Mujib, Bangladesh's post liberation bitterpill
Abid Bahar
Mujib was Bangladesh's post liberation bitterpill but to the hero worshippers he is the greatest Bengali of all times.However, when the real Mujib was brought to the daylight he becomes a bitterpill.
It is not easy to swallw Mujib the bitter pill by hero worshippers who forgive Mujib for imposing dictatorship on the infant nation, killing 30,000 by the Rakkhi and over 100,000 by the 1974 famine. All these were done only in three years of his rule which turned Bangladesh into a bottomless Bananaistan failed state, like "Fakistan".
-----------------------------
Mujib Wanted Confederation
Daily Star
Daily Star
Abid Bahar
If Mujib Wanted Confederation, how does this make him the artechetect of Bangladesh?
On the 25th night Mujib was last approached by Tajuddin to sign a handwritten statement about the declaration of independence which Mujib declined. Where does this myth of the declaration by telegram by Mujib come from? It seems that the telegram was circulated by the AL high command and a copy was also sent to Chittagong.
Referring to Mujib's confusing moves, Abul Mansur Ahmad says in his book, "I did not understand Mujib then, I do not understand him now." He adds, "Sheikh Mujib surrendered without resistance. He did not try to escape nor hide himself." Mansur Ahmad questioned "Is this the way the leader of a people fight against opposition?" (Amer Dekha Rajnitir... p. 551-555).
If Mujib Wanted Confederation, how does this make him the artechetect of Bangladesh?
On the 25th night Mujib was last approached by Tajuddin to sign a handwritten statement about the declaration of independence which Mujib declined. Where does this myth of the declaration by telegram by Mujib come from? It seems that the telegram was circulated by the AL high command and a copy was also sent to Chittagong.
Referring to Mujib's confusing moves, Abul Mansur Ahmad says in his book, "I did not understand Mujib then, I do not understand him now." He adds, "Sheikh Mujib surrendered without resistance. He did not try to escape nor hide himself." Mansur Ahmad questioned "Is this the way the leader of a people fight against opposition?" (Amer Dekha Rajnitir... p. 551-555).
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Syed_Aslam3 <syed.aslam3@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear AllHistorical personalities have to be understood in the proper historical context .....the history of a nation unfolds in it's own unique way ... there is close connection betweenthe leader and the masses, but at the end masses are the makers of history ....This has beenproved once again through our struggle for independence .....In 1946 the people of today's Bangladesh voted overhelmingly for Pakistan [which eventuallyturned to a Fakistan (as Poet Kazi Nazrul coined the word "Fakistan" when he first heard about it...)... it took about 24 years for the people of the then East Pakistan to get rid of their dellusionsabout "muslim homeland" Pakistan.In 1970 the people voted overhelmingly for Awami League under the leadership ofSheikh Mujibur Rahman .... The historical developments has to looked upon as a process thatmenifests itself through historical events .....Good, bad or ugly, (someone like it or not) Sheikh Mujibur Rahman's leadership has provento be the most decicive & bold voice that in essence raised people's consciousness to fight fortheir rights that led them to the fight for Bangladesh and a decicive victory at the end......There are many many details ...but the 7th March speech (Ebar er Sangram Shadinotor Sangram ...)& raising Bangladesher Pataka on 23 March 1971 signifies the culmination of Sheikh Mujibor Rahman'sthought process about the future of our mother land.All attempts to undermine Sheikh Mujibor Rahman as the uncompromising leader of the People'sStruggle for the Liberation of Bangladesh will be futile ......Mujib's tactical move such as getting arrested on the night of 25th March 1971 gave our nation'sliberation war against the Pakistani occupation an extra degree of legitamacy in the world's eyes ....[ After 25th March 1971 Mujib was in Pakistani jail for 9 months ..... he never bowed down or madeany compromise with the Pakistani Junta even under the threat of gallows .....]Just recall: how "Ekti Mojibor-er kontho hote, lokkko Mojibor-er Kontho-Dhoni ....."became a reality ....PS: "Mujib Wanted Confederation ..." So what ???? There is no historical basis for making suchover-simplified statement .... The historical processes are very complex. In political battle-field situationsand political maneavors leaders has to encounter many strategic vis-a-vis tactical moves ...... The bottom lineand strength of Mujib's leadership was that he never compromised in the question of rights of his people(the people of Bangladesh) ...... even under the threat of gallows (death by hanging) in Pakistani jail (1971)......Syed Aslam
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Faruque Alamgir <faruquealamgir@gmail.com> wrote:
FRIENDSNONE HAS TO DIG TONS OF MUD,SAND OR PUMP MILLION CUSEC WATER HERE THERE TO FIND THE CYCLOSTYLE MACHINE OR THE T&T MESSAGE AFTER 40 YEARS TO ESTABLISH TRUTH FOR THE PARTY OF THE PARTY N BY THE PARTY MEN. DETRACTORS MAY RAISE EYE BROWS ABOUT THE GENUINENESS N RIGHTEOUSNESS OF STORIES.TRUTH ABOUT THE CREATION OF BANGLADESH IS SPREAD THROUGHOUT THE LUSH GREENERY OF THE WONDER LAND BANGLADESH, AND IN THE HEARTS N MINDS OF THE 7.5 MILLION PEOPLE OF THEN E.PAKISTAN.INTERESTINGLY, IT MAY BE MENTIONED THAT NEITHER GREAT LEADERS SHEIKH MUJIBUR RAHMAN AND ZIAUR RAHMAN DID UTTER A SINGLE WORD OR CLAIMED SUPREMACY OVER ONE ANOTHER ON THE MATTER THAT OUR LEARNED HIGH COURT N INTELLECTUALS ARE BUSY WITH.THE TRUTH IS TRUTH AND TRUTH NEVER DIES EVEN IT IS DUMPED UNDER TONS OF DEBRIS SINCE IT HAS THE FORCE N POWER TO SET COME BACK AND MAKE IT'S RIGHTFUL PLACE IN THE GENUINE BOOKS OF HISTORY .Faruque Alamgir
Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 4:55 PM, abid bahar <abid.bahar@gmail.com> wrote:
Mujib Wanted ConfederationComment:On the 25th night Mujib was last approached by Tajuddin to sign a handwritten statement about the declaration of independence which Mujib declined. Where does this myth of the declaration by telegram by Mujib come from? It seems that the telegram was circulated by the AL high command and a copy was also sent to Chittagong.Referring to Mujib's confusing moves, Abul Mansur Ahmad says in his book, "I did not understand Mujib then, I do not understand him now." He adds, "Sheikh Mujib surrendered without resistance. He did not try to escape nor hide himself." Mansur Ahmad questioned "Is this the way the leader of a people fight against opposition?" (Amer Dekha Rajnitir... p. 551-555)
__._,_.___
[* Moderator's Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.
* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]
Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
