Banner Advertise

Monday, December 17, 2012

[chottala.com] Re: digit-AL corruption: Padma bridge



digit-AL corruption: 7 sued , Abuls dropped

ACC filed a case against seven people excluding the names of Syed Abul Hossain and Abul Hasan Chowdhury for their alleged roles in graft conspiracy in Padma bridge project.Former secretary of the Bridges Division Mosharraf Hossain Bhuiyan and three officials of Canadian consultancy firm SNC Lavalin -- Ramesh, Mohammad Ismail and Kevin Walid-- were made accused in the case which was filed with Banani Police Station.


On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Isha Khan <bdmailer@gmail.com> wrote:

4% was for Abul

Mentions Lavalin official's diary; ACC team files Padma graft conspiracy probe report; 7 officials accused, but Abul left out

An Anti-Corruption Commission enquiry team in its final report has recommended filing case against seven persons, excluding former minister Syed Abul Hossain, for corruption conspiracy in the Padma bridge project.

However, the report, submitted yesterday, says the ACC high-ups should decide on whether Abul Hossain would be sued.

The ACC bosses are split over implicating the ex-minister although the World Bank provided the anti-graft body with "evidence of corruption" against him.

Ramesh Shah, arrested official of Canadian firm SNC Lavalin, in his diary had mentioned Abul as the recipient of 4 percent out of 10pc bribe from the sum fixed for bridge supervision work, sources say.

The 10pc is equivalent to Tk 38 crore.

The seven include former Bridges Division secretary Mosharraf Hossain Bhuiyan and Lavalin officials Ramesh, Mohammad Ismail and Kevin Wales.

The rest are Kazi Mohammad Ferdous, ex-secretary of tender evaluation committee for the bridge construction; Executive Engineer of Roads and Highway Department Reaz Ahmed Zaber and Lavalin's local agent Mohammad Mostofa.

On Tuesday, the ACC team submitted its draft report where it had named Syed Abul Hossain, former state minister for foreign affairs Abul Hasan Chowdhury and businessman Nixon Chowdhury, brother of Ruling Awami League Whip Noor-E-Alam Chowdhury.

The trio were dropped in the final report because the team has no "hard evidence" against them, added the sources.

The World Bank's external panel, which visited the ACC for the second time from December 2 to 5, left Dhaka unhappy over the omission of Syed Abul Hossain's name as a top corruption suspect in the project.

Two high-ups and a legal adviser of the graft watchdog argued desperately with the WB's external panel about why the name of Abul Hossain would not be dropped, a competent ACC source said.

A high ACC official who opposed Abul Hossain's inclusion told The Daily Star that it was true Ramesh mentioned 4 percent against the ex-minister's name. But the Lavalin official did not put any date and this indicates the bribe was not given yet.

Ramesh might have decided to offer the bribe to Abul. But the ex-minister might not have been aware of it and in that sense the ACC cannot blame him, the official added.

"So far, we didn't find any proof in favour of the allegation against Abul Hossain."

But while Abul was the communications minister, the Bridges Division repeatedly dissolved the tender evaluation committee to favour Lavalin. In this regard, the ACC official noted that the investigators had not found any proof in Abul's role in dissolving or forming the committees.

Another official said the ACC needs not defend Abul so much. The ex- minister should be implicated as his name has surfaced. If he can prove his innocence, the court will acquit him.

Yesterday, the enquiry report was submitted to ACC Director General Khondakar Muhammad Aminur Rahman, who will now forward it to legal advisers.

Once the advisers send back the report along with their opinions, the DG will submit it to the chairman and two commissioners. It might take a day or two.

The ACC launched the enquiry in September last year after the WB raised corruption allegations in the project.

ACC sources say unless the anti-graft body files a First Information Report (FIR), it cannot launch a formal investigation as expected by the global lender.

The WB cancelled its $1.2 billion funding on June 29, saying it had proof of a "corruption conspiracy" involving Bangladeshi officials, executives of a Canadian firm and some individuals.

The global lender on September 21 decided to revive the loan after the Bangladesh government agreed to the WB's terms and conditions.

http://www.thedailystar.net/newDesign/news-details.php?nid=260586

On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Isha Khan <bdmailer@gmail.com> wrote:
digit-AL corruption: ACC Findings in short




Canadian company SNC Lavalin, which did not even qualify, was selected as the number one bidder in the tender for supervising Padma bridge construction through a corruption conspiracy by several government officials and powerful individuals, says the ACC enquiry report.

In order to make sure that Lavalin gets the job, the Bridges Division dissolved the tender evaluation committee thrice and formed a fourth one headed by Prof Jamilur Reza Chowdhury without giving it full technical and financial information about the bidders.

The division wasted 22 months in the process, which the World Bank deems as suspicious and part of a corruption conspiracy.

The ACC investigators did not recommend suing ex-communications minister Syed Abul Hossain but they mentioned that as a minister he could not shrug off the responsibility for the corruption conspiracy.

"But to prove allegations against him in the court, solid evidence is needed," said the ACC team in its enquiry report on corruption allegations in the $2.9 billion project.

According to the World Bank note, several individuals, including Abul Hossain, sought from SNC Lavalin 10 percent of $50 million (about Tk 38 crore) to help it qualify as the top bidder in the tender for supervising the bridge's construction.

The ACC prepared its report based on the interrogation of 29 people, and opinions from legal experts.

The ACC investigators recently submitted a report with findings on 10 people, including Abul Hossain, who was at the helm of the communication ministry, the parent body of the Bridges Division.

The commission is now making preparations for further enquiry against 15 persons, including Abul Hossain and Prime Minister's Economic Affairs Adviser Mashiur Rahman.

The report mentioned that ACC lawyer Anisul Haque gave the opinion that even if no evidence of corruption conspiracy is found against them, they can be charged with misuse of power.

The report exempted Mashiur on the basis of his statement to the ACC that if there were any irregularities in the tender, they had taken place before he joined as the Integrity Adviser of Padma bridge project. Though his name was mentioned in a diary of SNC Lavalin official Ramesh Saha, he claimed he had never met any Lavalin official.

The report said evidence of corruption conspiracy was found against seven people -- the secretary of the Bridges Division, three other government officials and three SNC Lavalin officials.

ACC TEAM'S FINDINGS ON 10 PERSONS

SYED ABUL HOSSAIN: his name was mentioned in Ramesh's diary in which the SNC Lavalin official wrote about "the bribe". The ACC could not find any trace of monetary transactions involving Abul. But the World Bank has filed complaint against him. None of the people quizzed by the ACC named Abul directly but they gave indications of his involvement. Solid evidence must be collected if he is to be sued.

ABUL HASAN CHOWDHURY: the former foreign minister, who does not hold any post in the incumbent government, regularly visited the Bridges Division. He introduced two Lavalin officials to Abul Hossain, who claimed that Chowdhury lobbied for Lavalin. But there is no documentary evidence of it. His name was also mentioned in Ramesh's diary.

NIXON CHOWDHURY: He is brother of parliament whip Nure Alam Chowdhury. He lobbied for Lavalin at the Bridges Division. His name was also mentioned in Ramesh's diary but not much evidence was found against him.

MOSHARRAF HOSSAIN BHUIYAN: The ACC report recommended suing the former secretary of the Bridges Division, as he is directly responsible for dissolving the tender evaluation committee four times. He tried his best to ensure that Lavalin gets the job. At least four persons, including ex-director of the bridge project Rafiqul Islam gave statements against him and said Lavalin was not qualified for the bridge consultancy job, yet the evaluation committee was formed four times to give the job to that company. Several government officials and individuals received help from Bhuiyan and hid information from the last committee headed by Prof Jamilur Reza Chowdhury. Ramesh's diary mentions Bhuiyan.

KAZI FERDOUS: the member secretary of tender evaluation committee was involved in leaking the committee's confidential information to vested interests to favour Lavalin. When the committee led by Jamilur Reza was formed, he confused the committee with wrong information about Halcrow, considered as the top bidder.

REAZ ZABER: the member of tender committee and executive engineer of roads and highways also served Lavalin's interests.

MD MOSTAFA: the local agent of SNC Lavalin facilitated meetings between Lavalin officials and minister and secretaries.

THREE FOREIGN OFFICIALS OF LAVALIN: Ramesh, Ismail and Kevin have privately met with minister, secretary and influential groups inside and outside the government. They have tried to bag the job by offering financial benefits. The Canadian court is now trying Ramesh and Ismail. Ramesh maintained a diary in which he wrote the names of several powerful people in Bangladesh. He referred to the minister as "min" or the secretary as "sec" or the project director as "PD". He also mentioned which person would get what share of bribe. Ismail, on the other hand, maintained communication with the Bangladeshi officials.


Full Text:
http://www.thedailystar.net/newDesign/news-details.php?nid=260591




__._,_.___


[* Moderator's Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[chottala.com] Events of 1971



 
 








Dr A Q Khan
Monday, December 17, 2012

All nations go through ups and downs - they have glorious periods and tragic ones. People usually ignore and forget the tragic ones while celebrating the good events with great pomp. Celebration of such events impresses a nation's achievements on the minds of its people and generates self-confidence in them. Tragic events are commemorated to remember past mistakes and the reasons for these mishaps. Unfortunately, Islamic history is full of tragic events, usually totally forgotten and ignored by subsequent rulers, to say nothing of learning a lesson from them. These rulers seemed intoxicated by wealth and power and lived luxurious lives.

We have the examples of Umayyad, Abbasid, Khwarizmi, Mongol, Mughal and Turkish dynasties, and the Islamic dynasty in Spain, etc. However, such episodes are not limited to Islamic countries. Christian dynasties have also had their fair share. Hitler ignored the fate that had befallen Napoleon after Napoleon's misadventure of attacking Russia, and he repeated the same mistake. This proved to be the beginning of his disastrous and ignominious end. Had Hitler not attacked Russia, the history of Europe would probably have been quite different and the United Kingdom would have been flattened. Fate has its own way and the Almighty usually seals the hearts and brains of the wrongdoers before destroying them.

It is most unfortunate that we in Pakistan have also not learnt any lessons from our past tragic mistakes. The breaking up of Pakistan on December 16, 1971, was one such recent event. Millions of Pakistanis are fully aware of the reasons behind that tragedy, but it seems that our rulers and the establishment are oblivious to these, despite the fact that it was such a traumatic experience.

The country was broken up, hundreds of thousands of people were killed, women were raped and almost 92,000 army and other personnel were taken prisoner. The way they were treated by the victorious Indian army was heart-breaking and I could not control my tears at seeing these events on TV. The public in Pakistan was not shown those scenes, but the western media exposed everything. As is usual here, nobody was held responsible for such a big and tragic disaster.

Bhutto appointed the Justice Hamoodur Rahman Commission, which was supposed to identify the culprits. The report was prepared, but the contents were never made public. There were a few leaks, a lot of guesswork and nothing more. Bhutto did not dare to have it published for fear of a backlash. This report was finally published in an Indian newspaper decades after the event had occurred. The main actor in the whole episode, Gen Yahya Khan, who was buried with the national flag draped over his coffin and, by what I read in the papers, with a 21-gun salute. Others went on to live comfortable, respected lives. The report also exposed some pseudo-brave, who later held very important posts.

We know that in March 1971 Gen Yahya Khan sent Gen Tikka Khan to East Pakistan to crush "insurgents." We saw our own army killing our own people. It is a well-known fact that, when given absolute power, people become cruel. Extremely horrible scenes were shown on TV abroad (I was in Belgium at the time) and I was ashamed to see that such cruel acts could be perpetrated by Muslims against Muslims – Pakistanis against fellow-Pakistanis. Everybody is aware of the fact that West Pakistani baboos considered East Pakistan a colony and treated its citizens in the same way as the British used to treat us. At the time Tikka Khan was unleashing a reign of terror in East Pakistan, our great and indomitable poet, Habib Jalib, warned the government in these words:

Mohabbat golion sey bo rahey ho

Watan ka chehra khoon sey dho rahey ho

Guman tumko key rasta kat raha hai

Yaqin mujhko keh manzil kho rahey ho

(You are promoting love with bullets and smearing the face of the country with blood. You are under the illusion that you are nearing your goal but I am sure that you are losing your destination.)

Our Islamic history is full of conflicts and intrigues, because of which we were destroyed. This process started with the wars of Jamal and Siffin in which the Companions of the Holy Prophet (pbuh) and close relatives fought each other, killing almost 80,000 people in the process. Ironically, both sides claimed that their dead would go straight to heaven. Later the Umayyad, Abbasid and Khwarizmi dynasties perished due to internal strife. Taimur fought against Bayazid Yildirim. Still later, the Arabs fought against the Turks, thus destroying powerful Islamic dynasties.

The mughal emperor Aurangzeb's campaign against his own brothers destroyed the very fabric of a grand dynasty, and after his death the country was dismembered. Furthermore, how can we forget the intrigues and treachery that led to the martyrdom of Tipu Sultan and the destruction of his kingdom?

The present situation in the country is not very different from that of 1971. Then, as now, the rulers and the establishment were under the illusion that they could and would crush their opponents. Unfortunately, the sovereignty of the country was sold by a dictator president without foresight, for his personal benefit, and who acknowledged a colonial war as being our own. We are behaving no better than mercenaries – killing our own people for a few bucks. We have forgotten how to protect our own borders and sovereignty.

It is unfortunate that both our political and military leaders are under the illusion (as happened in previous eras) that they can crush their opponents. They could not manage to do that to a very docile nation in 1971, how then can they contemplate crushing a martial race? They will be fighting for a thousand years and bleed the country to destruction and disintegration.

The rulers and the establishment are using our poor, brave soldiers as cannon fodder for the sake of a paltry sum in dollars. This money does not contribute to our economy or strength. The families of the poor martyred soldiers get a few consolatory statements and a few hundred thousand rupees, a sum with which they cannot even buy a small house on a five-marla plot, or live off the interest.

The country is at present in a worse situation than it was in 1971. It is plagued with all kinds of social evils. If we don't rectify this soon, the day will not be far off when we disintegrate again. In order to rectify the situation, the first and foremost necessity is to disengage ourselves from the foreign war and put our own house in order. The poem written by Ahmad Faraz after he had visited Dhaka Museum reflected his feelings and is a reminder to us of those tragic events and of the danger looming.

Email: dr.a.quadeer.khan@gmail.com

http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-9-148794-Events-of-1971




__._,_.___


[* Moderator's Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___