Dear All
1. Jamaate Islami was the only political party in 1971 whose central committe [Majlis-i-Shura] under the leadership of Gholam Azam, decided to organize a
Killing squads viz. Al-Bodor Bahini. [Jamaat's Golam Azam, Nizami, Mujahid
gang was at the helm of violent Death Squad & collaborators that was in
"Active Duly" in the killing fields of 1971 Bangladesh ....]. Crimes against our
nation and crimes agaist humanity were committed by Jamaat in the name of
religion.
The Muslim League, Nezame Islami and few other splinter groups supported
the integrity of Pakistan but didn't organize any armed Death Squad with a
central party decision [although some of their members joined the razaker forces].
In 1971 Jamaate Islami was the only political group that had an killer wing
Al-bodor and was engagged in killing of innocent civillians and various other crimes against humanity and war crimes in 1971.
Thus, by default, Jamaate Islami became the only political group that was
engaged in criminal violence and accessory to the genocides of 1971.
Jamaate Islami is the Party of the Traitors (Gadders).... and there
is no such thing as a Reformed Traitor .....Once a Gaddar, always
a Gaddar ......
2. The current govermnent was duly elected through a democratic
process and has the legitimate right to set up it's priorities and
course of actions : That is the law of the land.....
The current government is a government of the majority
and the majority must be granted ..... that is way our system works ....
[obviously, the War Criminals will oppose the trial in their attempts
to evade Justice by fair means or faul ....... ]
3. Putting signature in favor of the constitution or abstaining from
putting the signature on the constitution is a (and was a) part of the
due process and a constitutional right of the parliament/constitutional
assembly member. If Suronjit had denied putting his signature on the
original 1972 constitution, how does that make him a criminal and
under what law, Mr. Mokhter Ahmed?
You really sound silly when you say Suronjit "is great criminal and his
crime against the constitution is ever greater than anyone. He should be
tried for that."...
Your innuendo "Why Suronjet Sen was made the co-chair of the
constitution review committee?" is pure Nonsense & Grossly Fallacious
and quite unbecoming for an academician
Please don't think that we Bangladeshis are fools and you can create
murky waters by throwing these kinds of falacious logic ......
BTW, do you personally approve the spirit of 1972 Bangladesh
Constitution?
And since when you have become such an over-zealous-fan
[a zealot] of Bongobondhu that you made you think,
any difference of opinion with Sheikh Mujib is a criminal
offence that demands capital punishment? (message #24255)
Do you really believe that? Or that is another facet of Jamaati
opportunism?
4. I am little skeptic about the idea of banning any political party just
based on it's ideology per se. However, all political parties must respect
the constitution and operate within the bounds of the constitution.
The traitors and collaborators should not get any leeway in the name of
democracy.
No one should be allowed to misuse religion and "religion-trading"
i.e use religion to mislead ordinary masses should not be permitted.....
Any political party that has historical record of collaborating with the
Yahia-Tikka regime and was actively engaged in aiding and abetting the
occupation regime as party and has organized armed Death Squads
like Al-Bodor Bahini should not be allowed to function.
In Europe, Nazi Party is completely abolished and declared to
be illegal. This ban has remains in place in Germany and many
other European countries to the present day.
The Jamaate Islami's Anti-Bangladesh role and the
killing missions by it's armed Gestapo wing Al-Bodor Death
Squads makes this particular party nazi-equivalent in the
context of Bangladesh and our history .....
The operation of Jamaate Islami should be banned not
because it has a religious lebash, but for Jamaat's role in war
crimes, crimes against Bangladesh, crimes against humanity
including aiding and abetting genocides and greatest mass
rapes in human history.....
5. Why only "famous and seasoned politicians earlier" has to be
ministers ..." ?
As a matter of fact the ruling parties should always include
new faces in the cabinet which, in essence, may help to develop
that party's future leaderships.....
Of course, the a minister must be competent to do his/her job,
else the party in power will suffer in the long run...
In a parliamentary democracy the selection of cabinet members
is a complex balancing act ....[region, gender, expertise,
popularity within the party, loyality etc. ...]
Posing a question like "Does not it imply that they were picked up
by a third party for their interests?" is utterly motivated and
perhaps with insidious intents .....
Syed Aslam
On 8/10/10, Mokhter Ahmad <mokhterahmad@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear brothers and sisters!
We should think of the following issue before making any post in this popular blog:
1. Is war crime a sole responsibility of a particular political party? Are not there any war criminals in Awami League? I know many are there and in other political parties. Why then the sole target is a particular political party?
2. There is no consensus in Bangladesh about this trial. That particular party does have near about one crore vote bank, according to the estimate of EC. We voted 14 mohajot, which does not mean that we gave it a blank cheque to do anything. Before taking such a large-scale job, the govt. should seek referendum. A few papers and TV channels are not the sole standard to gauge people's feeling and perception in this case.
3. Why Suronjet Sen was made the co-chair of the constitution review committee? He was the man who denied putting his signature on the original 1972 constitution despite being repeatedly asked by Bangobondhu and Bangobondhu's signature there. He is great criminal and his crime against the constitution is ever greater than anyone. He should be tried for that.
4. Why should we allow the banning of any political party? Is politics a prerogative of any class? Is it banned in our model (?) countries like India and the West? In India many religion-based political parties are working like Shib Sena, BJP and hundred others. Even Christian Democratic Party (a religion-based party) is in power in Germany.
5. Who are the ministers ruling Bangladesh now? Were they any famous and seasoned politicians earlier? Are they capable to defend the dignity of our motherland? Why this peculiar pick-up, the boneless people who even do not know the political decorum? Who were behind this choice? Sheikh Hasina, the Prime Minister? I think, none will believe it that she would dare to deny other seasoned politicians any space in her cabinet. Does not it imply that they were picked up by a third party for their interests?
I think many other issues we do have in our front now. We should concentrate on those rather than being exploited by the interests of the political parties.
__._,_.___
[* Moderator's Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.
* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]
__,_._,___
