Banner Advertise

Sunday, August 2, 2009

Re: [chottala.com] The Biharis in Bangladesh?



Mr Jinnah was the show boy backed by Mr Neheru  for creation Pakistan
& all Bengali Muslim Politicians including Mr Mujib except Mr AKF Haque were dancing under his leadership for Fakistan.
That time Jamat & Jamia olamai hind were totally against for creation Pakistan They were that time in 1947 also rajakars & albadars.

--- On Mon, 3/8/09, Syed Aslam <Syed.Aslam3@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Syed Aslam <Syed.Aslam3@gmail.com>
Subject: [chottala.com] The Biharis in Bangladesh?
To: chottala@yahoogroups.com, "Khobor" <khabor@yahoogroups.com>, "Sonar Bangladesh" <SonarBangladesh@yahoogroups.com>
Received: Monday, 3 August, 2009, 5:24 AM

 
 
 
Here you go ... the creation of Fakistan didn't solve the
problems of Indian muslims, they are still suffering... ~160 million muslims are stranged and marginalized  by the creation of seperate homeland, now Izlamic Refublic of  Fakisntan ....  even those people who
migrated with great hopes are stranged and marginalized:
Muhajirs in Fakistan , Biharis in Bangladesh .....
 
The bottom-line
is communalism, parochialism and religion based politics is
no solution. In India ShivSena.thrieves on communalism and
religion based politics.... ...
 
We have seen the true nature of religion based politics
in 1971 when the Jamaate Islami and it's gestapo wing
Al-Bodor revealed it's fang on the people of Bangladesh.
 
Curiously enough, Mr. Enayet Ullah says:
"Pakistan maybe fuked up at this moment, but, history will takes its turn." I am sure, Mr Enayet Ullah will get lots
of appreciation fron the dellusional Pakistan-lovers 
 
But, the historical processes are very complex. As we all
know,  the history is very cruel: Pakistan as we see today
[even toady] will cease to exist ... and that will happen
in our life time .......It is amazing to see how & why the
wine-seeping, pork-eating Father of Izlamic Rufublic
of Fakistan Mohammad Ali Jinnah failed to foresee the
sequences of events that was initiated under his
leadership .....was he dellusional ... or was he a
"toooooooooo smart" ? He gave the masses of
Pakistan, a false sense of IDENTITY that has failed
the test of time ....
 
In any case, man proposes, but the Allah the Almighty
disposes ...... and exactly that has happened in case
of Pakistan [Fakistan - the "Land of Deceit." in the words
of our National Poet Kazi Nazrul Islam]
 
FYI:
The so-called stranded  Biharis in Bangladesh are sad
consequence of dellusional homeland doctrine which
promoted uprooting ordinary people from their ancestral
villages. 
 
Syed Aslam
 
On 8/2/09, Enayet Ullah <enayet_2000@ yahoo.com> wrote:
Taslima nasrin still enjoying her stay in India, after fanning and fuming hate against her own faith, but, renowned Indian artist Fida Hosain was evicted from India after painting about 'Maa-Kaali'. Babri Mosque was demolished and thousands of innocent Muslims slaughtered by ShivSena.. Nothing is new in India, Muslims are stranged and marginalized in India from every opportunity in the land of Brahmins. Look at the statistics, how many Muslim politicians elected in Indian politics, yet there are 160 million Muslims? Nada!

Take a look at the brothels in India, most of its servicers come from poor Muslim family. Indian Muslims still live below the poverty level, deprived of jobs!

Surely it's encouraging to see few Khans still entertaining Bollywood Boulevard by singing and dancing. That does not show the true state of Muslims. 160 milion Muslims are in a bad shape in India, and there are no true representation of Muslims, neither they have a future in the society.
yeah, Pakistan maybe fuked up at this moment, but, history will takes its turn.

Few left-winger of Bangla-politics, those who were in love with Communists, after the collapse of Soviets, now they turn their head in south, gushing their love for their new found master!

This is wrong politics! We should not loose our identity!
 
 
Syed Aslam <Syed.Aslam3@ gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [chottala.com] Why push the Biharis onto Bangladesh?
Date: Saturday, August 1, 2009, 7:41 PM

 
- Hide quoted text -
 
Dear All
 
Altaf Hussain's statement
"....partition of India was the greatest blunder in
the history of mankind ..........."
clearly reflects the fraustrations & disillusionment
of Muhazirs who were uprooted from their ancestral lands,
migrated to the new homeland Pakistan which eventually
turned into a Izlamic Refublic of Fakistan .....
Of course, Altaf Hussain never gained anything
substantial in Fakistani politics, so did the ordinary Muhajirs
from India who got marginalized in the every facet of Fakistan's
national life ....
 
It is very clear from from the recent history that creation of
Pakistan did not solve the basic problems of ~ 160 million Muslims  of India, whose muslim population is the second largest in the world.
 
Pakistan has essentially completed the cleansing of hindus and sikhs during the 1947-partion of India [Jhilam Nodir Tire by late auther Jajabor describes the genocides of Hindus and Sikhs during partition of India
vividly]. However the problem still exist, now the Shia Muslims and "lowly" Christian converts are the victims.].. Uprooting ordinary people from their ancestral villages and communally targetted Genocides [both sides] became the bottom-line feature of 1947-Partition of India.  Pakistan-born Professor Ishtiaq Ahmed of University of Stockholm recently noted in Punjab Panoroma that the gangs from Hindu, Sikh and muslim communities excelled each other
in inflicting cruelity on helpless men, women and children ... 
 
India definitely has it's ugly sides.But  it still  horbors
160 million muslims in that country.
[The were 133,295,077 muslims  in 2001
The current estimateof muslim population in India is 160
million - 2009]
 
Inspite of instigation of the Cottor Hindu leader Norendra
Singh Modi and torture of Kashmir Muslims the muslim population of India is growing and many through  free conversion:
Convert to Islam Hindu women live Dr Zakir Naik:
 
Similar public conversion from Islam to any other religion is unthinkable in Pakistan or most other muslim countries, even in liberal & moderate Bangladesh. .
 
About the "need to review the Weekly Standard and blue
print for a New American Century  ..", history has shown
that both Pakistan & Israel was created by the western
interests  [initially British global  interest then taken over
by USA ..] ..
 
Obviously, Pakistan has served the America's
geopolitical interest since it's very inception .... ..
Mr. Enayet has correctly said :
"Pakistan is in disarray after 'lost love' from Pentagon,
Pakis are strategically in the ditch, it does not have that
luster to Pentagon, after prostuting for American lords
for decades   ."
 ..
As a matter of fact, PAKISTAN (more appropriately,
Fakistan) is now an USED CONDOM, probably,  
with no futher use ...]....
 
BTW, 
 
(1) describing the personality of Fakistan's Father of
the Nation  Quad-e-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah,
one journalist observed:
 
"General Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq [Fakistan's ruler 1977-78]
must be a very relieved man that Mr. Jinnah  the father of
Pakistan is not alive today --- or he would have to be flogged
publicly for his personal habits ...Mr. Jinnah not only
chain-smoked  craven-A cigarettes but also liked his whiskey
and was not adverse to pork ...His was the life of an
upper-class  muslim politician that is not very uncommon
among the so-called Islam-passand politicians even in
today's Pakistan. and many muslim countries..
 
(2) Our Great  "Poet Nazrul Islam .... often used to poke fun at the  very name of the would be country. To him, "Pakistan" meant  "Fakistan"  or "Land of Deceit."
The poet Nazrul predicted the true nature of Pakistan even before  the birth of the country. Intuitively, Kazi Nazrul Islam knew rather well that one couldn't form a country based on religion alone. The breakup of Pakistan in 1971 is a testimony that Kazi Nazrul was right all along when he had his doubts about the longevity of this "arranged" marriage. Unfortunatly for us, the blind Islamists never  saw that coming.  [from internet]
 
Sent by:
Syed Aslam

 
On 7/30/09, Enayet Ullah < enayet_2000@ yahoo.com> wrote:
Altaf Hossain is a Muhajir (MQM), and it may not be surprising for him
to say so! He never gained anything substantial in Pakistani politics.

In recent history of Pakistan, Military Junta Ziaul Haque damaged Pakistan badly with Regan politics. Brewing thousands of Talibaans in Wijiristan and berating Soviet Commies, America gained unilateral super power after the demise of USSR. Cold War is over, to maintain a global dominance American Neo-Con launched an war with invisible enemy.
Aslam need to review the Weekly Standard and blue print for a New American Century.

To achieve that goal America need alliances in the far-east, as a deterance to rising chinese threat, America is bonding with India with super glue. Surely, Americans derench Iran for Nuclear ambition, but they love India now to deter China. Hypocracy at its behest!

Pakistan is in disarray after 'lost love' from Pentagon, Pakis are strategically in the ditch, it does not have that luster to Pentagon, after prostuting for American lords for decades, they found their country is bleeding with breeding snakes!

Some Bangladeshi politicians, mostly leftwingers and certainly BAL & hush puppy Hasina gushing their love to India. Sure, everyone likes to lick boot! Specially if it allows to cling to power, why not?

 
- Hide quoted text -
--- On Thu, 7/30/09, Syed Aslam <Syed.Aslam3@ gmail.com> wrote:
From: Syed Aslam <Syed.Aslam3@ gmail.com>
- Hide quoted text -

Subject: [chottala.com] Why push the Biharis onto Bangladesh?
To: chottala@yahoogroup s.com
- Hide quoted text -
Date: Thursday, July 30, 2009, 2:38 PM
 
 
Dear All
 
Mr. Enayet Ullah thinks  Dina Khan  is delusional !!!!!!!!
 
However, the honest proponents of the Two Nation Theory
[those who honestly  believed that Pakistan  would be 
the solution to the problems of the Musulmans of India]
were more dellusional than anyone else.
 
[ I am not talking about those agents who were
acting on behalf of the British colonial ruler's
the Divide & Rule policy masquareding as lovers of
muslims of India... interestingly enough, both
Pakistan and Israel were both created as
"homelands" ............ .....]
 
The history has proven many times that Religion
can not be the only basis of nationhood ....
Our earlier generation who in 1940s faught
for the creation of Pakistan  started getting disillutioned
soon after it's establishment which culminated in
the emergence of Bangladeh in  December 1971.
 
We can clearly see various facets of this disillusionment
in today's Pakistan too.... Altaf Hussain the leader of
MQM (3rd largest party of Pakistan) has expressed his
fraustrations  by saying:
 
"....partition of India was the greatest blunder in
the history of mankind ............ ......... ..."
 
Please see the You Tube videos to understand
the negative impact of Two Nation Theory in this
connection:
 
Partition of India was a Blunder in the history of mankind
07:52
Tehreek-e-Insaf pti Imran Khan MQM Altaf Hussain Karachi Nawaz Sharif ...
video lang: getattr(, 'lang', '')
 
Partition of India was greatest blunder in history of mankind. Altaf ...
video lang: getattr(, 'lang', '')
What Actually Altaf Hussain said in India Full Story
06:36
15,465 views
What Actually Altaf Hussain said in India Full Story
 
Sent by:
Syed Aslam

 
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Enayet Ullah < enayet_2000@ yahoo.com >
 wrote:
Dina Khan,
You seemed to be delusional!
 
Two nation theory is based on econimical deprivation of Muslims. Quid-e-Azam Jinnah gave a voice to poor & deprived populace to have their own dream come true.
 
Again, cessation of East Pakistan (aka Bangladesh) was also inspired by economics. Even before Mujib delcation of Independence, a rebelious Bengalees were stomping their feet against Jinnah, in 1949, a Language Movement was gaining momentum. Installing Urdu as a state language in majority-spoken Bengal definte work against the millions of Bangla-speaking population, terming them as ignorant.
 
Then famous writer Abul Monsur Ahmed penned clearly, "making Urdu as a state language will make millions of civil servents of Bengla as ignorant" and that will cost many jobs in East Pakistan Muslims. Urdu was retooled to deprive Bengali-speaking natives. Ashraf Ali, Ghulam Azam (VP of DUCSU in 47-48) of Tomuddun Majlis, and many other concensus people fought against Pakis. Religion has no play here, it's purely economical deprivation.

--- On Sat, 7/25/09, dina khan <dina30_khan@ yahoo.com> wrote:
From:dina khan <dina30_khan@ yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [chottala.com] Why push the Biharis onto Bangladesh?
To: chottala@yahoogroup s.com

Date: Saturday, July 25, 2009, 6:39 PM
Mr Dowllah
On religion basis division of Bengal & India was totally against the democracy.
The reality is that the theory of 2 nations was a conspiracy against the democracy & against the humanity & human right. This conspiracy was done not only by Urdu Speaker Mr. Jinna but also it is done in cooperation of Hindi Speaker Mr. Neheru.
It seems that Mr. Neheru might think if India not be divided then India might got before position of 1757 or fighting would start for state language of India between languages Urdu & Hindi or state Language of India would be majority people of Bangla   
Among then Muslims Politicians in the undivided Bengal except Mr. AKF Haque understood this conspiracy later Mr. Shahid Sarwardi could but other Muslims Bengal politicians including the father of now Independence Bangladesh could not be able to understand this conspiracy.
However
Now we need to confirm that East Pakistan is created on 2 nation theories which is the foundation of Bangladesh & all citizens of East Pakistan are the citizens of Bangladesh only the war criminals are needed to face trial for establishing social justice & lawful Administration in Bangladesh
--- On Sat, 25/7/09, siraj@yahoo. com <siraj@yahoo. com> wrote:
From: siraj@yahoo. com <siraj@yahoo. com>
Subject: [chottala.com] Why push the Biharis onto Bangladesh?
To: chottala@yahoogroup s.com
Received: Saturday, 25 July, 2009, 9:33 AM

 
Attention dina khan,

We came to know from the history there were so many scientific thesis written in Urdu. There is no question of revengeful attitude in my writing. In spite of their activities in 1971 still few lacs of Biharis staying there for the last 39 years in the middle of full of Bengali people without any untoward incidents or revengeful activities. Bengali people initially did not have any conflict with the Biharis. The conflict of Bangalee Bihari started in 1971 when Biharis instead of taking side with the Bengalis with whom they used to stay for 25 years they accepted Pakistanis as their friends and  initiated all sorts of atrocities against Bengalis by taking active parts along with their Pakistani associates.        

I don't know why I am unable to clear that the creation of Pakistan was on the basis of religion only, not on language.

Before 1947 many iron men from our Bengal joined hand in hand with M.A. Jinnah and took active part in the creation of Pakistan on the agreement to create a separate home land for the Muslims in India. According to that they tried and were successful in creating Pakistan as a separate land for the Muslims.

There was no agreement and no mention anywhere, the creation of Pakistan for Urdu only when there was movement for the creation of Pakistan going on. Why possessing this wrong idea, India was divided into two - Pakistan for Urdu language and India for Hindi language.

It was only due to M.A. Jinnah who later on without giving any value to our Bengali language took the opportunity of our sincerity to enforce most unwanted Urdu language on our shoulder and by telling Urdu and Urdu only will be the state language of Pakistan, igniting the volcano producing an eruption creating a big explosion of our language movement which results ultimately the creation of Bangladesh in 1971. How they thought our Bengali people would accept their foolish dictatorial proposal.

From our Bangladesh side there was no objection if West Pakistani people accept Urdu as their state language but in our the then East Pakistan how they thought and were dared enough to force Urdu language over  us and subsequently  objecting our own Bengali language in our own Bengal? Was it possible where the majority of us as son of the soil used to speak in Bengali by being born and brought up with our own ancestral Bengali language? How it was possible we would start again everything by accepting Urdu from the beginning as our new language? Sorry to say it was not possble.

Bengali people never objected for the Biharis who entered in our small Bangladesh to speak in their own Urdu language nor bothered for it. The problem started when M.A. Jinnah tried to enforce the Urdu over our  Bengal to accept it as state language. Really very strange to think even. 

We can sacrifice our small land of Bangladesh to share with those large influx of Biharis as they were our same Muslim community but in concern of language no compromise, as that was the language of our heart. 

That was the only reason by attacking our Bengali language these Biharis lost their all stronghold of their foot step in Bangladesh and have nowhere, got no place moving from one place to another as vagabond refugees.

Biharis who supported and favoured Pakistan against us during our liberation war in 1971 after repeated claim by them for the last 39 years as they are Pakistani, Pakistan  refused to accept them. On the other hand it is not possible for our Bangladesh to be converted again into Pakistan as it is already finished now.

The question is now why to push those "Urdu Wala Biharis" onto Bangladesh as their most intimate "Mouch Wala Khan of Pakistan" refused to accept them?  After staying for 25 years, Pakistan could not be a good friend of Bengalis how the Biharis thought those Pakistanis will be a good friend of them. What more we can do for them now? There is no other alternative except feeling pity for those poor Biharis. 

Dowllah.   

dina khan wrote:
Sent: July 24, 2009 8:59:39 PM
To: chottala@yahoogroup s.com
 
Mr. Dowllah
You are talking for revenging
I am asking for lawful administration based on justice of law for humanity & human right.
It is very clear though Pakistan was created based on the theory of 2 nations the cause is religion 
But historical causes of division were behind that reasons are still for continuing the problems in the subcontinent
Though Mr. Jinnah was blamed he was the responsible person for division of India logically it could not be said only Mr. Jinnah was responsible. 
He was the initial member of Congress later he joined to ML.
On analyzing it is clear that the historical backgrounds divisions of India are the main causes. Once on train travel Calcuta to Delhi I heard people in train gossiped that Urdu is language of Muslim & Hindi for Hindu.
So it is looked India has no language problem all other local languages people have taken Hindi their national language & Harmony of Geo Political cultural is there..
Though for Bengali language Bangladesh is liberated still in Bangladesh Bengali language is used only in domestic in drama in cinema & in political talking for illiterate people.
It can not be used for earning medical  knowledge or engineering knowledge or technical knowledge or official & administrative knowledge even it is not used for prestigious talking & in religion prayer.
 
It is the Language limited in Rabindra & Nazrul Sangith now in Natak of Homayan Ahmed & fun of Naslima Nasrin.
No authority still is thinking or taking perfect action for making it a media of knowledge earning language. People think wasting of time for using this language.
However Bangladesh Administration is needed to think how can be established lawful Administration & social justice for humanity & human right

Email slow, clunky, unreliable? Switch to Yahoo!Xtra Mail, New Zealand's new email address.

__._,_.___


[* Moderator�s Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Re: [chottala.com] Why push the Biharis onto Bangladesh?




This is the result of creation Pakistan.
If India was not divided then now Muslim would rule whole India 
Mr Neheru knew it better.
So he inspired Mr Jinnah to make divisions among the Muslim in creation Pakistan in the name of 2 nation theory.
 
--- On Sun, 2/8/09, Enayet Ullah <enayet_2000@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Enayet Ullah <enayet_2000@yahoo.com>
Subject: [chottala.com] Why push the Biharis onto Bangladesh?
To: chottala@yahoogroups.com, "Khobor" <khabor@yahoogroups.com>, "Sonar Bangladesh" <SonarBangladesh@yahoogroups.com>
Received: Sunday, 2 August, 2009, 7:15 PM

 
Taslima nasrin still enjoying her stay in India, after fanning and fuming hate against her own faith, but, renowned Indian artist Fida Hosain was evicted from India after painting about 'Maa-Kaali'. Babri Mosque was demolished and thousands of innocent Muslims slaughtered by ShivSena. Nothing is new in India, Muslims are stranged and marginalized in India from every opportunity in the land of Brahmins. Look at the statistics, how many Muslim politicians elected in Indian politics, yet there are 160 million Muslims? Nada!

Take a look at the brothels in India, most of its servicers come from poor Muslim family. Indian Muslims still live below the poverty level, deprived of jobs!

Surely it's encouraging to see few Khans still entertaining Bollywood Boulevard by singing and dancing. That does not show the true state of Muslims. 160 milion Muslims are in a bad shape in India, and there are no true representation of Muslims, neither they have a future in the society.
yeah, Pakistan maybe fuked up at this moment, but, history will takes its turn.

Few left-winger of Bangla-politics, those who were in love with Communists, after the collapse of Soviets, now they turn their head in south, gushing their love for their new found master!

This is wrong politics! We should not loose our identity!

--- On Sat, 8/1/09, Syed Aslam <Syed.Aslam3@ gmail.com> wrote:

From: Syed Aslam <Syed.Aslam3@ gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [chottala.com] Why push the Biharis onto Bangladesh?
To: chottala@yahoogroup s.com, "Khobor" <khabor@yahoogroups. com>, "Sonar Bangladesh" <SonarBangladesh@ yahoogroups. com>
Date: Saturday, August 1, 2009, 7:41 PM

 
 
Dear All
 
Altaf Hussain's statement
"....partition of India was the greatest blunder in
the history of mankind ..........."
clearly reflects the fraustrations & disillusionment
of Muhazirs who were uprooted from their ancestral lands,
migrated to the new homeland Pakistan which eventually
turned into a Izlamic Refublic of Fakistan .....
Of course, Altaf Hussain never gained anything
substantial in Fakistani politics, so did the ordinary Muhajirs
from India who got marginalized in the every facet of Fakistan's
national life ....
 
It is very clear from from the recent history that creation of
Pakistan did not solve the basic problems of ~ 160 million Muslims
of India, whose muslim population is the second largest 
in the world.
 
Pakistan has essentially completed the cleansing of hindus and sikhs
during the 1947-partion of India [Jhilam Nodir Tire by late auther Jajabor
describes the genocides of Hindus and Sikhs during partition of India
vividly]. However the problem still exist, now the Shia Muslims and
"lowly" Christian converts are the victims.].. Uprooting ordinary
people from their ancestral villages and communally targetted
Genocides [both sides] became the bottom-line feature of
1947-Partition of India.  Pakistan-born Professor Ishtiaq Ahmed of
University of Stockholm recently noted in Punjab Panoroma that the
gangs from Hindu, Sikh and muslim communities excelled each other
in inflicting cruelity on helpless men, women and children ... 
 
India definitely has it's ugly sides.But  it still  horbors
160 million muslims in that country.
[The were 133,295,077 muslims  in 2001
The current estimateof muslim population in India is 160
million - 2009]
 
Inspite of instigation of the Cottor Hindu leader Norendra
Singh Modi and torture of Kashmir Muslims the muslim population
of India is growing and many through  free conversion:
Convert to Islam Hindu women live Dr Zakir Naik:
 
Similar public conversion from Islam to any other religion
is unthinkable in Pakistan or most other muslim countries,
even in liberal & moderate Bangladesh. .
 
About the "need to review the Weekly Standard and blue
print for a New American Century  ..", history has shown
that both Pakistan & Israel was created by the western
interests  [initially British global  interest then taken over
by USA ..] ..
 
Obviously, Pakistan has served the America's
geopolitical interest since it's very inception .... ..
Mr. Enayet has correctly said :
"Pakistan is in disarray after 'lost love' from Pentagon,
Pakis are strategically in the ditch, it does not have that
luster to Pentagon, after prostuting for American lords
for decades   ."
 ..
As a matter of fact, PAKISTAN (more appropriately,
Fakistan) is now an USED CONDOM, probably,  
with no futher use ...]....
 
BTW, 
 
(1) describing the personality of Fakistan's Father of
the Nation  Quad-e-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah,
one journalist observed:
 
"General Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq [Fakistan's ruler 1977-78]
must be a very relieved man that Mr. Jinnah  the father of
Pakistan is not alive today --- or he would have to be flogged
publicly for his personal habits ...Mr. Jinnah not only
chain-smoked  craven-A cigarettes but also liked his whiskey
and was not adverse to pork ...His was the life of an
upper-class  muslim politician that is not very uncommon
among the so-called Islam-passand politicians even in
today's Pakistan. and many muslim countries..
 
(2) Our Great  "Poet Nazrul Islam .... often used to poke fun at the
very name of the would be country. To him, "Pakistan" meant
"Fakistan"  or "Land of Deceit."
The poet Nazrul predicted the true nature of Pakistan even before
the birth of the country. Intuitively, Kazi Nazrul Islam knew rather
well that one couldn't form a country based on religion alone.
The breakup of Pakistan in 1971 is a testimony that Kazi Nazrul was
right all along when he had his doubts about the longevity of this
"arranged" marriage. Unfortunatly for us, the blind Islamists never
saw that coming.  [from internet]
 
Sent by:
Syed Aslam

 
On 7/30/09, Enayet Ullah <enayet_2000@ yahoo.com> wrote:
Altaf Hossain is a Muhajir (MQM), and it may not be surprising for him
to say so! He never gained anything substantial in Pakistani politics.

In recent history of Pakistan, Military Junta Ziaul Haque damaged Pakistan badly with Regan politics. Brewing thousands of Talibaans in Wijiristan and berating Soviet Commies, America gained unilateral super power after the demise of USSR. Cold War is over, to maintain a global dominance American Neo-Con launched an war with invisible enemy. Aslam need to review the Weekly Standard and blue print for a New American Century.

To achieve that goal America need alliances in the far-east, as a deterance to rising chinese threat, America is bonding with India with super glue. Surely, Americans derench Iran for Nuclear ambition, but they love India now to deter China. Hypocracy at its behest!

Pakistan is in disarray after 'lost love' from Pentagon, Pakis are strategically in the ditch, it does not have that luster to Pentagon, after prostuting for American lords for decades, they found their country is bleeding with breeding snakes!

Some Bangladeshi politicians, mostly leftwingers and certainly BAL & hush puppy Hasina gushing their love to India. Sure, everyone likes to lick boot! Specially if it allows to cling to power, why not?
 
--- On Thu, 7/30/09, Syed Aslam <Syed.Aslam3@ gmail.com> wrote:
From: Syed Aslam <Syed.Aslam3@ gmail.com>
Subject: [chottala.com] Why push the Biharis onto Bangladesh?
To: chottala@yahoogroup s.com
Date: Thursday, July 30, 2009, 2:38 PM
 
 
 
Dear All
 
Mr. Enayet Ullah thinks  Dina Khan  is delusional !!!!!!!!
 
However, the honest proponents of the Two Nation Theory
[those who honestly  believed that Pakistan  would be 
the solution to the problems of the Musulmans of India]
were more dellusional than anyone else.
 
[ I am not talking about those agents who were
acting on behalf of the British colonial ruler's
the Divide & Rule policy masquareding as lovers of
muslims of India... interestingly enough, both
Pakistan and Israel were both created as
"homelands" ............ .....]
 
The history has proven many times that Religion
can not be the only basis of nationhood ....
Our earlier generation who in 1940s faught
for the creation of Pakistan  started getting disillutioned
soon after it's establishment which culminated in
the emergence of Bangladeh in  December 1971.
 
We can clearly see various facets of this disillusionment
in today's Pakistan too.... Altaf Hussain the leader of
MQM (3rd largest party of Pakistan) has expressed his
fraustrations  by saying:
 
"....partition of India was the greatest blunder in
the history of mankind ............ ......... ..."
 
Please see the You Tube videos to understand
the negative impact of Two Nation Theory in this
connection:
 
Partition of India was a Blunder in the history of mankind
07:52
Tehreek-e-Insaf pti Imran Khan MQM Altaf Hussain Karachi Nawaz Sharif ...
video lang: getattr(, 'lang', '')
 
Partition of India was greatest blunder in history of mankind. Altaf ...
video lang: getattr(, 'lang', '')
What Actually Altaf Hussain said in India Full Story
06:36
15,465 views
What Actually Altaf Hussain said in India Full Story
 
Sent by:
Syed Aslam

 
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Enayet Ullah <enayet_2000@ yahoo.com >
 wrote:
Dina Khan,
You seemed to be delusional!
 
Two nation theory is based on econimical deprivation of Muslims. Quid-e-Azam Jinnah gave a voice to poor & deprived populace to have their own dream come true.
 
Again, cessation of East Pakistan (aka Bangladesh) was also inspired by economics. Even before Mujib delcation of Independence, a rebelious Bengalees were stomping their feet against Jinnah, in 1949, a Language Movement was gaining momentum. Installing Urdu as a state language in majority-spoken Bengal definte work against the millions of Bangla-speaking population, terming them as ignorant.
 
Then famous writer Abul Monsur Ahmed penned clearly, "making Urdu as a state language will make millions of civil servents of Bengla as ignorant" and that will cost many jobs in East Pakistan Muslims. Urdu was retooled to deprive Bengali-speaking natives. Ashraf Ali, Ghulam Azam (VP of DUCSU in 47-48) of Tomuddun Majlis, and many other concensus people fought against Pakis. Religion has no play here, it's purely economical deprivation.

--- On Sat, 7/25/09, dina khan <dina30_khan@ yahoo.com> wrote:
From:dina khan <dina30_khan@ yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [chottala.com] Why push the Biharis onto Bangladesh?
To: chottala@yahoogroup s.com

Date: Saturday, July 25, 2009, 6:39 PM
Mr Dowllah
On religion basis division of Bengal & India was totally against the democracy.
The reality is that the theory of 2 nations was a conspiracy against the democracy & against the humanity & human right. This conspiracy was done not only by Urdu Speaker Mr. Jinna but also it is done in cooperation of Hindi Speaker Mr. Neheru.
It seems that Mr. Neheru might think if India not be divided then India might got before position of 1757 or fighting would start for state language of India between languages Urdu & Hindi or state Language of India would be majority people of Bangla   
Among then Muslims Politicians in the undivided Bengal except Mr. AKF Haque understood this conspiracy later Mr. Shahid Sarwardi could but other Muslims Bengal politicians including the father of now Independence Bangladesh could not be able to understand this conspiracy.
However
Now we need to confirm that East Pakistan is created on 2 nation theories which is the foundation of Bangladesh & all citizens of East Pakistan are the citizens of Bangladesh only the war criminals are needed to face trial for establishing social justice & lawful Administration in Bangladesh
--- On Sat, 25/7/09, siraj@yahoo. com <siraj@yahoo. com> wrote:
From: siraj@yahoo. com <siraj@yahoo. com>
Subject: [chottala.com] Why push the Biharis onto Bangladesh?
To: chottala@yahoogroup s.com
Received: Saturday, 25 July, 2009, 9:33 AM

 
Attention dina khan,

We came to know from the history there were so many scientific thesis written in Urdu. There is no question of revengeful attitude in my writing. In spite of their activities in 1971 still few lacs of Biharis staying there for the last 39 years in the middle of full of Bengali people without any untoward incidents or revengeful activities. Bengali people initially did not have any conflict with the Biharis. The conflict of Bangalee Bihari started in 1971 when Biharis instead of taking side with the Bengalis with whom they used to stay for 25 years they accepted Pakistanis as their friends and  initiated all sorts of atrocities against Bengalis by taking active parts along with their Pakistani associates.        

I don't know why I am unable to clear that the creation of Pakistan was on the basis of religion only, not on language.

Before 1947 many iron men from our Bengal joined hand in hand with M.A. Jinnah and took active part in the creation of Pakistan on the agreement to create a separate home land for the Muslims in India. According to that they tried and were successful in creating Pakistan as a separate land for the Muslims.

There was no agreement and no mention anywhere, the creation of Pakistan for Urdu only when there was movement for the creation of Pakistan going on. Why possessing this wrong idea, India was divided into two - Pakistan for Urdu language and India for Hindi language.

It was only due to M.A. Jinnah who later on without giving any value to our Bengali language took the opportunity of our sincerity to enforce most unwanted Urdu language on our shoulder and by telling Urdu and Urdu only will be the state language of Pakistan, igniting the volcano producing an eruption creating a big explosion of our language movement which results ultimately the creation of Bangladesh in 1971. How they thought our Bengali people would accept their foolish dictatorial proposal.

From our Bangladesh side there was no objection if West Pakistani people accept Urdu as their state language but in our the then East Pakistan how they thought and were dared enough to force Urdu language over  us and subsequently  objecting our own Bengali language in our own Bengal? Was it possible where the majority of us as son of the soil used to speak in Bengali by being born and brought up with our own ancestral Bengali language? How it was possible we would start again everything by accepting Urdu from the beginning as our new language? Sorry to say it was not possble.

Bengali people never objected for the Biharis who entered in our small Bangladesh to speak in their own Urdu language nor bothered for it. The problem started when M.A. Jinnah tried to enforce the Urdu over our  Bengal to accept it as state language. Really very strange to think even. 

We can sacrifice our small land of Bangladesh to share with those large influx of Biharis as they were our same Muslim community but in concern of language no compromise, as that was the language of our heart. 

That was the only reason by attacking our Bengali language these Biharis lost their all stronghold of their foot step in Bangladesh and have nowhere, got no place moving from one place to another as vagabond refugees.

Biharis who supported and favoured Pakistan against us during our liberation war in 1971 after repeated claim by them for the last 39 years as they are Pakistani, Pakistan  refused to accept them. On the other hand it is not possible for our Bangladesh to be converted again into Pakistan as it is already finished now.

The question is now why to push those "Urdu Wala Biharis" onto Bangladesh as their most intimate "Mouch Wala Khan of Pakistan" refused to accept them?  After staying for 25 years, Pakistan could not be a good friend of Bengalis how the Biharis thought those Pakistanis will be a good friend of them. What more we can do for them now? There is no other alternative except feeling pity for those poor Biharis. 

Dowllah.   

dina khan wrote:
Sent: July 24, 2009 8:59:39 PM
To: chottala@yahoogroup s.com
 
Mr. Dowllah
You are talking for revenging
I am asking for lawful administration based on justice of law for humanity & human right.
It is very clear though Pakistan was created based on the theory of 2 nations the cause is religion 
But historical causes of division were behind that reasons are still for continuing the problems in the subcontinent
Though Mr. Jinnah was blamed he was the responsible person for division of India logically it could not be said only Mr. Jinnah was responsible. 
He was the initial member of Congress later he joined to ML.
On analyzing it is clear that the historical backgrounds divisions of India are the main causes. Once on train travel Calcuta to Delhi I heard people in train gossiped that Urdu is language of Muslim & Hindi for Hindu.
So it is looked India has no language problem all other local languages people have taken Hindi their national language & Harmony of Geo Political cultural is there..
Though for Bengali language Bangladesh is liberated still in Bangladesh Bengali language is used only in domestic in drama in cinema & in political talking for illiterate people.
It can not be used for earning medical  knowledge or engineering knowledge or technical knowledge or official & administrative knowledge even it is not used for prestigious talking & in religion prayer.
 
It is the Language limited in Rabindra & Nazrul Sangith now in Natak of Homayan Ahmed & fun of Naslima Nasrin.
No authority still is thinking or taking perfect action for making it a media of knowledge earning language. People think wasting of time for using this language.
However Bangladesh Administration is needed to think how can be established lawful Administration & social justice for humanity & human right
 

 



Email slow, clunky, unreliable? Switch to Yahoo!Xtra Mail, New Zealand's new email address.

__._,_.___


[* Moderator�s Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[chottala.com] The Biharis in Bangladesh?



 
 
Here you go ... the creation of Fakistan didn't solve the
problems of Indian muslims, they are still suffering...~160 million muslims are stranged and marginalized by the creation of seperate homeland, now Izlamic Refublic of  Fakisntan ....  even those people who
migrated with great hopes are stranged and marginalized:
Muhajirs in Fakistan , Biharis in Bangladesh .....
 
The bottom-line
is communalism, parochialism and religion based politics is
no solution. In India ShivSena.thrieves on communalism and
religion based politics.......
 
We have seen the true nature of religion based politics
in 1971 when the Jamaate Islami and it's gestapo wing
Al-Bodor revealed it's fang on the people of Bangladesh.
 
Curiously enough, Mr. Enayet Ullah says:
"Pakistan maybe fuked up at this moment, but, history will takes its turn." I am sure, Mr Enayet Ullah will get lots
of appreciation fron the dellusional Pakistan-lovers 
 
But, the historical processes are very complex. As we all
know,  the history is very cruel: Pakistan as we see today
[even toady] will cease to exist ... and that will happen
in our life time .......It is amazing to see how & why the
wine-seeping, pork-eating Father of Izlamic Rufublic
of Fakistan Mohammad Ali Jinnah failed to foresee the
sequences of events that was initiated under his
leadership .....was he dellusional ... or was he a
"toooooooooo smart" ? He gave the masses of
Pakistan, a false sense of IDENTITY that has failed
the test of time ....
 
In any case, man proposes, but the Allah the Almighty
disposes ...... and exactly that has happened in case
of Pakistan [Fakistan - the "Land of Deceit." in the words
of our National Poet Kazi Nazrul Islam]
 
FYI:
The so-called stranded  Biharis in Bangladesh are sad
consequence of dellusional homeland doctrine which
promoted uprooting ordinary people from their ancestral
villages. 
 
Syed Aslam
 
On 8/2/09, Enayet Ullah <enayet_2000@yahoo.com> wrote:
Taslima nasrin still enjoying her stay in India, after fanning and fuming hate against her own faith, but, renowned Indian artist Fida Hosain was evicted from India after painting about 'Maa-Kaali'. Babri Mosque was demolished and thousands of innocent Muslims slaughtered by ShivSena.. Nothing is new in India, Muslims are stranged and marginalized in India from every opportunity in the land of Brahmins. Look at the statistics, how many Muslim politicians elected in Indian politics, yet there are 160 million Muslims? Nada!

Take a look at the brothels in India, most of its servicers come from poor Muslim family. Indian Muslims still live below the poverty level, deprived of jobs!

Surely it's encouraging to see few Khans still entertaining Bollywood Boulevard by singing and dancing. That does not show the true state of Muslims. 160 milion Muslims are in a bad shape in India, and there are no true representation of Muslims, neither they have a future in the society.
yeah, Pakistan maybe fuked up at this moment, but, history will takes its turn.

Few left-winger of Bangla-politics, those who were in love with Communists, after the collapse of Soviets, now they turn their head in south, gushing their love for their new found master!

This is wrong politics! We should not loose our identity!
 
 
Syed Aslam <Syed.Aslam3@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [chottala.com] Why push the Biharis onto Bangladesh?
Date: Saturday, August 1, 2009, 7:41 PM

 
- Hide quoted text -

 
Dear All
 
Altaf Hussain's statement
"....partition of India was the greatest blunder in
the history of mankind ..........."
clearly reflects the fraustrations & disillusionment
of Muhazirs who were uprooted from their ancestral lands,
migrated to the new homeland Pakistan which eventually
turned into a Izlamic Refublic of Fakistan .....
Of course, Altaf Hussain never gained anything
substantial in Fakistani politics, so did the ordinary Muhajirs
from India who got marginalized in the every facet of Fakistan's
national life ....
 
It is very clear from from the recent history that creation of
Pakistan did not solve the basic problems of ~ 160 million Muslims  of India, whose muslim population is the second largest in the world.
 
Pakistan has essentially completed the cleansing of hindus and sikhs during the 1947-partion of India [Jhilam Nodir Tire by late auther Jajabor describes the genocides of Hindus and Sikhs during partition of India
vividly]. However the problem still exist, now the Shia Muslims and "lowly" Christian converts are the victims.].. Uprooting ordinary people from their ancestral villages and communally targetted Genocides [both sides] became the bottom-line feature of 1947-Partition of India.  Pakistan-born Professor Ishtiaq Ahmed of University of Stockholm recently noted in Punjab Panoroma that the gangs from Hindu, Sikh and muslim communities excelled each other
in inflicting cruelity on helpless men, women and children ... 
 
India definitely has it's ugly sides.But  it still  horbors
160 million muslims in that country.
[The were 133,295,077 muslims  in 2001
The current estimateof muslim population in India is 160
million - 2009]
 
Inspite of instigation of the Cottor Hindu leader Norendra
Singh Modi and torture of Kashmir Muslims the muslim population of India is growing and many through  free conversion:
Convert to Islam Hindu women live Dr Zakir Naik:
 
Similar public conversion from Islam to any other religion is unthinkable in Pakistan or most other muslim countries, even in liberal & moderate Bangladesh. .
 
About the "need to review the Weekly Standard and blue
print for a New American Century  ..", history has shown
that both Pakistan & Israel was created by the western
interests  [initially British global  interest then taken over
by USA ..] ..
 
Obviously, Pakistan has served the America's
geopolitical interest since it's very inception .... ..
Mr. Enayet has correctly said :
"Pakistan is in disarray after 'lost love' from Pentagon,
Pakis are strategically in the ditch, it does not have that
luster to Pentagon, after prostuting for American lords
for decades   ."
 ..
As a matter of fact, PAKISTAN (more appropriately,
Fakistan) is now an USED CONDOM, probably,  
with no futher use ...]....
 
BTW, 
 
(1) describing the personality of Fakistan's Father of
the Nation  Quad-e-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah,
one journalist observed:
 
"General Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq [Fakistan's ruler 1977-78]
must be a very relieved man that Mr. Jinnah  the father of
Pakistan is not alive today --- or he would have to be flogged
publicly for his personal habits ...Mr. Jinnah not only
chain-smoked  craven-A cigarettes but also liked his whiskey
and was not adverse to pork ...His was the life of an
upper-class  muslim politician that is not very uncommon
among the so-called Islam-passand politicians even in
today's Pakistan. and many muslim countries..
 
(2) Our Great  "Poet Nazrul Islam .... often used to poke fun at the  very name of the would be country. To him, "Pakistan" meant  "Fakistan"  or "Land of Deceit."
The poet Nazrul predicted the true nature of Pakistan even before  the birth of the country. Intuitively, Kazi Nazrul Islam knew rather well that one couldn't form a country based on religion alone. The breakup of Pakistan in 1971 is a testimony that Kazi Nazrul was right all along when he had his doubts about the longevity of this "arranged" marriage. Unfortunatly for us, the blind Islamists never  saw that coming.  [from internet]
 
Sent by:
Syed Aslam

 
On 7/30/09, Enayet Ullah < enayet_2000@ yahoo.com> wrote:
Altaf Hossain is a Muhajir (MQM), and it may not be surprising for him
to say so! He never gained anything substantial in Pakistani politics.

In recent history of Pakistan, Military Junta Ziaul Haque damaged Pakistan badly with Regan politics. Brewing thousands of Talibaans in Wijiristan and berating Soviet Commies, America gained unilateral super power after the demise of USSR. Cold War is over, to maintain a global dominance American Neo-Con launched an war with invisible enemy.
Aslam need to review the Weekly Standard and blue print for a New American Century.

To achieve that goal America need alliances in the far-east, as a deterance to rising chinese threat, America is bonding with India with super glue. Surely, Americans derench Iran for Nuclear ambition, but they love India now to deter China. Hypocracy at its behest!

Pakistan is in disarray after 'lost love' from Pentagon, Pakis are strategically in the ditch, it does not have that luster to Pentagon, after prostuting for American lords for decades, they found their country is bleeding with breeding snakes!

Some Bangladeshi politicians, mostly leftwingers and certainly BAL & hush puppy Hasina gushing their love to India. Sure, everyone likes to lick boot! Specially if it allows to cling to power, why not?

 
- Hide quoted text -
--- On Thu, 7/30/09, Syed Aslam <Syed.Aslam3@ gmail.com> wrote:
From: Syed Aslam <Syed.Aslam3@ gmail.com>
- Hide quoted text -

Subject: [chottala.com] Why push the Biharis onto Bangladesh?
To: chottala@yahoogroup s.com
- Hide quoted text -
Date: Thursday, July 30, 2009, 2:38 PM

 

 
Dear All
 
Mr. Enayet Ullah thinks  Dina Khan  is delusional !!!!!!!!
 
However, the honest proponents of the Two Nation Theory
[those who honestly  believed that Pakistan  would be 
the solution to the problems of the Musulmans of India]
were more dellusional than anyone else.
 
[ I am not talking about those agents who were
acting on behalf of the British colonial ruler's
the Divide & Rule policy masquareding as lovers of
muslims of India... interestingly enough, both
Pakistan and Israel were both created as
"homelands" ............ .....]
 
The history has proven many times that Religion
can not be the only basis of nationhood ....
Our earlier generation who in 1940s faught
for the creation of Pakistan  started getting disillutioned
soon after it's establishment which culminated in
the emergence of Bangladeh in  December 1971.
 
We can clearly see various facets of this disillusionment
in today's Pakistan too.... Altaf Hussain the leader of
MQM (3rd largest party of Pakistan) has expressed his
fraustrations  by saying:
 
"....partition of India was the greatest blunder in
the history of mankind ............ ......... ..."
 
Please see the You Tube videos to understand
the negative impact of Two Nation Theory in this
connection:
 
Partition of India was a Blunder in the history of mankind
07:52
Tehreek-e-Insaf pti Imran Khan MQM Altaf Hussain Karachi Nawaz Sharif ...
video lang: getattr(, 'lang', '')
 
Partition of India was greatest blunder in history of mankind. Altaf ...
video lang: getattr(, 'lang', '')
What Actually Altaf Hussain said in India Full Story
06:36
15,465 views
What Actually Altaf Hussain said in India Full Story
 
Sent by:
Syed Aslam

 
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Enayet Ullah < enayet_2000@ yahoo.com >
 wrote:
Dina Khan,
You seemed to be delusional!
 
Two nation theory is based on econimical deprivation of Muslims. Quid-e-Azam Jinnah gave a voice to poor & deprived populace to have their own dream come true.
 
Again, cessation of East Pakistan (aka Bangladesh) was also inspired by economics. Even before Mujib delcation of Independence, a rebelious Bengalees were stomping their feet against Jinnah, in 1949, a Language Movement was gaining momentum. Installing Urdu as a state language in majority-spoken Bengal definte work against the millions of Bangla-speaking population, terming them as ignorant.
 
Then famous writer Abul Monsur Ahmed penned clearly, "making Urdu as a state language will make millions of civil servents of Bengla as ignorant" and that will cost many jobs in East Pakistan Muslims. Urdu was retooled to deprive Bengali-speaking natives. Ashraf Ali, Ghulam Azam (VP of DUCSU in 47-48) of Tomuddun Majlis, and many other concensus people fought against Pakis. Religion has no play here, it's purely economical deprivation.

--- On Sat, 7/25/09, dina khan <dina30_khan@ yahoo.com> wrote:
From:dina khan <dina30_khan@ yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [chottala.com] Why push the Biharis onto Bangladesh?
To: chottala@yahoogroup s.com

Date: Saturday, July 25, 2009, 6:39 PM
Mr Dowllah
On religion basis division of Bengal & India was totally against the democracy.
The reality is that the theory of 2 nations was a conspiracy against the democracy & against the humanity & human right. This conspiracy was done not only by Urdu Speaker Mr. Jinna but also it is done in cooperation of Hindi Speaker Mr. Neheru.
It seems that Mr. Neheru might think if India not be divided then India might got before position of 1757 or fighting would start for state language of India between languages Urdu & Hindi or state Language of India would be majority people of Bangla   
Among then Muslims Politicians in the undivided Bengal except Mr. AKF Haque understood this conspiracy later Mr. Shahid Sarwardi could but other Muslims Bengal politicians including the father of now Independence Bangladesh could not be able to understand this conspiracy.
However
Now we need to confirm that East Pakistan is created on 2 nation theories which is the foundation of Bangladesh & all citizens of East Pakistan are the citizens of Bangladesh only the war criminals are needed to face trial for establishing social justice & lawful Administration in Bangladesh
--- On Sat, 25/7/09, siraj@yahoo. com <siraj@yahoo. com> wrote:
From: siraj@yahoo. com <siraj@yahoo. com>
Subject: [chottala.com] Why push the Biharis onto Bangladesh?
To: chottala@yahoogroup s.com
Received: Saturday, 25 July, 2009, 9:33 AM

 
Attention dina khan,

We came to know from the history there were so many scientific thesis written in Urdu. There is no question of revengeful attitude in my writing. In spite of their activities in 1971 still few lacs of Biharis staying there for the last 39 years in the middle of full of Bengali people without any untoward incidents or revengeful activities. Bengali people initially did not have any conflict with the Biharis. The conflict of Bangalee Bihari started in 1971 when Biharis instead of taking side with the Bengalis with whom they used to stay for 25 years they accepted Pakistanis as their friends and  initiated all sorts of atrocities against Bengalis by taking active parts along with their Pakistani associates.        

I don't know why I am unable to clear that the creation of Pakistan was on the basis of religion only, not on language.

Before 1947 many iron men from our Bengal joined hand in hand with M.A. Jinnah and took active part in the creation of Pakistan on the agreement to create a separate home land for the Muslims in India. According to that they tried and were successful in creating Pakistan as a separate land for the Muslims.

There was no agreement and no mention anywhere, the creation of Pakistan for Urdu only when there was movement for the creation of Pakistan going on. Why possessing this wrong idea, India was divided into two - Pakistan for Urdu language and India for Hindi language.

It was only due to M.A. Jinnah who later on without giving any value to our Bengali language took the opportunity of our sincerity to enforce most unwanted Urdu language on our shoulder and by telling Urdu and Urdu only will be the state language of Pakistan, igniting the volcano producing an eruption creating a big explosion of our language movement which results ultimately the creation of Bangladesh in 1971. How they thought our Bengali people would accept their foolish dictatorial proposal.

From our Bangladesh side there was no objection if West Pakistani people accept Urdu as their state language but in our the then East Pakistan how they thought and were dared enough to force Urdu language over  us and subsequently  objecting our own Bengali language in our own Bengal? Was it possible where the majority of us as son of the soil used to speak in Bengali by being born and brought up with our own ancestral Bengali language? How it was possible we would start again everything by accepting Urdu from the beginning as our new language? Sorry to say it was not possble.

Bengali people never objected for the Biharis who entered in our small Bangladesh to speak in their own Urdu language nor bothered for it. The problem started when M.A. Jinnah tried to enforce the Urdu over our  Bengal to accept it as state language. Really very strange to think even. 

We can sacrifice our small land of Bangladesh to share with those large influx of Biharis as they were our same Muslim community but in concern of language no compromise, as that was the language of our heart. 

That was the only reason by attacking our Bengali language these Biharis lost their all stronghold of their foot step in Bangladesh and have nowhere, got no place moving from one place to another as vagabond refugees.

Biharis who supported and favoured Pakistan against us during our liberation war in 1971 after repeated claim by them for the last 39 years as they are Pakistani, Pakistan  refused to accept them. On the other hand it is not possible for our Bangladesh to be converted again into Pakistan as it is already finished now.

The question is now why to push those "Urdu Wala Biharis" onto Bangladesh as their most intimate "Mouch Wala Khan of Pakistan" refused to accept them?  After staying for 25 years, Pakistan could not be a good friend of Bengalis how the Biharis thought those Pakistanis will be a good friend of them. What more we can do for them now? There is no other alternative except feeling pity for those poor Biharis. 

Dowllah.   

dina khan wrote:
Sent: July 24, 2009 8:59:39 PM
To: chottala@yahoogroup s.com
 
Mr. Dowllah
You are talking for revenging
I am asking for lawful administration based on justice of law for humanity & human right.
It is very clear though Pakistan was created based on the theory of 2 nations the cause is religion 
But historical causes of division were behind that reasons are still for continuing the problems in the subcontinent
Though Mr. Jinnah was blamed he was the responsible person for division of India logically it could not be said only Mr. Jinnah was responsible. 
He was the initial member of Congress later he joined to ML.
On analyzing it is clear that the historical backgrounds divisions of India are the main causes. Once on train travel Calcuta to Delhi I heard people in train gossiped that Urdu is language of Muslim & Hindi for Hindu.
So it is looked India has no language problem all other local languages people have taken Hindi their national language & Harmony of Geo Political cultural is there..
Though for Bengali language Bangladesh is liberated still in Bangladesh Bengali language is used only in domestic in drama in cinema & in political talking for illiterate people.
It can not be used for earning medical  knowledge or engineering knowledge or technical knowledge or official & administrative knowledge even it is not used for prestigious talking & in religion prayer.
 
It is the Language limited in Rabindra & Nazrul Sangith now in Natak of Homayan Ahmed & fun of Naslima Nasrin.
No authority still is thinking or taking perfect action for making it a media of knowledge earning language. People think wasting of time for using this language.
However Bangladesh Administration is needed to think how can be established lawful Administration & social justice for humanity & human right


__._,_.___


[* Moderator's Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___