Banner Advertise

Tuesday, January 8, 2008

[chottala.com] Re: [khabor.com] Re: [notun_bangladesh] Khandakar Mushtaq, my neighbour in Aga Masih Lane -Salahuddin Ayubi !

Dear Mr.Salahuddin Ayubi
 
Thanks for admitting that  you regret the breakup
of Pakistan, in essense, the Liberation of  Bangladesh.
 
Just wait few more years to see how many more pieces
your favorite Islamic Republic of Pakistan breaks into.
Pakistan's time is up .....you can see total  collapse of Pakistan
in the horizon ....
 
Clearly,  you would like to be a Tolpibahak, a Bootlicker,
an Ass-kisser of Pakistan. You are are not alone .....
Even today, there are few people spearheading the agenda
of Pakistan, and doing so by various ways of deceptions.
These people have forgotton the lesson they (I mean,
their predecessors) have  learned in 1971.
 
No matter, how much you and your  cohorts try to appreciate him,
for the people of Bangladesh Khondoker Mustaq is the Mirzafor
of Twentieth Century. He has already been thrown into the dustbin
of history.
 
Syed Aslam
 
Salahuddin Ayubi <ayubi_s786@yahoo.com >
Dear Mr. Aslam,
To your question my answer is
affirmative
. In hind sight if you look at the
realities, you will observe that we are in fact a
subservient state (Tolpibahak) of India. Had we come
to a political settlement with Pakistan on our terms
then we surely would not have been a Bharatio
tolpibahok. I hope you see my point.
Salahuddin Ayubi
 
On 1/7/08, ROBERT GONSALVES <rgonsalves29@verizon.net> wrote:

Ayubi:
You are nothing but 'crazy'. Pakistani generals would never allow us to speak in 'Bangla' in Sheik Mujib and we would lose in freeing the country from the clutches of the west.  These generals with the help of their agents had started incorporating urdu into bangla and time would come when our next generation would speak half bangla and the rest urdu in communication. There were politicians who had already announced in 1950s that bangla is the language of Hindus not of  Muslims. During the liberation war one fine morning I was traveling from Dhaka to Chittagong by air. One 'Kolkata bihari' who sat next to me argued with the air hostess, "Aplok urdu paper kyuu nahi rakhte ?"  The hostess humbly said that she would refer his demand to the higher authority. By the by, Ayubi, are you an agent in disguise working for Pakistan ?
The Khans of Dhaka South


Salahuddin Ayubi <ayubi_s786@yahoo.com> wrote:
Dear Mr. Aslam,
To your question my answer is
affirmative. In hind sight if you look at the
realities, you will observe that we are in fact a
subservient state (Tolpibahak) of India. Had we come
to a political settlement with Pakistan on our terms
then we surely would not have been a Bharatio
tolpibahok. I hope you see my point.
Salahuddin Ayubi

--- "Md. Aminul Islam" < aminul_islam_raj@yahoo.com>
wrote:

> Dear Sayed Aslam,
> Do you think us boy of
> yesterday? Why do you try blame a hero of war of
> liberation? late Mustaq Ahmed was a true patriot,a
> successful politician,great organizer of liberation
> war, foreign minister of the exile mujibnagar govt
> and also a successful president
> .His contribution in liberation war is beyond any
> controversy
> Those who want to distort the glorious history of
> our liberation may say many false story against our
> hero's , without documentary evidence
>
> Syed Aslam < Syed.Aslam3@gmail.com> wrote:
> Mr. Ayubi
>
> Would it have made you much happier if your
> neighbor Khandakar Mustaq succeeded in his
> treacherous maneuvers for political settlement with
> Pakistan with the blessings of Henry Kissinger?
>
> [Readers : Details of Mostak's anti liberation
> conspiracies has been exposed in the book
> Muldhara-71, Moyeedul Hasan, University Press
> Limited, Dhaka).
>
> On 1/6/08, ayubi_s786 <ayubi_s786@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> During the liberation war Khandakar Mushtaq, my
> neighbour in Aga Masih Lane , did antagonise the
> Indian government by meeting the officials of the US
> mission in Calcutta to discuss about political
> settlement with Pakistan. This infuriated the Indian
> government so much so that they had to tell our
> government in exile not to meet any foreign mission
> personnel without prior permission from the Indian
> government.Sheikh Mujib and Khandakar Mushtaq were
> contemporaries and close friends and at the same
> time
> adversaries too i.e they ad love hate
> relationship.While Mushtaq was sly and street smart
> besides being
> able administrator Mujib was brash, brave and knew
> the pulse of the people. The history will determine
> the
> status of these two individuals on the basis of
> their performances.
> --- "Md. Aminul Islam" < aminul_islam_raj@...
> wrote:
>
> Dear sayed aslam,
> I don't know much about the great leader and
> foreign minister of acting govt of Bangladesh which
> lead the liberation war of Bangladesh Khondoker
> Mustak Ahmed. After Liberation he was duly honored
> By Sheikh
> Mujib.He was very important minister in in
> Mujib's cabinet. But India was not happy with
> him.As he did not
> agree with India on farakka issue.So Mujib gave
> him another port folio. He played a vital role in
> the war of our
> Independence as the foreign minister of acting
> govt
>
> Syed Aslam < Syed.Aslam3@... wrote:
> Re: [khabor.com ] "Greatest Patriot"
> Khandaker Mostak! Mr. Aminul Islam Raj, what do
> you
> say?
>
> Khandaker Mostak
>
> [Kissinger on Khandeker Mostak group: "we
> established contact with the Bangladesh people in
> Calcutta, and during August, September and October
> of this year, no fewer than eight such contacts took
> place. We approached Yahya Khan three times in
> order to begin negotiations with the Bangladeshi
> people in alcutta. The government of Pakistan
> accepted." :Congressional Records, December 9,
> 1971, P:45735 ]
>
> The uncouth but treacherous disciple of Jinnah,
> the founder of the so-called Islamic state,
> Pakistan. But lacking Jinnah's education and
> grooming, Khandaker Mostak, had been used as a dupe
> by the imperialist forces who exploited his naked
> political ambition. Due to his unenlightened
> character and opportunist bent of mind, Mostak was
> more machiavellian than Jinnah. Although Jinnah
> (personally secular) used Islam to compete with
> Nehru (he could never be the premier of India) and
> instigated communal riots to achieve his political
> goals, he did not involve in the murder of his
> political colleagues. Whereas Mostak not only
> nipped in the bud the mainstream secular politics
> in Bangladesh but also ruthlessly murdered his
> political colleagues to perpetuate political
> recession into Islamic medievalism. During the
> liberation war, Mostak opposed by all means the
> independence of Bangladesh: he tried to subvert
> the provisional government from within as
> well as the war of independence through conspiracy
> in alliance with the vicious representatives of
> imperialism: the CIA and Henry Kissinger. He
> instigated all the top Awami league leaders to
> undermine and remove Taj Uddin Ahmed from the head
> of the provisional government and the leader of the
> liberation war. Mostak was also the saboteur of
> democracy after the military coup of 1975 backed by
> the anti-liberation forces from within and CIA and
> Henri Kissinger from without. An arch hypocrite
> Mostak always maintained a shoddy Islamic
> appearance to veil his essentially venomous
> nature. His religious pretense could not fool Taj
> Uddin Ahmed. Taj Uddin Ahmed, competent statesman
> as he was, had the political acumen to quash all of
> Mostak's destructive plots in order to subvert
> Bangalees' struggle for independence ( for details
> of Mostak's anti liberation conspiracies see
> Muldhara-71, Maidul Hasan, UPL). As long as
> Tajuddin had the leadership Mostak
> could not apply his venoms in the political
> spheres of the liberating Bangladesh. All he did
> was secretly plant his poison tree. But as soon as
> Sheikh Mujibur Rahman took over, he directly fell
> under the spell of Mostak's witchcraft: his
> sycophancy, his Islamic pretenses. The tragedy of
> Sk Mujib's life was the tragedy of desertion. Away
> from the most crucial nine months of struggling
> Bangladesh, Sk Mujib, the invincible nationalist
> leader, was unaware of the venomous cobras hidden
> in the top echelon of his cabinet. Sk Mujib's
> greatest political blunder was his progressive
> distance from Tajuddin and the secular politicians
> of his ministry since his political take over. He
> never asked Tajuddin how the war was won and who
> were the friends and foes of the nascent
> Bangladesh. For the next four years the vicious
> Mostak group took Sk Mujib away from his real
> comrades at arms who fought all their lives for the
> same cause as his: free the Bangalees from
> the colonial repression. The more Sk Mujib
> deserted Tajuddin and his colleagues and associates
> the more he lost his popularity, the more he went
> away from the hearts of the Banglaees. In 1975 when
> Sk Mujib almost lost everything he stood for in
> 1969 and completely isolated from the sources of
> his political power, the people, and surrounded
> only by the sycophants and hypocrites: Mostak
> inflicted his deadly blows. Mostak's henchmen
> killed Sk Mujib, his family including his eight
> year son Russell, his pregnant daughter-in-laws,
> and relatives. Mostak did not stop in crushing the
> icon of Bangalee freedom (Sk Mujib) he ruthlessly
> murdered all the key figures for the independence of
> Bangladesh (and his political colleagues for last
> 15 years) in Dhaka Central Jail: Mostak killed
> all the key figures involved in liberating
> Bangladesh from Pakistan as part of his vicious
> scheme to make a virtual Pakistan out of
> independent Bangladesh . He restored the
> pro-Pakistani (Islamic) state machinery and set the
> ideology for the Muslim oligharchists: the army,
> the bureaucracy and the Mohajirs (Muslim settlers
> from India after 1947) Mostak will forever be
> condemned as the enactor of one the most inhuman
> ordinances in history: The Indemnity ordinance of
> 1975. Thismonstrous ordinance constitutionally
> endorses the murderers of Sk Mujibur Rahman, his
> family, relatives and top four national leaders in
> Dhaka Central Jail. This ordinance also secured the
> hegemony of the anti-liberation forces for few
> decades and underscored Bangladeshi constitution as
> the most inhuman charter.
> Kissinger on Khandeker Mostak group: "we
> established contact with the Bangladesh people in
> Calcutta, and during August, September and October
> of this year,
> no fewer than eight such contacts took place. We
> approached Yahya Khan three times in order to begin
> negotiations with the Bangladeshi people in
> Calcutta. The government of Pakistan accepted."
> :Congressional Records, December 9, 1971, P:45735
>
>
>
> Messages in this topic (1) Reply (via
> web post) | Start a new topic
> Messages | Files | Photos | Links | Database |
> Polls | Members | Calendar
> MARKETPLACE
>
> ---------------------------------
> Earn your degree in as few as 2 years - Advance
> your career with an AS, BS, MS degree -
> College-Finder.net.
>
>
>
>
=== message truncated ===

Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

 


__._,_.___

[* Moderator's Note - CHOTTALA is a non-profit, non-religious, non-political and non-discriminatory organization.

* Disclaimer: Any posting to the CHOTTALA are the opinion of the author. Authors of the messages to the CHOTTALA are responsible for the accuracy of their information and the conformance of their material with applicable copyright and other laws. Many people will read your post, and it will be archived for a very long time. The act of posting to the CHOTTALA indicates the subscriber's agreement to accept the adjudications of the moderator]




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___