Banner Advertise

Thursday, August 18, 2011

Re: [chottala.com] Barrister Moudud faces trouble in BNP !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hi politicians.

 

Modud is not a good politician. He is always seeker of opportunity. The policy making of  BNP does depend on good politicians.

Madam understands she is a strong lady for this reason she can not try to understand what is politics and who can do good politics,

Actually

Mujib is great leader over all but Major Zia also is not less than him.

Because

Zia politically was born when  AL party top leaders seriously failed to take right decision in right time whereas infamous Major Zia has taken right decision in right time for declaration of Bangladesh  Independence which  has made him famous Major ZIA and nation  leader which could not be tolerated by failure AL  leaders.

It is true

Present BAL and BNP both are the political party due to Major Zia

Because

Mujib had banned AL as political party along with all other political party and had formed BKSAL.

Present AL politicians are not doing BKSAL politics but they  are doing AL politics and it is due to Zia.  Babu Surenjet can explain it very nicely. 

So

Zia is not less important to AL politicians than Mujib.

Both are same great to them though they do not agree with it.

Modud is opportunity seeker politician.

 

 

 

 

 

--- On Thu, 18/8/11, abid bahar <abid.bahar@gmail.com> wrote:

From: abid bahar <abid.bahar@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [chottala.com] Barrister Moudud faces trouble in BNP !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
To: chottala@yahoogroups.com
Cc: "Khobor" <khabor@yahoogroups.com>, "notun Bangladesh" <notun_bangladesh@yahoogroups.com>, "Sonar Bangladesh" <SonarBangladesh@yahoogroups.com>, "canada.bnp" <Canada.bnp@gmail.com>, nazrul7@yahoo.com, farid2002hossain@hotmail.com, abid.bahar@gmail.com
Received: Thursday, 18 August, 2011, 9:53 AM

 
Fascism in the BNP:Target Maudud Ahamed
Abid Bahar
 
Maudud Ahamed is not only a politician in the  present BNP party, he has been a historian as well. If Mudud Ahamed said something in the past praising Sheikh Mujib, it was in his role of a historian; it was about Mujib's revolutionary contributions in the birth of Bangladesh but until 7th March after which he began to negotiate with the Pakistani rulers.  In the pre 7th March Mujib's glorious history Maudud is right that Zia's position is much lower than Mujib. However, like many of us who were the former Chatro League members, but disappointed at Mujib's authoritarian rule Maudud Ahamed, the historian was also disappointed after the independence of Bangladesh. This must have led to his change in heart about Mujib.  
BNP condemning the historian Maudud is following a dangerous path of hero-worshipping that had been originally introduced by Mujib .
In condemning Maudud, BNP's fascist elements following a Mujib principle perhaps unknowingly but dearly for their love of Zia. Hero-worshipping is a dangerous disease in fascism and a serious problem in the AL, now spreading in the BNP among the sycopants who worship none other than Zia. I hope the more enlightened BNP leaders instead of condemning Maudud the historian will appreciate him,  the politician and a truly reformed Bangladeshi.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Syed_Aslam3 <Syed.Aslam3@gmail.com> wrote: