Banner Advertise

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

[chottala.com] Boishak



 


__._,_.___


[* Moderator's Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[chottala.com] I can say with certainty that AL has very worst fate . Sign and sympotoms are ovbious in AL behaviour:Observr



One sign is here

  , ,    

 


?




__._,_.___


[* Moderator's Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[chottala.com] Re: [khabor.com] Fake Sunita Paul: The International (Wo)man of Mystery - A Shada Kalo blog



 It may be someones pen name . But is it fake what she is writing?  if, then put your logic, true information.

 
 
 
 
    ' ' ?
 
 
 
 
 
 


--- On Wed, 4/15/09, Syed Aslam <Syed.Aslam3@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Syed Aslam <Syed.Aslam3@gmail.com>
Subject: [khabor.com] Fake Sunita Paul: The International (Wo)man of Mystery - A Shada Kalo blog
To: "Khobor" <khabor@yahoogroups.com>, "notun Bangladesh" <notun_bangladesh@yahoogroups.com>, "reformbd Reform_bd_YG" <reform-bd@yahoogroups.com>, "Amra Bangladesi" <amra-bangladesi@yahoogroups.com>, chottala@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, April 15, 2009, 1:55 PM

Sunita Paul: The International (Wo)man of Mystery

Apr 12, 2009

Sunita Paul:
  • Deaf
  • Dumb
  • Born in an affluent family in Kochin
  • Twice masters (what the hell is that?)
  • A Fraud
  • A Plagiarist, and
  • A Liar
The first 4 are very easy to prove. Let's see what "Ms." Paul put up as her biography on American Chronicle, a website that regularly publishes her writing.

Wondering why I included an image instead of just linking to her bio? Because "Ms." Paul's bio has a mysterious habit of changing, just like some of her writing has a habit of disappearing (more on that later)

Can we agree on the first four items in my description of Ms. Paul? Then lets move on to the other three.

Sunita Paul: Fraud
Rest assured, I do not call Ms. Paul a "fraud" without any basis. First, a little lesson in American identity, and usage of English. I have spent half of my life in the USA, and people never, ever, describe someone in a publication with reference to their family background, simply because it is considered [a] rude and [b] having no bearing on a person's ability to perform. "Affluent family" is a strangely Asian affectation. Calling a mute person "dumb" is also typically an Asian trait. Lastly, no native speaker of English would also use the phrase "Twice masters" to describe two masters degrees--the common usage is "double masters" or simply "two masters." So we can safely conclude that this description was not written by an American who works for American Chronicle.

Question is, did "Ms." Sunita Paul write this? And if "she" did not write this, did "she" never see a glaring inaccuracy in her own bio on a site where she regularly publishes?

I am, of course, referring to the wonderful town of "Kochin" where "Ms." Paul was allegedly born.

See, this has been nagging me for a while. Paul is a Bangla last name. There is no rule that a Bangali from India could not be born in Kerala, where "Kochin" is located, and there is no reason why it could not be an established and "affluent" family there. But seemed a little unusual. But I dug a little, and to understand the implications of the results, let's play a little game. Raise your hand if you know the name of the town you were born in. Keep it raised if you don't know how to spell it, and lower it if you know how to spell it. How many hands do you have up?

Turns out our dear "Ms." Paul, this "twice masters" in Political Science and Journalism, would have one hand up in the air. Because there is no city/town/hamlet/ village in India called Kochin. There is, however, a famous city called "Cochin", since 1967 called "Kochi." However, in its many incarnations, it has never been spelled "Kochin."

Could this be true that "Ms." Paul does not know how to spell the name of her city of birth? Conclusion: "she" has never been to Kochi/Cochin- -only heard it mentioned in conversation and decided to use that as the birthplace of "her" fictional persona. "She" did not do any research, but just started using that in the fictitious bio.

Verdict:

Sunita Paul: Plagiarist.
Mashuqur Rahman, a blogger who has done ground-breaking research into the genocide of 1971 by the Pakistani Army against the civilians of Bangladesh, broke a story about the Chief of Staff of the Bangladesh Army being involved in transactions at an Army-owned bank that clearly violated banking regulations. His writeup on this was published in 2007, and was picked up by the media.

Mashuqur wrote in October of 2007:
Not only are General Moeen and his brother, Iqbal, on Trust Bank's board of directors, they are also borrowers of large sums of money from the bank. According to a prospectus filed by Trust Bank before its IPO, General Moeen had a loan with an outstanding balance of Taka 9,969,215 at the end of 2005. By the end of 2006, the outstanding amount had been reduced to Taka 3,315,323.




Sunita Paul wrote in 2009:
General Moeen and his brother, Iqbal, on Trust Bank´s board of directors, they are borrowers of large sums of money from the bank. According to a prospectus filed by Trust Bank before its IPO, General Moeen had a loan with an outstanding balance of Tk. 9,969,215 at the end of 2005. By the end of 2006, the outstanding amount had been reduced to Tk. 3,315,323.

Notice the usage in the first sentance. After the 2nd comma, Mashuqur's sentence continues with a "they" and it fits perfectly.
Not only are General Moeen and his brother, Iqbal, on Trust Bank's board of directors, they are also borrowers of large sums of money from the bank.
"Ms." Paul's writing contains the same "they" after the same comma, but it makes no sense. The pronoun appears out of nowhere.
General Moeen and his brother, Iqbal, on Trust Bank´s board of directors, they are borrowers of large sums of money from the bank.
Compare other sentences in the same paragraph for word-for-word, punctuation- for-punctuation, similarity.

I could cite other examples, but I will leave it to you, dear reader, as an exercise.

Conclusion: "Ms." Paul lifted this from the post by Mashuqur Rahman, made a minor change and did not bother fixing the grammatical error resulting from "her" change. She is a plagiarist-- a thief and a cheat.


Are you wondering where the article by "Ms." Sunita Paul is, and why it is not linked in the quote above?

Funny you should ask. Since Mashuqur Rahman accused "Ms." Sunita Paul of plagiarism, the article, titled "Ruling party getting set to try Bangladesh Generals" has vanished from the American Chronicle site. But due to the wonderful Google Cache, the bane of existance for all online liars, it still lives on. You can find it here, and see the Google result here. "She" actually tried to destroy the evidence when accused of being a plagiarist.

But wait.. what is this I see? Oh my! "Ms." Paul may have been able to remove the article from American Chronicle, but it is also on Global Politician, Priyo.com, and some other sites. So you would be able to make the comparison after all.

Sunita Paul: Liar
In "her" hatchet job trying to defend the plagiarism allegation, "Ms." Paul launched a vicious ad hominem attack against Mashuqur Rahman, that mostly revolves around Mr. Rahman's alleged allegiance to Awami League. While saner readers may ask what Mr. Rahman's political philosophy has to do with "Ms." Paul's plagiarism, it is obvious that such plain logic escapes "Ms." Paul.

Mr. Rahman may actually be the first to agree that he has questioned the transparency of General Moeen's finances, or criticized certain mainstream newspapers and their editors. After all, "Ms." Paul cites examples of Mr. Rahman's harsh criticism of New Age:
Mashuqur Rahman is also a harsh critic of Bangladeshi press. Commenting on Dhaka´s prominent English language newspaper, The New Age, he wrote "most progressive English language newspaper in Bangladesh, The New Age, published an editorial yesterday that offered no support to the cartoonist and backed the government´s decision to jail the young man for retelling a joke that even Islamists themselves have published before."
What does that have to do with the price of tea in China, I mean, the documented allegation that "Ms." Paul is a plagiarist? Had she cited Mr. Rahman falsely accusing others of plagiarism, then at least "she" could establish a pattern.

Let's see if we can parse this logic. Mashuqur Rahman criticized the press and the Army chief in Bangladesh. Ergo, his statement that Sunita Paul is a plagiarist is [a] True, or [b] False.

You would be correct in concluding that "Ms." Paul being a plagiarist has nothing to do with what Mr. Rahman thought of certain newspapers and their editors. Obviously, at least the Daily Star seems to take the criticism in good grace--they just published Mr. Rahman's op-ed where he charges that "Ms." Paul is a plagiarist and a cheat.

So while "Ms." Paul is trying to defend the Daily Star from Mr. Mashuqur Rahman's criticism, they themselves are publishing Mr. Rahman's article about Sunita Paul. Oh, the irony.

"Ms." Paul ends "her" rant with this graph:
Mashuqur Rahman calls me a plagarist and cheat. He did not cite one example behind such nasty allegation. I have never violated any copyright of any publication, ever. Wherefrom he invented this plagarism theory? Why he terms me as a 'cheat'? Just because I am not also one of the lap-dogs of Bangladesh Awami League like him?
Mr. Rahman cited chapter and verse, including links to the actual articles that he wrote in 2007, and "Ms." Paul plagiarized in 2009. "Ms." Paul lied outright in the above paragraph.


So we resolve that "Ms." Paul may not have "twice masters" and may never even seen the city of "Kochin" with her own eyes, let alone be born there, but she is a "thrice masters": Fraud, Plagiarist and a Liar.











14 comments:

tanoydutta said...
It is a great write up J Bhai
Nazim Farhan Choudhury said...
If I'm not mistaken I had read an article by Ms Sunita Paul in the Bangkok Post (or was it The Nation, Thailand) talking about how great then minister Lutfurzamman Babar was.

I was also forwarded another article by her praising Barrister Moudud Ahmed's political poweress.

If I had a beard, I'd be scratching it now!!
Anonymous said...
I did the same! This morning forwarded an article of Mrs. Paul to my friends regarding Nanok's illness and leaving Bangladesh to avoid inquiry commission!
I should think once again to do the same in future. Thank you for such writing.
Saki. Germany.
Zafa Noor said...
Can't thank you enough J.

This worm named Sunita Paul needs to be stopped. For years (s)he had been trying craps about Bangladesh and making bizzare allegations without any evidence.

Sunita Paul is a liar, a plagiarist a fraud.

His/her writing has always been in the same tune with another scum named Salahuddin Shoaib Chowdhury - who's on the payroll of the zionists and handles by Richard Benkim.
rayhan rashid said...
This has been bugging us for a while. Cannot really thank you enough (echoing Zafa) for this real public-interest post. We must ensure this is circulated as widely as possible. We will do our best:

http://www.nirmaaan .com/blog/ rayhanrashid/ 3386#comment- 1768

Cheers.
M H said...
Whoever (s)he is, I find her commentary to be much more interesting and incisive than what is available from other sources.

I notice a sudden rush to attack the messenger. What about the message? Her message appears to be non-partisan and she discusses issues openly what everyone in Bangladesh should be discussing.

The fact is Bangladesh "Democracy" thus far has been a farce hoisted upon the people by the criminal mafia organizations. Crime has skyrocketed in 3 short months! In 3 months Awami League criminals are making up for lost time. Just a few days ago ministers nephew was caught with counterfeit money and then released!

Which other democratically elected political organization has so many family members calling the shots behind the scene? One can argue the AL has turned into a crime family working under guise of politics.

Is there any competent political party? NO. there is NONE. Please let's talk about that. Stick to the message. Bangladesh is a failed state. Democracy has shown itself to not be an option to alleviate the massive poverty and corruption.

What is the solution to Bangladesh's ills? Let us discuss that instead of engaging in unfounded nationalism.
Zia said...
She is one (wo)man opposition party who is keeping the Govt in line. She may be many things other than a journo, but she is doing a hack of a job which the opposition party can not do - like opposing bad decisions and at least trying a little to get justice for slain officers.
Anonymous said...
MH ,

Look from your comments that you are

not from Bangladesh. Bangladesh is a failed state? is it that every one is telling Pakistan is a failed country . so you are become jealous and spreading venom about Bangladesh.
Iftheker Mohammad said...
I think this is Shafiq Rehman, no one else.
M H said...
@ Anon April 13, 2009 12:45:00 PM

Excessive Nationalism is a mental sickness that keeps the nationalist from making cogent decisions.

Nationalism is a sickness clearly evident in most Bangalis. We see it in the 2 illiterate women leaders of the 2 major political organizations.

These mentally sick women spout nationalistic rhetoric to placate the masses, and then spend all of their time collecting bribes and figuring out how to damage the other party. They don't know anything about nation building.We see it in the Student political parties killing each other. It's everywhere.

How many of Bangladesh politicians are honest? how many have the minimum level of education required to deal with the needs of modern governance? Maybe one or two.

Just 2 days ago a ministers nephew was caught with few million counterfeit Taka. And then released. A mass murderer is now minister. A corrupt illiterate woman is PM. Not to mention ALL circumstantial evidence points to several politicians of the current government being involved in the killing of its own military leaders! These are all hall marks of a failed state.

Outside of rampant criminal activity/corruption /extra-judicial killings/incompeten ce, maybe you can educate us on what is functioning in Bangladesh government.

Please stay on topic. Let's discuss the message, not the messenger. Sunita Paul writes about the very issues Bangladeshis need to surmount. As in Afghanistan, Bangladesh is functioning solely because of grass roots organizations. No need to get emotional about reality.
Anonymous said...
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
Sarkar said...
I strongly suspect Salah Uddin Shoaib Chowdhury of Weekly Blitz behind this fraud "Sunita Paul". This character is nothing but a new sinister game by deceitful right-wing cirle.
Fariha said...
MH

There's nothing wrong with being non-partisan. But you can't seriously expect all of us to not take an anti-bangladesh, plagiarist, liar and possibly a fictitious character masquerading as a journalist to task. That's all that the bloggers are trying to do.

PLus on most occasion she writes trash. Does anyone remember her post on army wives?
Zafa Noor said...
MH finds her commentary to be "much more interesting and incisive than what is available from other sources".
Sure. Becasue (s)he steals from other people's hard worked literary pieces/articles and pass on as hers.

The fraud pretending to be one 'Sunita Paul' has plagiarized from top notch world class news papers like New York Times. She will soon be charged for violating Digital Millennium Copyright Act.
What would you say if/when Sunita Paul decides to talk nonsense about you – just because someone was paying her lots of money to do that or that she decided one day she did not think you are good for Bangladesh anymore?
If you think you're being cogent by sticking your head in the sand –make that your sole problem – not a national one. You say "Please stay on topic." If you are literate enough to comprehend the post – it is all about fraudulence of one mysterious Sunita Paul (not Bangladeshi politics).

Zia, by 'she' if you mean Sunita Paul you are being delusional.
'She' is like a hired gun – writes mostly for the Zionists. And she'd write for anybody against abybody if (s)he liked the money amount. And writing is easy for her because she does not do her research or analysis she just copies from highly acclaimed writers and bloggers.
She is worse than the criminals 'she' supposedly 'writes' against.

Sarkar, you are not the only one having this nagging suspicion. That worm SSC has been charged with sedition couple of times. But his handler Richard Belkin got him loose every time.

Fariha, thank you for your sound wisdom dear. Most of the comments above was getting me frustrated.



__._,_.___


[* Moderator�s Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[chottala.com] Fake Sunita Paul: The International (Wo)man of Mystery - A Shada Kalo blog



Sunita Paul: The International (Wo)man of Mystery

Apr 12, 2009

Sunita Paul:

  • Deaf
  • Dumb
  • Born in an affluent family in Kochin
  • Twice masters (what the hell is that?)
  • A Fraud
  • A Plagiarist, and
  • A Liar
The first 4 are very easy to prove. Let's see what "Ms." Paul put up as her biography on American Chronicle, a website that regularly publishes her writing.

Wondering why I included an image instead of just linking to her bio? Because "Ms." Paul's bio has a mysterious habit of changing, just like some of her writing has a habit of disappearing (more on that later)

Can we agree on the first four items in my description of Ms. Paul? Then lets move on to the other three.

Sunita Paul: Fraud
Rest assured, I do not call Ms. Paul a "fraud" without any basis. First, a little lesson in American identity, and usage of English. I have spent half of my life in the USA, and people never, ever, describe someone in a publication with reference to their family background, simply because it is considered [a] rude and [b] having no bearing on a person's ability to perform. "Affluent family" is a strangely Asian affectation. Calling a mute person "dumb" is also typically an Asian trait. Lastly, no native speaker of English would also use the phrase "Twice masters" to describe two masters degrees--the common usage is "double masters" or simply "two masters." So we can safely conclude that this description was not written by an American who works for American Chronicle.

Question is, did "Ms." Sunita Paul write this? And if "she" did not write this, did "she" never see a glaring inaccuracy in her own bio on a site where she regularly publishes?

I am, of course, referring to the wonderful town of "Kochin" where "Ms." Paul was allegedly born.

See, this has been nagging me for a while. Paul is a Bangla last name. There is no rule that a Bangali from India could not be born in Kerala, where "Kochin" is located, and there is no reason why it could not be an established and "affluent" family there. But seemed a little unusual. But I dug a little, and to understand the implications of the results, let's play a little game. Raise your hand if you know the name of the town you were born in. Keep it raised if you don't know how to spell it, and lower it if you know how to spell it. How many hands do you have up?

Turns out our dear "Ms." Paul, this "twice masters" in Political Science and Journalism, would have one hand up in the air. Because there is no city/town/hamlet/village in India called Kochin. There is, however, a famous city called "Cochin", since 1967 called "Kochi." However, in its many incarnations, it has never been spelled "Kochin."

Could this be true that "Ms." Paul does not know how to spell the name of her city of birth? Conclusion: "she" has never been to Kochi/Cochin--only heard it mentioned in conversation and decided to use that as the birthplace of "her" fictional persona. "She" did not do any research, but just started using that in the fictitious bio.

Verdict:

Sunita Paul: Plagiarist.
Mashuqur Rahman, a blogger who has done ground-breaking research into the genocide of 1971 by the Pakistani Army against the civilians of Bangladesh, broke a story about the Chief of Staff of the Bangladesh Army being involved in transactions at an Army-owned bank that clearly violated banking regulations. His writeup on this was published in 2007, and was picked up by the media.

Mashuqur wrote in October of 2007:
Not only are General Moeen and his brother, Iqbal, on Trust Bank's board of directors, they are also borrowers of large sums of money from the bank. According to a prospectus filed by Trust Bank before its IPO, General Moeen had a loan with an outstanding balance of Taka 9,969,215 at the end of 2005. By the end of 2006, the outstanding amount had been reduced to Taka 3,315,323.




Sunita Paul wrote in 2009:
General Moeen and his brother, Iqbal, on Trust Bank´s board of directors, they are borrowers of large sums of money from the bank. According to a prospectus filed by Trust Bank before its IPO, General Moeen had a loan with an outstanding balance of Tk. 9,969,215 at the end of 2005. By the end of 2006, the outstanding amount had been reduced to Tk. 3,315,323.

Notice the usage in the first sentance. After the 2nd comma, Mashuqur's sentence continues with a "they" and it fits perfectly.
Not only are General Moeen and his brother, Iqbal, on Trust Bank's board of directors, they are also borrowers of large sums of money from the bank.
"Ms." Paul's writing contains the same "they" after the same comma, but it makes no sense. The pronoun appears out of nowhere.
General Moeen and his brother, Iqbal, on Trust Bank´s board of directors, they are borrowers of large sums of money from the bank.
Compare other sentences in the same paragraph for word-for-word, punctuation-for-punctuation, similarity.

I could cite other examples, but I will leave it to you, dear reader, as an exercise.

Conclusion: "Ms." Paul lifted this from the post by Mashuqur Rahman, made a minor change and did not bother fixing the grammatical error resulting from "her" change. She is a plagiarist--a thief and a cheat.


Are you wondering where the article by "Ms." Sunita Paul is, and why it is not linked in the quote above?

Funny you should ask. Since Mashuqur Rahman accused "Ms." Sunita Paul of plagiarism, the article, titled "Ruling party getting set to try Bangladesh Generals" has vanished from the American Chronicle site. But due to the wonderful Google Cache, the bane of existance for all online liars, it still lives on. You can find it here, and see the Google result here. "She" actually tried to destroy the evidence when accused of being a plagiarist.

But wait.. what is this I see? Oh my! "Ms." Paul may have been able to remove the article from American Chronicle, but it is also on Global Politician, Priyo.com, and some other sites. So you would be able to make the comparison after all.

Sunita Paul: Liar
In "her" hatchet job trying to defend the plagiarism allegation, "Ms." Paul launched a vicious ad hominem attack against Mashuqur Rahman, that mostly revolves around Mr. Rahman's alleged allegiance to Awami League. While saner readers may ask what Mr. Rahman's political philosophy has to do with "Ms." Paul's plagiarism, it is obvious that such plain logic escapes "Ms." Paul.

Mr. Rahman may actually be the first to agree that he has questioned the transparency of General Moeen's finances, or criticized certain mainstream newspapers and their editors. After all, "Ms." Paul cites examples of Mr. Rahman's harsh criticism of New Age:
Mashuqur Rahman is also a harsh critic of Bangladeshi press. Commenting on Dhaka´s prominent English language newspaper, The New Age, he wrote "most progressive English language newspaper in Bangladesh, The New Age, published an editorial yesterday that offered no support to the cartoonist and backed the government´s decision to jail the young man for retelling a joke that even Islamists themselves have published before."
What does that have to do with the price of tea in China, I mean, the documented allegation that "Ms." Paul is a plagiarist? Had she cited Mr. Rahman falsely accusing others of plagiarism, then at least "she" could establish a pattern.

Let's see if we can parse this logic. Mashuqur Rahman criticized the press and the Army chief in Bangladesh. Ergo, his statement that Sunita Paul is a plagiarist is [a] True, or [b] False.

You would be correct in concluding that "Ms." Paul being a plagiarist has nothing to do with what Mr. Rahman thought of certain newspapers and their editors. Obviously, at least the Daily Star seems to take the criticism in good grace--they just published Mr. Rahman's op-ed where he charges that "Ms." Paul is a plagiarist and a cheat.

So while "Ms." Paul is trying to defend the Daily Star from Mr. Mashuqur Rahman's criticism, they themselves are publishing Mr. Rahman's article about Sunita Paul. Oh, the irony.

"Ms." Paul ends "her" rant with this graph:
Mashuqur Rahman calls me a plagarist and cheat. He did not cite one example behind such nasty allegation. I have never violated any copyright of any publication, ever. Wherefrom he invented this plagarism theory? Why he terms me as a 'cheat'? Just because I am not also one of the lap-dogs of Bangladesh Awami League like him?
Mr. Rahman cited chapter and verse, including links to the actual articles that he wrote in 2007, and "Ms." Paul plagiarized in 2009. "Ms." Paul lied outright in the above paragraph.


So we resolve that "Ms." Paul may not have "twice masters" and may never even seen the city of "Kochin" with her own eyes, let alone be born there, but she is a "thrice masters": Fraud, Plagiarist and a Liar.











14 comments:

tanoydutta said...

It is a great write up J Bhai

Nazim Farhan Choudhury said...

If I'm not mistaken I had read an article by Ms Sunita Paul in the Bangkok Post (or was it The Nation, Thailand) talking about how great then minister Lutfurzamman Babar was.

I was also forwarded another article by her praising Barrister Moudud Ahmed's political poweress.

If I had a beard, I'd be scratching it now!!

Anonymous said...

I did the same! This morning forwarded an article of Mrs. Paul to my friends regarding Nanok's illness and leaving Bangladesh to avoid inquiry commission!
I should think once again to do the same in future. Thank you for such writing.
Saki. Germany.

Zafa Noor said...

Can't thank you enough J.

This worm named Sunita Paul needs to be stopped. For years (s)he had been trying craps about Bangladesh and making bizzare allegations without any evidence.

Sunita Paul is a liar, a plagiarist a fraud.

His/her writing has always been in the same tune with another scum named Salahuddin Shoaib Chowdhury - who's on the payroll of the zionists and handles by Richard Benkim.

rayhan rashid said...

This has been bugging us for a while. Cannot really thank you enough (echoing Zafa) for this real public-interest post. We must ensure this is circulated as widely as possible. We will do our best:

http://www.nirmaaan.com/blog/rayhanrashid/3386#comment-1768


Cheers.

M H said...

Whoever (s)he is, I find her commentary to be much more interesting and incisive than what is available from other sources.

I notice a sudden rush to attack the messenger. What about the message? Her message appears to be non-partisan and she discusses issues openly what everyone in Bangladesh should be discussing.

The fact is Bangladesh "Democracy" thus far has been a farce hoisted upon the people by the criminal mafia organizations. Crime has skyrocketed in 3 short months! In 3 months Awami League criminals are making up for lost time. Just a few days ago ministers nephew was caught with counterfeit money and then released!

Which other democratically elected political organization has so many family members calling the shots behind the scene? One can argue the AL has turned into a crime family working under guise of politics.

Is there any competent political party? NO. there is NONE. Please let's talk about that. Stick to the message. Bangladesh is a failed state. Democracy has shown itself to not be an option to alleviate the massive poverty and corruption.

What is the solution to Bangladesh's ills? Let us discuss that instead of engaging in unfounded nationalism.

Zia said...

She is one (wo)man opposition party who is keeping the Govt in line. She may be many things other than a journo, but she is doing a hack of a job which the opposition party can not do - like opposing bad decisions and at least trying a little to get justice for slain officers.

Anonymous said...

MH ,

Look from your comments that you are

not from Bangladesh. Bangladesh is a failed state? is it that every one is telling Pakistan is a failed country . so you are become jealous and spreading venom about Bangladesh.

Iftheker Mohammad said...

I think this is Shafiq Rehman, no one else.

M H said...

@ Anon April 13, 2009 12:45:00 PM

Excessive Nationalism is a mental sickness that keeps the nationalist from making cogent decisions.

Nationalism is a sickness clearly evident in most Bangalis. We see it in the 2 illiterate women leaders of the 2 major political organizations.

These mentally sick women spout nationalistic rhetoric to placate the masses, and then spend all of their time collecting bribes and figuring out how to damage the other party. They don't know anything about nation building.We see it in the Student political parties killing each other. It's everywhere.

How many of Bangladesh politicians are honest? how many have the minimum level of education required to deal with the needs of modern governance? Maybe one or two.

Just 2 days ago a ministers nephew was caught with few million counterfeit Taka. And then released. A mass murderer is now minister. A corrupt illiterate woman is PM. Not to mention ALL circumstantial evidence points to several politicians of the current government being involved in the killing of its own military leaders! These are all hall marks of a failed state.

Outside of rampant criminal activity/corruption/extra-judicial killings/incompetence, maybe you can educate us on what is functioning in Bangladesh government.

Please stay on topic. Let's discuss the message, not the messenger. Sunita Paul writes about the very issues Bangladeshis need to surmount. As in Afghanistan, Bangladesh is functioning solely because of grass roots organizations.No need to get emotional about reality.

Anonymous said...
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
Sarkar said...

I strongly suspect Salah Uddin Shoaib Chowdhury of Weekly Blitz behind this fraud "Sunita Paul". This character is nothing but a new sinister game by deceitful right-wing cirle.

Fariha said...

MH

There's nothing wrong with being non-partisan. But you can't seriously expect all of us to not take an anti-bangladesh, plagiarist, liar and possibly a fictitious character masquerading as a journalist to task. That's all that the bloggers are trying to do.

PLus on most occasion she writes trash. Does anyone remember her post on army wives?

Zafa Noor said...

MH finds her commentary to be "much more interesting and incisive than what is available from other sources".
Sure. Becasue (s)he steals from other people's hard worked literary pieces/articles and pass on as hers.

The fraud pretending to be one 'Sunita Paul' has plagiarized from top notch world class news papers like New York Times. She will soon be charged for violating Digital Millennium Copyright Act.
What would you say if/when Sunita Paul decides to talk nonsense about you – just because someone was paying her lots of money to do that or that she decided one day she did not think you are good for Bangladesh anymore?
If you think you're being cogent by sticking your head in the sand –make that your sole problem – not a national one. You say "Please stay on topic." If you are literate enough to comprehend the post – it is all about fraudulence of one mysterious Sunita Paul (not Bangladeshi politics).

Zia, by 'she' if you mean Sunita Paul you are being delusional.
'She' is like a hired gun – writes mostly for the Zionists. And she'd write for anybody against abybody if (s)he liked the money amount. And writing is easy for her because she does not do her research or analysis she just copies from highly acclaimed writers and bloggers.
She is worse than the criminals 'she' supposedly 'writes' against.

Sarkar, you are not the only one having this nagging suspicion. That worm SSC has been charged with sedition couple of times. But his handler Richard Belkin got him loose every time.

Fariha, thank you for your sound wisdom dear. Most of the comments above was getting me frustrated.



__._,_.___


[* Moderator's Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___