Banner Advertise

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Re: [chottala.com] Re: [KHABOR] Verdict of Col. Taher Case.

Humanitarian depends on justice justice depend on lawful
> administration and lawful administration can be established
> under the system of lawful democracy.
>
> Without lawful democracy justice of law can not be and
> lawful trial can not be done. Rules of laws and system of rules should be
> made to save the people and to protect humanitarians.
>
> But people were being killed in Bangladesh by police rab army and political actvists
>
> Because in Bangladesh
>
> There was no system of lawful democrcay for establishing
> justice of law to save people and to protect humanitarians..
>
> There was no system of lawful honest administration to
> administrate the administation for humanitarians
--->
> --- On Tue, 22/3/11, Helal Ahmed <huahmed@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > From: Helal Ahmed <huahmed@yahoo.com>
>
> > Subject: [chottala.com] Re: [KHABOR] Verdict of Col.
> Taher Case.
>
> > To: khabor@yahoogroups.com,
> alapon@yahoogroups.com,
> chottala@yahoogroups.com,
> "Miro Jangi" <mjangi@yahoo.com>,
> Diagnose@yahoogroups.com,
> "shahid mahmud" <shahid6609@yahoo.com>,
> "sultan chowdhury" <chottalasultan@yahoo.com>,
> "Saad Andaleeb" <saadandaleeb@gmail.com>
>
> > Cc: "Abba" <hussain7192@rogers.com>
>
> > Received: Tuesday, 22 March, 2011, 8:55 PM
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >  
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Dear
>
> > Manna Sir:
>
> > Assalamualaikum.
>
> > Thanks for sharing your comment on High courts verdict
> on
>
> > Taher killing.
>
> > Sir,
>
> > in the last few weeks there were many email circling
> around
>
> > regarding this matter. I also posted a thread few days
> back.
>
> > I would be honored to hear your feedback in regards of
> my
>
> > below statement:
>
> > â€Å"Assalamua'laikum.
>
> > Ok, for the sake of argument, I accept your notion
> that
>
> > Ziaur Rahman was a cold blooded murderer for killing
> Col
>
> > Taher. Then, do you also accept that Sheikh Mujibur
> Rahman
>
> > was also a cold blooded murderer for killing Siraj
> Sikdar! I
>
> > hope you must read or remember when Bongbondhu
> proclaimed,
>
> > where is Siraj Sikdar after he was
> assassinated.�
>
> > I’m really
>
> > looking fwd to have a knowledgeable discussion with
> you
>
> > regarding the hypocrisy in our
> today’s society when
>
> > it comes to discussing Mujib/Zia, India/Pakistan,
> Tarek/Joy,
>
> > and so on.
>
> > Sir, I can assume
>
> > how busy your life is however, your response is much
>
> > appreciated.
>
> > Helal
>
> >
>
> > --- On Tue, 3/22/11, Abdul Mannan
>
> > <abman1971@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > From: Abdul Mannan <abman1971@gmail.com>
>
> > Subject: [KHABOR] Verdict of Col. Taher Case.
>
> > To: khabor@yahoogroups.com,
> alapon@yahoogroups.com,
>
> > chottala@yahoogroups.com,
> "Miro Jangi"
>
> > <mjangi@yahoo.com>,
> Diagnose@yahoogroups.com,
>
> > "shahid mahmud" <shahid6609@yahoo.com>,
>
> > "sultan chowdhury"
>
> > <chottalasultan@yahoo.com>,
> "Saad Andaleeb"
>
> > <saadandaleeb@gmail.com>
>
> > Date: Tuesday, March 22, 2011, 3:21 AM
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >  
>
> >
>
> > High Court has given a verdict that the hanging of
>
> > Col. Taher by Gen. Zia was a cold blooded murder and
> the
>
> > lone person responsible for it was General Zia. The
> Court
>
> > also ruled that Zia was also directly  involved in
> the
>
> > killing of Bangabandhu Sk. Mujib.
>
> >
>
> > Mannan
>
> >
>
> > --
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



------------------------------------

[* Moderator�s Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chottala/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chottala/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
chottala-digest@yahoogroups.com
chottala-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
chottala-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[chottala.com] Banning the Fatwa a Miscarriage of Justice!

People, who want to take the world back to 7th Century can not succeed doesn't matter what they say about banning of FaTwa because time moves forward, not backwards.
They are the ones, who have caused Australian Prime Minister say, "You want Islam? Leave Australia ...!"
Why is this shameless man still in Australia?

--- In chottala@yahoogroups.com, "Noishorgik" <bidrohee@...> wrote:
>
>
> Banning the Fatwa a Miscarriage of Justice!
>
>
>
> Dr. R. Raashed
>
> (Ph.D. School of Law, Macquarie University Sydney, Australia)
>
> Managing Director,
>
> Islamic Information Services Australia (Legal and General)
>
>
>
> The legal system in Bangladesh is an extension of the British
> Westminister legal regimes and procedures. In a country where some 90%
> of population is Muslim, it's a failure on the part of the
> country's political system that this colonial misfit still being
> forced upon the public some after sixty five years from the
> independence. Through independence the British colonial rule was
> rejected by the population yet, the cunning and the shrewd among the
> nation wouldn't let it depart from its fate. The colonial masters
> are on foot guarding their agents and interest quarters in Muslim
> countries. But it is no pride that as a nation we have failed to
> distinguish between a friend and a foe. Guised under the garbs as the
> judiciary or executives, the stooges are happy for the servitude and
> indeed, are colonized at heart. Banning the Islamic Fatwa in the courts
> of Bangladesh represents a feature for the colonial past and hence, a
> distinct failure at the same time.
>
>
>
> As a slogan, the colonial stooges maintain entrenched love and loyalty
> for what they call the secular and religiously neutral identity. In
> reality however, their love and bias for the colonial legacies are
> intense. In the context of Bangladesh, it is to be juxtaposed with what
> the Qur'an (02:165) puts as Muslims' love for God should have
> been much stronger. This contrast will explain the reason why the
> judgment at point instigated the formidable opposition. Given the
> demography of the country, the judges of the courts in Bangladesh, must
> reflect the wishes and aspirations of people through their judgments.
> Banning the Islamic Fatwa would thus represent an assault on public
> interest.
>
>
>
> A judgment is never an individual view of the judge on an issue before
> him/her. Instead it must reflect the realistic application of a legal
> instrument in its holistic consideration. The legal instrument in this
> sense is the written law which in every sense is also a trust in the
> custody of a judge or a tribunal. But a huge gap between the law in this
> sense and its application is a true picture for most of the judiciary
> and executives in Bangladesh. This is also true of many other Muslim
> countries. This article is only an analytical approach to the legal
> reality in Bangladesh and hence does not intend to hurt the public
> prestige of the relevant courts. In relation to the judgment banning the
> Fatwa, its text is important. But its context is rather crucial and
> thus, demands a neutral readership.
>
>
>
> Through their judgment of banning Islamic Fatwa in a blanket form, the
> two judges of the High Court in Bangladesh have in fact struck through
> the hearts of 90% Muslims in the country. Worse still the duo of the
> tribunal have failed to appreciate this aspect of their decision. The
> naivety rooted in this judgment is apparent from the two judges'
> approach to the law in isolation from the social reality. A shallow
> approach to law such as this is a liability for the nation it was meant
> to serve. We may think of a novice in other offices, but in the
> application of law there is no provision for the apprentice judges. Said
> simply, the mediocrity has therefore, no place in law and legality. To
> secure the justice, not only the best and the brightest should practice
> the law, but also, the legal mechanism in the country must cater for
> this. Undoubtedly, banning the Islamic Fatwa in a blanket form drew a
> bad picture of legal reality in Bangladesh. Fortunately, however the
> Appeal Court did comprehend the gravity of the consequences and
> suspended its operation pending the outcome of the appeal. It is
> obviously a very limited comfort. We must accept that those initiating
> the appeal for this ominous judgment deserve being applauded. The
> hearing of the appeal is now continuing and hence, the relevance of this
> commentary.
>
>
>
> A word of caution: While reaching conclusions, we will not prejudge the
> religious affiliation of His Hon. Justice Golam Rabbani and his partner
> in the tribunal Justice Najmun Ara Sultana. The excuse to reprimand this
> critique under the provision as "contempt of the court" does not
> arise. The tribunal consist of these two judges banned the Islamic Fatwa
> in Bangladesh in 2001. It is however, our solid right to judge the merit
> behind their decision given the damages it caused to the hearts of
> millions of Muslims in the country and beyond. We already know that the
> Arabic names do not necessarily make anyone a Muslim or a believer, to
> be precise. For an individual to be a believer or otherwise is
> absolutely a personal choice. Hence in our derivations, no expectation
> would be built on the ground of the two judges' religious
> persuasion. By accepting the membership to a tribunal, they two judges
> have obviously adopted the liability for their judgment's
> professional integrity being critically and vehemently scrutinized.
> Throughout this commentary, our focus will therefore, remain on this
> aspect of the judgment's professional cohesion and integrity.
>
>
>
> We have a reason to presuppose that the two judges in this case are
> traditionally trained on the issues of law and legality in Bangladesh.
> Hence, they were expected to uphold the basic principles of justice for
> all while delivering a judgment in a case of nationwide significance.
> While making a judgment in such a sensitive case, what went missing was
> the very essence of the legal sensibility on the part of the two judges.
> The judgment miserably failed to protect the value system of Bangladesh
> as a Muslim majority nation that its constitution envisaged to protect.
> As the judgment of banning the Fatwa was delivered in 2001, the saga of
> the 5th amendment cancellation in 2010 was never an issue then. This
> judgment has also failed on being sensitive to the national feelings and
> emotion of 90% Muslims in the country. We don't dispute that there
> may well be the cases where the institution of the Islamic Fatwa have
> been misused. Consequently, the subjects are victimized. It may well be
> true that not all those issuing the Fatwa in Bangladesh do have the due
> credentials to do so. This being the reality, the institution of issuing
> the Fatwa should have been regulated with the appropriate directives
> being issued by the court to the executives.
>
>
>
> As a rule of thumb, the legal procedures aim at protecting fairness by
> de jure (by law) or by defacto (by the issues of fact) mechanisms. The
> Westminister system of legislature which has been the source of legal
> culture in Bangladesh is based on this basic principle. By applying a
> blanket ban on practice of duly made out Islamic Fatwa the two judges of
> the High Court have clearly failed on this account as well. This failure
> provided a clear case where the incompetent judges performing to the
> opposite direction of their appointment and office. This judgment can
> only be described as substandard. The misuse of Fatwa by those that are
> not duly qualified may warrant that this institution is regularized.
> Instead of applying a blanket ban, the court may in fact have won the
> appreciation of all by codifying the practice. This goodwill however,
> remained totally absent from this judgment and hence is the challenge of
> its professional integrity. In absence of this, the only option
> remaining open is either the misinformed ill will of the tribunal to the
> institution of Fatwa or worse still, an instance of outrageous
> incompetence.
>
>
>
> Let's now focus on the judgment itself and analyse critically its
> legal aspects. This decision although suspended later on by the Court of
> Appeal, has recently been brought before the appeal court for the
> review. At the outset we must accept that the decision on this case is
> fraught with consequences. This judgment should have cared for the
> impact it is going to have on the public. Handling the religious emotion
> without the due care and most importantly, interfering with the
> fundamental legal instrument of the Islamic fatwa have the impetus to
> plunge the nation into civil war. The Islamic edicts issued in personal
> or collective issues, by the duly qualified Islamic scholars can never
> be eradicated. Anyway considered, it is an issue of natural justice. It
> is one of the most fundamental pillars of the Islamic Shair'a and
> hence, above the court of law's jurisdiction.
>
>
>
> The constitution of Bangladesh provides for the freedom of choice and
> religion. By the operation of this supreme law as a legal instrument
> therefore, the constitution also provides the guarantee that Muslims in
> the country are free to seek the scholarly made out Islamic opinions
> where relevant, with a freedom to abide by them as well. The judgment
> has also failed to comprehend the true understanding of the Fatwa in
> Islam. When put in this perspective, the judgment banning the Islamic
> Fatwa in fact, defeats the operational provision of Bangladesh
> constitution whereby it guarantees the freedom of choice and religion.
> The Westminister system of administering justice represents a series of
> legislative procedures all of which are committed to reflect the wishes
> and aspirations of people in a country. This legal principle is
> engrained and deeply rooted in any democratic system that seeks to
> emulate the Westminister system.
>
>
>
> The court of Justice Golam Rabbani and Justice Najmun Ara Sultana has
> also failed on this ground. Venturing out to impose a blanket ban on
> Islamic Fatwas is a clear mark of short-sightedness on the part of this
> judgment. To say the minimum, this type of summary justice reflects the
> phenomenon as the miscarriage of justice itself in the system. This
> judgment has rightfully brought about the shame of injustice upon the
> nation that is paying for these judges. While deliberating, the tribunal
> has clearly failed to look into the law in its holistic nature and
> application. Should we then propose that a judgment should be merit
> checked before delivering? May be we should! A piecemeal approach to the
> law and its institutions, albeit easy, is bound to defeat the purpose
> behind the law. The judgment banning the Islamic Fatwa is an outstanding
> example.
>
>
>
> It is in this context that when established beyond doubt, the intention
> of the law makers also becomes a strong legal instrument in the
> Westminister system of administering justice. Maintaining an overall
> outlook to the legal institutions needs a sound culture of absolute
> adherence to legality alone. The seat of justice is in the heart of the
> judges. But where the judges are corrupt or incompetent, the legal
> institution administering justice must take all the blames for the
> failure. The judges are also human beings and thus, are susceptible to
> being swayed by the fear or favour while fostering a particular
> orientation in a judgment.
>
>
>
> It is an open truth that the legal institutions in Bangladesh are found
> to be cardinally corrupt in public opinion. But is it in fact true that
> they are indeed corrupt, is a million dollar question! The mechanism for
> disciplining the deliberate failure on the part of the judges must also
> be in place. Bangladesh where the judges are appointed along the line of
> political loyalties, paying back for such appointments is bound to
> victimize first the conscience of a neutral bystander. Prior to
> allocating a case that deals with the issues of public conscience and
> interest, the High Court should therefore, do a bit of in-house cleaning
> exercise. An audit of competency and neutrality in a judge should
> therefore precede the final allocation of such a case.
>
>
>
> A Disqualified Law Minister:
>
> Bangladesh where the merit based appointment of judges is at stake, the
> audit of competency must determine first, whether a single judge or a
> tribunal is competent enough to handle the case at hand and comprehend
> its consequences. The past ideo-political affiliation of the judges
> should be the deterrent from assigning to them a case that may encroach
> upon the bounds of neutrality. Once a government dubbed as the most
> corrupt on earth boasts the law and order, it becomes nothing but a
> laughing stock. People in Bangladesh are either, Muslims, Hindus,
> Buddhists, Christians or nature worshippers. The only fabric that binds
> them all is belief in a religion, revealed or otherwise. The atheists
> thus, constitute a sheer minority in the make-up of its population. A
> minister for women's rights and welfare should be a woman herself.
> For the same reason, an atheist is an outright misfit for the law
> ministry. Short of realizing this, a government is either naive or a
> part of criminal complicity against the public interest.
>
>
>
> Appointing the law minster of a highly religious nation such as
> Bangladesh, a self confessed communist who by definition is also the
> atheist, is an outright misfit and indeed, a grotesque blasphemy. In a
> sense, this is the hypocrisy on the part of a government that undertakes
> the obligation to guarantee public aspirations. Instead of interfering
> with the peoples' choices, this huge inconsistency is the debacle
> that the High Court should look into first. Without dealing with this
> inconsistency head on, administration of true justice will continue to
> be a mirage and daydream. The audacity to uphold the institution of
> justice at any cost needs the brave-hearted professionalism and the
> legal scholarship in the judges. When a judgment fails, the justice
> seekers do pay with their rights. But more importantly, losing the
> neutrality in the system of justice administration is indeed, a grave
> ominous sign for a religiously diverse country like Bangladesh. Should
> we then trust a fox with our chickens? May we then conclude that when
> the conscience becomes corrupt, justice is lost from the inception?
>
>
>
> The constitution of Bangladesh needs to be re-done:
>
> Let's now refer back to the judgment of blanket banning the Islamic
> Fatwa by the tribunal under the scrutiny. From observing the procedures
> of appeal, it appears that the attorneys on both sides of the
> application have got their approach to the case totally wrong. The
> attorney of the plaintiff sought to argue the case from the pure Islamic
> point of view, which has no place before the court in Bangladesh. The
> Westminister system of administering justice may therefore be excused if
> it decides to look at such submissions at askance. In fact, the future
> of this case lies squarely in arguing it on the basis of law makers'
> intention behind drawing up the constitution. The holistic approach to
> this supreme law of the nation will only guide the appeal court that the
> judgment of the tribunal was dangerously, localized and superficial and
> thus, needs to being scrapped at once.
>
>
>
> It is almost annoying to note that the court appointed ten lawyers as
> amicus curiae (the friends of the court without any substantive
> credentials on Islamic law. The arguments rendered by some of its
> members are devoid of legal substance and hence, are ludicrous. To start
> with, the concept of referring a court to the amicus curia is based in
> the Vatican and thus rooted very much in the Christian culture of
> Catholicism. Making such a church based concept the jury in deciding the
> outcome of the Islamic Fatwa is and outright ridicule! It is a glowing
> example of ignorance on the part of the High Court in Bangladesh in
> deciding the prerequisites before setting a competent appeal process.
>
>
>
> Equally disturbing is the submissions of the attorney for the defendant
> who in naivety, opted to argue his case also from the localized view of
> the constitutional provisions. By this approach he in fact failed to
> establish any real relevance. If it is true that the defense attorney
> had in fact contribution to draw up the current constitution of
> Bangladesh, he should have been disqualified on the basis of conflict of
> interest. His argument is almost blasphemous as to who is the source of
> the real power by the constitution. Ironically however, the judgment
> under the appeal hammer of the court, had failed in the first place, to
> uphold the provisions of the constitution itself.
>
>
>
> To start with, the constitution of Bangladesh has not gone through the
> stringent procedures of public plebiscites and hence, it is urgently
> needed to be done again. In its current form, it can be described as a
> temporary legal document dedicated to care for the interest of an
> emerging nation. It clearly lacks the commitment to cater for the wide
> ranging interests of Bangladesh as a nation. Without undertaking a
> genuine and widespread public consultation, a constitution will serve
> nothing but an elitist approach to the law and legality. This is the
> guilt that Bangladesh as a Muslim nation continued to live for the last
> forty one years. It will indeed be a national pride for a forward
> looking government in future to set the foundation of the nation right
> to re-cast a realistic constitution based on true and wide-scaled public
> consultation. In fact, it can be a good public agenda for campaigning
> re-election by a strong political party now. Prior to this, speaking of
> a true representative justice system in Bangladesh will continue to be a
> daydream.
>
>
>
> · Dr. Raashed is the author for "The Book that Contains
> No Doubt" due to be published soon!
>


------------------------------------

[* Moderator's Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chottala/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chottala/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
chottala-digest@yahoogroups.com
chottala-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
chottala-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[chottala.com] Tumi Jodi...........



Here is a perfect poem on Dr. Younus!
 
 
 
তুমি যদি জন্মাতে ভারত কিংবা পাকিতে,
জনগণের মনে তুমি 'রাজা' হয়ে থাকিতে।

তুমি যদি জন্মাতে লংকা কিংবা ভূটানে,
মূর্তি বানিয়ে পূজা করত জনগণ উঠানে।

তুমি যদি জন্মাতে বরফাচ্ছন্ন নেপালে,
জনগণ ফূঁসে উঠতো তোমায় কেউ ক্ষেপালে।

কপাল দোষে তুমি জন্মেছো ঘষেটি বেগমের দেশে,
অপমানের বোঝা বইতে হবে পরাজিতের বেশে।

ভুল জায়গায় জন্মে তুমি করেছ মহাপাপ,
ঝামেলা হতনা নোবেলটা যদি পেত জাতির বাপ।
 
Regards,
NK

' ' ,
'Awami League' is not a name of a political party, it's a name of disease of Bangladesh.


__._,_.___


[* Moderator�s Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[chottala.com] Warcriminals in BAL, Part-IV



Here is next episode:
 
 
Blog:
 
 
পুরনো কলাম
 
আওয়ামী লীগে যুদ্ধাপরাধী - ৪ (১৯/০৩/২০১১)
আওয়ামী লীগে যুদ্ধাপরাধী-৩ (২২/০১/২০১১)
আওয়ামী লীগে যুদ্ধাপরাধী-২ (০৮/০১/২০১১)
আওয়ামী লীগে যুদ্ধাপরাধী-১ (০১/০১/২০১১)
বিরোধীদল দমন, একদলীয় পথে সরকার? (০৩/০৭/২০১০)
'ধর্মভিত্তিক রাজনীতি আওয়ামী লীগ নিষিদ্ধ করবে না' (০৮/০৫/২০১০)
কেমন হলো বিচারপতি নিয়োগ? (২৪/০৪/২০১০)
কেমন হল ট্রাইব্যুনাল গঠন? (০২/০৪/২০১০)
আগের লেখা
563


আওয়ামী লীগে যুদ্ধাপরাধী - ৪

এ্যাডভোকেট নয়ন খান

[আগের পর্বগুলো পড়তে এই লেখার বাম দিকে লক্ষ্য করুন]

আওয়ামী লীগে সম্পৃক্ত মুক্তিযুদ্ধ বিরোধী, যুদ্ধাপরাধী ও মানবতার বিরূদ্ধে অপরাধ সংগঠনকারীদের তালিকা
মুক্তিযুদ্ধ চলাকালীন সময়ে আওয়ামী লীগের তালিকাভূক্ত ব্যক্তিরা _
১. মুক্তিবাহিনী, তাদের সমর্থক এবং সহানূভূতিজ্ঞাপনকারীদের বিরূদ্ধে পাকিস্তানী সেনা বাহিনীর সদস্যদের কুমন্ত্রণা দিত,
২. অপহরণ, বন্দী এবং পরিশেষে হত্যা করতে পাকবাহিনীকে তারা সহায়তা দিত
৩. দলীয় কর্মীদের সহায়তায় মুক্তিযোদ্ধা ও দেশের নিরীহ মানুষকে বিভিন্ন ক্যাম্পে বা হত্যা কেন্দ্রে প্রেরণ করত,
৪. মুক্তিযোদ্ধা ও মুক্তিযুদ্ধের সমর্থক নিরপরাধ সাধারণ মানুষের ঘর-বাড়ি পুড়িয়ে দিত এবং অবাধ লুটতরাজ করত
৫. হাজার হাজার বাঙ্গালী নারীদের অপরহন করে ধর্ষণ ও যৌন নির্যাতন করত।
৬. পাকিস্তানী সেনা বাহিনীর কর্মকর্তা ও সদস্যদের কাছেও তারা নিপীড়নের জন্য বাঙ্গালী নারীদের তুলে দিত।
৭. তাদের মদতে বা সক্রিয় অংশ গ্রহণে দুই লাখ নিরাপরাধ নারী যৌননিপীড়নের শিকার হয়।
তাদের মধ্যে মুক্তিযুদ্ধের পাকিস্তানী সেনা বাহিনীকে সহায়তা, গণহত্যা, লুন্ঠন, অগিড়ব সংযোগ ও নারীদের ধর্ষণের ক্ষেত্রেপাকিস্তানী গণ পরিষদের ১৬ জন নির্বাচিত সদস্য, যারা আওয়ামী লীগের গুরূত্বপূর্ণ নেতৃবৃন্দ, গুরূত্বপূর্ণ ভূমিকা পালন করে যুদ্ধাপরাধ ও মানবতার বিরূদ্ধে অপরাধ সংঘটনে ব্যাপক ভূমিকা পালন করেন।
তারা হলেন -
(১) মোহাম্মাদ হাবিবুর রহমান (বগুড়া)
(২) লেঃ কর্নেল এ, কে, এম মাহবুবুল ইসলাম (পাবনা)
(৩) ঙ্সয়দ হোসেন মনসুর (পাবনা)
(৪) মোহাম্মাদ আব্দুল গাফফার (খুলনা)
(৫) মোহাম্মাদ সাঈদ (খুলনা)
(৬) আবুল কালাম ফায়জুল হক (বরিশাল)
(৭) মোশারফ হোসেন শাহজাহান (বরিশাল)
(৮) এ, বি, এম নুরূল ইসলাম (ফরিদপুর)
(৯) আমজাদ হোসেন খান (ফরিদপুর)
(১০) মোহাম্মাদ নুরূল ইসলাম (ঢাকা)
(১১) জহীরূদ্দীন (ঢাকা)
(১২) মোহাম্মাদ ওবায়দুলাহ মজুমদার (নোয়াখালী)
(১৩) শামছুল হক (চট্টগ্রাম)
(১৪) আখতারূজ্জামান (ময়মনসিংহ)
(১৫) সৈয়দ বদরূজ্জামান (এস,বি, জামান, ময়মনসিংহ)
(১৬) ডাঃ আবুল হাসেম (সিলেট)

তাদের ১৯৭২ সালের ৬ এপ্রিল বাংলাদেশ আওয়ামী লীগের প্রেসিডেন্ট বঙ্গবন্ধু শেখ মুজিবুর রহমান দলীয় শৃংখলা, স্বার্থ ও নির্দেশনাবলী বিরোধী কার্যকলাপ ও দালালীর অভিযোগে গণ পরিষদ থেকে বহিষ্কারকরেন। দৈনিক আজাদ ৭ এপ্রিল ১৯৭২ তারিখে আরো জানায়, "এদের মধ্যে জনাব জহিরূদ্দীন ঢাকা শহরের একটি এলাকা থেকে এম, এন, এ নির্বাচিত হয়েছিল। বাংলাদেশের সব লোক যখন মুক্তিযুদ্ধে লিপ্ত ছিল, তখন তিনি ইয়াহিয়া সরকারের সঙ্গে যোগাযোগ রক্ষাকরেছিলেন। নোয়াখালী থেকে এম, এন, এ নির্বাচিত জনাব ওবায়দুলাহ মজুমদার পাকিস্তানী গভর্নর ডাঃ মালিকে তথাকথিত মন্ত্রী পরিষদের অন্যতম সদস্য ছিলেন। তিনি এখন কারাগারে আছেন। ময়মনসিংহ থেকে এম, পি, এ নির্বাচিত জনাব এস, বি জামান বঙ্গবন্ধু শেখ মুজিবুর রহমানের বিরূদ্ধে ইয়াহিয়া সরকার কর্তৃকআনীত মিথ্যা মামলায় প্রতিহিংসামূলক আচরণে লিপ্ত ছিল। তিনি এ মামলায় সাক্ষীর ব্যবস্থাও করেছিলেন এবং ইয়াহিয়া সরকারের সঙ্গে বিভিন্নভাবে সহযোগীতা করেছেন বলে প্রকাশ। ফরিদপুরের এ, বি এম নুরূল ইসলামও ইয়াহিয়া সরকারের সঙ্গে সহযোগিতা করেছেন বলে জানা গেছে। তিনিও কারাগারে আছেন।" তথ্য সূত্র: (দৈনিক আজাদ, ৭-৪ -৭২, পৃষ্ঠা-১, কলামঃ ১-৩, ঢাবি; লাই)

এদের বিভিন্ন জনের কর্মকান্ডের আমরা কোন যোগ ছাড়াই আরো বিবরণ সেসময়ের জনপ্রিয় পত্রিকা দৈনিক আজাদ থেকে জানতে পারি।
১.
আওয়ামীলীগ সদস্যের দলত্যাগ
"মোমেনশাহী হইতে নির্বাচিত এম.পি.এ এবং বেআইনী ঘোষিত আওয়ামীলীগের একজন বিশিষ্ট সদস্য জনাব এস.বি.জামান দলের দেশদ্রোহীদের সাম্প্রতিক জঘন্য কার্যকলাপে বীতশ্রদ্ধ হইয়া উক্ত দলের সহিত সম্পর্ক ছিন্নকরিয়াছেন।তিনি এক বিবৃতিতে বলেন , তাহার মত বহু সংখ্যক দেশপ্রেমিক আওয়ামী লীগের এম.পি.এ ও এম.এন.এ এই সব দূষ্কৃতকারীদের (অর্থাৎ মুক্তিযোদ্ধাদের) আসল মতলব সম্পর্কে কিছুই জানিতেন না। তিনি পাকিস্তানের ঐক্য ও সংহতি রক্ষাকল্পে প্রেসিডেন্ট ইয়াহিয়া ও সশস্ত্রবাহিনীকে সাহায্য কল্পে আগাইয়া আসার জন্য মোমেনশাহী জেলার সকল দেশপ্রেমিক নাগরিকদের প্রতি আকুল আবেদন জানান। তথ্য সূত্র: দৈনিক আজাদ,তাং ২-৫-১৯৭১ , পৃ: ১-ক-১-২, প্রকাশ-ঢাকা)

২.
আওয়ামী লীগ নেতার বিবৃতি
একই ধরণের সূত্র থেকে নিশ্চিত হওয়া গেছে, বেআইনী ঘোষিত আওয়ামী লীগের এম. পি. এ অধ্যাপক শামসুল হক গতকাল বলেন যে, নির্বাচনের পর যে সকল ঘটনা ঘটিয়াছে তাহাতে আমরা এই সিদ্ধান্তে উপনীত হইতে বাধ্য হইয়াছি যে, শেখ মুজিবর রহমান সহ বেআইনী ঘোষিত আওয়ামীলীগের উচ্চ পদস্থ নেতারা পূর্ব পাকিস্তানের বিচ্ছিন্নতার জন্য মানুষের প্রতি বিশ্বাস ঘাতকতা করিয়াছেন ।
বেআইনী ঘোষিত আওয়ামীলীগের সহিত সকল সম্পর্ক ছিন্নকরার কথা ঘোষণা করিয়া অধ্যাপক শামসুল হক বলেন আমি তাহাদের এই খেলায় কখনই অংশ গ্রহণ করিব না। তিনি ভারতীয় সাম্রাজ্যবাদী ও শেখ মুজিবুর রহমানসহ তাহাদের এজেন্টদের পাকিস্তানের প্রকৃত শত্রূ বলিয়া আখ্যায়িত করিয়া তাহাদের ভূমিকার নিন্দা করেন।
৩ .
আওয়ামীলীগ নেতার বিবৃতি
হবিগঞ্জে ২৮ আগস্ট আওয়ামী লীগের টিকিটে প্রাদেশিক পরিষদের নির্বাচিত সদস্য ডাঃ আবুল হাশিমসহ প্রায় ৪৮ জন বিদ্রোহী স্থানীয় শান্তি কমিটির নিকট আত্মসমর্পণ করিয়া একটি বিবৃতি প্রদান করিয়াছেন।
তাহারা বিবৃতিতে বলেন যে, আমরা পবিত্র কোরান শরীফ স্পর্শ করিয়া শপথ করিয়াছি যে, পাকিস্তানেরআজাদী ও সংহতির জন্য জান-মাল কোরবান করিতে প্রস্তুত থাকিবো। তাহারা এই অভিযোগ উত্থাপন করিয়াছে যে, স্থানীয় আওয়ামী লীগের কর্মকর্তারা তাহাদিগকে দুষ্কৃতিকারীদের দলে যোগদান করিতে বলপূর্বক বাধ্য করিয়াছে। ইহা ছাড়া তাহারা আওয়ামীলীগের কার্যকলাপের নিন্দা করিয়া উহার সহিত সকল প্রকার সম্পর্কচ্ছেদের কথাও উলেখ করেন। তথ্য সূত্র: দৈনিক আজাদ, তাং ৩০-৮-১৯৭১ , পৃ ২-ক-১-৩, প্রকাশ-ঢাকা)

এসছাড়া আরো তিন জন আওয়ামী লীগ এমপিএ মুক্তিযুদ্ধে বিরোধিতা করেনঃ
১. যশোরের মোঃ মইনুদ্দিন মিয়াজী ,
২. খুলনার জনাব হাবিবুর রহমান খান ও
৩. জনাব মোঃসাঈদ
তথ্য সূত্র: দৈনিক আজাদ , তাং ১৬-৫-১৯৭১ , পৃ ১-ক-৭-৮, প্রকাশ-ঢাকা)

তাদের জড়িত থাকার বিষয়টি সূত্র থেকে এভাবে নিশ্চিত হওয়া গেছেঃ
'তিন আওয়ামী লীগ নেতার বিবৃতি
বেআইনী ঘোষিত আওয়ামী লীগের তিন জন এম পি পৃথক পৃথক বিবৃতিতে যে কোন উপায়ে পাকিস্তানের সংহতি ও সার্বভৌমত্ব রক্ষার প্রয়োজনীয়তার প্রতি গুরূত্ব আরোপ করিয়াছেন। তাহারা বলেন যে , পাকিস্তান এক ও অভিন্ন । বিশ্বের কোন শক্তি ইহা ধ্বংস করিতে পারিবে না। তাহারা কঠোর ভাষায় পূর্ব পাকিস্তানে ভারতীয় সশস্ত্র অনুপ্রবেশ এবং পাকিস্তানের সার্বভৌমত্বের ব্যাপারে হস্তক্ষেপেরতীব্র নিন্দা জানাইয়াছেন। এই তিনজন এম পি হইতেছেন যশোরের জনাব মোঃমইনুদ্দিন মিয়াজী , খুলনার জনাব হাবিবুর রহমান খান ও জনাব মোঃ সাঈদ।'

(চলবে)
http://www.sonarbangladesh.com/articles/AdvNayanKhan
পাঠকের মন্তব্য:
ঢাকা থেকে তমাল লিখেছেন, ২০ মার্চ ২০১১; সকাল ০৬:০২
পরের পর্বের অপেক্ষায় রইলাম।
বড়ই জনহিতকর কাজ করছেন এ্যাডভোকেট সাহেব।

নয়ন খান জিন্দাবাদ।
51402
New York থেকে Probashi লিখেছেন, ২০ মার্চ ২০১১; সকাল ০৬:২৫
ধন্যবাদ ড. নয়ন। আপনি লেখাশেষ করুন।
51403
abudhabi থেকে saidul লিখেছেন, ২০ মার্চ ২০১১; সকাল ০৮:৪৬
apnar lekha ai document ta bortoman sorkarer manobota birudi bichar ba juddo oporadir bichar korar ketre onek kaje asbe. karon onarato to ondo tai ata pot dekabe onader. ar apni jader kota bolchen tader modde oneke hoito ba mara gachen kintu jibito achen abong hasinar poribarer sate somporko ache amon lokjon o akon gure beraiteche . tader birudde greptari poruana keno jari hoy na?
51407
ঢাকা থেকে রাইসুল আসাদ লিখেছেন, ২০ মার্চ ২০১১; দুপুর ১২:৪৬
এর সাথে আরো একটা নাম যোগ করতে পারেন। টাঙ্গাইলের প্রখ্যাত ব্যক্তিত্ব এক সময়ের পৌর চেয়ারম্যান পদপ্রার্থী প্রয়াত হাজী আবুল হোসেন। তিনি ছিলেন পাকিস্তানের দোসর এবং জেলা পিচ কমিটির চেয়ারম্যান। মজার বিষয় হরলা পরবর্তীতে যখন তিনি আওয়ামীলীগের হয়ে পৌর নির্বাচনে অংশ নেন তখন নির্বাচনী পোস্টারে তার নামের পাশে লেখা ছিল বীর মুক্তিযোদ্ধা। অবশ্য নির্বাচনে তিনি বিজয়ী হননি। তার ইতিহাস টাঙ্গাইলের প্রায় সবাই অবগত। তার ছেলেরা এখন তার নামে হাজী আবুল হোসেন ইন্সটিটিউট অব টেকনোলজি নামে একটি প্রাইভেট কলেজ গড়ে তুলেছেন যা অত্র এলাকায় বিখ্যাত। লেখক টাঙ্গাইলের কোন বন্ধুর কাছে তার ব্যাপারে খোঁজ খবর নিয়ে তার নামটি তালিকাভুক্ত করতে পারেন (যদি প্রয়াতদেরও তালিভুক্তির সিস্টেম থাকে)। ধন্যবাদ।
51436
দোহা থেকে রিজাউল লিখেছেন, ২০ মার্চ ২০১১; দুপুর ০৩:৫২
তথ্যবহুল উপস্থাপনা। চলতে থাকুক।
51455
Dhaka থেকে waliullah nayem লিখেছেন, ২০ মার্চ ২০১১; দুপুর ০৩:৫৫
I am very much amused by this writing. these are the historical truth and facts. no one can avoid this. please try to reveal these truth sincerely more and more.


__._,_.___


[* Moderator�s Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[chottala.com] BD concedes Transit Corridor to India?



India was not receiving Charity of US Aid because it had wanted Communist and Socialist Parties banned. India has received very little US Aid after end of USSR and if she owes any small amount of IMF loan, it can pay in a day out of her $ 250 billion Foreign Exchange Reserves.
There is a difference between a country that lives off Aid and Loan and never pays back a Penny like all Poor Moslim Countries and a country that has paid up all her Loans and is not begging for more loans anymore. Has not BD and all poor Moslim countries been begging for Loan write offs and have already gotten some Loans written off by USA and other rich countries?
What do you call that?
Has India ever done that?
Has not India written off Loans to Nepal and Bhutan?
Which country has BD ever granted a loan in her history?


From: Khoka Mia <akhoka786@yahoo.com>

Does accepting charity of Aid or Loans make a country beggar? What about India?


From: S Turkman <turkman@sbcglobal.net>

Oh sorry. I did not know, BD has never accepted any Charity of Aid or Loans.


From: Khoka Mia <akhoka786@yahoo.com>

Mr. Turkman, you have crossed the limit by characterizing my homeland BD as "Beggar BD". Bangladesh may have become poor due to historical events, that does not make her beggar, and yes Bangladesh is a dignified nation and demands equal treatmnet. There was a time when Bangladesh was considered technologically ahead of even England for her muslin fabric and other industrial products - read history or go to the London museum and you will find the proof of it. You are so knowledgeable and should know  that the Indian Statesman Gopalkrishna Gokhale said, "What Bengal thinks today India thinks tomorrow" in his immortal statement.
What do you know what I have done and what I am still doing for Bangladesh. You have a tendency to belittle people. Refrain from talking tall and nonsense. Thank you.


From: S Turkman <turkman@sbcglobal.net>

Thank you sir for telling me Beggar BD has something called Dignity and in name of her Sovereignty you can act Anti poor people of your country. What would BD would do with her friends like you ...!
Okay sir, BD Per Capita is not low enough yet. BD is not backwards enough. Bangladeshis are not yet poor enough. Go ahead and make them become poorer so you can have more Servants in your House ...!  


From: Khoka Mia <akhoka786@yahoo.com>

Here you go again! Mr. Turkman. Whenever an issue with India comes up, you jump on playing the religion card. You and your likes drag Pakistan as well. It is not about fighting the Kaafir, it is about equality (not being subserviant), dignity, and sovereignity between nations. Bangladesh may be small in size, but a great nation of 160 million strong placing her in the fourth position in people power. Bangladeshis are eternally devoted to their national identity.


From: S Turkman <turkman@sbcglobal.net>

Oh please forgive me. I had no idea we are at war with Kaafir India just like Pakistan has been since 1948 and had no idea that BD should not have any kind of dealings with our Enemy India. How could I be so treasonous?
Lets talk with Pakistan and declare war at India simultaneously to conquer it ...!


From: Khoka Mia <akhoka786@yahoo.com>



Mr. Turkman, why it is always that you are fanatically in support of India's interest? Are you an India promoter? What is your share in this deal, will you tell us? If you are brave enough why don't you list all the unsettled issues between Bangladesh and India; and don't forget to add on the list the diversion of all surface water by India, building dams on transboundary rivers.
All the issues brought to light by Zoglul Husain is absolutely correct. These are legitimate concern and poses threat to the existence of Bangladesh as an independent and sovereign nation.
What Bangladesh is getting except the perpetuity assurance of the present government? The present government is buying perpetuity to a tutelage government under India by selling the interest of Bangladesh.
 
-Bangladeshi 

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: "S Turkman" <turkman@sbcglobal.net>


   


Look at Iran ...!
* She is at fault in making money through Bandar Abbas port also because it is providing Transit Corridor to Russia, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan and all Central Asian States 2 decades ago.
Iran is so stupid that 2 decades ago, she spent billions to build a Highway connecting that port of Ashkhabad, Turkmenistan and also built a Railway Line going through whole length of the country from that port to connect with old USSR Railway System northeast of her.
What a stupid country ...!
* And then, there is a stupid country, Germany that conceded Transit to Soviet Natural Gas Pipe Line in 1970's to let her Gas be sold to almost all countries in Continental Europe despite US Opposition.
USA is a stupid country. She had also conceded transit of Natural Gas Pipe line to Canada going through whole north-south length of it going to Mexico.
* Pakistan is another example of such stupid concession. She has conceded transit to Iranian Gas Pipe Line despite US Opposition, going to India and our stupid Enemy, India has conceded Transit of that Pipe line to BD after it reaches her. 
What can we do?
This world is full of stupid countries like BD.
.
S U Turkman

--- In reform-bd@yahoogroups.com, Zoglul Husain <zoglul@...> wrote:
>
>
> Equipment from India arrives
>
> http://www.thedailystar.net/story.php?nid=177610

> Comment: We are totally opposed to transit/corridor agreement with India under the present circumstances. Roads constructed for these purposes will almost certainly be used for India's military purposes, which may even be from the very first consignment of smaller items, scheduled from 20 March. (Please see: ODC shipment begins March 20 http://www.bdnews24.com/details.php?cid=2&id=189840 ). This is not only a security risk, it is occupation of our infrastructure, an attempt to subjugate us, which may also drag us between warring parties. 

> I don't know if there would be demos, barricades, etc., but the govt is making a grievous betrayal of the country. They know we were denied transit from/to Nepal, Bhutan, etc. They know the problems between the two countries have not been resolved. The very serious problems of river water, border killings, smuggling in India's favour, enclaves, trade policies, conspiracy and hegemony, military and security, etc., etc. are in the way of developing friendly relations between the two countries. The govt is still behaving like lackeys mesmerised under the spell of a hegemonic power.

> It's all an utter betrayal of national interest and sovereignty. We condemn the govt on Hasina's MoU's with India, in which our national interests have been sold out and our sovereignty surrendered. We must unite to resist these.

   






__._,_.___


[* Moderator�s Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Re: [chottala.com] Re: Father of Nation: Father of Bangladesh should be AK Fazlul Haque. Who deserves most? Bhasani or Mujib

Father of Bangladesh should be AK Fazlul Haque.
Because
Bangladesh is libarated and India also helped Bangladesh libaration to execute Lahore Resulation which was proposed by Sher Bengal AK Fazlul Haque in 1940 at Lahore Conference.

--- On Tue, 22/3/11, Sirajul Haider <sirajulhaider@yahoo.com> wrote:

> From: Sirajul Haider <sirajulhaider@yahoo.com>
> Subject: [chottala.com] Re: Father of Nation: Who deserves most? Bhasani or Mujib
> To: chottala@yahoogroups.com
> Received: Tuesday, 22 March, 2011, 9:15 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear Mr Ataul
> Karim,
>  
> I fully agree with you that Maulana Bhasani deserves
> more to be honoured as father of the nation than Mujib.
> Maulana Bhasani never compromised with any evil desires be
> it from India or Pakistan. He organised a long march against
> Farakka Barage Dam. Very unfortunately present BAL
> govt. even trying to erase Bhasani's name from our
> history. Bhasani Novo Theatre has been changed to
> Bongonbondhu Novo theatre by BAL govt. Maulana Bhasani was
> the first person in the then East pakistan  who
> demanded independent of our homeland. I believe over 70%
> people of Bangladesh would accept Bhasani as Father of
> Nation and it would solve our long lasting dispute about who
> should be the actual Father of Nation.
>  
> Sirajul
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Ataul
> Karim <ataulkarim49@yahoo.com>
> To:
> chottala@yahoogroups.com
> Sent:
> Tuesday, 22 March 2011 14:05:10
> Subject: Re:
> [chottala.com] Re: Sarmila Bose’s
> “Research� Exposed by Mashuqur Rahman
>
>  
>
>
>
> Dear All
>  
> I think the father of Bangladesh should be Moulana
> Abdul Hamid Bhashani not Mujib because it was Bhashani
> who first thought of the idea of independent
> Bangladesh and later hijacked by Mujib. If you declare him
> as the father
> of Bangladesh i think the controversy over father of
> the nation would be over for good.
>  
> Ataul Karim
> (free thinker)
>
>  
>
>
>
>
> From: abid
> bahar <abid.bahar@gmail.com>
> To:
> Syed_Aslam3 <syed.aslam3@gmail.com>
> Cc: Khobor
> <khabor@yahoogroups.com>; notun Bangladesh
> <notun_bangladesh@yahoogroups.com>;
> chottala@yahoogroups.com; Ovimot@yahoogroups.com; Gazi Zakir
> Hossain <binte04@rogers.com>; Zoglul Husain
> <zoglul@hotmail.co.uk>; abid bahar
> <abid.bahar@gmail.com>; Helal Ahmed
> <huahmed@yahoo.com>
> Sent: Sun,
> March 13, 2011 12:47:48 PM
> Subject:
> [chottala.com] Re: Sarmila Bose’s
> â€Å"Research� Exposed by
> Mashuqur Rahman
>
>  
>
>
> People's Freedom Struggle vs the AL Confusion
> Continues
> Abid Bahar
>
> "Bangladesh's freedom struggle
> continues" is a line repeated by Mawlana Bhasani one of
> the great leaders of Bangladesh. True, the life of an
> emerging nation or an independent nation is as if like the
> continued survival of the fittest among other nations
> because to keep a nation sovereign, freedom struggle
> continues.
> 1971 war vs the cold war
> ------------------------------------
> Often some people blinded by emotion think it is a one time
> issue, not in dynamic terms.From this perspective we call
> the 1971 struggle as the war against Pakistan.Now we truly
> have a cold war going on with India which is closing rivers
> one after another, using its puppets in Bangladesh it is
> building its infrastructure within Bangladesh by
> Bangladesh's 1 billion borrowed money, fencing the
> border with its Brahmin Wall and killing our people while we
> facilitate them transit.
> Pakistani razakars vs Indian razakars
> ------------------------------------------------------
>  During the 1971 war we had Pakistan as the agressor
> and there were the razakars. Now that we have war going on
> with India, the collaborators like Hasina, Razzak, Faroque,
> Moinul, Suranjit becomes the prominant Indian razakars. That
> the devoted AL leaders/ members tend to excuse India for
> killing and raping our women. The death tool from the new
> aggression by the BSF is now a thousand and continues to go
> up. These Indian razakars speak loudly only when it comes to
> the Pakistani atrocities. True, some AL freedom fighters
> lack this true spirit of the freedom fighter, Helal Uddin
> wrote that both Pakistani and now Indian aggressors are
> condemnable. It seems to me a result of a generation gap. He
> further wrote: "Your generation saw Pakistan as
> oppressor and you spoke loud about it as that was the right
> thing to do. Our generation is seeing India as the
> oppressor, and we are speaking about it. I do not have any
> hurt feeling towards the Indian people but the Indian
> authority who is humiliating us periodically."
> Muji's own Confusion Continues in the AL
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> The confusion is also due to a difference between made in
> Awami League history of Bangladesh vs. made in scholars'
> history of Bangladesh. The further remifications are in
> those areas: (a) AL claim of death in 1971 has been 3
> million and the others including historians local and
> foreign claim is that it is from three hundred thousand to
> maximun one million.This discripency is a result of the lack
> of any survey done on it. In some cases according to the
> Bihari claims that some Bihari dead bodies were shown as
> Bengali genocide dead bodies.
>
> It is unfortunate that like many confusions Sheikh Mujibur
> Rahman created (a) for not declaring the independence 
> due to his signiture in the LFD (b) staying the entire
> liberation war time in Pakistan, and (c)after his return to
> put Bangladesh in the world map as the bottomless basket
> case (d) perhaps he was not good at mathematics or
> intellectually not so bright to say "three
> lac as three million", but AL found him as the
> father of the nation and the best Bengali in thousand years.
>
> People's History vs. the AL history
> -------------------------------------------------
> In all these the source of contradictions is
> not  methodological, nor of memory but it has been
> due to the fascist tendency in the Awami League's
> hero-worshipping, based on propaganda devoted to make its
> own ownership history about Mujib and Bangladesh; In the end
> Bangladesh has the AL's Bangladesh history of how they
> owned it but the unfortunate Bangladesh does not have its
> own people's history about the freedom struggle of
> 1971.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011
> at 12:13 AM, Syed_Aslam3 <syed.aslam3@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Sarmila Bose’s
> â€Å"Research� Exposed
>
>   Bangladesh, Bangladesh Liberation
> War
>
> [Hat tip to Robin Khundkar]
> Recently I wrote about Sarmila
> Bose’s apologia for the
> Pakistan army that was published last September in
> Economic and Political Weekly. In this
> week’s issue of EPW, two critical
> comments were published that take to
> task Ms. Bose’s "research". The
> first comment is from Mr. Akhtaruzzaman Mandal, a freedom
> fighter whose first-person account of finding Bengali
> rape victims being held by Pakistani soldiers was disputed
> by Ms. Bose. The second comment is from Dr. Nayanika Mookherjee,
> lecturer in the Department of Sociology at Lancaster
> University. Ms. Bose had cited one of Dr.
> Mookherjee’s articles to try to cast doubt
> on the rapes committed by the Pakistan army in their
> campaign of genocide in 1971.
> Mr. Mandal exposes Ms. Bose’s
> "research" with the authority of one who has lived
> history. Below are some excerpts from Mr.
> Mandal’s comment:
>
> Since Bose knew nothing about this humble freedom
> fighter and the pride we all bear, she could casually
> describe me as a muktijoddha accompanying the Indian army.
> Such description also served her purpose, as she tried to
> portray me as someone who had no prior knowledge about the
> land and people of Bhurungamari/Nageshwari, about their
> suffering and destitution. As guerrilla fighters we were
> active in the region all through monitoring the day to day
> developments. We were like the fish in the water, as the
> saying goes. That is why in my book, not known to Bose, I
> have also written about few other specific cases of how
> women had to suffer. But that is another story, quite a long
> one, let me concentrate here on the accusation made by
> Bose.  
> While doing her "research", Bose never tried
> to contact me. On the other hand her search for truth took
> her to Pakistan and she interviewed Lt Col Saleem Zia of 8
> Punjab who was stationed in that area and cross-checked my
> information with this partisan source of hers. Quoting my
> account Bose writes, "According to Mandal, Bhurungamari
> seemed like a ghost town. He claims 60 East Pakistan Civil
> Armed Force (EPCAF) members and 30-40 Pakistani soldiers
> were captured â€â€Å" they
> had run out of ammunition. He also claims that 40-50
> Pakistani soldiers were killed in this battle." Then
> quoting her Pakistani source she writes, "Brigadier Zia
> found 30 injured men, who were evacuated, and 36 able-bodied
> ones. The rest were dead or dispersed and four or five, by
> his estimate, were captured." The anomaly in the
> description provided by members from two contending side is
> not new in any battle account. It is the
> researcher’s job to dig for the
> truth. But according to our researcher here Akhtaruzzaman
> Mandal "claims" whereas brigadier Zia
> "found" and that shows where she is standing as a
> dispassionate independent scholar. Even in her account about
> the number of deaths she has not said anything about the
> EPCAF, who were raw recruits from the villages of West
> Pakistan and were put into forward position to work as a
> shield to the Pakistan army.
> …
> Now let us take the case of captain Ataullah Khan, the
> human devil. Bose has been successful in collecting laudable
> quotes about Ataullah and in her attempt to whitewash the
> devil’s deeds made a jugglery of the
> location of Bhurungamari and Nageswari depicting them as two
> sites completely separated from each other. She writes,
> "According to this fellow (Pakistani) officer, Captain
> Ataullah had not been in Bhurungamari before and he was
> based at Nageswari. He had barely got there when he faced
> the Indian attack." Her research or lack of research
> has led her to greatly differentiate between Nageswari and
> Bhurungamari and if only she was interested to know more she
> could have found out that the distance between the two place
> is only 15 km and at that time, even with a ferry crossing,
> it took only 30 minutes for a commanding officer to cover
> the distance by his jeep. The Pakistani captain being based
> at Nageswari was a frequent visitor to the
> forward position at Bhurungamari and he was no stranger
> there.
> Bose never asked any woman, any common man of
> Nageswari and Bhurungamari, about Ataullah Khan but
> quoted her Pakistani source at length and writes, "This
> fellow officer of 25 Punjab described (not claimed: AM)
> Captain Ataullah as a six-foot plus Pathan officer known for
> being ‘humane’. He further
> stated that he saw people in Nageswari weep upon hearing the
> Ataullah’s death. According to him, when
> the Pakistanis were POW’s in India after
> the war, a senior Indian officer had expressed his respect,
> soldier-to-soldier, to the officers of 25 Punjab and
> mentioned by name Ataullah, who had become a
> ’shaheed’ (martyr)."
> In the footnote Bose mentions that, "this inclusion of
> evidence from the Indian side in the future would be of
> great value in assessing this and many other aspect of 1971
> war". I am happy that she noted the importance of the
> Indian source which she never tried to use and would request
> her to look
> for members of 6 Mountain Division with whom we fought
> side by side. After 36 long years I cannot remember all of
> them or their full names, but how can I forget Major General
> Thappa, Brigadier Josie, Major Chatowal Singh, Captain
> Shambu, Captain Mitra, Captain Bannerje, Major Bala Reddy,
> as well as fellow fighters from the 78 Battalion of the BSF
> and others. Instead of interviewing only the perpetrators of
> genocide, rape and crimes against humanity she should also
> try to get evidences from the Indian side.  
> As Bose has gathered most of her information from highly
> dubious one-sided Pakistani sources following atrocious and
> unbelievable lines, "The picture painted of captain
> Ataullah by his fellow officer, who knew him, completely
> contradicts the one given by Mandal, who appears to have
> only seen his dead body. Clearly, if captain Ataullah had
> been based in Nageswari and only gone up to Bhurungamari the
> day the Indian attack started, he could not have been
> responsible for whatever might have been going on in
> Bhurungamari. Mandal offers no corroborating evidence for
> his character assassination of an officer who had died
> defending his country, and therefore, cannot speak in his
> own defence."
> As a freedom fighter operating in the area we came to
> know about many of the atrocious acts of Ataullah and this
> human-devil was not unknown to us. Our informers also
> brought many news and on that auspicious day we knew very
> well about the bunker he took shelter in and that is why the
> Indian army could pinpoint their artillery attack. I have
> seen his dead body at the bunker and could immediately know
> that this was the man who brought so much suffering to our
> people, to the poor civilians and villagers of the area.
> Ataullah Khan was no soldier defending his country, he was
> part of a killing machine, doing heinous acts against an
> unarmed civil population which no professional soldier can
> ever think of. Such acts can in no way be equated with
> defending one’s country. In that case all
> the Nazi war criminals will get acquitted as they were
> "defending" their own country.  
> [Read the entire article here]
> Dr. Mookherjee, in her comment, discusses Ms.
> Bose’s flawed methodology and bias. Below
> are some excerpts:
>
> To any student of social science methodology and memory
> studies, the article reveals how the pursuit of
> "facts" alone disallows any analytical,
> sociological, historical and interpretative perspective.
> That it was published in EPW is a surprise indeed.
> …
> It is not clear from the article the extent of the
> research in Bangladesh, how many survivors the author met,
> particularly women, what was her position towards these
> women, i e, her reflexive position. It is clear that she
> talked to Pakistani military authorities and accepts
> everything they say to be true but considers all Bangladeshi
> accounts as predominantly fabricated.
> …
> The article accepts every account of Pakistani military
> authorities as truth while that of Bangladeshis as false and
> "shrill cries". Particularly if the accounts are
> of "illiterate" Bangladeshis they can only be
> false â€â€Å" so the space
> for any "subalterns" is clearly absent, while
> those within the military paraphernalia provide legitimate
> authoritative accounts according to the author. Particularly
> the role of Bangladeshi women either as witnesses or as
> raped: like the sweeper Rabeya Khatoon or the sculptor
> Firdousy Priyobhashini is always of suspect to Bose. Also
> while mentioning the Hamdoodur Rehman commission of the
> Pakistani government the author does not mention the
> instances of rapes and the role of General Niazi as cited in
> the document.
> …
> The article cites the case of Ferdousy Priyobhashini who
> as a single woman had to look after her widowed mother and
> young siblings and continued to work during the war and
> becomes the focus of sexual violence by various Pakistani
> officers as well as Bengali collaborators.
> The article interrogates
> Priyobhashini’s account questioning why she
> stayed back during the war and whether her rape was as a
> result of coercion or a voluntary sexual act by stating that
> she "willingly fraternised". By that argument is
> the article suggesting that Priyobhashini brought the rape
> upon her since she stayed back? This is extremely
> problematic and parallels the biases within various rape
> laws which seem to suggest that women must have brought the
> rape upon them in different instances.  
> By this argument the sociologically nuanced analysis of
> how single women and their sexuality are always suspect, is
> never addressed and instead Priyobhashini’s
> experience is highlighted by the derisive comment that she
> "makes much of her threats". The complexity of war
> time violence and the various threatening compulsive
> situations is well articulated in the work of Cynthia Enloe,
> Veena Das, Urvashi Butalia, Ritu Menon and Kamla Bhasin.
> Primo Levi’s work on the holocaust also
> shows the complex negotiations made by survivors.
> …
> The article also states the account of Champa from one
> of my articles [Mookherjee 2003] and tries to infer that no
> rapes happened during the Bangladesh war. My article was
> exploring how the trauma of rape is understood in
> independent Bangladesh and in the process I explore how
> scholars of memory make sense of the process of forgetting.
> The nuanced arguments I make about Champa is hinged on
> long-term fieldwork, cross-checking of hospital files and
> documents and finding the social workers who found her and
> brought her to the hospital. These are the
> "evidences" of Champa’s war-time
> violent encounter of rape. I have also worked with and
> written about other women who encountered rape during the
> Bangladesh war. This was done by means of over a
> year’s fieldwork as well as cross-checking
> interviews, and examining archival, official documents, etc.
>
> [Read the entire article here]
> Related: Research on Bangladesh War by
> Akhtaruzzaman Mondol
> http://www.epw.org.in/uploads/articles/11334.pdf
>  
>  
> Link: http://www.docstrangelove.com/2007/12/20/sarmila-boses-research-exposed/
> © 2007 Mashuqur Rahman | Category: Bangladesh, Bangladesh Liberation War | 16 comments | 3,908 views | Subscribe to the comments of this
> post
>  
>  
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



------------------------------------

[* Moderator�s Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chottala/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chottala/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
chottala-digest@yahoogroups.com
chottala-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
chottala-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [chottala.com] Re: [KHABOR] Verdict of Col. Taher Case.

Humanitarian depends on justice justice depend on lawful administration and lawful administration can be established under the system of lawful democracy.
Without lawful democracy justice of law can not be and lawful trial can not be done. Rules and system should be made to save the people and to protect humanitarians.
But people were being killed
Because
There was no system of lawful democrcay for establishing justice of law to save people and humanitarians..
There was no system of lawful honest administration to administrate the administation for humanitarians.
There is also no any lawful proceedure for doing trial after doing neutral proper lawful investigation to establish justice of law for humanitarians.

--- On Tue, 22/3/11, Helal Ahmed <huahmed@yahoo.com> wrote:

> From: Helal Ahmed <huahmed@yahoo.com>
> Subject: [chottala.com] Re: [KHABOR] Verdict of Col. Taher Case.
> To: khabor@yahoogroups.com, alapon@yahoogroups.com, chottala@yahoogroups.com, "Miro Jangi" <mjangi@yahoo.com>, Diagnose@yahoogroups.com, "shahid mahmud" <shahid6609@yahoo.com>, "sultan chowdhury" <chottalasultan@yahoo.com>, "Saad Andaleeb" <saadandaleeb@gmail.com>
> Cc: "Abba" <hussain7192@rogers.com>
> Received: Tuesday, 22 March, 2011, 8:55 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear
> Manna Sir:
> Assalamualaikum.
> Thanks for sharing your comment on High courts verdict on
> Taher killing.
> Sir,
> in the last few weeks there were many email circling around
> regarding this matter. I also posted a thread few days back.
> I would be honored to hear your feedback in regards of my
> below statement:
> “Assalamua'laikum.
> Ok, for the sake of argument, I accept your notion that
> Ziaur Rahman was a cold blooded murderer for killing Col
> Taher. Then, do you also accept that Sheikh Mujibur Rahman
> was also a cold blooded murderer for killing Siraj Sikdar! I
> hope you must read or remember when Bongbondhu proclaimed,
> where is Siraj Sikdar after he was assassinated.�
> I’m really
> looking fwd to have a knowledgeable discussion with you
> regarding the hypocrisy in our today’s society when
> it comes to discussing Mujib/Zia, India/Pakistan, Tarek/Joy,
> and so on.
> Sir, I can assume
> how busy your life is however, your response is much
> appreciated.
> Helal
>
> --- On Tue, 3/22/11, Abdul Mannan
> <abman1971@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: Abdul Mannan <abman1971@gmail.com>
> Subject: [KHABOR] Verdict of Col. Taher Case.
> To: khabor@yahoogroups.com, alapon@yahoogroups.com,
> chottala@yahoogroups.com, "Miro Jangi"
> <mjangi@yahoo.com>, Diagnose@yahoogroups.com,
> "shahid mahmud" <shahid6609@yahoo.com>,
> "sultan chowdhury"
> <chottalasultan@yahoo.com>, "Saad Andaleeb"
> <saadandaleeb@gmail.com>
> Date: Tuesday, March 22, 2011, 3:21 AM
>
>
>  
>
> High Court has given a verdict that the hanging of
> Col. Taher by Gen. Zia was a cold blooded murder and the
> lone person responsible for it was General Zia. The Court
> also ruled that Zia was also directly  involved in the
> killing of Bangabandhu Sk. Mujib.
>
> Mannan
>
> --
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



------------------------------------

[* Moderator�s Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chottala/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chottala/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
chottala-digest@yahoogroups.com
chottala-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
chottala-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/