Banner Advertise

Sunday, October 12, 2008

[chottala.com] Re: [Amra-Bangladesi]Ground Realities: Colonel Taher murder issue ...

    Please read the article by Syed Badrul Ahsan is Executive Editor, Dhaka Courier.
published in 2006 in this connection:
     
                                                                                                                          Ground Realities
Colonel Taher, Lifschultz and our collective guilt
by Syed Badrul Ahsan


Lawrence Lifschultz has been giving us much food for thought lately. More pointedly, he has been informing us, to our undying shame, of all the things we have not done in this country over the past three decades and more. When he speaks of Colonel Abu Taher and the macabre manner of his murder (it was murder pure and simple) in July 1976, he revives within our souls all the pains we have either carefully pushed under the rug all these years or have not been allowed to feel through the long march of untruth in this country.

There are people in Bangladesh who have some very valid reasons to think that Taher's decision in November 1975 to back Ziaur Rahman against Khaled Musharraf was a new phase in the disaster which had already befallen the country in August 1975. He simply backed the wrong horse, a course he ought not to have taken. But that is not what we mean to speak about here. What concerns us is the terrible manner in which the life of a good soldier, a valiant freedom fighter, was put to an end through what was clearly a sham of a trial in July 1976. Of course, we have known that all these years. Unlike Lifschultz, though, we have stayed quiet about it. We in the journalists' community in Bangladesh have not sought all these thirty years to raise the question of the wrong that was done to Taher. His murder, in effect, was the killing of idealism.

There was the profoundly reflective in Taher. In March 1971, once the Pakistan army had begun its murder of Bengalis in a soon to die East Pakistan, he walked the streets of distant Quetta brooding over his own political state of being. The intellectual in him was not ready to acknowledge any reality of physical distance. It was inconceivable for the scholar in him to prevent the man of action which lurked within him from making his way to the war front. He did make his way to his battered country, and fought for its freedom, losing a leg in the process. If that is not sacrifice, what is?

And yet there was the bigger sacrifice that Taher was fated to pay. On July 21, 1976, after a trial that was no trial but a farce enacted under the dark spotlight of a ruthless dictatorship, he lost his life on the gallows. The men who had decreed that he mount those final steps in living form -- President Sayem, General Zia, the judges and the prosecutor -- were to live on, unrepentant and happy. No one in this country wrote about Taher's predicament. And many among the journalists who today cheerfully identify themselves with either Bengali nationalism or the jatiyotabadi way of looking at life stayed quiet at a time when it was an absolute necessity to speak up.

Lifschultz speaks of the remorselessness which marked Justice Sayem, a good man who had always believed in the rule of law. This same good man did not protest, or not much anyway, when the soldiers he was surrounded by informed him that Taher needed to die. And what was Taher's guilt? He had, said the dictatorship, engaged in conspiracy to overthrow an established government. That is a good point. When does a junta, having ascended to power by sheer force of arms, become a legally established government? The answer here is that no government set in place by a military coup can be a legal one. You can have all the constitutional amendments in the world (and we have the fifth and the seventh, especially) towards ensuring that a violation of law becomes a fact of recognized law. They do not change a thing. Morality cannot be overridden by the passage of a bill that will have the citizen swearing fealty to a soldier suddenly desirous of becoming a democratic politician.

It is these questions that worry us. When Lifschultz speaks, thirty years after the hanging of Taher, about all the dirt and mud we have not yet removed from our society, he speaks for us. To this day, no government (except for the one in office between 1996 and 2001) has tried telling us of the conspiracy that went into the murder of the four national leaders in jail in November 1975. The truth, it has been made sure, remains under the lid. Or perhaps it has gone to the grave with the dead men?

But the psychological predicament that people are often left facing once truth is denied or run out of town is that they cannot then relate to the world around them. Their silence in the face of all the questions regarding the murder of their illustrious men is then fundamentally a condoning of the crime that has taken place. As long as you do not finger the men who killed the Mujibnagar leaders in prison, as long as you do not name them and shame them, you will remain part of a nation that is willing, regrettably, to live with shame.

There are the sad, sordid stories of the army officers who died without probably knowing about their crimes. Brigadier Mohsinuddin maintained till the end, in 1981, that he was not aware of why he was being tried for the Zia murder. Those others who were executed with him were quite clearly home to similar sentiments. Justice Sattar, as the nation's interim president, signed the order of execution.

Does it not worry you that some of the costliest mistakes in Bangladesh's history have been made by men who have risen to the highest perches of the law? Sayem sent Taher to death, with Zia making sure he did so. And Sattar dispatched those officers to perdition. It was Ershad and his men who stood watch over him as he did so. Neither of these legal luminaries was able to withstand the power of the military in staying the execution of all these valiant men almost all of whom, you will note, had waged war for the country's freedom.

And the rest of us? We stayed conveniently silent, afraid of the repercussions of protest. But truth does have a way of coming back to us and at us. It has now come to us in the form of Lawrence Lifschultz. When he wrote about Bangabandhu's assassination and Taher's murder, we were, most of us, impressed with the details of his inquiries. That was all.

Now that we reopen the old books of record, we realize with shock smeared with crimson shame how opportunistic we have been in saving our own skins and thereby legitimizing the power of the grasping men who have sent some of our best men, all of them our own fellow patriotic citizens, down the road to swift and premature death. The four hundred soldiers hanged by the Zia regime in the 1970s, the murder of General Manzoor, the conspiracy behind the killing of General Ziaur Rahman and the horrible end of the Mujibnagar leaders have left gaping holes in our political history.

And do not forget that not a single government has ever tried to launch an inquiry into the murder of General Khaled Musharraf, Colonel Huda and Major Haider. Many of the men who instigated their killing as well as the men who forced the life out of them are yet around. No one has taken them in for questioning. The holes have remained, and grown bigger and deeper.

Those holes need plugging. How we go about doing that is something suggested by Lifschultz. Let there be a Truth Commission, or a series of them. Since history is a long tale of events that have become irreversible through force of time, all we can do in our enlightened self-interest is to delve into the details of the wrongs that have been done, locate the witnesses to these wrongs, go looking for the men responsible for such gross errors of judgement or travesty of history, as the case may be, and arrive at the truth.

As for reconciliation, that will take time, a lot of patience and thorough psychological preparation on the part of the families that have suffered through three decades of bruising pain.

It is a fractured society we are part of. And fractures trouble the body and the sensibilities as long as pretence serves as an alternative to truth.

Syed Badrul Ahsan is Executive Editor, Dhaka Courier.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     

 
On 10/11/08, Salahuddin Ayubi <s_ayubi786@yahoo.com> wrote:

I guess Taher had to die because he was over ambitious and he had already built a base in the Army and in the civilaian political arena.  Zia felt threatened from him and he felt that if Taher is not eleiminated he is going to be eliminated by Taher. The reason Taher helped in Zia's rescue was to ewlimingfate Khalid Mosharraf. Zia did not want the fate of Mosharraf. So he had to kill him.  It was not a mistake. It was a well calculted murder.
                       Ayubi

--- On Sat, 10/11/08, mohiuddin@netzero.net <mohiuddin@netzero.net> wrote:

 

<mohiuddin@netzero.net>
Subject: Re: [vinnomot] Re: [Dahuk]: Re: [Amra-Bangladesi] Re: [notun_banglades h] Who is runni ng the Care Taker Government in Bangladesh ?
To: Amra-Bangladesi@yahoogroups.com
Cc: Amra-Bangladesi@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, October 11, 2008, 4:45 AM
Mr. Aslam,

 
  I never justified the killing of Col.Taher( who helped Zia by revolting against pro-Awami  coup led by Awami M.P. Rashed Mosharraf's brother Brig. Khaled Mosharraf)as a result Zia was freed by Sipahi/Jonota from house arrest by revolting Mosharraf follwers.. Without active help from  Taher's Gonobahini ,mobilization of military forces could have been difficult at that time. But  why Taher was punished we still donot know. Personally I think killing the savior was unforgivable mistake by Zia.
   Promoter of Bangladesh's "Scientific Socialism"  theory 'Mehnoti Jonotar Konthoshor' ASM Abdur Rob still alive who once served as Minister under Netri Hasina can inform you  about how many JSD workers were killed by Rakkhibahi and other Petoa Bahini .Of course Gonobahini also killed some followers of Mujib at that time.I don't keep record of those numbers.
   Killing  Chatro Union workers Motiul Kader and killing JSD workers had different objective. Motiul and Kader was B-team members ,unfortunately killed by Mujib's Police force  and there was no commission was formed to find out how those two B-team members were killed. Even B-team leaders had to apologize to Mujib for this demonstration against the A-Team government. B-Team leaders never comemorated those unfortunate workers.
M.Anwar_

 

 On 10/10/08, Syed Aslam <syed.aslam3@gmail.com> wrote:
Mr. Mohiuddin Anwar
 
Therefore, you are justifying the hanging of Colonel Taher in 1976 because
some violation was done by "Mujibi Police force". How can one one wrong validates
other wrong doings? How about your Boiganic Samajtantra? Can you provide us
with a list of Jassod workers killed by Rakkhi Bahini?

 

  • Colonel Taher- Khaled Mosharraf-ATM Haider: I « In the Middle of ...

    The hanging of Col. Abu Taher was one such mistakes among the many significant mistakes that have been made in our dark past. The killing of Khaled Mosarraf ...
    rumiahmed.wordpress.com/2006/07/21/colonel-taher-khaled-mosharraf-atm-haider-i/ - 29k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this
  • Colonel Taher- Khaled Mosharraf-ATM Haider : II « In the Middle of ...

    Niether Sheikh Mujib nor Zia nor Khaled Mosharraf or Col- Taher is alive but we are still killing each other blowing of bombs on each other, when all this ...
    rumiahmed.wordpress.com/2006/07/24/colonel-taher-khaled-mosharraf-atm-haider-ii/ - 33k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this
    More results from rumiahmed.wordpress.com »
  • BANGLAPEDIA: Taher, (Colonel) Abu

    Colonel Taher joined in politics in October 1972 and was elected the vice ... After the tragic killing of Bangabandhu sheikh mujibur rahman on 15 August ...
    banglapedia.search.com.bd/HT/T_0023.htm - 11k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this
  • Welcome to Colonel Taher's website

    This is the statement of Colonel Abu Taher of the Bangladesh Army. ..... Their units were drawn within the killing zone of the freedom fighters. ...
    www.col-taher.com/english/testament.html - 60k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this
  • Welcome to Colonel Taher's website

    J.S.D. The Political Party Col. Taher Belonged. FOREWORD ... After the killing of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman and military take over, J.S.D. concentrated movement ...
    www.col-taher.com/jsd_politics.html - 94k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this
  • Col. Taher…History…and Us « Angelmorn

    This is the statement of Colonel Abu Taher of the Bangladesh Army. .... No one can kill me. I live in the midst of the masses. My pulse beats in their pulse ...
    otherface.wordpress.com/2006/11/12/col-taherhistoryand-us-2/ - 30k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this
  • Zia

    One should remember that neither Khaled Musharaf, nor Colonel Taher, .... One doesn't need to occupy the throne to advertise for modesty or kill his ...
    www.muktadhara.net/page81.html - 38k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this
  • Unheard Voices » Ziaur Rahman and the 'Force'.

    Col Taher never denied these charges. In addition, Col Taher also didn't deny charges that he is responsible for killing of many leading freedom fighter ...
    www.drishtipat.org/blog/2007/05/30/ziaur-rahman-and-the-force/ - 135k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this


  •  

     
     

     

     

     

     

    Y! Groups blog

    the best source

    for the latest

    scoop on Groups.

    Best of Y! Groups

    Discover groups

    that are the best

    of their class.

    Curves on Yahoo!

    A group for women

    to share & discuss

    food & weight loss.

    .


    __._,_.___

    [* Moderator's Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

    * Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




    Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
    Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
    Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
    Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

    __,_._,___