Banner Advertise

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Re:: [chottala.com] Att. Dr. Siraj Uddowllah....How India created Bangladesh & lessons for Sri Lanka



Mr. turkman@sb​cglobal.net wrote: SIRAJ WROTE: "Bengali Muslims are now not Total Muslims or not Total Bengali Leader can tell". written by dina khan. 

Mr. turkman@sb​cglobal.net you are confused. dina khan WROTE this not Dr. Siraj Uddowllah. 


TURKMAN: 
I was reading a book about situation and circumstances the Prophet Mohammad was born Hijaaz. After learning, what kind of Character those Bedouin had, I had started crying because our Characters are worse than them now and they were called 'Koffaar' by Allah in Qoraan. If they were Koffaar, what are we? 
Was word Allah invented by our Prophet? No. It exited before as Supreme God over all gods just like word 'BHugwaan' exists in Hindi and means the same. Did they believe in Allah before birth of our Prophet?
Yes they had. Did they worship Him?
Yes they but Tradition of worship was different. Did they observe 'Rmjaan'?
Yes they did, just like Jews and Christians, who practice Fasting also still but in a different way and in a different Month. Did they pay Alms or Charity like ZkaaT?
Yes they did just like we are doing now. Did they celebrate Eid?
Yes they did because both Eid are their Customs that were adopted in Islam. Did they perform Hajj?
Yes they did and every year because it was also their Tradition that was adopted in Islam. So, in which term were they different from us except calling ourselves Moslims and accepting Prophet Mohammad as Messenger of Allah that Allah should not think of us same as Koffaar since we are worse in character than the one's He had called Koffaar?
Is there any Mollaa that can answer my this question alive?
---------- 

--- In chottala@yahoogroups.com, dina khan <dina30_khan@...> wrote:
Division of India in 1947 is shameful and harmful for Muslims people over all of India sub continent. It is
clear that creation of Pakistan was not for Islam or not for then Indian Muslim€™s
interest. 
Examples.
> Punjab and Bengal was Muslim
> Majority Provinces in undivided India.
>  Punjab and Bengal is
> divided.  
> Is division of Punjab and Bengal for
> Majority Muslim' interest?
>  Or
> Is division of Punjab and Bengal for
> Minority Hindus' interest? 
> Why are not for the interest of
> Muslim divided other Provinces of India where Muslims are Minority and Hindus
> are Majority? 
> Is it not clear?
>  That division was done Punjab and
> Bengal only for the interest of minority Hindus who are in Punjab and Bengal.
>  Division was not done other provinces of India
> where Muslims are minority for interest of Muslim. Division also was not done for
> religion of Islam... If division is done for religion then why by division of
> India are not created separate states for Christ people Buddies people Sheik
> people and other religion people of India 


> It can say that 
>  The then Muslims leaders in
> India Sub continent were either not foresighted politicians or were very
> foolish politicians or they were not doing politics for common Muslims€™
> Interest or they thought to getting power and common Muslims people were
> misguided by so called power catching Muslim leaders. 
> Urdu and Hindi language speaking leaders
> thought to rule Indian people  under control  Hindi and Urdu 
> Language by dividing  India  in 2 nation theory in the name Hindu
> and Muslims and after division of India Hindi  has become  state
> language of India and Urdu tried in Pakistan.  Then Muslim Bengali leader
> AK Fazlul Haque who was against of such type division of Bengal understood the meaning of India division in 1947 but  others were not and
> foolish Bengal Muslims leaders understood it later. 
> And Pakistan broken by the help India for language and was created Bangladesh 

>
 Bengali Muslims are now not
> Total Muslims or not Total Bengali
> Leader can tell.
> What Bengali Muslims is either
> Bengali or Bangladeshi? Or Total what?

 

 



 

 


 From:  siraj uddowllah <siraj_58@hotmail.com wrote

--- In chottala@yahoogroups.com,


Dear dina khan I fully agree with your viewpoint but could not agree when you mentioned in India there were minority people of Bangla language. When we consider in united Pakistan Bangla language was not a language of minority people rather this Bangla language people in the whole of Pakistan were the language of majority people more than the urdu speaking people of whole of Pakistan. Bangla Language may be minority people language inIndia but not in Pakistan where Urdu speakers (Panjabi, Pathans, Sindhi, Baluchi and multi language societies) were minority in comparison to Bangla speaking people.

The creation of Pakistan overwhelmingly supported by the Muslims of Bengal just to make a separate Muslim state in India and that was spoiled by the foolish Muslim rulers of that part of Pakistan I mean the foolish Muslims of West Pakistan and few foolish Pakistani Generals in association with that mad hatter and power hunger man Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto. Pakistan was not created on language basis but on Muslim ideology but the Pakistani rulers neglecting the majority Bengalees tried to impose their minority Urdu language over the people of majority Bengalees of East Pakistan. 
Pakistan was created because of the sacrifices of millions of Muslims of territories that went on to constitute East and West Pakistan. After the independence of Pakistan, East Pakistan now Bangladesh played a tremendous role in the country's affairs especially in foreign currencies earning by exporting jute, leathers and others.

I really feel pity for the Indian's left out Muslims who could not be able to migrate and suffered and still suffering a lot in the hands of fanatic Hindus as it happened in Gujarat and other parts of India every now and then without the knowledge to the outside world. Those who were lucky enough to be able to migrate in West Pakistan commonly known as Mohajirs or Hidustani and migrated Muslims in East Pakistan mostly from Bihars used to be named as Biharis over there.

The Muslims from India who entered in West Pakistan Karachi, Sindh province mostly from Hyderabad and western part of India still considered to be the 3rd class citizen and most neglected and hated types of society by the Pakistanis up till now. Whereas Biharis who entered in East Pakistan in mass were accepted by the Bengalis from the very beginning as their migrated Muslim brothers and co-operated with them in all possible ways they can do at that time. In the beginning the Biharis did not have any land or neither possessing any land of their own. The Bengalees gave them shelter by giving their own land in spite of the facts they had little land to share because their territory of 54,000 squire miles was the most thickly populated in the world. They also helped them in getting jobs and co-operated with them in all possible ways to all spheres of their lives. The Bengalis did this in view of the Islamic ideology and because they advocate the unity and political advancement and uplift-men of the Muslim Ummah.

Dr. Siraj Uddowllah.


> > 
> > http://www.lankaweb.com/news/items/2012/03/25/how-india-created-bangladesh-lessons-for-sri-lanka/
> > http://www.asiantribune.com/news/2012/03/25/how-india-created-bangladesh-lessons-sri-lanka





__._,_.___


[* Moderator�s Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___