Banner Advertise

Wednesday, March 31, 2010

[chottala.com] Towards a Free and Fair War Crime Tribunal in Bangladesh



Very informative article by two renowned scholars:
 
By Dr. S. Serajul Islam and Dr. M. Saidul Islam
Although Bangladesh (formerly East Pakistan) got its independence from Pakistan in 1971 following a bloody war, the nation has yet to resolve one of its contentious issues, the issue of war criminals, that is still dividing the nation. Today, the country is ready to try the ‘war criminals’ not of Pakistani forces but of its own people who opposed the idea of an independent Bangladesh, fought for a united Pakistan, and committed war crimes.

As an election promise, the government of Bangladesh seems to be very serious in prosecuting the war criminals through a special tribunal despite doubts and skepticisms mounting from home and abroad regarding a free and fair trial. Recently, the American Muslim Taskforce on Civil Rights and Elections (AMT), a coalition of major national Islamic organizations, held a news conference on 22 March 2010 in the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., to call for ending, among other things, ‘suppression of political oppositions and wrongful accusation and persecution of Islamic leaders for so-called “war crime”.’

A petition signed by AMT Chair Dr. Agha Saeed was also sent to the Secretary of State, Hilary Clinton (AMT Newsletter, Vol. 10, No. 1). International Bar Association (IBA) also found about a dozen loopholes in The Crimes (Tribunal) Act, 1973, by which the accused would be tried (bdnews24.com, Dhaka, 14 March 2010). Most importantly, Evidence Act and Criminal Procedure code application has been excluded by section 23 of the Act, and this may make the tribunal a kangaroo court. Therefore, despite the government’s commitment to assuring a fair and free trial, the whole move remains largely contested.

The AMT, along with other keen observers, think that the government is deliberately targeting a particular political party, Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami (BJI), the largest mainstream liberal Islamic party of the country that formed coalition government with Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) during 2001-2006. They claim that Bangladesh Awami League (BAL), the party in power, came up with a plan to try the “war criminals” of 1971 and accordingly have created a discourse in which they have selectively targeted only the leaders of the BJI.

It is evident in history, however, that war crimes, alongside grievous oppression of civilians were committed in the 1971 war by the Pakistani forces and some of their local allies. Following the independence of Bangladesh, 195 Pakistani army officers were identified as war criminals in the preliminary investigation by the then Bangladesh government.

Following the Simla Agreement signed on 2nd July 1972 between Indira Gandhi, Prime Minister of India and Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, President of Pakistan, a number of agreements were signed between India and Pakistan regarding repatriation of the POWs. On 9th April 1974, an Agreement was signed between Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan in New Delhi in which, among other issues, the question of trial of the 195 POWs was raised and finally it was decided that they would be repatriated to Pakistan along with the other prisoners without trial (The Daily Tribune, Wisconsin, 10 April 1974). For better understanding, paragraph 15 of the 1974 Agreement is quoted here: “In the light of the foregoing and, in particular, having regard to the appeal of the Prime Minister of Pakistan to the people of Bangladesh to forgive and forget the mistakes of the past, the Foreign Minister of Bangladesh stated that the Government of Bangladesh had decided not to proceed with the trials as an act of clemency. It was agreed that the 195 prisoners of war may be repatriated to Pakistan along with the other prisoners of war now in process of repatriation under the Delhi Agreement.”

On 24 January 1972, the government of Bangladesh enacted another law to try those who did not side with the liberation war, or politically opposed the call of liberation war, or willingly cooperated with the Pakistan Army or committed criminal acts. It was called the Collaborators Act, 1972. More than a hundred thousand persons were arrested under that Act. Of them, 37,471 persons were charged. Another 30,623 could not be prosecuted for lack of evidence.

A total of 2,848 were brought to trial. Of them, 752 were found guilty. BJI claims that, none of its leaders was ever convicted of war crimes. The remaining 2,096 accused persons were found not guilty and freed. Taking into account the overall situation (of discontent) obtaining in the country, in November 1973 the Government of Bangladesh under the leadership of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman declared a general amnesty. By virtue of the general amnesty, those accused or convicted for minor crimes under the Act were all set free. But those accused of rape, murder, arson or plunder were not pardoned. In other words, the general amnesty kept the scope of prosecution and trial of those accused of such serious crimes under the Act. On December 31, 1975, the Collaborators Act was repealed by a Presidential Order. After the amnesty, the Act remained in force for a little over two years. In that period, no case was filed for the said four serious offences. Perhaps that was the logic behind repeal of the law in 1975.

The attempt of the Bangladesh government for trials of war crimes after 39 years is, however, according to many, a politically motivated act. It is claimed that the government is conducting a “hate campaign against some individuals before any charge has been brought against them, let alone be proved in the court of law.” Many apprehend that the tribunal will thus simply be a kangaroo court. A list of 36 war criminals has already been announced even before the trial has started and among them majority of them are from BJI. Few of them in the list were even between 4-8 years old during the war in 1971 (Daily Amar Desh, 28 March 2010). It is further claimed that “while the issue of war crimes was resolved internationally (through Simla Agreement) and nationally (through Collaboration Act), bringing it up again shows that it is highly politically motivated. Moreover, Bangladesh judiciary is now being subjugated by the current regime and therefore a fair judgment is absolutely unexpected from this politically motivated trial” (Daily Amar Desh, 16 February 2010).

The skepticism and doubts about a free and fair trial remain largely intact because of some fundamental reasons: First, the tribunal will not try the actual war criminals, the 195 Pakistani army officers, who were identified as war criminals but got released after a tri-party agreement between Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan. Second, it intends to try only some “collaborators” belonging to an opposition party who supported a united Pakistan but do not have any proven record of war crimes, such as killing, rape, arson etc. Third, the International Bar Association (IBA) thinks, the Act does not guarantee any free and fair justice and protection for the convicted ones. Fourth, it is not clear how much the judges of this court are either trained or neutral for this specialized kind of trials. According to various reports, most of the appointed judges and prosecutors are former party men of ruling coalition. Finally, many doubt that the legal apparatus is being manipulated and therefore expectation of a fair and free trial is a mere dream, while currently there have been rampant violations of human rights without any justice, such as 154 extra-judicial killings in 2009 (Odhikar 2009 Report).

More importantly, if the trial is not conducted freely and fairly for all criminals irrespective of any kind of political affiliation, the nation has to pay a severe price. In the first place, for example, if it targets only the members of Islamic parties, reconciliation with the Muslim world will be very difficult. While Bangladesh needs to build strong relations with the Muslim countries for financial support and for supplying manpower to those countries, this will have a negative impact. Second, having no alternative, the BJI which is openly involved in the democratic process of politics may go underground due to the unjust trial. If that happens, it will be dangerous for the nation. In Turkey, once Islamic party was banned for many years but it has come back to power now. BJI’s open activities can be banned temporarily but who knows it may come back if one takes the lesson from history. Third, the unfair trial will divide the whole nation as BJI has millions of supporters which are evident from last few elections. Finally, if the regime fails to conduct the trial, it will backfire the party-in power.

The whole move of the government so far seems to be interpreted by the international communities as nothing but an extreme political vendetta and is intended to subdue the opposition party/parties. This is called “victor’s justice”, which is a questionable justice. The regime has already started a nation-and-worldwide campaign for this trial and obstructed the free movement and overseas travel of the BJI leaders. If this highly disputed trial is conducted unfairly, Bangladesh will certainly enter into another dark chapter of political chaos, uncertainties, and most likely a civil war. Every patriotic Bangladeshis believe that very tragic and pathetic incidents/crimes happened during the liberation war in 1971. If the trial is held, the government must ensure a free and fair trial beyond any doubt. The best way is to form an international tribunal under the auspices of the United Nations. It will not only provide credibility to the current regime, but also remains a reference for trying other war crimes committed elsewhere.

-------------------
*Dr. S. S. Islam can be reached at: sseraji99@yahoo.com , and Dr. M. Saidul Islam can be reached at: msaidul@gmail.com.


Yahoo! Canada Toolbar : Search from anywhere on the web and bookmark your favourite sites. Download it now!



__._,_.___


[* Moderator�s Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[chottala.com] Chollisha of Mrs. L. A. Chowdhury

Dear family and friends, our beloved mother Mrs. L. A. Chowdhury's 40th day of passing will be held on Friday, April 2 at Azad Mosque, Gulshan, Dhaka. Please join us ba'd Asr to pray for her departed soul. Thank you!

Sincerely yours,

Miro Jangi

------------------------------------

[* Moderator's Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chottala/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chottala/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
chottala-digest@yahoogroups.com
chottala-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
chottala-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [chottala.com] Kader Siddiki says the ruling party is not a party of Bangubandhu



Kader Siddiki is 100% correct.
BAL is not the Party of Mr Shiek Mujib.
Present BAL is born on the blessing of Mr Ziarur Rahman.
Major formed his party BNP & rebirth twin BAL under the leaderships of Abdul Malik Ukil & Mijanur Rahman.And
The present BAL is the inheritant of Abdul Malik Ukil's BAL.

--- On Wed, 31/3/10, Nayan Khan <udarakash08@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Nayan Khan <udarakash08@yahoo.com>
Subject: [chottala.com] Kader Siddiki says the ruling party is not a party of Bangubandhu
To: chottala@yahoogroups.com, dahuk@yahoogroups.com, dhakamails@yahoogroups.com, Diagnose@yahoogroups.com, khabor@yahoogroups.com, mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com, notun_bangladesh@yahoogroups.com, odhora@yahoogroups.com, shetubondhon@yahoogroups.com
Received: Wednesday, 31 March, 2010, 8:27 PM

 
 â€˜The Awami League which is now governing the country is not the party of Bagabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman. The seed which Bangabandhu planted was BKSAL,’ he said
 
Click the link to read more:
 
Bangladesh Krishak Sramik Janata League president Abdul Kader Siddiqui on Tuesday said Bangladesh Krishak Sramik Awami League was the party of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, not Bangladesh Awami League.
   â€˜Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman killed off Awami League in 1975 to give birth to Bangladesh Krishak Sramik Awami League,’ said Kader Siddiqui told a discussion meeting.
   Garbo Bangladesh, a social organisation, arranged the discussion meeting styled ‘how we are doing and how we want to live’ marking the launch of its front organisation, Laal Surja at the National Press Club.
   â€˜The Awami League which is now governing the country is not the party of Bagabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman. The seed which Bangabandhu planted was BKSAL,’ he said while praising the present chairman of BKSAL, Amiruzzaman, for keeping the party alive.
   About the rule of the present Awami League-led government, he said, ‘It is now being said that Bangladesh would be digitalised. But they [the government] should keep in mind that electricity is the key to building a digital Bangladesh.’
   â€˜You cannot build a digital Bangladesh if the people experience load shedding 14 times a day. Before going for digitalising Bangladesh, you will have to meet the demand for gas and water.’
   In an implicit warning to the government, Kader Siddiqui, said, ‘People will not always remain friendly to you.’
   As the audience was chanting Joy Bangla, the liberation war hero said, ‘I say both Joy Bangla and Bangladesh Zindabad, as I am a Bengali by birth and at the same time I am a Bangladeshi as it is my country.’
   Jatiya Samajtantrik Dal general secretary Abdul Malek Ratan said though the countrymen had achieved the geographical map of Bangladesh in 1971, their true emancipation remained unattained.
   â€˜We never saw democracy functional in the last 39 years. The definition and character of democracy has been changed. Now democracy is about going to power by spending crores of taka in elections to plunder public wealth.’
   He said it was important that we change the political culture, governing system and the leadership. Echoing him, Shahed Obayed, the convener of Garbo Bangladesh, said 95 per cent of the country’s politicians did not do politics in the true sense of the term.
   â€˜They are simply busy making their chiefs happy in exchange for money. Political leadership is not something which can be inherited.’
   The discussion meeting, presided over by Shaheda Obayed, was also addressed by former state minister Syed Didar Bakth, Jatiya Party’s additional secretary general Sadek Siddiqi, former lawmaker Del-war Hossain and BKSAL chairman Sharif Md Amiruzzaman.


Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr!

 

__._,_.___


[* Moderator�s Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[chottala.com] Blocking of DeshCalling indicates the true meaning of ‘Digital Bangladesh’



Blocking of DeshCalling indicates the true meaning of `Digital Bangladesh'

 

 

Dear All,

 

I recently received an email from a yahoo forum indicating an article linked to the DeshCalling blog operated by Barrister MBI Munshi.  When I opened the link I saw a caption stating that the blog was blocked to viewers in Bangladesh. Visitors to the site apparently see only a white screen or a backdated version of the blog without recent posts being displayed. Since I am in London I could view the blog and tried to discover the reason for the Bangladesh government's action. It seems that Barrister Munshi had published two articles (written anonymously) on the Pilkhana Massacre which revealed direct government complicity in the tragedy. The publication of these articles must have caused a great deal of consternation and annoyance in ruling circles hence the blocking procedure. I delved further into the archive of DeshCalling and read through several law related articles on the recently concluded Sheikh Mujibur Rahman murder case which presented in full the defense of one of the accused. There were also a number of articles written by Barrister Munshi that displayed a negative attitude to Indian foreign policy as applied to Bangladesh as well as other South Asian countries. One may argue that Barrister Munshi should have been more sensitive to the present government's agenda and avoided such controversial subjects and thereby avoided the blocking. But when one reads about death threats against Mahmudur Rahman (Amar Desh), Nurul Kabir (New Age) and Shahidul Alam (DRIK) one gets the impression that something else is going on here. A relative of mine, residing in Bangladesh, sent me a message a few days ago expressing surprise that the newspapers and TV channels were not showing the large and violent protests in Dhaka over pay, loadshedding and extortionate practices of the AL or BCL. It should now be clear to all what this Digital Bangladesh charade is really all about. Its purpose is to control opinion and censor information that could prove embarrassing to the government. Everyone should be aware of this pernicious trend and what it means for the future of Bangladesh. Digital Bangladesh is merely a cover for government oppression and the shutting down of oppositional viewpoints. DeshCalling could be the first of many blockings that will result in the narrowing down of opinion creating a climate of fear and distrust that is essential for the government's own survival.    

 

S. T. Islam

 

Imperial College London

 

 



__._,_.___


[* Moderator's Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[chottala.com] Kader Siddiki says the ruling party is not a party of Bangubandhu



 'The Awami League which is now governing the country is not the party of Bagabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman. The seed which Bangabandhu planted was BKSAL,' he said
 
Click the link to read more:
 
Bangladesh Krishak Sramik Janata League president Abdul Kader Siddiqui on Tuesday said Bangladesh Krishak Sramik Awami League was the party of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, not Bangladesh Awami League.
   'Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman killed off Awami League in 1975 to give birth to Bangladesh Krishak Sramik Awami League,' said Kader Siddiqui told a discussion meeting.
   Garbo Bangladesh, a social organisation, arranged the discussion meeting styled 'how we are doing and how we want to live' marking the launch of its front organisation, Laal Surja at the National Press Club.
   'The Awami League which is now governing the country is not the party of Bagabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman. The seed which Bangabandhu planted was BKSAL,' he said while praising the present chairman of BKSAL, Amiruzzaman, for keeping the party alive.
   About the rule of the present Awami League-led government, he said, 'It is now being said that Bangladesh would be digitalised. But they [the government] should keep in mind that electricity is the key to building a digital Bangladesh.'
   'You cannot build a digital Bangladesh if the people experience load shedding 14 times a day. Before going for digitalising Bangladesh, you will have to meet the demand for gas and water.'
   In an implicit warning to the government, Kader Siddiqui, said, 'People will not always remain friendly to you.'
   As the audience was chanting Joy Bangla, the liberation war hero said, 'I say both Joy Bangla and Bangladesh Zindabad, as I am a Bengali by birth and at the same time I am a Bangladeshi as it is my country.'
   Jatiya Samajtantrik Dal general secretary Abdul Malek Ratan said though the countrymen had achieved the geographical map of Bangladesh in 1971, their true emancipation remained unattained.
   'We never saw democracy functional in the last 39 years. The definition and character of democracy has been changed. Now democracy is about going to power by spending crores of taka in elections to plunder public wealth.'
   He said it was important that we change the political culture, governing system and the leadership. Echoing him, Shahed Obayed, the convener of Garbo Bangladesh, said 95 per cent of the country's politicians did not do politics in the true sense of the term.
   'They are simply busy making their chiefs happy in exchange for money. Political leadership is not something which can be inherited.'
   The discussion meeting, presided over by Shaheda Obayed, was also addressed by former state minister Syed Didar Bakth, Jatiya Party's additional secretary general Sadek Siddiqi, former lawmaker Del-war Hossain and BKSAL chairman Sharif Md Amiruzzaman.


Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr!

__._,_.___


[* Moderator�s Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___