Banner Advertise

Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Re: [chottala.com] Re: To our respected Teachers!



Thanks for your comments Dear Helal. I appreciate your views. Ms. Sarmila Bose has already been invited by journalist Haroon Habib. Let us see if she ever visits Bangladesh. Bangladesh will never be a Failed State or a Collapsed State. We have our problems and who does not? We manage to solve it and survive and go forward. I am not sure if you had the chance of reading my feature in the Daily Sun's Independence Day Supplement.  The problem with us we always believe whatever the West says as sacrosanct and do not have much faith, belief and trust on our  own self. Immediately after the occupation of Iraq a group of mid level diplomats from a powerful West country came to my previous workplace to give a seminar on the rebuilding of Iraq. That was one of their PR job they thought they should do in this part of the world. Unfortunately I was invited to Chair  the session.Once they spoke for about an hour I just talked for ten minutes and reminded them about the CIA engineered coup in Iran 1953 where the elected government of Dr. Mossadegh was toppled to serve the oil interest of Anglo-Iranian Oil Company and the Shah of Iran. These diplomats had no clue of the incident. Over coffee I politely requested them to read a book by one of their own, Stephen Kinzer (then a NY Times Correspondent), `All the Shah's Men.' In return they invited me to lunch later, which for some reasons I could to avail. Yes, we will look forward, but not forgetting the past. The past is like a rear view mirror. You need it to go forward.

Warm wishes.

May God Bless You.

Mannan

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Helal Ahmed <huahmed@yahoo.com> wrote:
 

Dear Mannan Sir:

 

Asslamualaikum. I read your article on Prothom Alo regarding Sharmila Bashu. I understand your sentiment regarding her as she is claiming something you think is wrong. I also grossly disagree with her with some of her assumptions regarding what happened in 1971. I will buy her book and read it to see if the entire book is misleading or not.

 

The only thing I respectfully disagree with you is that Bangladesh shouldn't banned her coming to visit Bangladesh. Instead, people like you should invite her and make her understand what really happened to Bangladesh 1971 with your well documented study against her book. That's the civic way to deal with a misinformed writer like her.

 

Sir, I also read your mail regarding my response. It is understood that you are bit biased towards AL as most of us are bit biased to certain political party and that is quite acceptable. And it is also understood that some of us can not associated with a party which has much ideological differences for his/her point of view.

 

Sir, what I do not understand is that when people like your intellect can not realize international politics towards Bangladesh as some quarter of the world are trying to portray Bangladesh as a soon to be failure state. I hope you realize, if Bangladesh ever becomes a failed state, it won't be East Pakistan again. I also hope you further realize  the alternative scenario as well.

 

Not to mention, if we fail, we won't be able to find any pro or anti Bangladeshi forces to blame, as there will be no such thing call Bangladesh to begin with.

 

Sir, before it is tool late, pls bring to an end being divisive and lead us towards unity and prosperity. As a student, I urge you to teach us love and respect instead of revenge and hatred. We desperately, need guidance from you and people like you to make Bangladesh a successful country.

 

Thank you.

Helal

--- On Mon, 3/28/11, Abdul Mannan <abman1971@gmail.com> wrote:


From: Abdul Mannan <abman1971@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [chottala.com] Re: To our respected Teachers!
To: chottala@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, March 28, 2011, 11:45 PM

 
Thanks to all of you who discussed my column published in the Daily Prothom Alo in their own way. I always respect the opinion of others, but also think it should be as objective and based on facts as far as  possible. I agree that it is the responsibility of the new generation to write history. We created it you write it. But history is different from fiction. That has to be clearly understood. We say 'write something that is readable, do something that is write-able.'  I plan to write an English Version of my column sometimes next month.

Regards and warm wishes to all. 

Have a nice day.

Mannan

On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:57 AM, abid bahar <abid.bahar@gmail.com> wrote:
 
No offence to Professor Abdul Mannan who wrote about Sharmila Bose
Abid Bahar
In the below I will talk about Professor Mannan's article published in the Prothon Alo. http://www.prothom-alo.com/detail/date/2011-03-27/news/141872
Overall it is a good article with good writing skill but he used very flawed methodology in understanding Sharmila Bose's works.  Previously, in my
short review about Bose, I wrote
"Indeed, Ms. Bose's book came out with numerous holes. This is especially when she praises the killers and the drunken Yahya and Niazi. But it was a good thing that she was allowed to speak about her findings even with biases; atleast now we know what are her biases. In this if we blindly followed Dr. Nurun Nabi we would all have become some fanatic"secular mullahs."
 
Having said the above, I want to add 'The surge of nationalism usually presents a morally ambivalent, and for this reason often fascinating, picture. "National awakening" and struggles for political independence are often both heroic and inhumanly cruel; the formation of a recognizably national state often responds to deep popular sentiment, but can and does sometimes bring in its wake inhuman consequences, including violent expulsion and "cleansing" of non-nationals, all the way to organized mass murder. The moral debate on nationalism reflects a deep moral tension between solidarity with oppressed national groups on the one hand and the repulsion people feel in the face of crimes perpetrated in the name of nationalism on the other." http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nationalism
 
Professor Mannan himself as a Bangladeshi and like many of us that suffered during the war  but bringing that personal dimention of popular sentiment in research which makes him strong in memory but weak in methodology. In his writing he shows his anger toward Bose by taking up his position in glorifying the AL nationalist conclusions. Bose finds the AL's exaggerated conclusions inconsistent with methodological errors. This makes Mannan angry. With the Bengali nationalist sentiment not the sentiment of a researcher to  Mannan Bose is bound to be wrong. In his such consideration he commits the falacy of begging the question. He denies Bose's"facts" and accepts everything  of the AL made history to be true by the accounts of such people as AL's Nurun Nabis nationalist stand.
This wouldn't draw anybody's attention if Professor Mannan was not the ex vice cencellor, which position carried a very high esteem among Bangladeshi people. But his devotion and blind onesided support to the AL makes him even one commentator assuming that he was not as much qualified for the job but was in that high position due to the AL nepotism. I am certain that this is not true but the professor's extreme bias toward the AL had this unfortunate fallout.
In the Prothom Alo article comments section  as expected Professor Mannan  was appreciated by the Bengali nationalists, but drew harsh criticism from one who commentator who understood what is truly good writing that uses sound methology which is missing in the professor's writing:. The comment in Bengali is as follows:
২০১১.০৩.২৭ ০২:৩২
শর্মিলা বসুর আলোচনাগুলোর সমালোচনা আরো ভালোভাবে করা উচিৎ। কিছু ব্যপারে মান্নান স্যারের মন্তব্য বেশ আপত্তিকর মনে হলো। ১৯৭১ সালে কারো চাক্ষুস অভিজ্ঞতা না থাকলে কি ইতিহাস বিষয়ে গবেষণা করা যাবে না? তাহলে তো আর তরুন প্রজন্মের কারো ১৯৭১ এর ইতিহাস নিয়ে কাজ করা বৃথা ! তাছাড়া শর্মিলা বসুর সম্ভ্রমহানি নিয়ে কোন ব্লগারের অভদ্র কমেন্টটা ওনার মত মানুষের রেফারেন্স হিসেবে টানাটা ঠিক হলো না। সবশেষে, একজন গবেষককে (যে মানের-ই হোক) বাংলাদেশে অবাঞ্চিত করার ঘোষণা দেবার উস্কানি দেয়াটাও ঠিক মনে হয়নি। একাডেমিক বিতর্ক ইতিহাসের নানা বিষয়ে থাকে, সেটা পালটা গবেষণা করার মাধ্যমেই জবাব দেয়া উচিৎ, কাউকে নিষিদ্ধ করার মাধ্যমে নয়। আশা করি এ নিয়ে বিতর্ক নতুন গবেষণায় বাংলাদেশীদের উদ্বুদ্ধ করবে।
http://www.prothom-alo.com/detail/date/2011-03-27/news/141872  No offence to the respected teacher, Professor Abdul Mannan who wrote about Sharmila Bose stepping out to extremism which is beyond the scope of research methology..
 
 
References
 
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 4:45 AM, dina khan <dina30_khan@yahoo.com> wrote:
 
Respected Teahers are needed to be honest in speaking teaching and writing.
Respected Teachers are needed to be sincere in learnig and knowing the truth for making knowlege learning resouces for teaching the people to build nation.
Dishonest teachers are worse than Rajakars.


--- On Fri, 25/3/11, Abdul Mannan <abman1971@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Abdul Mannan <abman1971@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [chottala.com] Re: To our respected Teachers!
> To: chottala@yahoogroups.com
> Received: Friday, 25 March, 2011, 8:57 AM

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To my friends well wishers and  others.
>
> I never subscribed to JSD politics and was never a follower
> of AL politics blindly. I try to be objective as far as
> possible. May be I am a bit biased towards the politics of
> AL as I cannot be with any politics of BNP for obvious
> reasons.  I also have many critics in AL who thinks I
> should not speak some truths so bluntly they do not like.
> Now for the trial of Col. Taher. His deeds on 7th. November
> was not under trial but his trial was. The trial of Col.
> Taher was a miscarriage of justice and absolutely non
> transparent. I expect to write on this. Even the trial of
> killing of Zia was to some extent more transparent though
> many wrong people were tried (it included quite a few of my
> childhood friends). I never supported his deeds on 7th.
> November and I will say so.
>
>
> Many wishes of our Independence day.
>
> Have a nice day.
>
> Mannan
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011
> at 10:03 AM, Helal Ahmed <huahmed@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear Mr.
> Abid:
>  
> Assalamualaikum.
> Thanks for your
> response towards my posting. In my 40 years of life I
> didn't see many Bangladeshis with good political
> consciousness. We are overly biased with our political
> ideology. No matter how educated we are, we simply can't
> go beyond our loyalty towards the preferred
> party/ideology.
>  
> With no offence to
> Manna sir and all the respected teacher's in these forums,
> in our student life, we observed how teachers (mostly who
> thought in the public universities in Bangladesh) are busy
> aligning themselves among Shada, Neel, Holud and Golapi
> panels. We also observed how the best student can't become
> a teacher if he/she doesn't get the blessing from those
> color coded panels. Contrary, how ordinary student become a
> teacher with the help of same color coded panels.
>  
> It is also worth
> to mention that it is our Sir's who polluted the student
> politics and used us (students) to become the leader of the
> above mentioned colored coded panels and the ultimate price
> is becoming VC. Now days, some of them do politics in the
> public university and teaches in the private ones.
>  
> Saying that, it is
> also acknowledged, there are still teachers' left who does
> genuinely teaching job. That's why we still have
> institution like BUET and IBA to name a few.
>  
> Now, one can ask,
> can't teacher be involved in politics! Of course they can.
> But they can't encourage students to be a part of it and
> should leave it out side the institution, at least to some
> extent.
>  
> Thanks
> again.
>  
> Helal
> Toronto,
> Canada.
>  
> PS: I request all
> the respected teacher's in these forums to not to take my
> writing personally. And I hope my writing is not towards
> them as they don't fall into the teacher's category I
> mentione above. As I said, there are many honorable
> teachers' in Bangladesh, who is keeping
> the teaching profession with minimal financial compensation.
> And some of them still help their student to become
> extraordinary human being. We still visited them and touched
> their feet out of outmost respect because they deserve it.
> Whenever I go home, I make sure to visit few of my teachers
> who taught me throughout my life to be a better human being.
> Not necessarily, to be the best student. One of them
> is Samar Kanti Chowdhury sir, who thought be from Grade 1
> to 6. I wish all the teacher's in Bangladesh is just like
> him.
>  
>  
>  --- On
> Wed, 3/23/11, abid bahar <abid.bahar@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> From: abid bahar <abid.bahar@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [chottala.com] Re: [KHABOR]
> Verdict of Col. Taher Case.
>
> To: chottala@yahoogroups.com,
> abid.bahar@gmail.com,
> Ovimot@yahoogroups.com,
> faruquealamgir@gmail.com,
> farhadmazhar@hotmail.com,
> farid2002hossain@hotmail.com,
> notun_bangladesh@yahoogroups.com,
> modzaman@gmail.com
>
> Date: Wednesday, March 23, 2011, 7:26 PM
>
>
>  
>
>
> Hasina Fooling People with the Rule of Law
> Abid Bahar
> Professor Mannan is a very enlightened person but at
> the same time I read him in his work that he is an overly
> enthuasistic pro AL person as well. He is an honorable
> person. I don't think I am qualified to say anything to
> increase his enlightenment about Bangladesh politics but I
> want to say one thing to help him understand about his
> enthuasism that with the AL appointed judges some of whom
> were vendals and one was a murder accused, the judgement
> about Taher who was the killer of many innocent army offices
> for implimenting his vision of a the then Chinese style
> sepoy army, Hasina's is clearly politically motivated.
> In this judgement there is nothing to celebrate unless you
> are a hardcore Awami Leaguer enthusiast.
>
> Additionally, it says what is legal is not always
> moral. Example: If the fascist leader Sadam made laws, or
> Gaddafi or Mujib with their one party rule, made laws, in
> Mujib's case when the elected Mujib denying the
> people's mandate made laws to supress the opposition
> installed one party rule, killing the opposition with his
> High Court laws, or killing Siraj Sikdar without laws and
> boosting about it,  it was simply a betrayal with the
> people who voted him to power. In the end such leaders as
> was Saddam with his two children were killed by the invasion
> forces, Mujib with his two children were killed by
> Bangladesh army and another dictator Gadafi calling himself
> as a revolutionary stays in power for decades now killing
> his countryman with the same fascist rule of law and who
> knows what awaits for him as well.  
>
> In Hasina's case keeping Mahmudur Rahman, the
> editor of a newspaper in jail by Hasina's court was
> legal but abusing power through courts was neither
> democratic nor moral. True, politicians and their
> enthuasiasts are fooling and ruling people with the excuse
> of rule of law- is a village headman style politics brought
> to the city to convince some already enlightened people
> fighting against dictators and fascist regimes worldwide.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Helal Ahmed <huahmed@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>  
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear
> Manna Sir:
> Assalamualaikum.
> Thanks for sharing your comment on High courts verdict on
> Taher killing.
> Sir,
> in the last few weeks there were many email circling around
> regarding this matter. I also posted a thread few days back.
> I would be honored to hear your feedback in regards of my
> below statement:
> "Assalamua'laikum.
> Ok, for the sake of argument, I accept your notion that
> Ziaur Rahman was a cold blooded murderer for killing Col
> Taher. Then, do you also accept that Sheikh Mujibur Rahman
> was also a cold blooded murderer for killing Siraj Sikdar! I
> hope you must read or remember when Bongbondhu proclaimed,
> where is Siraj Sikdar after he was assassinated."
> I'm
> really looking fwd to have a knowledgeable discussion with
> you regarding the hypocrisy in our today's society when it
> comes to discussing Mujib/Zia, India/Pakistan, Tarek/Joy,
> and so on.
> Sir, I
> can assume how busy your life is however, your response is
> much appreciated.
> Helal
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- On Tue, 3/22/11, Abdul Mannan <abman1971@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> From: Abdul Mannan <abman1971@gmail.com>
>
> Subject: [KHABOR] Verdict of Col. Taher Case.
> To: khabor@yahoogroups.com,
> alapon@yahoogroups.com,
> chottala@yahoogroups.com,
> "Miro Jangi" <mjangi@yahoo.com>,
> Diagnose@yahoogroups.com,
> "shahid mahmud" <shahid6609@yahoo.com>,
> "sultan chowdhury" <chottalasultan@yahoo.com>,
> "Saad Andaleeb" <saadandaleeb@gmail.com>
>
> Date: Tuesday, March 22, 2011, 3:21 AM
>
>
>
>  
>
> High Court has given a verdict that the hanging of
> Col. Taher by Gen. Zia was a cold blooded murder and the
> lone person responsible for it was General Zia. The Court
> also ruled that Zia was also directly  involved in the
> killing of Bangabandhu Sk. Mujib.
>
>
> Mannan
>
> --
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>





--
_________________________________
Abdul Mannan
Professor
School of Business
University of Liberal Arts Bangladesh
House # 56, Road # 4/A
Dhanmondi R/A, Dhaka-1209
Bangladesh.
BDT=GMT +6
Working Days Sunday-Thursday
E-mail: abman1971@gmail.com
 http://www.ulab.edu.bd




--
_________________________________
Abdul Mannan
Professor
School of Business
University of Liberal Arts Bangladesh
House # 56, Road # 4/A
Dhanmondi R/A, Dhaka-1209
Bangladesh.
BDT=GMT +6
Working Days Sunday-Thursday
E-mail: abman1971@gmail.com
 http://www.ulab.edu.bd



__._,_.___


[* Moderator�s Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[chottala.com] Fw: open letter



 

 
 
 

Mr. Sajeeb Wazed Joy and Tariq Zia

VS

the supporters of 2 major political party of Bangladesh

 

Past has gone. Our generation is full of confusion. We are still fighting with our forty years of independence history.

 

Aren't we sensible enough to understand the rights and wrong and between good and bad ?

 

My fear is not the future but the bloody quarrel among each other. We know the past cannot be regained but we can understand and ask the question who is benefiting and why we are giving in?  Time and again let us watch below 4 YouTube video to justify our leaders and our freedom:

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgKPui9VtU0&feature=related

                                                                                                         http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2SzkNUvO1yU&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgHR-gKjMfU&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nL-VmSMN_oI&NR=1%22

 

Thank you for watching above video.

 

Now, let me ask every supporter a simple question.  Who is benefiting out of our bloody politics?  Attaining  independence was not an easy task or end of struggle. It was only the beginning of our struggle for political independence.

 

Every Bangladeshi must remember what Bangobhandu and Ziaur Rahman had done for Bangladesh no one should question nor dare to undue their contribution for this nation.

 

Let us not talk the past but do good to our people. There is nothing wrong in being grateful to a great man or woman and we must remember that no man can be grateful at the cost of his honor and no woman at the cost of her chastity and no nation at the cost of liberty.

 

We can only hope that political leader will govern this nation with civility and rationality that would be social progress, economic prosperity and living with honor and dignity.

   

Thank you

Dilawar Hossain

Washington DC



__._,_.___


[* Moderator's Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[chottala.com] "Pahela Boishakh" celebration, Bangladesh Embassy, Washington DC, 17 April 2011, 6:30pm [1 Attachment]

[Attachment(s) from muhammad hoque included below]

Dear all,

Bangladesh Embassy in Washington DC is happy to inform that it is going to celebrate the Bengali New Year on 17 April 2011, Sunday, at its Bangabandhu Auditorium, in a big way. The programme will start at 6:30 pm. A flyer of the programme is attached. All are cordially invited.

Sincerely,

Muhammad Nazmul Hoque
First Secretary
Embassy of Bangladesh
Washington DC


Attachment(s) from muhammad hoque

1 of 1 Photo(s)


__._,_.___


[* Moderator�s Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[chottala.com] BNP on Dr. Yunus and Grameen in 1991-2006



That was then .... and this is now ..... - BNP high command ...
 
Picture

 

 



On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Shamim Chowdhury <veirsmill@yahoo.com> wrote:
 

Khaleda Zia is making hue and cry on expulsion of Dr. Yunus from Grameen Bank. Conversely, while she was in power her government's attitude toward Dr. Yunus was full of jealousy. From a close source of Khaleda Zia who dose not wants to be named told journalists that Khaleda Zia directed her Finance Minister Saifur Rahman to disparage the news of Dr. Yunus getting Nobel Prize. Accordingly BNP Finance Minister ridiculed Dr. Yunus saying " FOKIRNIR HATA DUI TEEN HAZAR TAKA AR AKTA MOBILE PHONE DHORAI DILA DESHER UNNOYON HOYNA.Finance Minister Saifur Rahman cast doubt on contributions by Nobel laureate Prof Muhammad Yunus and micro credit to the country's development.

Following Khaleda Zia's instruction FM Saifur Rahman arranged agitation against Dr.Yunus and Grameen Bank in Sylhet and elsewhere during BNP first term in power. Finance Minister himself said in his speech speaking at the inaugural ceremony of Dutch Bangla Bank Ltd Moulvibazar branch in Oct 19th of 2006.

Now in 2011 being opposition leader Khaleda Zia all of a sudden becomes solemn defender of Dr. Yunus and Grameen Bank. Who you believe, Khaleda Zia of 1991 and 1996 who asked her Finance Minister to agitate people against Dr. Yunus and Grameen as well as ridicule role of Grameen small finance in real economy or the champion defender of Grameen and Dr. Yunus in 2011.

Readers please read Daily Star report on October of 2006 and come to your own conclusion.

Thanks,
Shamim Chowdhury
Maryland, U.S.A.

Link: http://www.thedailystar.net/2006/10/23/d61023011713.htm
Link: http://www.thedailystar.net/2006/10/20/d61020011913.htm

================================================================
 
Committed to PEOPLE'S RIGHT TO KNOW

Vol. 5 Num 858 Mon. October 23, 2006  
   
Front Page


Saifur doubts contributions of Prof Yunus
Staff Correspondent

Emphasising the BNP-led government's achievements, Finance Minister Saifur Rahman yesterday cast doubt on contributions by Nobel laureate Prof Muhammad Yunus and microcredit to the country's development.

"What did microcredit do regarding life expectancy, women literacy and reserve of foreign exchange?" Saifur asked while addressing a farewell programme at the finance and planning ministry. Officials of his ministry organised the programme at the ministry auditorium as the government's tenure expires on October 27.

The minister sarcastically remarked that the government has established thousands of schools across the country. He posed a question whether a handful of those institutions was established by Prof Yunus or the BRAC.

Citing examples of the country's development during the BNP government's rule, he asked how much of it was the result of microcredit system.

Though Prof Yunus won Nobel Peace Prize for microcredit Saifur claimed the then government of 1979-80 actually initiated the system.

Meanwhile, in his last speech as a minister of the outgoing government, Saifur yesterday discussed a number of other issues.

Regretting the current political trend, the minister said he would not involve in politics any further, as unethical "things" have to be done in this arena.

He stressed that these unethical "things" are the reasons behind corruption.

He mentioned an incident when a World Bank official informed him of a serious corruption attempt in a project.

Saifur however ruled out one-sided criticism of Bangladesh in connection with corruption, saying officials from international organisations are equally involved in irregularities.

He expressed his frustration over the mammoth size of the government and the differences among the ministers, MPs and bureaucrats and lamented for the "good old days".

"We miserably lack democratic mentality," he bemoaned.

Though Bangladesh has a permanent civil service, Saifur said corruption occurred too frequently in this sector and it must be stopped.

Admitting that his ministry had delayed project implementation process, he said, "The prime minister used to say that the planning ministry is to blame for these."

The planning ministry actually holds up the project proposals from the concerned ministries as it finds various problems during scrutiny and thus the implementation further slows down.

The accusation is 99 percent appropriate, Saifur observed, adding, though he formed a committee to avoid such circumstances it did not work.

The minister started working at 10:30am and except for two to three hours, he was busy signing files even at the farewell venue.

Saifur also attended a programme at the Finance Division yesterday.


================================================================

 
Committed to PEOPLE'S RIGHT TO KNOW

Vol. 5 Num 855 Fri. October 20, 2006  
   
Front Page


Saifur critical of Grameen Bank
Our Correspondent, Moulvibazar

Finance and Planning Minister M Saifur Rahman said true development of the country will be achieved through establishing large-scale industries and modernising agriculture, not by running microcredit programmes.

Saifur criticised Grameen Bank's microcredit scheme and other activities even though he congratulated Prof Muhammad Yunus on his winning the Nobel Peace Prize.

He was speaking at the inaugural ceremony of Dutch Bangla Bank Ltd Moulvibazar branch yesterday afternoon.

Saifur said the people of Sylhet region demonstrated against the Grameen Bank during the previous term of the BNP government and he had to go to the spot himself to sort the situation out.

He claimed that the current government has distributed more microcredit loans than the Grameen Bank. He said according to his knowledge none was able to relieve themselves of poverty with the help of microcredit only and they failed to become self-reliant.

Saifur alleged that Yunus was able to win the Nobel Peace Prize only because he has good relations with former US president Bill Clinton and New York Senator Hillary Clinton, who helped Yunus in this regard.

Saifur also criticised Yunus' recent announcement to form a new political party. The finance minister said great leaders like Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman and Ziaur Rahman had formed political parties and their parties have been in power several times. But they could not solve all the problems of the people.

 
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yunus victim of vendetta: Khaleda
Sun, Mar 6th, 2011 4:13 pm BdST
Dial 2000 from your GP mobile for latest news  
Dhaka, Feb 6 (bdnews24.com) — BNP chairperson Khaleda Zia has said Muhammad Yunus has been the victim of the government's political vendetta and urged all to remain alert about its 'pernicious campaign'.

"The controversy unleashed over Grameen Bank and Prof Muhammad Yunus is the manifestation of political meanness. It'll only harm the microfinance organisation, depriving the underprivileged people, and women," she said in a statement on Sunday.

In the statement, undersigned by her press secretary Maruf Kamal, Khaleda said, "The government has long been involved in undermining a personality like Prof Yunus of international repute in a planned way."

"…it has become clear to all that the recent move to remove him [Yunus] as the managing director of Grameen Bank is the effort to bring down the curtain of the conspiracy against the Nobel laureate," Khaleda said, voicing her deep concern over the incident.

She continued: The 'unethical and discourteous' behaviour towards Yunus reflects some government high-ups' sheer jealousy against him and lack of knowledge about his contributions.

Referring to the role of Grameen Bank in changing the lots of poor people both at home and abroad, Khaleda said, "The organisation [Grameen Bank] has been in a constant effort to improve the state of the poor people, particularly of the womenfolk … organisations like Grameen Bank has been replicated in Africa, South America and even in the USA to alleviate poverty."

"But it's so unfortunate that the present prime minister [Sheikh Hasina], whenever she gets any chance, undermines the role of Grameen Bank and other microfinance institutions through her sweeping comments that do not match her position," observed Khaleda, also a former prime minister.

She alleged that the government had neither left any room for justice in the country nor had it been able to protect the name and fame of any respectable citizen.

The BNP chief said, "Grameen Bank is a non-government organisation with government stake in it. Although the chairman of the organisation is nominated by the government, it is virtually a self-governed organisation under the direct supervision of its board of directors."

"Its female members own 95 percent of its shares while the government has a scanty 3.5 percent stake. So, there is no reasonable ground to consider it as a government-owned organisation. The bid to label Grameen as a scheduled bank only reflects the ignorance about related rules and regulations," Khaleda added.

"The issue, I believe, should be kept above party politics and personal meanness," she said and called upon all irrespective of political affiliations and beliefs to unite against the heinous attempt to malign respected personalities.

She also hoped that the people of good conscience, teachers, employees, peasants, labourers, professionals, political activists and the members of Grameen Bank in particular, would unitedly foil the conspiracy against Yunus as well as Grameen Bank.

bdnews24.com/sm/sht/mr/1835h




__._,_.___


[* Moderator�s Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Re: [chottala.com] Re: To our respected Teachers!



Dear Mannan Sir:

 

Asslamualaikum. I read your article on Prothom Alo regarding Sharmila Bashu. I understand your sentiment regarding her as she is claiming something you think is wrong. I also grossly disagree with her with some of her assumptions regarding what happened in 1971. I will buy her book and read it to see if the entire book is misleading or not.

 

The only thing I respectfully disagree with you is that Bangladesh shouldn't banned her coming to visit Bangladesh. Instead, people like you should invite her and make her understand what really happened to Bangladesh 1971 with your well documented study against her book. That's the civic way to deal with a misinformed writer like her.

 

Sir, I also read your mail regarding my response. It is understood that you are bit biased towards AL as most of us are bit biased to certain political party and that is quite acceptable. And it is also understood that some of us can not associated with a party which has much ideological differences for his/her point of view.

 

Sir, what I do not understand is that when people like your intellect can not realize international politics towards Bangladesh as some quarter of the world are trying to portray Bangladesh as a soon to be failure state. I hope you realize, if Bangladesh ever becomes a failed state, it won't be East Pakistan again. I also hope you further realize  the alternative scenario as well.

 

Not to mention, if we fail, we won't be able to find any pro or anti Bangladeshi forces to blame, as there will be no such thing call Bangladesh to begin with.

 

Sir, before it is tool late, pls bring to an end being divisive and lead us towards unity and prosperity. As a student, I urge you to teach us love and respect instead of revenge and hatred. We desperately, need guidance from you and people like you to make Bangladesh a successful country.

 

Thank you.

Helal

--- On Mon, 3/28/11, Abdul Mannan <abman1971@gmail.com> wrote:


From: Abdul Mannan <abman1971@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [chottala.com] Re: To our respected Teachers!
To: chottala@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, March 28, 2011, 11:45 PM

 
Thanks to all of you who discussed my column published in the Daily Prothom Alo in their own way. I always respect the opinion of others, but also think it should be as objective and based on facts as far as  possible. I agree that it is the responsibility of the new generation to write history. We created it you write it. But history is different from fiction. That has to be clearly understood. We say 'write something that is readable, do something that is write-able.'  I plan to write an English Version of my column sometimes next month.

Regards and warm wishes to all. 

Have a nice day.

Mannan

On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:57 AM, abid bahar <abid.bahar@gmail.com> wrote:
 
No offence to Professor Abdul Mannan who wrote about Sharmila Bose
Abid Bahar
In the below I will talk about Professor Mannan's article published in the Prothon Alo. http://www.prothom-alo.com/detail/date/2011-03-27/news/141872
Overall it is a good article with good writing skill but he used very flawed methodology in understanding Sharmila Bose's works.  Previously, in my
short review about Bose, I wrote
"Indeed, Ms. Bose's book came out with numerous holes. This is especially when she praises the killers and the drunken Yahya and Niazi. But it was a good thing that she was allowed to speak about her findings even with biases; atleast now we know what are her biases. In this if we blindly followed Dr. Nurun Nabi we would all have become some fanatic"secular mullahs."
 
Having said the above, I want to add 'The surge of nationalism usually presents a morally ambivalent, and for this reason often fascinating, picture. "National awakening" and struggles for political independence are often both heroic and inhumanly cruel; the formation of a recognizably national state often responds to deep popular sentiment, but can and does sometimes bring in its wake inhuman consequences, including violent expulsion and "cleansing" of non-nationals, all the way to organized mass murder. The moral debate on nationalism reflects a deep moral tension between solidarity with oppressed national groups on the one hand and the repulsion people feel in the face of crimes perpetrated in the name of nationalism on the other." http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nationalism
 
Professor Mannan himself as a Bangladeshi and like many of us that suffered during the war  but bringing that personal dimention of popular sentiment in research which makes him strong in memory but weak in methodology. In his writing he shows his anger toward Bose by taking up his position in glorifying the AL nationalist conclusions. Bose finds the AL's exaggerated conclusions inconsistent with methodological errors. This makes Mannan angry. With the Bengali nationalist sentiment not the sentiment of a researcher to  Mannan Bose is bound to be wrong. In his such consideration he commits the falacy of begging the question. He denies Bose's"facts" and accepts everything  of the AL made history to be true by the accounts of such people as AL's Nurun Nabis nationalist stand.
This wouldn't draw anybody's attention if Professor Mannan was not the ex vice cencellor, which position carried a very high esteem among Bangladeshi people. But his devotion and blind onesided support to the AL makes him even one commentator assuming that he was not as much qualified for the job but was in that high position due to the AL nepotism. I am certain that this is not true but the professor's extreme bias toward the AL had this unfortunate fallout.
In the Prothom Alo article comments section  as expected Professor Mannan  was appreciated by the Bengali nationalists, but drew harsh criticism from one who commentator who understood what is truly good writing that uses sound methology which is missing in the professor's writing:. The comment in Bengali is as follows:
২০১১.০৩.২৭ ০২:৩২
শর্মিলা বসুর আলোচনাগুলোর সমালোচনা আরো ভালোভাবে করা উচিৎ। কিছু ব্যপারে মান্নান স্যারের মন্তব্য বেশ আপত্তিকর মনে হলো। ১৯৭১ সালে কারো চাক্ষুস অভিজ্ঞতা না থাকলে কি ইতিহাস বিষয়ে গবেষণা করা যাবে না? তাহলে তো আর তরুন প্রজন্মের কারো ১৯৭১ এর ইতিহাস নিয়ে কাজ করা বৃথা ! তাছাড়া শর্মিলা বসুর সম্ভ্রমহানি নিয়ে কোন ব্লগারের অভদ্র কমেন্টটা ওনার মত মানুষের রেফারেন্স হিসেবে টানাটা ঠিক হলো না। সবশেষে, একজন গবেষককে (যে মানের-ই হোক) বাংলাদেশে অবাঞ্চিত করার ঘোষণা দেবার উস্কানি দেয়াটাও ঠিক মনে হয়নি। একাডেমিক বিতর্ক ইতিহাসের নানা বিষয়ে থাকে, সেটা পালটা গবেষণা করার মাধ্যমেই জবাব দেয়া উচিৎ, কাউকে নিষিদ্ধ করার মাধ্যমে নয়। আশা করি এ নিয়ে বিতর্ক নতুন গবেষণায় বাংলাদেশীদের উদ্বুদ্ধ করবে।
http://www.prothom-alo.com/detail/date/2011-03-27/news/141872  No offence to the respected teacher, Professor Abdul Mannan who wrote about Sharmila Bose stepping out to extremism which is beyond the scope of research methology..
 
 
References
 
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 4:45 AM, dina khan <dina30_khan@yahoo.com> wrote:
 
Respected Teahers are needed to be honest in speaking teaching and writing.
Respected Teachers are needed to be sincere in learnig and knowing the truth for making knowlege learning resouces for teaching the people to build nation.
Dishonest teachers are worse than Rajakars.


--- On Fri, 25/3/11, Abdul Mannan <abman1971@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Abdul Mannan <abman1971@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [chottala.com] Re: To our respected Teachers!
> To: chottala@yahoogroups.com
> Received: Friday, 25 March, 2011, 8:57 AM

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To my friends well wishers and  others.
>
> I never subscribed to JSD politics and was never a follower
> of AL politics blindly. I try to be objective as far as
> possible. May be I am a bit biased towards the politics of
> AL as I cannot be with any politics of BNP for obvious
> reasons.  I also have many critics in AL who thinks I
> should not speak some truths so bluntly they do not like.
> Now for the trial of Col. Taher. His deeds on 7th. November
> was not under trial but his trial was. The trial of Col.
> Taher was a miscarriage of justice and absolutely non
> transparent. I expect to write on this. Even the trial of
> killing of Zia was to some extent more transparent though
> many wrong people were tried (it included quite a few of my
> childhood friends). I never supported his deeds on 7th.
> November and I will say so.
>
>
> Many wishes of our Independence day.
>
> Have a nice day.
>
> Mannan
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011
> at 10:03 AM, Helal Ahmed <huahmed@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear Mr.
> Abid:
>  
> Assalamualaikum.
> Thanks for your
> response towards my posting. In my 40 years of life I
> didn't see many Bangladeshis with good political
> consciousness. We are overly biased with our political
> ideology. No matter how educated we are, we simply can't
> go beyond our loyalty towards the preferred
> party/ideology.
>  
> With no offence to
> Manna sir and all the respected teacher's in these forums,
> in our student life, we observed how teachers (mostly who
> thought in the public universities in Bangladesh) are busy
> aligning themselves among Shada, Neel, Holud and Golapi
> panels. We also observed how the best student can't become
> a teacher if he/she doesn't get the blessing from those
> color coded panels. Contrary, how ordinary student become a
> teacher with the help of same color coded panels.
>  
> It is also worth
> to mention that it is our Sir's who polluted the student
> politics and used us (students) to become the leader of the
> above mentioned colored coded panels and the ultimate price
> is becoming VC. Now days, some of them do politics in the
> public university and teaches in the private ones.
>  
> Saying that, it is
> also acknowledged, there are still teachers' left who does
> genuinely teaching job. That's why we still have
> institution like BUET and IBA to name a few.
>  
> Now, one can ask,
> can't teacher be involved in politics! Of course they can.
> But they can't encourage students to be a part of it and
> should leave it out side the institution, at least to some
> extent.
>  
> Thanks
> again.
>  
> Helal
> Toronto,
> Canada.
>  
> PS: I request all
> the respected teacher's in these forums to not to take my
> writing personally. And I hope my writing is not towards
> them as they don't fall into the teacher's category I
> mentione above. As I said, there are many honorable
> teachers' in Bangladesh, who is keeping
> the teaching profession with minimal financial compensation.
> And some of them still help their student to become
> extraordinary human being. We still visited them and touched
> their feet out of outmost respect because they deserve it.
> Whenever I go home, I make sure to visit few of my teachers
> who taught me throughout my life to be a better human being.
> Not necessarily, to be the best student. One of them
> is Samar Kanti Chowdhury sir, who thought be from Grade 1
> to 6. I wish all the teacher's in Bangladesh is just like
> him.
>  
>  
>  --- On
> Wed, 3/23/11, abid bahar <abid.bahar@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> From: abid bahar <abid.bahar@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [chottala.com] Re: [KHABOR]
> Verdict of Col. Taher Case.
>
> To: chottala@yahoogroups.com,
> abid.bahar@gmail.com,
> Ovimot@yahoogroups.com,
> faruquealamgir@gmail.com,
> farhadmazhar@hotmail.com,
> farid2002hossain@hotmail.com,
> notun_bangladesh@yahoogroups.com,
> modzaman@gmail.com
>
> Date: Wednesday, March 23, 2011, 7:26 PM
>
>
>  
>
>
> Hasina Fooling People with the Rule of Law
> Abid Bahar
> Professor Mannan is a very enlightened person but at
> the same time I read him in his work that he is an overly
> enthuasistic pro AL person as well. He is an honorable
> person. I don't think I am qualified to say anything to
> increase his enlightenment about Bangladesh politics but I
> want to say one thing to help him understand about his
> enthuasism that with the AL appointed judges some of whom
> were vendals and one was a murder accused, the judgement
> about Taher who was the killer of many innocent army offices
> for implimenting his vision of a the then Chinese style
> sepoy army, Hasina's is clearly politically motivated.
> In this judgement there is nothing to celebrate unless you
> are a hardcore Awami Leaguer enthusiast.
>
> Additionally, it says what is legal is not always
> moral. Example: If the fascist leader Sadam made laws, or
> Gaddafi or Mujib with their one party rule, made laws, in
> Mujib's case when the elected Mujib denying the
> people's mandate made laws to supress the opposition
> installed one party rule, killing the opposition with his
> High Court laws, or killing Siraj Sikdar without laws and
> boosting about it,  it was simply a betrayal with the
> people who voted him to power. In the end such leaders as
> was Saddam with his two children were killed by the invasion
> forces, Mujib with his two children were killed by
> Bangladesh army and another dictator Gadafi calling himself
> as a revolutionary stays in power for decades now killing
> his countryman with the same fascist rule of law and who
> knows what awaits for him as well.  
>
> In Hasina's case keeping Mahmudur Rahman, the
> editor of a newspaper in jail by Hasina's court was
> legal but abusing power through courts was neither
> democratic nor moral. True, politicians and their
> enthuasiasts are fooling and ruling people with the excuse
> of rule of law- is a village headman style politics brought
> to the city to convince some already enlightened people
> fighting against dictators and fascist regimes worldwide.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Helal Ahmed <huahmed@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>  
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear
> Manna Sir:
> Assalamualaikum.
> Thanks for sharing your comment on High courts verdict on
> Taher killing.
> Sir,
> in the last few weeks there were many email circling around
> regarding this matter. I also posted a thread few days back.
> I would be honored to hear your feedback in regards of my
> below statement:
> "Assalamua'laikum.
> Ok, for the sake of argument, I accept your notion that
> Ziaur Rahman was a cold blooded murderer for killing Col
> Taher. Then, do you also accept that Sheikh Mujibur Rahman
> was also a cold blooded murderer for killing Siraj Sikdar! I
> hope you must read or remember when Bongbondhu proclaimed,
> where is Siraj Sikdar after he was assassinated."
> I'm
> really looking fwd to have a knowledgeable discussion with
> you regarding the hypocrisy in our today's society when it
> comes to discussing Mujib/Zia, India/Pakistan, Tarek/Joy,
> and so on.
> Sir, I
> can assume how busy your life is however, your response is
> much appreciated.
> Helal
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- On Tue, 3/22/11, Abdul Mannan <abman1971@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> From: Abdul Mannan <abman1971@gmail.com>
>
> Subject: [KHABOR] Verdict of Col. Taher Case.
> To: khabor@yahoogroups.com,
> alapon@yahoogroups.com,
> chottala@yahoogroups.com,
> "Miro Jangi" <mjangi@yahoo.com>,
> Diagnose@yahoogroups.com,
> "shahid mahmud" <shahid6609@yahoo.com>,
> "sultan chowdhury" <chottalasultan@yahoo.com>,
> "Saad Andaleeb" <saadandaleeb@gmail.com>
>
> Date: Tuesday, March 22, 2011, 3:21 AM
>
>
>
>  
>
> High Court has given a verdict that the hanging of
> Col. Taher by Gen. Zia was a cold blooded murder and the
> lone person responsible for it was General Zia. The Court
> also ruled that Zia was also directly  involved in the
> killing of Bangabandhu Sk. Mujib.
>
>
> Mannan
>
> --
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>





--
_________________________________
Abdul Mannan
Professor
School of Business
University of Liberal Arts Bangladesh
House # 56, Road # 4/A
Dhanmondi R/A, Dhaka-1209
Bangladesh.
BDT=GMT +6
Working Days Sunday-Thursday
E-mail: abman1971@gmail.com
 http://www.ulab.edu.bd



__._,_.___


[* Moderator�s Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[chottala.com] HOW BNP TREATED DR. YUNUS !!!!!!!!!!

 
Committed to PEOPLE'S RIGHT TO KNOW
Vol. 5 Num 858 Mon. October 23, 2006  
   
Front Page


Saifur doubts contributions of Prof Yunus


Emphasising the BNP-led government's achievements, Finance Minister Saifur Rahman yesterday cast doubt on contributions by Nobel laureate Prof Muhammad Yunus and microcredit to the country's development.

"What did microcredit do regarding life expectancy, women literacy and reserve of foreign exchange?" Saifur asked while addressing a farewell programme at the finance and planning ministry. Officials of his ministry organised the programme at the ministry auditorium as the government's tenure expires on October 27.

The minister sarcastically remarked that the government has established thousands of schools across the country. He posed a question whether a handful of those institutions was established by Prof Yunus or the BRAC.

Citing examples of the country's development during the BNP government's rule, he asked how much of it was the result of microcredit system.

Though Prof Yunus won Nobel Peace Prize for microcredit Saifur claimed the then government of 1979-80 actually initiated the system.

Meanwhile, in his last speech as a minister of the outgoing government, Saifur yesterday discussed a number of other issues.

Regretting the current political trend, the minister said he would not involve in politics any further, as unethical "things" have to be done in this arena.

He stressed that these unethical "things" are the reasons behind corruption.

He mentioned an incident when a World Bank official informed him of a serious corruption attempt in a project.

Saifur however ruled out one-sided criticism of Bangladesh in connection with corruption, saying officials from international organisations are equally involved in irregularities.

He expressed his frustration over the mammoth size of the government and the differences among the ministers, MPs and bureaucrats and lamented for the "good old days".

"We miserably lack democratic mentality," he bemoaned.

Though Bangladesh has a permanent civil service, Saifur said corruption occurred too frequently in this sector and it must be stopped.

Admitting that his ministry had delayed project implementation process, he said, "The prime minister used to say that the planning ministry is to blame for these."

The planning ministry actually holds up the project proposals from the concerned ministries as it finds various problems during scrutiny and thus the implementation further slows down.

The accusation is 99 percent appropriate, Saifur observed, adding, though he formed a committee to avoid such circumstances it did not work.

The minister started working at 10:30am and except for two to three hours, he was busy signing files even at the farewell venue.

Saifur also attended a programme at the Finance Division yesterday.

Picture

 




________________________________
From: Mohammed Ramjan <mramjan@hotmail.com>
To: Khabor group <khabor@yahoogroups.com>; syed.aslam3@gmail.com;
notun_bangladesh@yahoogroups.com; chottala@yahoogroups.com; group Alochona
<alochona@yahoogroups.com>; wideminds@yahoogroups.com; dahuk@yahoogroups.com;
abidbahar@yahoo.com; delwar98@hotmail.com; mohiuddin@netzero.net;
udarakash08@yahoo.com; sonarbangladesh@yahoogroups.com;
serajurrahman@btinternet.com; amra-bangladesi@yahoogroups.com;
bangladesh-zindabad@yahoogroups.com; aminul_islam_raj@yahoo.com;
amin_chaudhury@yahoo.com; alapon <alapon@yahoogroups.com>; moassghar@yahoo.com;
Eng. Ruhul Bhai (Canada) <kruhul@hotmail.com>
Sent: Wed, March 30, 2011 8:25:04 AM
Subject: RE: [KHABOR] AMI JODI HUKUM DEBAR NA PARI ----------- !!!!!

 
 
Mr. Sayeed Aslam
Not answered my question. How Muzib can give order an unarmed nations to fight
with a modern army of pakistan who has plain , tanks, rifles, machine gun I do
not understand man? kindly be specific.
 
How a sheikh is Sharbo Kaler Shorbo Shresto Banglai also not understandable whos
blood at all not from Bangladesh
 

________________________________
To: khabor@yahoogroups.com; notun_bangladesh@yahoogroups.com;
chottala@yahoogroups.com
From: Syed.Aslam3@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:19:03 -0400
Subject: Re: [KHABOR] AMI JODI HUKUM DEBAR NA PARI ----------- !!!!!

 
Mr. Mohammed Ramjan


You have reasons to be ANGRY !!!!!

You seem to be very sorry that your  "united pakistan " has been broken ?
Is that the reason that Jamaate Islami is  keeping "under ground relation
with Pakistan
from 1971 ? Does Armed Al-Bodor bahini (Jammat's armed gestapo wing) still exist
to compliment your " modern army of pakistan". (perhaps as an underground
network)?

You say "We are not convienced ......". Who are these "We" ?? Does it include
your Pakistani buddies (ISI and Military Inc....of Pakistan)......???

Again, what's so good about your "Muslim Pakistan" ????? .....Even today ???

Mr. Ramjan, you said :"fight with LATI against bullet ..."  

FYI, it is not bullet ....it is the unity of the people and the LATI symbolized
the unity

of the unity and determination of the masses that brought that ultimate  VICTORY
of people of Bangladesh against the occupation army - the modern army of
pakistan.

[ Sheikh Mujib's bold & uncompromising leadership was the main driving force
behind

unity of the maases of Bangladesh in 1971 against your the army of your "Muslim
Pakistan" ... ]

Shuno Ekti Mujiborer Theke :
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cbXhaGekrWc
 

Syed Aslam

PS:
What's your definition of "pure bengali" ...read the history of our land from
the
pre-historic days and find out, if your ideas are not dellusional ????

  
2011/3/29 Mohammed Ramjan <mramjan@hotmail.com>

 
>We are not convienced, that means we have to fight with LATI against bullet - a
>modern army of pakistan? Sorry all are nonsence. Was the matter that sheikh
>Muzibur Rahaman had been under ground relation with India from 1947 ? to destroy
>anti Indian power Muslim Pakistan  and he was an enemy of united pakistan
>serving Indian agenda ?

>Sheikh Muzib himself was not a pure bengali, why ? because all the Sheikh,
>Sayeed, Moghul & Patan are migrated people in Bengali Land so he can not be
>sharbo Kaler Sharbo shresto Bangali, sorry.

>
________________________________
To: alochona@yahoogroups.com; WideMinds@yahoogroups.com; dahuk@yahoogroups.com;
abidbahar@yahoo.com; delwar98@hotmail.com; notun_bangladesh@yahoogroups.com;
mohiuddin@netzero.net; udarakash08@yahoo.com; sonarbangladesh@yahoogroups.com;
serajurrahman@btinternet.com; amra-bangladesi@yahoogroups.com;
Bangladesh-Zindabad@yahoogroups.com; aminul_islam_raj@yahoo.com;
amin_chaudhury@yahoo.com; alapon@yahoogroups.com; moassghar@yahoo.com
>CC: maqsudo@hotmail.com; khabor@yahoogroups.com; alapon@yahoogroups.com
>From: manik195709@yahoo.com
>Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 09:11:12 -0700
>Subject: [KHABOR] AMI JODI HUKUM DEBAR NA PARI ----------- !!!!!
>
>
>
>  
>  
>আমি যদি হুকুম দেবার না পারি -----
>সর্বকালের সর্বশ্রেষ্ঠ বাঙালি জাতির জনক বঙ্গবন্ধুর ৭ মার্চের কাব্বিক
>ভাষণের পংতিমালা :
>"আমি যদি হুকুম দেবার না পারি , তোমদের যার যা কিছু আছে তাই দিয়ে শত্রুর মোকাবিলা 
>কর "- এই অমোঘ বাণীর পরে ও  কি  কারো অপেক্ষা করতে হবে  স্বাধীনতার ঘোষণার জন্য !!!
>
>স্বাধীনতার শত্রু এবং আওয়ামী বিরোধীরা বলে বেড়াচ্ছে যে বঙ্গবন্ধু ৭ মার্চ যুদ্ধ
>ঘোষণা না করে
>
>পাকিস্তানের প্রধানমন্ত্রী হবার জন্য ইয়াহিয়ার সাথে   দেন-দরবার করছিলেন ৷
>বঙ্গবন্ধু বাঙালির মুক্তিসনদ
>
>৬ দফার পূর্ণ বাস্তবায়নের জন্য ইয়াহিয়ার সাথে দর-কষাকষি করছিলেন ---- ৬ দফার
>পুর্ণবাস্তবায়ন মানেই
>
>ছিল "রক্তপাতহীন স্বাধীনতা অর্জন "! আর আলোচনা না করে হুট করে স্বাধীনতা এবং যুদ্ধ
>ঘোষণা করলে
>
>বঙ্গবন্ধু দেশদ্রোহী হিসাবে সারা বিশ্বে পরিচিতি পেতেন আর আমাদের স্বাধীনতার
>স্বপ্নও  অংকুরেই বিনষ্ট হত !
>একদিকে ছিল আলোচনা আর অন্য দিকে ছিল যুদ্ধের প্রস্তুতি -- এই দুইয়ের সমন্নয় এত
>মজবুত ছিল বলেই
>
>আমরা মাত্র নয় মাসে পাকিস্তানি দখলদার বাহিনীকে পরাভূত করে বিজয় ছিনিয়ে এনেছিলাম !

>জয় বাংলা ,
>জয় বঙ্গবন্ধু ,

>ড৷: মুহাম্মদ আলী মানিক
>জর্জিয়া আওয়ামী লিগ
>
>
>
>
>________________________________
>From: Faruque Alamgir <faruquealamgir@gmail.com>
>To: alochona@yahoogroups.com; wideminds <WideMinds@yahoogroups.com>; dahuk
><dahuk@yahoogroups.com>; Dr. Abid Bahar <abidbahar@yahoo.com>; delwar
><delwar98@hotmail.com>; notun_bangladesh@yahoogroups.com; mohiuddin@netzero.net;
>
>Nayan Khan <udarakash08@yahoo.com>; Sonar Bangladesh
><sonarbangladesh@yahoogroups.com>; serajurrahman@btinternet.com; Amra Bangladesi
>
><amra-bangladesi@yahoogroups.com>; Bangla Zindabad
><Bangladesh-Zindabad@yahoogroups.com>; Md. Aminul Islam
><aminul_islam_raj@yahoo.com>; amin chaudhury <amin_chaudhury@yahoo.com>; alapon

>alapon <alapon@yahoogroups.com>; Mo Assghar <moassghar@yahoo.com>
>Cc: maxx ombba <maqsudo@hotmail.com>
>Sent: Thu, March 24, 2011 6:39:26 AM
>Subject: Re: [ALOCHONA] mujib
>

> Friends
>
>
>THE HISTORY OF BANGLADESH IS INCOMPLETE N DISTORTED IF THE PATRIOTIC ROLE
>OF ZIAUR RAHMAN IS NOT GLORIFIED AS OF THE ROLE OF SHEIKH MUJIBUR RAHMAN AS PER

>INDIVIDUAL ROLE PERFORMED FOR THE BIRTH OF BANGLADESH.
>
>
>On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 6:43 AM, maxx ombba <maqsudo@hotmail.com> wrote:
>

>>AL thugs are trying to re-write history/
>>
>>
>>If Sk. Mujib had declared independence on 7th. March, how he was in a meeting on
>>
>>22 March, 1971...as
>>a leader of " EAST PAKISTAN ".
>>
>>
>>AL leaders did not have enough education, wisdom, efficiency to understand that
>
>>Pakistani
>>govt. was importing more army + arms, while conducting bottom-less meetings!!!
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Don't trust army, Mujib told Bhutto
>>
>>
>>On the morning of March 22, 1971, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman resumed his
>
>>dialogue with President Yahya Khan. At the same time, the Awami League team was
>
>>busy negotiating the wording of the proposed proclamation with the President's

>>advisers. 
>>
>>
>>
>>On arriving at the President's House, Mujib found Bhutto there. As the Bangalee
>
>>leader would later say, he pulled the PPP chairman aside and on to the verandah
>
>>in order not to have their conversation overheard or bugged. 
>>
>>
>>Bhutto would later corroborate Mujib's statement and would go on to say that at
>
>>a certain point both leaders were taken to see General Yahya Khan. Once they
>>were together, all three men exchanged polite greetings.
>>
>>
>>http://www.thedailystar.net/newDesign/news-details.php?nid=178681
>
>        
>
>
>
>



Mr. Mohammed Ramjan


You have reasons to be ANGRY !!!!!

You seem to be very sorry that your  "united pakistan " has been broken ?
Is that the reason that Jamaate Islami is  keeping "under ground relation
with Pakistan
from 1971 ? Does Armed Al-Bodor bahini (Jammat's armed gestapo wing) still exist
to compliment your " modern army of pakistan". (perhaps as underground network)?

You say "We are not convienced ......". Who are these "We" ?? Does it include
yourPakistani buddies (ISI and Military Inc....of Pakistan)......???

Again, what's so good about your "Muslim Pakistan" ????? .....Even today ???

Mr. Ramjan, you said :"fight with LATI against bullet ..."  

FYI, it is not bullet ....it is the unity of the people and the LATI symbolized
the unity

of the unity and determination of the masses that brought that ultimate  VICTORY
of people of Bangladesh against the occupation army - the modern army of
pakistan.

[ Sheikh Mujib's bold & uncompromising leadership was the main driving force
behind

unity of the maases of Bangladesh in 1971 against your the army of your "Muslim
Pakistan" ... ]

Shuno Ekti Mujiborer Theke :
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cbXhaGekrWc
 

Syed Aslam




2011/3/29 Mohammed Ramjan <mramjan@hotmail.com>

 
>We are not convienced, that means we have to fight with LATI against bullet - a
>modern army of pakistan? Sorry all are nonsence. Was the matter that sheikh
>Muzibur Rahaman had been under ground relation with India from 1947 ? to destroy
>anti Indian power Muslim Pakistan  and he was an enemy of united pakistan
>serving Indian agenda ?

>Sheikh Muzib himself was not a pure bengali, why ? because all the Sheikh,
>Sayeed, Moghul & Patan are migrated people in Bengali Land so he can not be
>sharbo Kaler Sharbo shresto Bangali, sorry.

>________________________________
To: alochona@yahoogroups.com; WideMinds@yahoogroups.com; dahuk@yahoogroups.com;
abidbahar@yahoo.com; delwar98@hotmail.com; notun_bangladesh@yahoogroups.com;
mohiuddin@netzero.net; udarakash08@yahoo.com; sonarbangladesh@yahoogroups.com;
serajurrahman@btinternet.com; amra-bangladesi@yahoogroups.com;
Bangladesh-Zindabad@yahoogroups.com; aminul_islam_raj@yahoo.com;
amin_chaudhury@yahoo.com; alapon@yahoogroups.com; moassghar@yahoo.com
>CC: maqsudo@hotmail.com; khabor@yahoogroups.com; alapon@yahoogroups.com
>From: manik195709@yahoo.com
>Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 09:11:12 -0700
>Subject: [KHABOR] AMI JODI HUKUM DEBAR NA PARI ----------- !!!!!
>
>
>
>  
>  
>আমি যদি হুকুম দেবার না পারি -----
>সর্বকালের সর্বশ্রেষ্ঠ বাঙালি জাতির জনক বঙ্গবন্ধুর ৭ মার্চের কাব্বিক
>ভাষণের পংতিমালা :
>"আমি যদি হুকুম দেবার না পারি , তোমদের যার যা কিছু আছে তাই দিয়ে শত্রুর মোকাবিলা 
>কর "- এই অমোঘ বাণীর পরে ও  কি  কারো অপেক্ষা করতে হবে  স্বাধীনতার ঘোষণার জন্য !!!
>
>স্বাধীনতার শত্রু এবং আওয়ামী বিরোধীরা বলে বেড়াচ্ছে যে বঙ্গবন্ধু ৭ মার্চ যুদ্ধ
>ঘোষণা না করে
>
>পাকিস্তানের প্রধানমন্ত্রী হবার জন্য ইয়াহিয়ার সাথে   দেন-দরবার করছিলেন ৷
>বঙ্গবন্ধু বাঙালির মুক্তিসনদ
>
>৬ দফার পূর্ণ বাস্তবায়নের জন্য ইয়াহিয়ার সাথে দর-কষাকষি করছিলেন ---- ৬ দফার
>পুর্ণবাস্তবায়ন মানেই
>
>ছিল "রক্তপাতহীন স্বাধীনতা অর্জন "! আর আলোচনা না করে হুট করে স্বাধীনতা এবং যুদ্ধ
>ঘোষণা করলে
>
>বঙ্গবন্ধু দেশদ্রোহী হিসাবে সারা বিশ্বে পরিচিতি পেতেন আর আমাদের স্বাধীনতার
>স্বপ্নও  অংকুরেই বিনষ্ট হত !
>একদিকে ছিল আলোচনা আর অন্য দিকে ছিল যুদ্ধের প্রস্তুতি -- এই দুইয়ের সমন্নয় এত
>মজবুত ছিল বলেই
>
>আমরা মাত্র নয় মাসে পাকিস্তানি দখলদার বাহিনীকে পরাভূত করে বিজয় ছিনিয়ে এনেছিলাম !

>জয় বাংলা ,
>জয় বঙ্গবন্ধু ,

>ড৷: মুহাম্মদ আলী মানিক
>জর্জিয়া আওয়ামী লিগ
>
>
>
>
>________________________________
>From: Faruque Alamgir <faruquealamgir@gmail.com>
>To: alochona@yahoogroups.com; wideminds <WideMinds@yahoogroups.com>; dahuk
><dahuk@yahoogroups.com>; Dr. Abid Bahar <abidbahar@yahoo.com>; delwar
><delwar98@hotmail.com>; notun_bangladesh@yahoogroups.com; mohiuddin@netzero.net;
>
>Nayan Khan <udarakash08@yahoo.com>; Sonar Bangladesh
><sonarbangladesh@yahoogroups.com>; serajurrahman@btinternet.com; Amra Bangladesi
>
><amra-bangladesi@yahoogroups.com>; Bangla Zindabad
><Bangladesh-Zindabad@yahoogroups.com>; Md. Aminul Islam
><aminul_islam_raj@yahoo.com>; amin chaudhury <amin_chaudhury@yahoo.com>; alapon

>alapon <alapon@yahoogroups.com>; Mo Assghar <moassghar@yahoo.com>
>Cc: maxx ombba <maqsudo@hotmail.com>
>Sent: Thu, March 24, 2011 6:39:26 AM
>Subject: Re: [ALOCHONA] mujib
>

> Friends
>
>
>THE HISTORY OF BANGLADESH IS INCOMPLETE N DISTORTED IF THE PATRIOTIC ROLE
>OF ZIAUR RAHMAN IS NOT GLORIFIED AS OF THE ROLE OF SHEIKH MUJIBUR RAHMAN AS PER

>INDIVIDUAL ROLE PERFORMED FOR THE BIRTH OF BANGLADESH.
>
>
>On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 6:43 AM, maxx ombba <maqsudo@hotmail.com> wrote:
>

>>AL thugs are trying to re-write history/
>>
>>
>>If Sk. Mujib had declared independence on 7th. March, how he was in a meeting on
>>
>>22 March, 1971...as
>>a leader of " EAST PAKISTAN ".
>>
>>
>>AL leaders did not have enough education, wisdom, efficiency to understand that
>
>>Pakistani
>>govt. was importing more army + arms, while conducting bottom-less meetings!!!
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Don't trust army, Mujib told Bhutto
>>
>>
>>On the morning of March 22, 1971, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman resumed his
>
>>dialogue with President Yahya Khan. At the same time, the Awami League team was
>
>>busy negotiating the wording of the proposed proclamation with the President's

>>advisers. 
>>
>>
>>
>>On arriving at the President's House, Mujib found Bhutto there. As the Bangalee
>
>>leader would later say, he pulled the PPP chairman aside and on to the verandah
>
>>in order not to have their conversation overheard or bugged. 
>>
>>
>>Bhutto would later corroborate Mujib's statement and would go on to say that at
>
>>a certain point both leaders were taken to see General Yahya Khan. Once they
>>were together, all three men exchanged polite greetings.
>>
>>
>>http://www.thedailystar.net/newDesign/news-details.php?nid=178681
>
>        
>
>
>
>