On Sun, 11/2/08, maruf rahman <marufrbd@yahoo.com> wrote: Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 3:10:18 PM 22 September 2008 To Coordinator/Organiser International Symposium for Sustainable Transport for Developing Countries Co-organisers: British Subject: International Symposium for Sustainable Transport for Developing Countries and STP initiatives for Dear Sir or Madam, On behalf of Roads for People, a movement dedicated to the development of an eco-friendly and sustainable transport system in First of all I would like to congratulate the organisers of the symposium for undertaking initiatives for sustainable transport development in developing countries.. However, it is a matter of deep concern that in the name of sustainable transport development, the forum was mainly used to promote unsustainable, capital intensive, car-friendly and anti-fuel free transport policy directives, notably the Strategic Transport Plan (STP) for ·Shows total disregard to the majority of trips, i.e. all short trips (76% of the total trips) and fuel free transport (48% of the trips); ·Takes a stand against sustainable transport modes by banning fuel free transport and restricting intercity buses and railways, etc.; ·Invests the maximum amount of resources (237% more) for the less optimal transport solution; ·Promotes car friendly and unsustainable policy directives like change of modal share in favour of cars, promotion of more car parking facilities, etc.; ·Promotes auto-friendly, inefficient and environmentally disastrous projects like the Eastern Bypass, elevated expressways and other unnecessary road projects, defying the findings of the STP study itself; ·Develops transport alternatives considering only the supply side of the problem under the assumption of unconstrained demand, which would likely promote unsustainable use of scarce resources; ·Takes important transport policy decisions solely on the basis of arbitrary reasoning without any valid supporting scientific analysis; ·Promotes long distance trips and encourages the need for more travel, which is likely to induce more congestion and pollution; ·Provides a disproportionate amount of resources for car-friendly and capital intensive projects and allocates inadequate provisions and funding for sustainable transport systems such as walking, fuel-free vehicles (bicycles and rickshaws), low cost public transit and an integrated waterway system; ·Promotes inequality and social injustice. A detailed review of the main features of the STP and ongoing unsustainable transport interventions is attached herewith, which you may find useful. In this connection, it might be appropriate to learn lessons from the dismal failure of Dhaka Urban Transport Project (DUTP) (DUTP 2006, The main conclusion of the project is that there is no justification for wasting public money in the name of so-called development projects, such as DUTP, which cause colossal damage to the economy (well over Tk 7.78 billion per year), reduce mobility of people and goods, divide neighbourhoods and sever service facilities, inflict environmental degradation, destroy the basic fabric of sustainable development, deny vulnerable sections of the society their fundamental rights to accessibility and income, promote social inequality, and exacerbate poverty and hunger. An independent assessor appointed by the World Bank (World Bank 2007) also came down heavily on the justification of the key initiative of the project which attempted to ban fuel-free transport in favour of a tiny minority of car owners, who represent less than 5% of the population. The dual role currently being played by a section of academics related to some higher learning institutions in The use of a sustainable transport development forum to promote such unsustainable STP or DUTP policy directives represents both insult and injury to the genuine movement for sustainable transport development. Those of us in that movement strongly deplore such practice and hope that organisers will in future be careful to avoid allowing their forum to promote such misguided transport initiatives. We also hope that the sponsors of the symposium would constitute an enquiry committee comprising an international panel of experts on sustainable transport development to review the activities of the so-called sustainable transport development symposium and undertake requisite corrective measures to avoid such controversies in future and hence to uphold the dignity of the basic philosophy of sustainable transport development, that is, to promote low-cost, eco-friendly, space- and energy-efficient transport that recognizes the rights of the majority rather than prioritizing the elite. Sincerely, On behalf of the Roads for People movement, Mahabubul Bari International Expert on Transportation Infrastructure Independent Adviser to the Ministry of Infrastructure Post Box: 4989 |
__._,_.___
[* Moderator's Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.
* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___