Mr. Munshi has the guts to tell the truth.
And the truth is:
"I have some doubts whether the BNP
is fully committed to facing Indian aggression
................. I have found them to be opportunists
and utterly corrupt " - MBI Munshi
Do you agree, Mr. Salahuddin Ayubi?
Syed Aslam
On 7/4/09, Salahuddin Ayubi <s_ayubi786@yahoo.com> wrote:
Mr. Munshi has the guts to tell the truth. This country is corrupt to the core. All politicians, all bureaocrats , petty leaders of political prties, petty officials. Tell me who is not corrupt in the country? Just ask any Tom Dick and harry to explain his or her life style and ask them if it is commensurate with their income. I bet noe can . Does his statement imply that there is no corruption among the BALists?Ayubi
From: Syed Aslam <Syed.Aslam3@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, July 3, 2009 7:23:52 AM
Subject: [Amra-Bangladesi] Zia vs Zafar Reply to Salahuddin Ayubi
Salahuddin Ayubi ShahibYou said:"Please speak up and meet the challange thrown at you."Please read Mr. MBI Munshi's response in this connection.Although it is self-explainarory, I must mention that he hasmade it clear that:(in his own words)"I have some doubts whether the BNPis fully committed to facing Indian aggressionwhich has prevented me joining their party andI have found them to be opportunists and utterly corrupt "- MBI MunshiHope, you got real answer to the on-going challenge...Syed AslamOn 6/30/09, MBI Munshi <MBIMunshi@gmail. com> wrote:The sentence contained in the comment pointed out by you merely asserts that both me and the BNP are common targets of RAW. That should not imply by that I am a supporter of the BNP. All it may indicate is that me and the BNP are against Indian hegemony and RAW has identified us as targets. I have some doubts whether the BNP is fully committed to facing Indian aggression which has prevented me joining their party and I have found them to be opportunists and utterly corrupt.
On 6/29/09, Syed Aslam <syed.aslam3@ gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Mr. MunshiPlease read NB Message # 21407 at:You statement in that message gives an aura that you, yourself andBNP are natural allies and common targets of RAW.... ...Also, please read my post dated June 24th:in this connection where I agreed with your contention that you didn'twrite the NFB article: I clearly said" I belive you now. I am sure you did not write the article in NFB.
As a matter of fact, I felt little awkward when I first saw yourname in the byeline ..... I thought, people change, so it took iton a good faith ....In any case, there are quite a few points to ponder inthe article.. ...truth is always stranger than fiction ....but that is beside the point especially when I am talking to you ...Thanks for your patience .... "Sorry or hurting your feelings ..... I understand that you are aninpindent thinker and any similarity between your and BNP'sposition are just random and stochastic coindence ..........RegardsSyed AslamOn 6/29/09, Salahuddin Ayubi <s_ayubi786@yahoo. com> wrote:Syed Sahib,Please speak up and meet the challange thrown at you.Ayubi
--- On Mon, 6/29/09, MBI Munshi <MBIMunshi@gmail. com> wrote:From: MBI Munshi <MBIMunshi@gmail. com>
Subject:Lesson from Plassey - Zia vs Zafar [MBI Munshi revisited]
Date: Monday, June 29, 2009, 12:55 AM
Dear Mr. Aslam,
What is this NB Message # 21407 in which I bracket myself with the BNP? I do not recall bracketing myself with any political party. Simply throwing allegations and innuendos around is not good enough. You could have cur and paste the message and shown us what you are trying to prove. Your approach is entirely faulty.
Regards
MBI Munshi
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Syed Aslam <Syed.Aslam3@ gmail.com> wrote:Mr. Salahuddin AyubiI didn't assume anything.... ..This Barrister Shahib himself initiated it.He is the one who put BNP and himself in the same bracket[NB Message # 21407]Please follow your own dictum:" Please do not judge others by your own standard."Please read all the posts in this context and then comment ....Just don't assume .... I hope, You Know What Happens WhenYou Just Assume .....?BTW, what's wrong with supporting BAL, BNP, Jamaat or evenyour now-defunct Muslim League .....? That is anyone's personalchoice. Acknowledgem ent of the existence of political pluralismis the essence of any civilized society....ThanksSyed Aslam
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:31 PM, MBI Munshi <mbimunshi@gmail. com> wrote:
Dear Mr. Syed Aslam,
It really doesn't matter with me whther my credibility with the BNP remains intact or not. The point is I did not write the article and so this is a form of fraud by the person who had originally circulated the article and those who know that I did not write seeing my previous rejections.
Regards
MBI Munshi
Plausible denial ..... I hope, your credibility with BNP remainintact ...... !ThanksRegardsSyed Aslam[Note: Sender Syed Aslam, neither endorses nor contradicts the views expressed by our erudite blogger Barrister MBI Munshi. It is up to the readers to comment.On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:27 AM, MBI Munshi <mbimunshi@gmail. com> wrote:
Dear Mr. Aslam,
That is a fake and fabricated write-up. I never wrote such an article. This is the third time in 4 years that this article has appeared in my name. It has been circulated by RAW to discredit me and the BNP. I disown it and its contents and reject any association with it.Regards
MBI Munshi
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Syed Aslam <syed.aslam3@ gmail.com> wroteLesson from Plassey - Zia vs Zafar[Barrister MBI Munshi's writeup revisited]Zia vs Zafar
Monday October 24 2005 23:08:53 PM BDT
MBI Munshi, BangladeshFirst published in "News rom Bangladesh":http://www.banglade sh-web.com/ view.php? hidRecord= 67716
Nabab Siraj was not an excellent ruler; East India Company and their collaborators publicized him as an eccentric autocrat. He could not save his grandfather's kingdom from the British merchants. He was too lenient to the merchants and too naïve about their intention. Ultimately, his naiveté and lenience paid off. He lost his kingdom and life; Bangla lost its independence. After 100 years of bad publicity by British and their local collaborators he cam back in the pages of history as a symbol of our independence; a symbol of our lost pride.
Modern propaganda ministers and pet historians also publicized Sheikh Mujib as a bad ruler too. People thought everything would be solved automatically after the independence, denying the fact that nation building is a long term tedious job. No nation has been developed until several decades of independence. Modern day Robert Clive, Jagat Shetth, Rajballav, etc. were working behind the scene.
Eventually Mujib was pushed to establish a totalitarian system BAKSHAL; even though he said, "if my people don't like it, I will revert" in a speech. General Zia wrote an article in Daily Bichitra supporting BAKSHAL. Despite being a lenient ruler he will be in the pages of history as he led the nation to independence. His vigorous stance for Bangalee rights amidst Paki generals' red eyes will keep in the pages of history as a super hero.
The independence lost through Siraj's defeat in 1757 was gained back by Mujib's rigid struggle for "six-point demands," win in 1970 election, unbending negotiation tactics with Paki dictators and finally the Liberation War.
Siraj's death led to a dark era of colonial rule. Mujib's death prompted a U-turn from the spirit of liberation and eventually brought the War Criminals and religion traders to power. From a plural secular nation the U-turn took us back to a backward nation that is longing for 7th century style theocracy; that is intolerant to minorities (Hindus, Kadianis, etc.). Now the country is heading for a Taleban style revolution.
The British merchants and their local collaborators like Jagat Shetth, Raj Ballabh gong and their successors, denigrated Siraj for a century after 1757. Mustaq-Zia- Ershad-Golam gong blacked out Mujib from Bangladesh for a long time after 1975. Siraj's killer Miran, backed by British and Mir Zafar, never faced justice for killing the Nabab. Mujib's killers, backed and rewarded by Mustaq- Zia- Ershad-Khaleeda gong escaped justice too.
There are several analogies between Mir Zafar Ali Khan and General Ziaur Rahman.
1. Mir Zafar acquired the Army Chief position by his good service to Murshid Kuli Khan. General Zia acquired Army Chief of Staff position by good job, as a sector commander, announcer of independence in liberation war, and afterwards serving Sheikh Mujibs government. Even appraising BAKSAL.
2. Mir Zafar was personally a religious and honest man and was popular at his time. But, he let the British and Hindu merchants virtually loot the country. Ziaur Rahman was a financially honest man and popular, but was dishonest in every other respect. All his ministers were corrupt and some patronized dacoits like Imdu, Galkata Kamal; they virtually looted the country.
3. Mir Zafar was the chief of Siraj's army. General Zia was a senior general at Mujib's time and Chief of Staff at the time of 1975 carnage.
4. Mir Zafar remained inactive when Jagat Shetth, Raj Ballabh, and British merchants defeated Nabab. Ziaur Rahman remained inactive when Faruk-Rashid- Mushtaq gong killed Mujib, his family, and the leaders of liberation war. [killer Farooq's clime, Bangladesh a Legacy of Blood. Zia's response was "don't come to me if you fail" (what a subidhabadi! )].
5. Mir Zafar awarded the Jagat Shetth, Raj Ballabh, and British merchants afterwards, when he came to power. General Zia awarded Farooq and Rashid Bangladesh Embassies in different countries after he came to power. He rewarded the razakars and gong for their loyalty to Paki colonialists and war criminals.
6. Mir Zafar kept silent when Miran killed Siraj. General Zia kept silent when his officers (later he made them ambassadors) killed Sheikh Mujib and leaders in the Jail.
7. Mir Zafar let Miran escape punishment. General Zia let Farooq-Rashid gong escape justice. Zia amended the constitution to save the killers (the black Indemnity Ordinance).
8. Mir Zafar's treason led the death of liberation itself leading to a colonial rule for centuries. Zia's treason led the death of spirits of liberation finally taking War Criminals and traitors to power. The country is now heading towards being a black shadow of Pakistan and Talebans.
9. Siraj was hated by the subsequent regimes like Mir Zafar and British rulers. Mujib is also blacked-out by the subsequent regimes like Zia, Ershad, Khaleda.
10. Mir Zafar demolished "monarchy" and promoted "colonialism", both existing in many underdeveloped countries then. General Zia demolished totalitarian BAKSHAL and promoted "militarism", both existing in many underdeveloped countries at his time. His election fiasco made world records.
11. Mir Zafar promoted treason, letting the Englishmen take power. He was finally hunted down by his own creation- treason. General Zia promoted killing and assassination by adopting "Indemnity Ordinance" in the constitution, freeing the punished war criminals from jails, freeing "seven murder" convict from jail, taking 11 murder convict to Hizbul Bahar, appointing the killers of Mujib in different Embassies, creating musclemen on campus. He was finally hunt down by his own creation – treason and killing. The brutality of his killing reflected his own ruthlessness towards any dissent.
12. Mir Zafar let East Indian Company loot the country. Zia let goons and thugs loot the country. He created hundreds of bank loan defaulters by forcing banks to lend money to his party goons. He took young talents and notorious killers in the same ship "Hizbu Bahar" together and taught them evade taxes. He also freed 2 thousand criminals from jails who were not only collaborators of Paki Junta, but also took part in killing, raping, looting, and torching freedom fighters.
MBI Munshi, Bangladesh
************ ********* *********
Sent by: Syed Aslam[Note: Sender Syed Aslam, neither endorses nor contradicts the views expressed by our erudite blogger Barrister MBI Munshi. It is up to the readers to comment. Barrister Munshi is the author of a recently published book'The India Doctrine'Read Book Review by By Zoglul Husain at
http://deshcalling. blogspot. com/2008/ 05/book-review- mbi-munshis- india-doctrine. html
- Name: MBI Munshi
- Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh
__._,_.___
[* Moderator's Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.
* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]
Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
