Banner Advertise

Monday, November 24, 2008

[chottala.com] Einstein's e=mc2 and Mullah Turkman's attempted distortion of Physics

Einstein's e=mc2 and Mr.Turkman's attempted distortion of Physics
"No well-trained physcist would describe Einstein's theory as a negtion of Newton's. Only a person with shallow, superficial and mechinistic
understanding of physics would lead to that kind conclusion"
 
 
If Mr.Turkman is such a great Physicist he should publish a paper based on his
theorical calculations & thought experiments in peer-reviwed journal of physics.
 
Dear All
 
Mr. Turkman seem to be confused about the frame of reference.
He is out context, the news item is about Mass-energy equivalence:
 

 

 
It is not about the about the gravitational aspect of special theory of relativity.
 
Einstein  did not negate Newtons laws of motion or theory of gravitation.
[Mr. Turkman indication that " his (Einstein's] theory that Issac Newton was wrong"
is an erroneous assertion].
 
Einstein, clearly showed that Newton's Three Laws of Motion were only correct in the appropriate frame of reference, breaking down when velocities approached that of light. Secondly he showed that Newton's Law of Gravitation was only correct
in the relatively weak gravitational field,  breaking down in the presence of very strong gravitational fields.
 
To summarize the differences between Newton's theory of gravitation and the Einstein's theory of gravitation implied by the General Theory of Relativity.
They make essentially identical predictions as long as the strength of the gravitational field is weak, which is our usual experience. However, there are three crucial predictions where the two theories diverge:
 

The orientation of Mercury's orbit is found to precess in space over time.This is commonly called the "precession of the perihelion", because it causes the position of the perihelion to move. Only part of this can be accounted for by perturbations in Newton's theory. There is an extra 43 seconds of arc per century in this precession that is predicted by the Theory of General Relativity and observed to occur (a second of arc is 1/3600 of an angular degree). This effect is extremely small, but the measurements are very precise and can detect such small effects very well with todays technology.

 

Einstein's theory predicts that the direction of light propagation should be changed in a gravitational field, contrary to the Newtonian predictions.

 

Precise observations indicate that Einstein is right, both about the effect and its magnitude. A striking consequence is gravitational lensing. The General Theory of Relativity predicts that light coming from a strong gravitational field should have its wavelength shifted to larger values (what astronomers call a "red shift"), again contary to Newton's theory. Once again, detailed observations indicate such a red shift, and that its magnitude is correctly given by Einstein's theory. The electromagnetic field can have waves in it that carry energy and that we call light. Likewise, the gravitational field can have waves that carry energy and are called gravitational waves. These may be thought of as ripples in the curvature of spacetime that travel at the speed of light. Just as accelerating charges can emit electromagnetic waves, accelerating masses can emit gravitational waves. However gravitational waves are difficult to detect because they are very weak and no conclusive evidence has yet been reported for their direct observation. They have been observed indirectly in the binary pulser.

Because the arrival time of pulses from the pulser can be measured very precisely, it can be determined that the period of the binary system is gradually decreasing. It is found that the rate of period change (about 75 millionths of a second each year) is what would be expected for energy being lost to gravitational radiation, as predicted by the Theory of General Relativity. Modern theory of gravitation is the General Theory of Relativity. However, only if velocities are comparable to that of light, or gravitational fields are much larger than those encountered on the Earth, do the Relativity theory and Newton's theories differ in their predictions. Under most conditions Newton's three laws and his theory of gravitation are adequate..

 
No well-trained physcist would describe Einstein's theory as a negtion of Newton's.
Only a person with shallow, superficial and mechinistic understanding of physics would lead to that kind conclusion.
 
Mr. Turkman has rights to present his own theory but that needs to substatiated with
proper calculation or appropriate experimental results. [Just like the then Dhaka University
Professor Satyen Bose did to establish Bose-Einstein Statistics]
 
If Mr.Turkman is such a great Physicist he should publish a paper based on his
theorical calculations & thought experiments in peer-reviwed journal of physics.
 
Mr. Turkman's out of context blanket question "What proof is there that Light curves
going through Compressed Space and not because of Gravity of a Planet or Sun?"
is out and out an attempt to distort science and clearly Mullah-like.
 
 
Thanks for everyone's patience.
 
Syed Aslam

 --- On Sun, 11/23/08, S Turkman <turkman@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
 
 From: S Turkman <turkman@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: [sa7rong] Einstein's e=mc2: 103 years later, corroborated
To: sa7rong@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, November 23, 2008, 3:39 PM

But I do not agree with his theory that Issac Newton was wrong and Gravity is caused because of compression of Space by the planets.

What proof is there that Light curves going through Compressed Space and not because of Gravity of a Planet or Sun?

Oh I'm sorry. I should be discussing this with a Physicist. I have no idea, if you are one.
 

--- On Fri, 11/21/08, Syed Aslam <syed_aslam3@ yahoo.com> wrote

Here is how AFP used the word:
It's taken more than a century, but Einstein's celebrated formula e=mc2 has finally been corroborated, thanks to a heroic computational effort by French, German and Hungarian physicists.
 
Yahoo News featured:
 
Einstein's e=mc2: 103 years later,  proven right
 
AFP/File – People walk past a giant sculpture featuring Albert Einstein's formula "E=mc2" in front …

PARIS (AFP) – It's taken more than a century, but Einstein's celebrated formula e=mc2 has finally been corroborated, thanks to a heroic computational effort by French, German and Hungarian physicists.

A brainpower consortium led by Laurent Lellouch of France's Centre for Theoretical Physics, using some of the world's mightiest supercomputers, have set down the calculations for estimating the mass of protons and neutrons, the particles at the nucleus of atoms.

According to the conventional model of particle physics, protons and neutrons comprise smaller particles known as quarks, which in turn are bound by gluons.

The odd thing is this: the mass of gluons is zero and the mass of quarks is only five percent. Where, therefore, is the missing 95 percent?

The answer, according to the study published in the US journal Science on Thursday, comes from the energy from the movements and interactions of quarks and gluons.

In other words, energy and mass are equivalent, as Einstein proposed in his Special Theory of Relativity in 1905.

The e=mc2 formula shows that mass can be converted into energy, and energy can be converted into mass.

By showing how much energy would be released if a certain amount of mass were to be converted into energy, the equation has been used many times, most famously as the inspirational basis for building atomic weapons.

But resolving e=mc2 at the scale of sub-atomic particles -- in equations called quantum chromodynamics -- has been fiendishly difficult.

"Until now, this has been a hypothesis," France's National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) said proudly in a press release.

"It has now been corroborated for the first time."

For those keen to know more: the computations involve "envisioning space and time as part of a four-dimensional crystal lattice, with discrete points spaced along columns and rows."

 

 

AFP: Math is Heroic? Dumbing Down the English Language
NewsBusters - 1 hour ago
It's taken more than a century, but Einstein's celebrated formula e=mc2 has finally been corroborated, thanks to a heroic computational effort by French, ...
 

This detail photographed at the Museum of Science in Boston, Monday, March 15, 2004, from a paper written in 1946, in which Albert Einstein explained how he derived the formula E=MC(2), a consequence of his Special Theory of Relativity, first published in 1905. (AP)

Einstein's formula proven

103 years later, scientists figure out that the famous E=MC(2) theorem is correct. » Atomic mystery solved


 


 

__._,_.___

[* Moderator's Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___