Banner Advertise

Wednesday, March 16, 2011

[chottala.com] Sarmila Bose denies any rape by Pakistan military in 1971.by Prof. ABM Nasir

Please, please ...!
Try to understand, what she means.
She only means that she was not raped by whole Pak Army. She was just raped by a couple of Pak Soldiers.

--- In chottala@yahoogroups.com, Syed_Aslam3 <Syed.Aslam3@...> wrote:
>
> **
>
> **
>
> *Sarmila Bose, an apologist for atrocities in 1971 and a denier of rape by
> Pakistani military, returns *
>
> *ABM Nasir*
>
> *March 11, 2011*
>
> Sarmila Bose, a denier of rape committed by Pakistani military in 1971 and
> an apologist for Pakistani atrocities in East Pakistan in 1971, returns with
> (perhaps with more distortion) her new book *"Dead Reckoning: Memories of
> the 1971 Bangladesh War"* scheduled to be discussed at a book event at
> the Woodrow
> Wilson Center in Washington D.C., on March 15, 2011. Around 2005-06, she was
> widely rebutted for her distorted views on Liberation War in an
> article *“Anatomy
> of Violence: Analysis of Civil War in East Pakistan in 1971”* published at
> the October 8, 2005 issue of the *Economic and Political
> Weekly*.[i]<https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=js&name=main,tlist&ver=Of_RlI9KfPQ.en.&am=!0aqARIAlezD7BT3CrXU2blSBF5yeGDF_moAvbZuDmHqdmIE-W9Ro0B3rZw&fri#12eb1dad435c1cb3__edn1>In
> the article, while Sarmila Bose rightly pointed out that
> *“there has been little systematic study of the violent conflicts during the
> nine-month long civil war,”* she and other (see, e.g. Bose, 2005; and
> Mohaiemen, 2008[ii]<https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=js&name=main,tlist&ver=Of_RlI9KfPQ.en.&am=!0aqARIAlezD7BT3CrXU2blSBF5yeGDF_moAvbZuDmHqdmIE-W9Ro0B3rZw&fri#12eb1dad435c1cb3__edn2>)
> so called ‘*self-righteous*’ truth seekers like her appears to be filling
> the vacuum in rewriting, revising, and, even, twisting the history of
> Liberation War on their own volitions, based largely on selective
> references, report published by Pakistan government in 1971, and the
> eye-witness accounts of the Pakistani military officials. For example, both
> Bose and Mohaiemen termed the 1971 crisis in East Pakistan as the ‘civil
> war’ although the 1971 crisis is most commonly referred in Bangladesh as
> either Liberation War (or Mukti Juddho) or Independence War (Shadinotar
> Juddho). The use of the term ‘civil war’ to address the 1971 war in East
> Pakistan is an attempt to *“deflect the attention from its genocidal
> connotation”* as argued by Mookherjee (2006) in a rebuttal to Sarmila Bose’s
> article. [iii]<https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=js&name=main,tlist&ver=Of_RlI9KfPQ.en.&am=!0aqARIAlezD7BT3CrXU2blSBF5yeGDF_moAvbZuDmHqdmIE-W9Ro0B3rZw&fri#12eb1dad435c1cb3__edn3>
> Indeed,
> instead of referring such analyses as being *“a systematic analysis of the
> context and nature of violence in the conflict of 1971,”* as Sarmila Bose
> claimed, one must reject such articles as systematic attempt to discount the
> severity of the brutal assault of Pakistani military on Bengali people.
>
> *What are the main arguments in Sarmila Bose’s Article?*
>
> In her article she claimed that
>
> (a) *“The civil war was not merely between the two wings of Pakistan, but
> also within the territory of East Pakistan, between Bengalis and
> non-Bengalis, and Bengalis themselves, who were bitterly divided between
> those who favored independence for Bangladesh and those who supported the
> unity and integrity of Pakistan,”*
>
> (b) the atrocity in East Pakistan was provoked by the resistance of the
> Bengali nationalists,
>
> (c) violence committed by both sides with Bengalis attacking Biharis at the
> beginning of the war, provoking Pakistani military and Bihari reprisals
> during the war followed by Bengali retribution against Biharis toward the
> end of and after the War,
>
> and
>
> (d) no evidence of rape of Bengali women by Pakistani Military could be
> found. Her prevarication reflected in her:* *constant and deliberate attempt
> to depict Pakistani military officials as compassionate individuals,
> apparently, to deflect the severity of genocidal act committed by Pakistani
> military on the Bengali populace; heavy emphasis on Bengali atrocities on
> Biharis; deliberate and frequent use of the word ‘male’ to discount the
> violence against women; use of the phrase *“collective punishment” *to
> justify mass killings of Pakistani atrocities; frequent terming the ‘freedom
> fighters’ as ‘Bengali nationalist rebels’ to deflect attention from the
> broader historical cultural, social, political, and economic context of west
> Pakistani discrimination behind the Liberation War; and, the use of specific
> example based on selective references, reports published by west Pakistani
> regime, and interviews of former Pakistani military commanders to deny the
> broader perspective of the west Pakistani military atrocities.
>
>
>
> The review of only one study, by Beachler (2007), containing an objective
> analysis of the Liberation War, would expose her distorted views and
> undoubtedly prompt one to throw the 16-page long contorted analysis of the
> Liberation War in historical recycle bin.
> [iv]<https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=js&name=main,tlist&ver=Of_RlI9KfPQ.en.&am=!0aqARIAlezD7BT3CrXU2blSBF5yeGDF_moAvbZuDmHqdmIE-W9Ro0B3rZw&fri#12eb1dad435c1cb3__edn4>
>
>
>
>
> *Why deniers deny? *
>
> Sarmila Bose’s contorted views of the Liberation War remind this author of
> the denials by a group of academia of the major genocides in the world
> history including the Holocaust and the Armenian genocide. Why deniers deny?
> Charny <http://www.ideajournal.com/authors.php?id=15> (2001), a leading
> scholar on Genocide studies, stated in this article, that *“… deniers are
> not necessarily rabid anti-some people, like anti-Semites and haters of
> Armenians, but may more simply be out for their personal gain, economic
> advantage, or even more simply career advantage -- research grants imply a
> combination both of financial resources as well as opportunities to engage
> in research in desired settings.”*
> [v]<https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=js&name=main,tlist&ver=Of_RlI9KfPQ.en.&am=!0aqARIAlezD7BT3CrXU2blSBF5yeGDF_moAvbZuDmHqdmIE-W9Ro0B3rZw&fri#12eb1dad435c1cb3__edn5>
>
> In another article, Charny and Fromer (1990, 1998) presented five *“conceptual
> characteristics of 'innocent denial.”* Among the five, one referred to as ‘*
> Innocence-and-Self-Righteousness*’ appears to fit the profile of Sarmila
> Bose. According to this feature of denial “*The respondents claim that they
> only intend to ascertain the truth. Moreover, they do not believe that human
> beings could have been so evil as the descriptions of the genocide imply *(as
> reflected in Sarmila Bose’s defense for Pakistani military officials)*.
> Furthermore, even if many deaths took place a long time ago, it is important
> to put them aside now and forgive and forget *(similarly, Sarmila Bose
> proposed, in the last sentence of her article, *“efforts towards
> reconciliation, rather than the recrimination that has so far been its
> hallmark .”*).[vi]<https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=js&name=main,tlist&ver=Of_RlI9KfPQ.en.&am=!0aqARIAlezD7BT3CrXU2blSBF5yeGDF_moAvbZuDmHqdmIE-W9Ro0B3rZw&fri#12eb1dad435c1cb3__edn6>
>
> Sarmila Bose derives her credibility from her being affiliated with
> multitudes of renowned organizations, being a Hindu of Indian origin, and
> being a Harvard graduate. However, her apparent objectivity, true
> intentions, and wisdom are exposed in her passion defense for Pakistani
> cause reflected in a coauthored article published in *Christian Science
> Monitor* on April 11,
> 2005.[vii]<https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=js&name=main,tlist&ver=Of_RlI9KfPQ.en.&am=!0aqARIAlezD7BT3CrXU2blSBF5yeGDF_moAvbZuDmHqdmIE-W9Ro0B3rZw&fri#12eb1dad435c1cb3__edn7>In
> the article, not only she defended the U.S. sale of F-16 to Pakistan,
> but
> she referred Pakistan as a stable Muslim democracy and praised former
> military ruler General Musharraf as a modernizer.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> [i]<https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=js&name=main,tlist&ver=Of_RlI9KfPQ.en.&am=!0aqARIAlezD7BT3CrXU2blSBF5yeGDF_moAvbZuDmHqdmIE-W9Ro0B3rZw&fri#12eb1dad435c1cb3__ednref1>
> Bose,
> Sarmila (2005). “Anatomy of Violence: Analysis of Civil War in East Pakistan
> in 1971.” EPW, October 8.
>
> [ii]<https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=js&name=main,tlist&ver=Of_RlI9KfPQ.en.&am=!0aqARIAlezD7BT3CrXU2blSBF5yeGDF_moAvbZuDmHqdmIE-W9Ro0B3rZw&fri#12eb1dad435c1cb3__ednref2>
> Mohaiemen,
> Naeem (2008). “Accelerated Media and the 1971 Civil War in Bangladesh,” EPW,
> January 26.
>
> [iii]<https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=js&name=main,tlist&ver=Of_RlI9KfPQ.en.&am=!0aqARIAlezD7BT3CrXU2blSBF5yeGDF_moAvbZuDmHqdmIE-W9Ro0B3rZw&fri#12eb1dad435c1cb3__ednref3>
> Mookherjee,
> Nayanika (2006). *“Skewing the history of rape in 1971 A prescription for
> reconciliation?”* EPW, Vol. 41 No 36: 3901-3903.
>
> [iv]<https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=js&name=main,tlist&ver=Of_RlI9KfPQ.en.&am=!0aqARIAlezD7BT3CrXU2blSBF5yeGDF_moAvbZuDmHqdmIE-W9Ro0B3rZw&fri#12eb1dad435c1cb3__ednref4>Beachler,
> Donald (2007).
> *“The politics of genocide scholarship: the case of Bangladesh,*” Patterns
> of Prejudice (2007). Beachler also indicated that *“No book-length study of
> the genocide in Bangladesh has been published in the United States; essays
> about it have appeared in some collections on genocide not in
> others.”*Beachler also referred to only one article
> *“Atrocities against humanity during the liberation war in Bangladesh”* by
> Akmam, Wadratul (2002) appeared in the Journal of Genocide Research.
>
> [v]<https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=js&name=main,tlist&ver=Of_RlI9KfPQ.en.&am=!0aqARIAlezD7BT3CrXU2blSBF5yeGDF_moAvbZuDmHqdmIE-W9Ro0B3rZw&fri#12eb1dad435c1cb3__ednref5>
> Charny <http://www.ideajournal.com/authors.php?id=15>, Israel W. (2001). *“The
> Psychological Satisfaction of Denials of the Holocaust or Other Genocides by
> Non-Extremists or Bigots, and Even by Known Scholars,”* The IDEA Journal,
> July 17.
>
> [vi]<https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=js&name=main,tlist&ver=Of_RlI9KfPQ.en.&am=!0aqARIAlezD7BT3CrXU2blSBF5yeGDF_moAvbZuDmHqdmIE-W9Ro0B3rZw&fri#12eb1dad435c1cb3__ednref6>
> Charny,
> Israel W. and Fromer, Daphna (1998). *“Denying the Armenian Genocide:
> Patterns of thinking as defence-mechanisms,”* Patterns of Prejudice, 39-49.
>
> [vii]<https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=js&name=main,tlist&ver=Of_RlI9KfPQ.en.&am=!0aqARIAlezD7BT3CrXU2blSBF5yeGDF_moAvbZuDmHqdmIE-W9Ro0B3rZw&fri#12eb1dad435c1cb3__ednref7>Milam,
> William B. and Sarmila Bose (2005).
> *“The right stuff: F-16s to Pakistan is wise decision.”* Christian Science
> Monitor, April 11.
>
>
>
> ABM Nasir, Ph.D.
> Associate Professor of Economics
> School of Business
> North Carolina Central University
> Durham, NC 27707.
> Phone: (919) 530-7372
> Fax: (919) 530-6163
>
> Shompriti Forum
> http://www.shompritiforum.org
>


------------------------------------

[* Moderator's Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chottala/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chottala/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
chottala-digest@yahoogroups.com
chottala-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
chottala-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/