Brother Kamal you are right. People have sinister reason to take Akber, the deviant, as secular, who was Islamically a kafir, left Islam and devised a new 'Deen-e-Ilahi'----how Ilahi it was???
On the other hand, Aurangzeb was a true muslim and took care of the 'Sharee'ah' as much as he could follow it. This the hindu majority disliked and tried to malign Aurangzeb, where as he took care of both the communities under his rule.
A'llamah Iqbal contended Aurangzeb to be the last ramnent from the pristine humanity asset and noted that it was he who spread the light of humanity that was becoming dimmer by the deviance of Akber.
Once Hitler had told his audience," God can't change the past history, but a corrupt historian can."
So, it was the dirty work of the historians particularly burtons, hindus and sikhs to bringforth the pseudo dark image of Aurangzeb.
I can bring to the notice of readers, if need be, the glimses of the nicest character of Aurangzeb discovered by the present day hindu historians.
--- On Thu, 3/21/13, Kamal <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: