientific explanation for a man to die or live. In front of me many people died, but I got a bonus of life.� He used that bonus well, but last week it ran out.

����������������
Rumi Ahmed is a blogger.

http://opinion.bdnews24.com/2011/05/30/ziaur-rahman-the-kind-of-statesman-we-need-now/

____________________________________________________________
Get Free Email with Video Mail Video Chat!




--
"

Attachment(s) from Engr. Shafiq Bhuiyan

1 of 1 File(s)


__._,_.___


[* Moderator�s Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___